International Consortium on Government Financial Management May 8, 2006 Gene Dodaro Chief Operating...
-
Upload
noel-kelley -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of International Consortium on Government Financial Management May 8, 2006 Gene Dodaro Chief Operating...
International Consortium on Government Financial ManagementMay 8, 2006
Gene DodaroChief Operating OfficerUnited States Government Accountability Office
2
Outline
• Achieving Federal Transformation
• Remaining Federal Challenges
• Modernizing the Accountability Profession
• Maximizing Key Partnerships
3
Foundation Laid for Federal Transformation
• 1990-1995 – CFOs, Performance and Accountability & Audit Frameworks
• 1996-2000 – Financial Systems & CIOs
• 2001-Present – Expansion of Audits
4
Transformation in Process
• Achieving Cultural Change
• Establishing Leadership Structure
• Addressing Financial Systems and Operations
• Preparing Auditable Financial Statements
5
Transformation in Process
• Preparing Accountability Reports
• Strengthening Internal Controls
• Developing New Accounting Standards
• Refining Audit Standards and Methods
6
Remaining Federal Challenges
• Addressing Structural Fiscal Imbalance
• Confronting Difficult High Risk Areas
• Improving U.S. Financial Statements
• Modernizing Systems and Controls
8
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1797 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2005Fiscal Years
Federal Surplus or Deficitas a Share of GDP
Fiscal Years 1797-2005
Note: Data until 1929 are shown as a percent of gross national product (GNP); data from 1930 to present are shown as a percent of GDP. Source: Department of Commerce, Office of Management and Budget, and Congressional Budget Office.
Percent of GNP/GDP
9
Estimated Fiscal Exposures($ trillions)
2000 2005
• Explicit liabilities $6.9 $9.9– Publicly held debt– Military & civilian pensions & retiree health– Other
• Commitments & contingencies 0.5 0.9– E.g., PBGC, undelivered orders
• Implicit exposures 13.0 35.6– Future Social Security benefits 3.8 5.7
– Future Medicare Part A benefits 2.7 8.8
– Future Medicare Part B benefits 6.5 12.4
– Future Medicare Part D benefits -- 8.7
Total $20.4 $46.4
Source: U.S. government’s consolidated financial statements (CFS).Note: Estimates for Social Security and Medicare are at present value as of January 1 of each year as reported in the CFS and all other data are as of September 30.
10
How Big is OurGrowing Fiscal Burden?
2000 2005
Total Fiscal Exposures $20.4 trillion $46.4 trillion
BurdenPer Person $72,000 $156,000
Per Full-time Worker $165,000 $375,000
Per Household $189,000 $411,000Sources: GAO analysis.
11
Composition of Spending as a Share of GDPUnder Baseline Extended
0
10
20
30
40
50
2005 2015 2030 2040Fiscal year
Revenue
Social Security
Medicare & MedicaidNet Interest
All other spending
Percent of GDP
Notes: In addition to the expiration of tax cuts, revenue as a share of GDP increases through 2016 due to (1) real bracket creep, (2) more taxpayers becoming subject to the AMT, and (3) increased revenue from tax-deferred retirement accounts. After 2016, revenue as a share of GDP is held constant.
Source: GAO’s January 2006 analysis.
12
Composition of Spending as a Share of GDPAssuming Discretionary Spending Grows with GDP after 2006
and All Expiring Tax Provisions are Extended
0
10
20
30
40
50
2005 2015 2030 2040Fiscal year
Revenue
Social Security
Medicare & MedicaidNet Interest
All other spending
Percent of GDP
Note: This includes certain tax provisions that expired at the end of 2005, such as the increased AMT exemption amount.Source: GAO’s January 2006 analysis.
