Intro. to High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor
-
Upload
topan-setiadipura -
Category
Engineering
-
view
180 -
download
8
Transcript of Intro. to High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor
High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor
Topan [email protected]
Pusat Teknologi dan Keselamatan Reaktor Nuklir
BATAN
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 20154/23/2015 1
Bahasan
1. Desain HTGR (Vs. PWR)
2. Fitur Keselamatan HTGR
3. Desain dan Analisis HTGR
1. Konsep desain dan keselamatan
2. Perhitungan Kritikalitas
3. Perhitungan Equilibrium (burnup)
4. Sejarah HTGR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 2
Sejarah HTGR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 3
Sejarah HTGR (dan Kita)
4/23/2015T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 20154
4/23/2015T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 20155
Sejarah HTGR (dan Kita)
4/23/2015T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 20156
Sejarah HTGR (dan Kita)
Pressurized Water Reactor
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 7
Teras Reaktor PWR
Fuel pin
Tampang lintang Fuel-pin
Fuel-Assembly(penampang lintang) teras reaktor
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Bahanbakar UO2
berbentukpin/pellet.
4/23/2015 8
High Temp. Gas-cooled Reactor
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 9
Teras Reaktor (Prismatik) HTGR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 10
Bahan Bakar (Prismatic) HTGR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 11
KomponenUtama:- Bahan bakar bola- Pendingin He- Reflektor graphite- Batang kendali
Teras PBR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 12
Bahan bakar (Pebble) HTGR
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 13
4/23/2015 14T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Fitur Keselamatan• Power density yang rendah (~3 W/cm3)• Heat capacity dan conductivity yang tinggi.• Pengungkungan produk fisi yang baik pada
bahan bakar hingga pada temp. tinggi. (limit 1620oC, karena teknologi TRISO ).
• Koeff. temp. negatif yang tinggi.• Kemampuan `afterheat removal through the
vessel wall` (diameter teras yang kecil ~3m)• Excess reactivity yang rendah (karena on-line
refueling).
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 15
Fitur Keselamatan(1): ControlSecara inherent/melekat teras reaktor dapat mengkontrol laju reaksi fisi
bahkan hingga menghentikannya.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 16
HTR-Module Siemens Design
Fitur Keselamatan(1): ControlSecara inherent/melekat teras reaktor dapat mengkontrol laju reaksi fisi
bahkan hingga menghentikannya.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 17
HTR-Module Siemens Design
Fitur Keselamatan(2): CoolingMampu mengeluarkan panas yang dihasilkan dengan hanya bergantung
pada mekanisme alamiah tanpa perlu tindakan aktif:
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 18
rcore
Fitur Keselamatan(3): Contain
Rilis zat radioaktif yang sangat kecil kepada lingkungan dalamkondisi apapun, bahkan pada kecelakaan terparah sekalipun:
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 19
TRISO Integrity
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Faktor utama dari fitur keselamatan `contain` tersebut adalah lapisan SiC(Silikon Karbida) pada partikel bahan bakar TRISO.
4/23/2015 20
Faile
d P
arti
cle
Fra
ctio
n
German Fuel
TRISO Integrity
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Faktor utama dari fitur keselamatan `contain` tersebut adalah lapisan SiC(Silikon Karbida) pada partikel bahan bakar TRISO.
4/23/2015 21
Skema Operasi Pebble Bed Reactor(1)
Skema strategi pengisian bahan bakar Multipass dan OTTO pada reaktor PBR.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 22
Skema strategi pengisian bahan bakar peu-a-peu padareaktor PBR.
