Internet2 K20 Initiative & Abilene SEGP Update Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 6 th...
-
Upload
hope-price -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Internet2 K20 Initiative & Abilene SEGP Update Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 6 th...
Internet2 K20 Initiative & Abilene SEGP Update
Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager
6th Annual Summer Institute, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
July 17, 2003
7/17/2003 2
Internet2 Mission
Develop and deploy advanced network applications and technologies, accelerating the creation of tomorrow’s Internet.
7/17/2003 3
Internet2 Goals
Enable new generation of applications
Re-create leading edge R&E network capability
Transfer technology and experience to the global production Internet
7/17/2003 4
Internet2 Membership
Regular• US institutions of higher education
Corporate• For-profit US-based companies
Affiliate• Non-profit and other research or education organizations
7/17/2003 5
Internet2 Universities202 University Members, July 2003
7/17/2003 6
Internet2 Affiliate Members
Altarum
American Distance Education Consortium
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA)
CENIC
CERN
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Cleveland Institute of Music
Cleveland Museum of Art
Department of Commerce, Boulder
Desert Research Institute
EDUCAUSE
Food and Drug Administration
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Indiana Higher Education Telecommunications System (IHETS)
Jet Propulsion Laboratories
LaNet
Manhattan School of Music
MCNC
Merit Network, Inc.
MOREnet
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
National Institutes of Health
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – Silver Spring
National Science Foundation
New World Symphony
NYSERNet, Inc.
Oak Ridge National LabsOARnetOneNet
PeachNet
Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA)
Southwest Research Institute
State University of New York System
State University System of Florida
Survivors of the Shoah-Visual History Foundation
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
University of Missouri System
University of North Carolina, General Administration
7/17/2003 7
Corporate Membership
Corporate Membership by Type• 16 Partners• 10 Sponsors• 35 Members
Diversity of Corporate Membership• Telecommunications and networking companies• Educational content providers• Pharmaceuticals• Start-ups
7/17/2003 8
International Partners
Asia-PacificAAIREP (Australia)APAN (Asia-Pacific)APAN-KR (Korea)APRU (Asia-Pacific)CERNET, CSTNET, NSFCNET (China)JAIRC (Japan)JUCC (Hong Kong)NECTEC / UNINET (Thailand)SingAREN (Singapore)TAnet2 (Taiwan)
AmericasCANARIE (Canada)CEDIA (Ecuador)CNTI (Venezuela)CR2NET (Costa Rica)CUDI (Mexico)REUNA (Chile)RETINA (Argentina)RNP [FAPESP] (Brazil)SENACYT (Panama)
Europe-Middle EastARNES (Slovenia)BELNET (Belgium)CARNET (Croatia)CESnet (Czech Republic)DANTE (Europe)DFN-Verein (Germany)GIP RENATER (France)GRNET (Greece)HEAnet (Ireland)HUNGARNET (Hungary)INFN-GARR (Italy)Israel-IUCC (Israel)NORDUnet (Nordic Countries)POL-34 (Poland)FCCN (Portugal)RedIRIS (Spain)RESTENA (Luxembourg)RIPN (Russia)SANET (Slovakia)Stichting SURF (Netherlands)SWITCH (Switzerland)TERENA (Europe)JISC, UKERNA (United Kingdom)
Last updated: 1 July 2003
7/17/2003 9
Abilene Focus
Goals• Enabling innovative applications and advanced services
not possible over the commercial Internet• Backbone & regional infrastructure provides a vital
substrate for the continuing culture of Internet advancement in the university/corporate research sector
Advanced service efforts• Multicast• IPv6• Measurement• Security
7/17/2003 10
Partnership approach
The Abilene Network is an Internet2 project done in partnership with
• Cisco Systems (routers, switches, and access)• Juniper Networks (routers)• Nortel Networks (SONET kit)• Qwest Communications (SONET & DWDM circuits, co-location)• Indiana University (network operations center)
• Internet2 Test & Evaluation Centers (ITECs)– North Carolina and Ohio
7/17/2003 11
Abilene – July 2003
IP-over-DWDM (OC-192c) and IP-over-SONET backbone (OC-48c)
48 direct connections (OC-3c 10-Gbps)• 2 10-Gbps (10 Gig Eth) connections
– OC-192 SONET also supported
• 6 OC-48c & 1 Gig Eth connections• 23 connections at OC-12c or higher
221 participants – research univs. & labs• All 50 states, District of Columbia, & Puerto Rico
Expanded access• 88 sponsored participants and 28 state education networks
7/17/2003 12
7/17/2003 13
Next Generation Abilene status
11 next generation router nodes in place • Deploying two racks in each location: Juniper T640 router
& four measurement servers• Cisco 12008 routers phased out, except in Atlanta• Very pleased to date with new router performance and
interoperability with 1st generation backbone
Transcontinental 10-Gbps ’s in place• Seven ’s connected to network
– DC-NYC-Chicago-Indy-KC-Sunnyvale CA-Los Angeles– KC-Houston now in place
ITEC network performance validation test • 8 Gbps of 2-way traffic (50% v4/v6 and 100% v6)
transmitted transcontinentally without loss or reordering
7/17/2003 15
Internet2 Applications
What are “Internet2 applications”?
