Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

15
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizatio nal Survival Kit Chapter Thirteen

description

Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit. Chapter Thirteen. After reading the material in this chapter, you should be able to:. LO13.1 Name five “soft” and four “hard” influence tactics and summarize Cialdini’s principles of influence and persuasion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

Page 1: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Influence, Power, and Politics: An

Organizational Survival Kit

Chapter Thirteen

Page 2: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-2

After reading the material in this chapter, you should be able to:

LO13.1 Name five “soft” and four “hard” influence tactics and summarize Cialdini’s principles of influence and persuasion.LO13.2 Identify and briefly describe French and Raven’s five bases of power.LO13.3 Define the term empowerment and explain how to make it succeed

Page 3: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-3

After reading the material in this chapter, you should be able to:

LO13.4 Define organizational politics and explain what triggers it, and specify the three levels of political action in organizations.LO13.5 Distinguish between favorable and

unfavorable impression management tactics.

LO13.6 Explain how to manage organizational politics.

Page 4: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-4

Three Influence Outcomes

1. Commitment substantial agreement followed by initiative

and persistence in pursuit of common goals

2. Compliance reluctant agreement requiring subsequent

prodding to satisfy minimum requirements

Page 5: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-5

Three Influence Outcomes

3. Resistance stalling, unproductive arguing, or outright

rejection

Page 6: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-6

Five Bases of Power

Reward power obtaining compliance by promising or granting

rewards.

Coercive power obtaining compliance through threatened or

actual punishment.

Legitimate power obtaining compliance through formal authority.

Page 7: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-7

Five Bases of Power

Expert power obtaining compliance through one’s knowledge

or information.

Referent power obtaining compliance through charisma or

personal attraction.

Page 8: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-8

The Evolution of Power

Page 9: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-9

Participative Management

Participative management process whereby employees play a direct role

in setting goals, making decisions, solving problems, and making changes in the organization

Page 10: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-10

Domain of Organizational Politics

Organizational politics intentional acts of influence to enhance or

protect the self-interests of individuals or groups

Page 11: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-11

Levels of Political Action in Organizations

Page 12: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-12

Commonly Used Political Tactics

Page 13: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-13

Impression Management

Impression management any attempt to control or manipulate the

images related to a person, organization, or ideas

Page 14: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-14

Apologies

Apologies form of trust repair where one acknowledges

an offense and often offers to make amends.

It is a widely held norm in the United States and other cultures (e.g., Japan) to apologize when one’s actions (or lack of action) cause harm to another, whether intentional or not.

Page 15: Influence, Power, and Politics: An Organizational Survival Kit

13-15

Purposes for Leader Apologies and Their Desired Outcomes