Skema Operasi Pebble Bed Reactor(2)
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 23
Sistem Penanganan Bahan BakarHTR-Module
Siemens Design(Multipass)
4/23/2015 24T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Spesifikasi Teknis RDE
4/23/2015T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 201525
Siklus Pebble Bed Reactor
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi
Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April
2015
4/23/2015 26
Perhitungan Kritikalitas
• HTR-10 Benchmarking
– CFP Modeling
– Fuel Pebble Modeling
• ASTRA Benchmarking
– Fuel Pebble Modeling
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 27
HTR-10 Benchmarking
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 28
HTR-10 Design Features
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 29
HTR-10 Full Core ModelingBromated
carbon bricks
Graphite reflector
structure
Cold Coolant Chamber
Top reflector
Top core cavity
Mix of Fuel and dummy pebbles
Dummy pebbles
Control rod borings
Carbon bricks
Bottom reflector
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 30
HTR-10 Core Cross Section
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 31
CFP Modeling
• Coated Fuel Particles (CFP) are modeled explicitly in this benchmarking calculation.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 32
Pebble Fuel Model
Statistical Geometry Model Regular Lattice Model
Statistical Vs. Regular Lattice Model
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 33
ASTRA Benchmarking
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 34
ASTRA Critical Assembly
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 35
ASTRA Benchmark Model(1)1. Annular Core2. Bottom reflector3. Lower part IR support
structure (air)4. Upper part IR support
structure (metal)5. Side graphite
reflector6. Separating sheet7. Top reflector8. Internal reflector (IR)
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 36
ASTRA Benchmark Model(2)Borings Function
CR1, … CR7 Channels for Control rods CR1-CR7
MR Channel for Manual Rod
SR1, …SR8 Channels for Safety rods SR1-SR8
LIPR1, LIPR2 Channels for Placement of Rods LIPR1 and LIPR2
Outer dimension of side reflector is 380 cmT.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 37
ASTRA Benchmark Model(3)
Model of -Control Rods (CR)- Safety Rods (SR)- Leave in Place Rods (LIPR)Contain B4C material.
Model of Manual Rods (MR), made of Aluminum.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 38
ASTRA Benchmarking Cases
Cas
e
Position, Z, along the channel height,
cm*
Core
Height**
Packing
Fraction
LIPR1 LIPR2 MR CR5 Hc fi
1 OUT OUT 178.8 402.6 180.354 0.59914
2 42.6 OUT 160.5 402.6 215.134 0.60304
3 42.6 42.6 225.1 402.6 292.584 0.6048
4 42.6 42.6 403.5 184.6 321.044 0.60618
5 42.6 42.6 403.5 93 321.044 0.60618
CasePosition, Z, along the channel height, cm
CR1 CR2 CR3 CR4 CR6 CR6 SR 1-8
All
Case404.8 402.8 391.2 398.7 395.1 395 400
* Z vertical distance between the bottom of the graphite reflector (bottomsurface of SRf and BR) and bottom of the poison rod** Core height is from the upper boundary of the bottom reflector of lowerboundary of the core.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 39
HTGR Benchmark Summary
Carbon
thermal
capture
cross section
JENDL-4.0 JENDL-3.3 ENDF/B-VII.0 JEFF-3.1
3.85 mb 3.53 mb 3.36 mb 3.36 mb
0.98500
0.99000
0.99500
1.00000
1.00500
1.01000
1.01500
1.02000
1.02500
1.03000
HTR-10(IAEA)
HTR-10(IRPhEP)
ASTRA#1
ASTRA#2
ASTRA#3
ASTRA#4
ASTRA#5
HTTR
K-E
FF
Benchmark Model
ENDF/B-VII.0
JENDL-3.3
JENDL-4.0
EXP.
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 40
Perhitungan Teras EquilibriumBurnup Calculation of Moving Core Pebble Bed Reactor
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 41
Concept of PBR BU Calculation
The interdependence of neutron flux and nuclide density requiresthat the depletion equation should be solve simultaneously withneutronic core calculation. The common method applied multi-group neutron diffusion approximation for neutronic corecalculation.
Depletion analysis in PBR type needs to account simultaneously for themovement of the fuel elements and for the changes of their composition.
Modeled as
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 42
Equilibrium Analysis of 10MWt Small PBR
Design parameters [units] Values
Power [MWt] 10
Core height [cm] 196.5
Core diameter [cm] 180
Top reflector height [cm] 90
Bottom reflector height [cm] 121
Void region height [cm] 42
Power density [W/cc] 2
U-235 enrichment [wt%] 10
Axial fuel velocity [cm/day] 0.5
Core residence time [days] 393
Initial and equilibrium keff for different HM/pebble
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 43
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
• Effective multiplication factor for different HM-loading with 20% U-
235 enrichment. HM-loading of 2.1 g/pebble was the lowest to
achieve a critical equilibrium core.
• The related optimized burnup is of 69.4 MWd/kg-HM achieved
by 20% U-235 enrichment and 2.1 gHM/pebble.
