International Research Ethics Jenell Coleman, M.D. Clinical Fellow, Reproductive Infectious...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of International Research Ethics Jenell Coleman, M.D. Clinical Fellow, Reproductive Infectious...
International Research Ethics
Jenell Coleman, M.D.
Clinical Fellow, Reproductive Infectious Diseases, UCSF
M.P.H. Candidate 2005, UCBMarch 1, 2005
My Experience
• Ethical sensitivity• Lack of adequate training in ethics• International research
– Unethical foundation
• Goal– Stimulate further ethical review of
your own projects
Definition
• Ethics: ways of examining the moral life– Normative: formulation and defense of a
system of fundamental moral principles and rules that determine which actions are right and which are wrong• What people ought to do
– Non-normative: factual investigation of moral behavior and beliefs • How people reason and act
Beauchamp and Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1989
Ethical Principles• Autonomy
– Respect for persons; self-governance– Free choice without coercion; informed consent
• Justice– Equal distribution of risks and benefits– Persons from groups unlikely to be among the
beneficiaries of subsequent application should not be involved in research
• Beneficence– Minimize risks and maximize benefits
• Nonmaleficence– Do no harm
Ethical Theories
• Utilitarian– Greatest good for the greatest number– Some people may have to carry the
burden which will ultimately benefit society
– Social benefits of research for future pts.
• Deontological– Human rights based– Individual rights
Informed Consent
• Disclosure of information• Understanding of this information• Voluntariness• Competence• Consent
Incompetence• Inability to evidence a choice or preference
• Inability to understand one’s situation• Inability to understand disclosed
information
• Inability to give a reason• Inability to give a rational reason• Inability to give risk/benefit-related reasons• Inability to reach a reasonable decision
Appelbaum and Roth. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1982; Roth and Meisel. Emory Law Journal. 1982
Vulnerable populations
• People infected with HIV • Women• Children• People with drug addictions• Poor individuals• Elderly• Prisoners• Military recruits
Exploitation
Subjects participating in the research project are burdened with the risks of the project, yet are not recipients of the benefits– May even be doing harm– Violation of nonmaleficence principle
Declaration of Helsinki
World Medical Association 1962
In any medical study, every patient-including those of the control group-should be assured the best proven diagnostic and therapeutic method
DHHS Ethical Guidelines
It is permissible to observe the standards of the host country, if it was determined that they “ afford protections that are at least equivalent to those provided in this policy”
International Ethical Guidelines 1993
...the ethical standards applied should be no less exacting than they would be for research in the sponsoring country itself
Placebo Trials
• 1994 ACTG 076 Results» $800-$1000
• 1994 WHO Recommendations• 1995 15 RCTs and 1
equivalency trial• 1997 Public Citizen letter to
DHHS• 1998 CDC funded trial results
Placebo Arguments
• Pro– beneficence– standard of care– scientific rigor– equipoise
• Anti– beneficence– autonomy– nonmaleficence– exploitation– violation of
international ethical guidelines
Colonialism
• The state of developing countries is the byproduct of colonialism– Reason why substandard care is
provided– Reason for the widespread poverty– Reason for the dependence on 1st
world countries for financial assistance
Cultural Relativism
• Cannot apply our ethical standards and definitions to a different culture
• What are the ethical beliefs of the community?
Western Imperialism
• “These are Ugandan studies, conducted by Ugandan investigators, on Ugandans, for the good of their people”
• The extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence– Sweden RCT– South African viewpoint– Ethical Review Boards
Placebo Arguments
• Pro– beneficence– standard of care– scientific rigor– equipoise
• Anti– beneficence– autonomy– nonmaleficence– exploitation– violation of
international ethical guidelines
Discussion
• How do you define standard of care?
• Are placebo controlled trials in low income countries unethical?
• Are developing countries exploited?• What do researchers owe the
subjects, if anything?
Responsibility of researchers
• Disconnect between research and policy
• Passive role of many researchers• Lack of support for subjects after
study ends
RESEARCH FINDINGS
POLICY
Human Rights• Clarify the true purpose of the
research– Must matter to the subjects
• Evaluate likely effectiveness– Honest, rigorous investigation into the
potential effectiveness in that population
• Determine whether the research is well targeted– Disproportionately impacting certain
groups in society?
Human Rights• Examine the research for possible
human rights burdens– Balancing of potential benefits to the
health of the community with the human rights repercussions
• Determine whether the research is the least intrusive that can achieve the objective
• If a coercive measure is truly necessary to avert a significant risk, guarantee fair procedures to persons affected
Gostin and Mann
In sum,
Researchers– aim to strengthen the community– know the purpose of the research– formulate a plan to implement study
results
...a placebo-controlled trial may be ethically acceptable, even if proven therapy is available, under the following circumstances:
- Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons its use is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of a prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic method; or
- Where a prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic method is being investigated for a minor condition and the patients who receive placebo will not be subject to any additional risk of serious or irreversible harm.
Declaration of HelsinkiRevision 2002