Insurer Solvency CONFERENCE PRESENTS. Welcome Presented by Concurrent Session B3 Insurer Solvency...
-
Upload
loren-barton -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Insurer Solvency CONFERENCE PRESENTS. Welcome Presented by Concurrent Session B3 Insurer Solvency...
WelcomeWelcome
Presented by
Concurrent Session B3
Insurer Solvency
Monday, September 14, 2009
CONFERENCE
3
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Presenter PanelInsurer Solvency Concurrent Session B3 September 14, 2009
Rating Agency Perspective
Richard Attanasio, Vice President, North America Property/CasualtyA.M. Best Company, Inc.
Moderator
George Simpson, Senior Manager, Insurance Risk ManagementCapital Power Corporation
Insurer Perspective
Lynn Oldfield, President Chartis
Broker Perspective
Brian McAskill, Managing Director Marsh Canada Limited
CONFERENCE
Rating Agency Perspective
Richard Attanasio - Vice President - North American P/C RIMS Canada ConferenceSeptember 14, 2009
AgendaA.M. Best’s Rating Process
Key Components of the RatingBalance SheetOperating PerformanceBusiness Profile
Financial Strength Ratings/Issuer Credit Ratings
Objective of A.M. Best’s Financial Strength Ratings
To perform a constructive and
objective role in the insurance
industry toward the prevention and
detection of insurer insolvency
Best’s Interactive Rating Process
10-12 Week (P/C) Process (depending on the time of year)
Company Meeting
Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses(based on balance sheet strength, operating performance
& business profile)
General Structure of Agenda CEO Strategic Overview Organizational Structure Underwriting Claims & Loss Reserving Investments Enterprise Risk
Management
Corporate Governance Capital Structure Business Production Reinsurance Programs Financial Review
More Specific Information on Actual Agenda
•Certified Full Actuarial Reports•By-line Underwriting Data•Risk Management Program•Reinsurance Security•Investment Program•Marketing Plans•Capital Management Plan•Management Organization & Bios
•Audited Annual Report •Sponsoring Organization Info.•A.M. Best Questionnaire•Regulatory Environment•Assessment of Business Environment•Group Business Strategy / Plan•Shareholders’ Information
Information
Best’s Interactive Rating Process
Startups & New Companies:•(3 to 5 years) Proformas
•Business Plans
SRQ, QAR, BCAR, CAR
Develop rating recommendations
Explore company’s strategy and future direction
Best’s Rating Process—How does it all fit?
Information captured using A.M. Best’s proprietary rating
forms/systems
Research & develop comprehensive
company database
A.M. Best meets senior company executives
Present to Rating Committee
Rating Committee Process Rating committee presentation includes:
– Analyst review– Slides and other exhibits – Peer comparisons– Financial data (Consolidating financials)– Rating Tools SRQ, QAR, BCAR
Rating committee determines the rating Role of the AMB Analyst--primary relationship
manager Role of the AMB Team Leader---provides guidance
and support to Analyst
Rating Decision
Communicated to Company
Best’s Interactive Rating Process
President’s Letter
Public Reports Not Published or Released until company
has reviewed them for confidential or factual issues
Release of Best’s Ratings• Rating opinions formally evaluated every 12
months– Monitored continuously– Constant access to Analyst
• Ratings may be released throughout the year:– Upgrades– Downgrades– Affirmations– New assignments– Ratings placed under review
A.M. Best’s Rating Approach
Operating Company ICR
Insurance Affiliates
Holding Company
Non-InsuranceBusinesses
Top-Down
Bottom-Up
OperatingCompany
A.M. Best’s Rating Approach
Operating Company
ICR
Operating Company
FSR
Holding Company
ICR
Notching
Translation
Key Components of Best’s Rating Evaluation
Balance Sheet Strength
Operating Performance
BusinessProfile
Best’s Rating
Best’s Rating Evaluation Balance Sheet Strength
Capitalization/Leverage
Capital Structure/Holding Company
Quality/Soundness of Reinsurance
Adequacy of Loss Reserves
Quality/Diversification of Assets
Liquidity
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Best Rating EvaluationOperating Performance
Profitability
Revenue Composition
Cycle ManagementAbility to Meet Plan
Sustainability
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Best Rating EvaluationBusiness Profile
Competitive Advantages
Spread of Risk
Event Risk
Regulatory Risk
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
A.M. Best Rating Definitions
A.M. Best’s Issuer Credit Rating (ICR) is an opinion as to the ability of the issuer to meet its ongoing senior financial obligations.
A.M. Best’s Financial Strength Rating is an opinion as to an insurer’s ability to meet its ongoing obligations to policyholders.
