iPD Update

20
iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 iPD: Rethinking Professional Development in Districts Amy Hodges Slamp Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation College Ready Work Team

description

iPD : Rethinking Professional Development in Districts Amy Hodges Slamp Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation College Ready Work Team May 24, 2013. iPD Update. CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013. Every Person Deserves the Chance to Live a Healthy, Productive Life. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of iPD Update

Page 1: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD: Rethinking Professional Development in Districts

Amy Hodges SlampBill & Melinda Gates FoundationCollege Ready Work TeamMay 24, 2013

Page 2: iPD Update

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |

EVERY PERSON DESERVES THE CHANCE TO LIVE A HEALTHY, PRODUCTIVE LIFE.

2

Page 3: iPD Update

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |

Our Areas of Focus at the Foundation

4

25%United States Program

50%Global Health Program

25%Global Development Program

Page 4: iPD Update

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |

9

By 2025, 80% of students graduate from high school college and career ready so they can be successful in their the community and the world.

Page 5: iPD Update

Empowering Effective Teachers

Milestones Outcomes Impact

College-Ready Work

Research & Data

Next Generation Learning

80% College

Readiness Rate

Transformed Education

System

Advocacy

More Effective Teachers

with better

tools & supports

Will lead to

Will lead to

Page 6: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

What’s the problem we are trying to solve

with PD?

Page 7: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Page 8: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Page 9: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

The good news is,we know what

matters!

Page 10: iPD Update

The difference in student learning between having a teacher in the top quartile of effectiveness and the bottom quartile is 7.5 months in math. (MET)

Page 11: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Page 12: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Page 13: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

PD today vs iPD:

Source: Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the U.S. and Abroad, Darling-Hammond, Linda, Stanford University, 2009.

What Current Context Future Context iPD Impact

Access One shot workshops with limited follow-up.

Job embedded with easy access to supports.

PD resources available to teachers 24/7 at work and at home.

Frequency Limited and/ or sporadic support. On demand and accessible support initiated by teacher.

Teachers participate in professional learning daily.

Quality Most systems do not define or measure PD.

PD has a demonstrated impact on student learning.

PD quality assessed through linkage to student learning data

Delivery Labor intensive limits the frequency of PD.

Menu of quality options offered on demand.

Increased access to PD without increasing labor costs.

Feedback Limited feedback; not tied to PD. Unlimited opportunities for feedback to inform PD.

Teachers have access to a range of informal, high quality feedback to support their instruction.

Design One size fits all. Differentiated learning strategies. Teachers have access to different modes of support through collaboration, 1:1 and alone.

Context No or little connection to data. PD informed by reliable sources and types of data.

Teachers have up to date information on how to improve student learning.

Coherence Fragmented. Aligned with CCSS and measures of effective teaching.

Professional learning is integrated into the daily routine of teachers.

Page 14: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

PERSONALIZED TECH ENABLED JOB EMBEDDED ADAPTIVE & MASTERY BASED DATA INFORMED FRAMED BY DISTRICT’S INSTRUCTIONAL

THEORY OF ACTION & DEFINED MEASURES OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTIPLE DOMAINS

Key components of iPD:

Page 15: iPD Update

PERFORMANCEEXPECTATIONS

STANDARDSFOR EFFECTIVEINSTRUCTION

CURRENTTEACHING

PERFORMANCE

PERSONALIZED

QUALITY PD PROTOCOLS &EXPERIENCES

COMMUNITIES & NETWORKS

Page 16: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Thank you TeachLive for giving us a model of what

great PD and teacher training look like. We are excited you are partnering with us in our

work!!!

Page 17: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Launching the iPD Challenge:

• Launching with 5 districts as proof points

• Adding additional districts this fall and networks next year

• Districts must commit to a set of priorities, sharing learning and participating in research

• We are hoping to catalyze the market by both supply and demand

Page 18: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD Challenge Participants Commit to:

• Whole system redesign• Aligned initiatives/coherence goal• Data systems in place or in process• Supporting value propositions of

teacher voice, job embedded and mastery based PD

• Research for group learning and participation in community of practice

Page 19: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

Tight Outcomes, Loose Metrics:

• Outcome #1: Improve processes for identifying individual teacher professional development needs

• Outcome #2: Improve the match of professional development plans with teacher needs.

• Outcome #3: Broaden the topics and delivery modes of high quality professional development.

• Outcome #4: Improve the feedback provided teachers on their instruction linked to the district’s method of measuring instructional quality

• Outcome #5: Increase the proportion of teachers who are empowered and effective

Page 20: iPD Update

iPD Update

CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

What’s next?

• We are just at the beginning but we are excited and hopeful

• We are working with great partners to do great things

• We want to learn and share what we learn

“Swing for the Fences”