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Eff
ec
tive
Mu
ltip
lic
ati
on
Fa
cto
r
Operation Time (days)
1.4 gHM/pebble
1.6 gHM/pebble
1.8 gHM/pebble
2 gHM/pebble
2.1 gHM/pebble
2.5 gHM/pebble
3 gHM/pebble
4 gHM/pebble
Parametric survey for 20wt% enrichment
Equilibrium Analysis of 10MWt Small PBR
4/23/2015 44
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Effect of lower HM loading (also means lower burnup):- increase the burnup- increase and shift the peak power density to the upper part
of the core.
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Po
we
r D
en
sit
y [
W/c
m3
]
Axial Region (top to bottom)
4 ; 20wt%
3 ; 20wt%
2.5 ; 20wt%
2.1;20wt%
Power density profile for different HM-loading.
4/23/2015 45
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
1.3494
1.3857
1.3597
1.32821.2867
1.26421.2338
1.0114
1.03331.0448 1.0537 1.0603 1.0565 1.0519
0.9000
1.0000
1.1000
1.2000
1.3000
1.4000
1.5000
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21
Eff.
Mu
ltip
licat
ion
Fac
tor
HM-Loading[g-HM/pebble]
Init. Core
Equil. Core
Effective multiplication for different HM loading with 15wt% U-235 enrichment of initial and equilibrium core.
For 15wt% enrichment of U-235, the lowest HM-loading to achieve critical equilibrium condition is 8 gHM/pebble.
Equilibrium Analysis of 200MWt PBR
4/23/2015 46
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Effective multiplication for different HM loading with 17wt% U-235
enrichment of initial and equilibrium core
1.461 1.445
1.4351.427
1.3731.341
1.3001.278
1.250
1.0229
1.08001.0876 1.0862 1.0827 1.0805
0.900
1.000
1.100
1.200
1.300
1.400
1.500
0 5 10 15 20 25
Eff.
Mu
ltip
licat
ion
Fac
tor
HM-Loading [g-HM/pebble]
Init. Core
Equil. Core
For 17wt% enrichment of U-235, the lowest HM-loading to achieve critical equilibrium condition is 7 gHM/pebble.
Equilibrium Analysis of 10MWt Small PBR
4/23/2015 47
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Effective multiplication for different HM loading with
20wt% U-235 enrichment of initial and equilibrium core
1.4831.477
1.464
1.447
1.3931.360
1.3191.298
1.270
1.039
1.0831.121 1.125 1.121 1.116 1.115
0.900
1.000
1.100
1.200
1.300
1.400
1.500
1.600
0 5 10 15 20 25
Eff
. M
ultip
licatio
n F
acto
r
HM-Loading [g-HM/pebble]
Init. Core
Equil. Core
For 20wt% enrichment of U-235, the lowest HM-loading to achieve critical equilibrium condition is 6 gHM/pebble.
Equilibrium Analysis of 10MWt Small PBR
4/23/2015 48
Effect of Fuel Velocity
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Eff.
Mu
ltip
licat
ion
Fac
tor
Operation Time (days)
v=0.5cm/day v=0.8cm/day
200MWt ; 20wt% ; 6 gHM/pebble
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 49
Power Density & Effect of Velocity
6.34
3.41
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Po
we
r D
en
sity
[kW
/pe
bb
le]
Axial Region (top to bottom)
v=0.5cm/day v=0.8cm/day
200MWt ; 20wt% ; 6 gHM/pebble
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 50
Parameter Desain
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
• Skema pemuatan bahan bakar: Multipass / OTTO / Peu a Peu•Geometri teras dan bahan bakar• Pengayaan U-235• Pemuatan Heavy Metal (HM) per pebble (fraksi volume CFP di fuel zone pebble bed)• Kecepatan axial rerata bahan bakar / core residence time.• BU target
4/23/2015 51
Tantangan dan Peluang ?
- Costmemperkecil biaya pembangkitan.- Resourcememperbesar energi densitas (energi
per bahan bakar, MWd/TU), membangun konseppembiak?.
- Accident Inherent safety aspect, keselamatanbergantung pada hukum alam yang availability-nya100%.
- Bomb aspek Non-proliferasi (kemudahan untukdigunakan sebagai bom).
- Waste konsep reaktor nuklir pemakan `sampahnuklir`, close-cycle system.
4/23/2015 52T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain
HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
Sejarah HTGR(1)
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 53
Sejarah HTGR(2)
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 54
Terimakasih…
T.Setiadipura, Workshop Evaluasi Desain HTGR, BAPETEN, 22 April 2015
4/23/2015 55