A.M. Best’s Debt Rating is an opinion as to the issuer’s ability to meet its ongoing financial obligations to security holders when due.
Operating Insurance Co.
Financial Strength Rating (FSR)
ICR to Debt Notching / Holding Co.
FSR to Credit Market Scale / ICR
Guide To Best's Financial Strength Ratings
B, B- FairC++, C+ MarginalC, C- WeakD PoorE Under Regulatory SupervisionF In Liquidation
Vulnerable Ratings
Secure Ratings
A++, A+ SuperiorA, A- ExcellentB++, B+ Good
FSR and ICR Rating Translation
FSR ICR
Se
cure
Inve
stm
en
t G
rad
e
A++ aaaaa+
A+ aaaa-
A a+a
A- a-
B++ bbb+bbb
B+ bbb-
FSR ICR
Vu
lne
rab
le
No
n-I
nv
es
tme
nt
Gra
deB bb+
bb
B- bb-
C++ b+b
C+ b-
C ccc+ccc
C-ccc-cc
Key Rating ComponentsSecure
A++ B+Vulnerable
B D
Balance SheetStrength
OperatingPerformance
BusinessProfile
Outstanding
Very Stable/Strong
Strong market positionSustainable advantages
Well-diversified
Weak
Volatile/Poor
Questionable viabilityCompetitive disadvantages
Concentrated risk
A.M. Best has regularly produced impairment studies of its ratings
Impairment rates consistently increase with time & rating degradation:– A superior rated (A++ or A+) insurer has a
one-year impairment rate of about 0.06%– At the next lower rating level (A and A-),
this rate increases by nearly 3.5 times– Vulnerable category has a default rate of
more than 15 times that of a secured rating
Best’s Ratings Are Predictive
A.M. Best FSR Default StudyCumulative Average Default Rate By Year
Based on 1977-2005 Data
A rating of C/C- has a 21% probability of default within six years and
approximately 40% within 15 years.
WHY INSURERS FAIL…
RAPID GROWTH
INSUFFIENT LOSS RESERVES
PRICE INADEQUACY
Source: Canadian Underwriter, “Why Insurers Fail”; D. Leadbetter et al., pg 38-41, June 2009
Data Deficiency and Poor
Information-Management
Practices
PRICING CHALLENGES
Pricing Challenges
in New Markets
Pricing Under Duress
Disruption of Link Between Pricing and Expected
Claims Costs
INSURANCE PRICING
Source: Canadian Underwriter, “Why Insurers Fail”; D. Leadbetter et al., pg 38-41, June 2009
CLIENT EXPOSURE
INSOLVENCY…
Short Rate RP
CancellationMid Term
New Policy Insurance
Cost
Runoff or Insolvent
Insurer Cover
PACICC Recovery Limited
Claims and IBNR
Source: Canadian Underwriter, “Why Insurers Fail”; D. Leadbetter et al., pg 38-41, June 2009
CO
VE
RA
GE
(in
mill
ion
s)
YEAR
$1
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$120
$130
1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
CASE STUDY: COVERAGE TIMELINE 1940-2005
EACH COLOUR REPRESENTS AN INSURER49 INSURANCE COMPANIES IN 65 YEARS
Source: Excess Liability Exposure: A View from Above, Seminar Presentation, R. Goldstein et al., April 18, 2009
CO
VE
RA
GE
(in
mill
ion
s)
$1
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$120
$130
YEAR
1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
CASE STUDY: COVERAGE TIMELINE 1940-2005
HOLES IN COVERAGE FROM INSOLVENCIES
Source: Excess Liability Exposure: A View from Above, Seminar Presentation, R. Goldstein et al., April 18, 2009
RISK MANAGER GUIDE TO INSURER REVIEW RATING
BROKERGUIDANCE
FACE
TIME
POLICY
SURPLUS
HOLDER
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
PEER
DISCUSSION
AGENCIES
CLAIMSHANDLING &RESERVING
INSURER CORE COMPETENCIES
RISK
APPETITEUNDERWRITI
NGCAPACITY
EMPLOYEES
COMMUNICATIONS
ACCESS TO
LEADERSHIP
Chartis is a world leading property-casualty and general insurance organization serving more than 40 million clients in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. With a 90-year history, one of the industry most extensive ranges of products and services, deep claims expertise and excellent financial strength, Chartis enables its commercial and personal insurance clients alike to manage virtually any risk with confidence.