13
Current Fiscal Policy Is Unsustainable
• The “Status Quo” is Not an Option
• Faster Economic Growth Can Help, But It Cannot Solve The Problem
• The Sooner the Better
14
The Way Forward
• Stimulate Public Education
• Use Budget Controls
• Improve Accounting and Reporting
• Re-examine Policies and Programs
16
Key National Indicators
• Portfolio of outcome-based measures
• Many initiatives underway
• Consortium housed by National Academies
• Related efforts by the OECD
18
GAO High-Risk Program
• Original list included 14 areas
• Since 1990, 30 areas have been added, 18 taken off or consolidated
• 26 areas on the current list
19
High-Risk Categories
• Addressing Broad-based Transformations
• Managing Contracting More Efficiently
• Assessing Tax Law Administration
• Modernizing Insurance Benefit Programs
20
GAO’s High-Risk List
High-Risk Areas Designated High Risk
Addressing Challenges in Broad-based TransformationsProtecting the Federal Government’s Information Systems and the Nation’s Critical Infrastructures
1997
Strategic Human Capital Managementa 2001U.S. Postal Service Transformation Efforts and Long-Term Outlooka 2001Managing Federal Real Propertya 2003Implementing and Transforming the Department of Homeland Security 2003Establishing Appropriate and Effective Information-Sharing Mechanisms to Improve Homeland Security
2005
DOD Approach to Business Transformationa 2005DOD Supply Chain Management (formerly Inventory Management)DOD Weapon Systems AcquisitionDOD Business Systems ModernizationDOD Financial ManagementDOD Support Infrastructure ManagementDOD Personnel Security Clearance Program
199019901995199519972005
Managing Federal Contracting More EffectivelyDOE Contract Management 1990NASA Contract Management 1990
DOD Contract Management 1992Management of Interagency Contracting 2005
Assessing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Tax Law AdministrationEnforcement of Tax Lawsa, b 1990IRS Business Systems Modernizationc 1995
Modernizing and Safeguarding Insurance and Benefit ProgramsMedicare Programa 1990HUD Single-Family Mortgage Insurance and Rental Housing Assistance Programs 1994Medicaid Programa 2003Modernizing Federal Disability Programsa 2003Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Single-Employer Insurance Programa
National Flood Insurance Program 20032006
OtherFAA Air Traffic Control Modernization 1995a Legislation is likely to be necessary, as a supplement to actions by the executive branch, in order to effectively address this high-risk area.bTwo high-risk areas—Collection of Unpaid Taxes and Earned Income Credit Noncompliance—have been consolidated to make this area.cThe IRS Financial Management high-risk area has been incorporated into this high-risk area. 20
Added March 2006
22
Progress in AgencyAudit Results
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1996 2000 2005
Unqualified Qualified Mixed Disclaimed
(2005 includes the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which became a CFO Act Agency in FY 2005. FEMA, which became part of DHS, is included in prior years.)
Audit Results for 24 CFO Act Agencies
23
The Federal Financial Audit Environment
Main challenges for the U.S. financial statements:
• Department of Defense
• Intergovernmental Transactions
• Financial Statement Preparation
25
Limited FFMIA ProgressAuditors’ FFMIA AssessmentsFiscal Years 1997 through 2005
0
6
12
18
24
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Key Problems: Nonintegrated Systems and Weak Information Systems Security
CFO Act Agencies Not In Compliance
26
Modernizing the Accountability Profession
• Defining success in financial management
• Accelerating reporting
• Opining on system of internal control
• Updating Auditing Standards
27
Modernizing the Accountability Profession
• Monitoring implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• Exploring revised approaches to quality assurance programs
28
Key GAO Partnerships
GAO
NationalAudit Forum
INTOSAI
Good Government
Organizations
Professional Associations
GAO Advisory Groups
28
Others
30
Selected Countries that Have Adopted or Adapted the Yellow Book
• Albania• Bangladesh • Benin • Bolivia• Ecuador• El Salvador• Ethiopia• Ghana• Guyana• Honduras• Indonesia
• Kenya• Malawi• Mongolia• Nepal• Panama• Senegal• South Africa• Thailand• Uganda• Viet Nam• Zimbabwe
31
Auditors GeneralGlobal Working Group
• 18 countries
• Discuss common issues and challenges
• Learn from each other
• Leverage knowledge and expertise
32
Performance Audit Peer Review
• GWG Initiative
• GAO Experience– Seven Country Team– Clean Opinion– Global Good Practices
• INTOSAI Peer Review Subcommittee
33
Peer Review in the21st Century Should
• Serve the public interest
• Evolve to meet changing circumstances
• Be principle based, not rule based
• Be based on value and risk
• Be integrated with other considerations
• Allow peer reviewer judgment
International Consortium on Government Financial ManagementMay 8, 2006
Gene DodaroChief Operating OfficerUnited States Government Accountability Office