INTRODUCTION TO E-TUTORING. TOPICS TO BE COVERED: Definition of an etutor What is and etutor? Who is...
-
Upload
christal-byrd -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of INTRODUCTION TO E-TUTORING. TOPICS TO BE COVERED: Definition of an etutor What is and etutor? Who is...
INTRODUCTION TO E-TUTORING
TOPICS TO BE COVERED:
• Definition of an etutor• What is and etutor?• Who is an etutor?• Competencies required• Role of the traditional tutor• Advantages and disadvantages of traditional
tutoring• Advantages and disadvantages of an etutor• Interaction Models
LESSON OBJECTIVES:
At the end of this lesson the learner should be able to:
• Define e-tutoring.• Contrast the competencies required of an e-
tutor with that of a traditional tutor.• Illustrate using scenarios from their
working environment how the roles of tutors and learners will change in the online environment.
LESSON OBJECTIVES:
• Learners should be able to identify lecturing models that underpin the design of an online classroom.
Define the following interaction:
• Student-student
• Student-tutor
• Student-content
DEFINITION
• E-tutoring can be defined as teaching, support, management and assessment of students on programmes of study that involve a significant use of online technologies (TechLearn, 2000).
WHAT IS AN ETUTOR?
• An E-Tutor is the interface between the learner and the knowledge. They give the feeling of closeness that reduces social isolation that usually engulfs the online learner
WHO IS AN E-TUTOR?
• Subject matter expert
• Mentor • Facilitator • Motivator • Counselor
• Coach• Administrator• Assessor• Technical support
person
An e-tutor is a Jack-of-all-trades:
COMPETENCIES REQUIRED
• A good all round knowledge of the subject-matter of the course
• The background pedagogy that underpins the course
• A good understanding of the limits and limitations of the information and communications technology
COMPETENCIES REQUIRED
• A close working and sharing relationship with the learner
• Providing learners with support and encouragement
• Mentoring/counseling and advising
ADV. AND DISADV. OF TRADITIONAL TUTORING
• Strengths• Direct
communication between participants and tutor.
• Favourable in case of learning soft skills.
Weaknesses• Usually not entire
time of training is spent on effective learning.
• Delays in training schedule, problems with getting right group together.
ADV. AND DISADV. OF TRADITIONAL TUTORING
Strengths
• Opportunity for asking questions, clarifying doubts and discussing subjects on the spot.
• Contact with respected authorities and experienced professionals.
Weaknesses
• Impossibility of adjusting message to level of all participants ('one size does not fit all')
• Difficulties in monitoring participants' progress and evaluating acquired knowledge.
ADV. AND DISADV. OF TRADITIONAL TUTORING
Weaknesses
• Teaching process may vary depending on tutor, participants, time of day, atmosphere etc.
ADV. AND DISADV. OF ETUTORING
Strengths
• Well-documented efficiency of this learning method.
• Significant decrease in funds spent on training arrangement
Weaknesses
• High initial costs of the training production, particularly custom content in highly specialized fields of knowledge.
ADV. AND DISADV. OF ETUTORING
• Time saved as a result of lack of preparatory activities
• Training can be conducted anytime and anywhere.
• Need of appropriate IT infrastructure.
• Limited efficiency in soft skills training.Lack of direct contact between participants.
ADV. AND DISADV. OF ETUTORING
Strengths
• Individual course of teaching adjusted to student's needs and skills.
LEARNING MODELS
An organisation may seek to implement any one of or a combination of the following three models of interaction:
• Student-Student• Student-Tutor• Student-ContentThe etutor will be required to formulate
strategies for learning that are in keeping with the design employed by the institution
STUDENT-STUDENT
• Interaction between one learner and other learners, alone or in groups, with or without the real-time presence of the instructor
STUDENT- TUTOR
• interaction both between the learner and the tutor
STUDENT-CONTENT
• Interaction between the learner and the content or the subject of the study