They deliver qualitative and quantitative improvements in how we conduct research and engage in teaching and learning.
They require advanced networks to work.
http://apps.internet2.edu/
7/17/2003 16
Virtual Laboratories
Real-time access to remote instruments
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Distributed nanoManipulator
7/17/2003 17
Digital Video Applications
Broadcast TV quality videoconferencing
Both live distribution and on-demand access to a variety of content
HDTV-based digital cinema, network-based studio production, …
7/17/2003 18
Internet2 K20 Initiative - Overview
Goals
Structure
Communications Strategy
Communities/Partnerships
Projects/Activities
7/17/2003 19
Past Lessons Learned
The more innovators brought on board early the greater the progress.
The more broadly shared the tech platforms and tools the greater the leverage.
A disproportionate share of important innovations come from the .edu realms.
There are many important opportunities for the use of technology in teaching, learning and access.
We need to do a better job of evaluation and timely communication.
Internet culture (“loose consensus and working code”) plus partnerships works for this -- much better than traditional education process/planning models.
7/17/2003 20
K20 Initiative Goals:Beyond Connectivity
To bring innovators in K-12, community colleges, universities,
libraries and museums into appropriate regional, national and international advanced networking efforts, via the "Sponsored Education Group Participant" (SEGP) process.
To encourage and help sustain partnerships among these education institutions, the private sector and government.
To enhance teaching and learning by facilitating projects that explore the ways in which advanced network applications, services, tools and digital content can extend access to education and educational resources.
To develop mechanisms for timely communication across all educational sectors and regions in order to enable quick, pervasive technology diffusion.
7/17/2003 21
K20 Initiative: 2003 foci
Continue to work with communities of interest
• libraries via ALA and IMLS• Quilt• Deaf Education Community
and Federal funding agencies • IMLS• NEH• NSF-Education• NEA
7/17/2003 22
K20 Initiative: 2003 foci….cont.
Continue developing better ways to engage the volunteers who must drive any application projects forward
myK20 Database Project • web application allows any of the 10,000 SEGP
institutions to contribute project information • Most importantly - find those with common interests who
would like to engage other institutions in some or all aspects of a given project
• Project peer review forums, links to resources created, best practices, and lessons learned information embedded with project description.
7/17/2003 23
Internet2 K20 Approach
Projects will be carried out by multi-state, often multi-sector, project teams
Project leadership will come from the team, with support from Internet2 K20 project staff
Initial projects will seek to leverage current Internet2 projects and innovative efforts among Internet2 members, institutions, sponsored participants and SEGPs
7/17/2003 24
K20 Advisory Committee
Representatives from each stateDesignated by Internet2 sponsorsRepresent the broad programmatic interests of the SEGP sponsor(s), connector, as well as the spectrum of participants/audiences (e.g., K12, colleges and universities, public libraries, museums, science centers, zoos, etc.)Provide input, ideas, feedback to help shape, guide, and inspire the national Initiative
7/17/2003 25
K20 Advisory Committee Roles
Identify and engage innovators within their state -- among the K12, higher education, library and museum communities -- in Internet2 K20 projects
Bring forward projects for multi-state participation
Encourage SEGP participation in existing Internet2 working groups where appropriate
Serve as an information conduit between local/regional/state efforts and the national initiative
Provide feedback to the project directors as the Initiative evolves
7/17/2003 26
K20 Executive Committee
Group of 13 individuals from various states around the SEGP community
More nimble than the larger advisory committee
Help shape overall initiative goals and strategy
Identify possible working group areas to engage other Advisory Committee membersand their constituencies.
7/17/2003 27
K20 Communication Strategy
Demo Materials• materials need not be themselves Internet2 applications but
need to capture applications and projects in a compelling way
Featured SEGP• opportunity to overview the work and accomplishments
underway in SEGP states
Internet2 K20 Newsletter • focuses on the work being done by K20 institutions and is
shared broadly with the K20 community via listserv and the web site
7/17/2003 28
K20 Communication Strategy (continued)
Resources• guides K20 constituents to important SEGP and Internet2 related information
Opportunities• a list of opportunities to help various communities get involved in the Internet2 K20 Initiative
Tearsheet glossy• single-page glossy overview of the Initiative. Available in print and pdf on the web site
7/17/2003 29
A Few Relevant Communities
Sponsored Education Group Participants (“state networks”)
Museums, libraries, archives, cultural institutions
“Beltway” societies and associations
Key sponsored research agencies, e.g., NSF, NIH, NEA
Education and learning research organizations, including think tanks, research groups, national academies
Internet2 & Internet2 members
International partners (e.g., CANARIE)
7/17/2003 30
K20 Initiative Partnerships
American Library Association's Office for Information Technology Policy
• working with the K20 Initiative to shape a strategy for using advanced networks and applications in public and academic libraries.