Chartis is the marketing name for the worldwide property-casualty and general insurance operations of Chartis Inc. For additional information, please visit our website at www.chartisinsurance.com.
www.marsh.ca www.marsh.com
Insurer SolvencyBroker Perspective
September 14, 2009
Brian McAskillManaging DirectorMarsh Canada Limited
CONFERENCE
37
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
AgendaInsurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Risk Management Concerns
Regulatory Environment
Broker Role
Insurer Transparency
38
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Risk Manager ConcernsInsurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
How concerned are you currently about the level of risk associated with insurers?
Financial Institutions Communications, Media, Technology
Retail, Consumer Brands
Very Concerned 7% 15% 6%
Fairly Concerned 26% 17% 28%
What steps are you taking to manage the risks associated with your insurers?
ActionFinancial Institutions Communications,
Media, TechnologyRetail, Consumer Brands
Look at their rating 21% 7% 14%
Comparing Insurance Companies/Benchmarking
13% 17% 7%
39
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Risk Manager Concerns (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Key steps risk managers are taking to manage the level of risk with their insurers– Understand the insurer’s corporate legal organization structure
Branch or subsidiary – Meet with their insurers – Review insurer ratings and utilize broker expertise in interpreting
confusing and conflicting data– Spread their risk across more insurers– Buy Side A - Difference in Conditions (DIC) – drops down in event
of insurer insolvency– Benchmark insurers– Determine your minimum acceptable rating and have a
contingency plan in place if an insurer is downgraded below that level
– Negotiate prorated return premium - for credit rating changes
40
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Risk Manager Concerns (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
What is affecting client perceptions and what drives actual change in relationships?
1. Concerns about solvency
2. Price and coverage enhancements or restrictions
3. Poor claims payment practice historically
4. Debt covenants that require a certain minimum rating (e.g. real estate industry)
5. Concentration of risk (client side) and position in coverage towers
6. “CNN Factor”
7. Fanning of the flames by competitors
8. Lack of direct personal connectivity
9. Increased claims frequency/severity caused change (insurer decision)
41
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Risk Manager Concerns (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Questions being asked include– “Will there be an insurer to pay my claims?”– “Have they changed their reserving practices?”– “Have they changed their claims philosophy?”– Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) – “In case of insurer failure,
how is IBNR treated?” Those claims on file and reported prior to the declared insolvency are
admitted if proof of loss has been provided Pure IBNR – Normally courts provide a date for clients to replace
coverage and allow the ability to report losses to that date IBNR would be picked up in the new policy through the
claims-made provisions Otherwise, IBNR issues simply off the table and there is no recourse
after the court declared policy replacement date
42
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Risk Manager Concerns (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Also clients are– Assessing where insurers sit on certain layers– Challenging structures by line of coverage
As are some insurers – excess (XS) players following primaries
– Directors and officers (D&O) and long-tail business Increased interest and concern at board level Need for pro-active communication of accurate information by
risk managers
– Concerned about employee turnover at insurer, movement of underwriters, and succession planning, for example D&O underwriting teams have moved in the United States Canada has done a better job keeping personnel
– Canadian Underwriter, August 2009 article - Phoenix Rising
43
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Regulatory EnvironmentInsurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) and provincial regulators are responsible for regulation to
– Provide confidence in regulating the insurance companies– Supervise and regulate financial institutions– Determine the institution is in sound financial condition– Regular meetings with insurers to discuss results– Promptly advise the board of a financial institution of any concerns
they have– Work with financial institutions to correct
44
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Regulatory Environment (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
During the recent economic and insurer crisis – OSFI was silent during insurer crisis period– OSFI Web site – standard summary financial data – but extremely limited
amount of information– Clients/brokers rely on public information – good in the U.S., but not much
financial information is available in Canada that is public or readily accessible
– Brokers/clients had to seek financial information and clarification from insurers
– Events took place in an untimely fashion and required financial analysts to interpret
Why this matters– To provide risk assessment and timely intervention help to safeguard the
policyholders– Allows brokers to act as a liaison and be proactive to ensure findings are
appropriately communicated to our clients– Presents objective information about insurer
45
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Regulatory Environment (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
INSURANCE COMPANIES ACT
PART XV - REGULATION OF COMPANIES, SOCIETIES, FOREIGN COMPANIES AND PROVINCIAL COMPANIES — SUPERINTENDENT
Confidential information672. (1) Subject to section 673, all information regarding the business or affairs of a company,
society, foreign company or provincial company, or regarding a person dealing with any of them, that is obtained by the Superintendent, or by any person acting under the direction of the Superintendent, as a result of the administration or enforcement of any Act of Parliament, and all information prepared from that information, is confidential and shall be treated accordingly.