The Quilt• UCAID project whose participants are non-profit advanced regional network organizations dedicated to furthering research and education in the United States.
7/17/2003 31
Internet2 K20 Projectsa few examples…
Additional project information http://k20.internet2.edu/projects/index.html
7/17/2003 32
A Sampling of Areas of Interest
Digital Content: actively seeking out local resources • Music (e.g., ethnomusicology and music education)• Documentary films, animation arts, local history• Presidential libraries• Historical information, primary source documents
Learning courseware & curriculum repositoriesVideo: H.323 and future interactive video and multimedia technologies, digital video, low- to high-end video multicastRemote instrumentation & other scientific apparatus which could be shared across educational communitiesMiddleware deployment and partnerships Engaging public libraries – uses of advanced networksInternet2 server technologies, caching, co-location
7/17/2003 33
Get Involved!
Contact Louis Fox or James Werle with ideas or questions
Read about what is going on
Get to know your friendly SEGP representative
Make frequent visits the Opportunities section of the Internet2 K20 website
7/17/2003 34
Abilene Access
Primary Participants – research universities, corporations, etc.
Affiliate & Corporate members
Sponsored Participants – individual locations
And now…..
SEGPs: Sponsored Education Group Participants
7/17/2003 35
Sponsored Education Group Participant (SEGP) Fundamentals
SEGP status targeted at both developed and emerging state-based education networksOne or more Internet2 University Members in the same state act as sponsor(s)Connectors take overall fiscal and operational responsibility for the SEGPPeriodic SEGP progress updates to Abilene required (e.g., how are SEGPs implementing advanced applications?)
7/17/2003 36
Approved SEGPs
• Alabama • New Mexico• California • New York• Florida • North Carolina• Georgia • North Dakota• Hawaii • Ohio• Illinois • Oklahoma• Indiana • Oregon• Iowa • Pennsylvania• Louisiana • Rhode Island• Maryland • Texas• Massachusetts • Virginia• Michigan • Washington• Minnesota • Wisconsin• Missouri • Utah
7/17/2003 37
Sponsored Education Group Participants as of July 17, 2003
7/17/2003 38
SEGP Inquiries
• Colorado• Connecticut• Delaware• Kansas• Kentucky• Nevada• New Hampshire• New Jersey• South Carolina• Tennessee
7/17/2003 39
SEGP Connectivity SurveyFall 2002
Survey Goals• Provide a high level view of the connectivity and enabled technologies within the SEGPs
• Also, totals for the entire SEGP program (as of August 2002)
• Provide contact information for pursuing additional information
• The goal is NOT to provide a detailed site survey as this is too resource intensive and hard to maintain
7/17/2003 40
SEGP Connectivity SurveySummary of Results (Fall 2002)
62% of the state education networks can access the Internet2 backbone network at >155 Mbps
As of late 2002, there are 25 state k12/k20 networks participating connecting about 9800 K20 institutions –
• 7173 k12 schools (73% of total)
• 1482 public libraries (15% of total)
• 551 community colleges (6% of total)
• 526 four-year colleges and universities (5% of total)
• 102 museums, zoos, aquariums, and science centers (1% of total)
For more information: http://k20.internet2.edu/segp/stateconnect/segpsurvey.shtml
7/17/2003 41
SEGP Process
• Sponsor(s) complete SEGP Application• SEGP Connector completes Abilene Connection Agreement Addendum
• Connector submits SEGP routing information to UCAID at [email protected]
• UCAID reviews and approves routes and submits them to the Abilene NOC
• Abilene NOC begins passing additional SEGP traffic on the network
• Appoint Internet2 K20 Initiative Representatives
7/17/2003 42
SEGP Connector Requirements
A Connector supporting the Sponsored Education Group Participant(s) must:
• Maintain a 7x24 Network Operations Center (NOC)• Register its routing information and that of the Participant(s)
in the Internet2 Routing Registry (I2db) or equivalent• Provide UCAID a quarterly report on the relative utilization
of the Abilene connection by the SEGP• Assure compliance with the Abilene CoU by the
Participant(s)• Inform the Participant(s) that Abilene does not provide
transit to the commodity Internet
These steps will be implemented through an amended Abilene Connection agreement
7/17/2003 43
SEGP Related Costs
Annual participation fee • $30,000 + $2,000 x (size of State’s U.S. House delegation)
• Delegation size provides a readily auditable population metric
This annual fee• will be charged on a per-connecting organization, per-state basis
• will be paid directly by the Abilene Connector on behalf of the Sponsored Participant
• is not eligible for E-rate discount
7/17/2003 44
Contact Information
On the Web• k20.internet2.edu/• abilene.internet2.edu/
Email• Louis Fox: [email protected]• Heather Bruning: [email protected]• Abilene (general inquiries): [email protected]
Phone• Louis Fox: (206) 685-4745• Heather Bruning: (734) 352-4955