Disclosure by Superintendent673. (1) The Superintendent shall disclose, at such times and in such manner as the Minister may
determine, such information obtained by the Superintendent under this Act as the Minister considers ought to be disclosed for the purposes of the analysis of the financial condition of a company, society, foreign company or provincial company …
Disclosure by a company, etc.673.1 (1) A company, society, foreign company or provincial company shall make available to the public
such information concerning (a) the compensation of its executives, as that expression is defined by the regulations, and(b) its business and affairs for the purposes of the analysis of its financial condition,
in such form and manner and at such times as may be required by or pursuant to such regulations as the Governor in Council may make for the purpose.
[Source: Insurance Companies Act (1991, c. 47), Department of Justice Canada, Act current to August 12th, 2009]
46
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Regulatory Environment (continued) Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Opportunities
1. Provide more information in communications by identifying the actions they are taking, for example– Report more frequently as "Topic is under review" or "We have
reviewed the information as at such and such date or time“
2. Consider creating practices – externally, for example– If there is an "amber alert" policy internally, state that and create
appropriate communication plans to respond to these alert levels
3. Allow for increased transparency in the information that is publicly available
47
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Broker RoleInsurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Articulate what the risk management community is expressing and doing
Provide clients information about insurers
Monitor developments in the industry globally
Set minimum financial guidelines for insurers by country and monitor key financial indicators
Meet with insurers to understand local market issues
Facilitate collaborative client and underwriter meetings
48
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Broker Role (continued)Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Education and Advisory– To present facts, not state opinion other than client advice– Provide security presentations and produce reports on major insurers– Determine if insurer meets guidelines and discuss with clients– Discuss insurer financial strength… not their credit rating
Insurers under stress - Conduct market security group, one-to-one client meetings/calls as well as open client calls
Provide insurer security tools to allow clients to monitor their insurance program and changes in ratings including explanations for those changes
49
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Insurer TransparencyInsurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
1. Provide enhanced transparency/disclosure of your financial performance– Make full P&C1 and P&C2’s available on request– How are you raising capital?– Why the change in capital?– What is the quality and detail of the investments?
2. Focus on the claims process – To provide consistency– Expedite settlements– Help brokers and our clients understand the development of your
claims reserving– Be prepared to discuss various reinsurance arrangements by placement
3. “Inadequate pricing of insurance is by far the most persuasive solvency risk factor” (Canadian Underwriter, June 2009)
50
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
Insurer Transparency (continued)Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
4. Do not write products simply to improve the bottom line without strong expertise—particularly for non-traditional risks Be in it for the long term as ultimately it affects the client when you
discontinue sources of coverage
5. Get the right message out – soon– Address the “street issues” and understand that it exists– Verify your position through other means– Consider an anonymous survey asking “How do we stack up?”– Let us know that you are active this way– Be conscious of each other and control how your teams comment on
other insurers as they generally do not know the facts and can impact your reputation and that of others
– Remember that industry solvency is an overall visual Intra-insurer competitive strategies around solvency are damaging
51
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
In Conclusion Insurer Solvency – Broker Perspective
Four things that we feel will support an insured's buying decision are– Information– Expertise– Transparency– Communication
52
Event_CRIMS20090914_InsurerSolvencyPanel.ppt
Marsh
DISCLAIMER
The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable, but we did not verify nor do we guarantee its accuracy. It should be understood to be general risk management and insurance information only. Marsh makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the financial condition, solvency, or application of policy wordings of insurers or reinsurers nor does Marsh make any representations or warranty that coverages may be placed on terms acceptable to you. The information contained in this presentation provides only a general overview of subjects covered, is not intended to be taken as advice regarding any individual situation, and should not be relied upon as such. Statements concerning tax and/or legal matters should be understood to be general observations based solely on our experience as risk consultants and insurance brokers and should not be relied upon as tax and/or legal advice, which we are not authorized to provide. Insureds should consult their own qualified insurance, tax and/or legal advisors regarding specific risk management and insurance coverage issues. Marsh assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage sustained in reliance of this presentation.
Marsh is part of the family of MMC companies, including Guy Carpenter, Mercer, the Oliver Wyman Group (including Lippincott and NERA Economic Consulting), and Kroll.
The materials, data and/or methodologies used in this presentation are proprietary to Marsh. This document or any portion of the information it contains may not be copied or reproduced in any form without the permission of Marsh Canada Limited, except that clients of any of the companies of MMC need not obtain such permission when using this report for their internal purposes, so long as this page is included with all such copies or reproductions.
Copyright 2009 Marsh Canada Limited. All rights reserved.
WelcomeWelcome
Presented by
Concurrent Session B3
Insurer Solvency
Monday, September 14, 2009
CONFERENCE