Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical...
Transcript of Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical...
![Page 1: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials
V olume 20 , Number 12 , December 2013 , Page 1214
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-013-0857-6
Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3
nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying
Majid Abdellahi1), Javad Heidari2), and Rahman Sabouhi2)
1) Materials Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad, Iran
2) Materials Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran
(Received: 14 May 2013; revised: 15 June 2013; accepted: 23 June 2013)
Abstract: An Al2O3-TiB2 nanocomposite was successfully synthesized by ball milling of Al, TiO2 and two B source
materials of B2O3 (system (1)) and H3BO3 (system (2)). Phase identification of the milled samples was examined by X-
ray diffraction. The morphology and microstructure of the milled powders were monitored by scanning electron microscopy
and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the formation of this composite was completed after 15 and 30 h
of milling time in systems (1) and (2), respectively. More milling energy was required for the formation of this composite
in system (2) due to the lubricant properties of H3BO3 and also its decomposition to HBO2 and B2O3 during milling. On
the basis of X-ray diffraction patterns and thermodynamic calculations, this composite was formed by highly exothermic
mechanically induced self-sustaining reactions (MSR) in both systems. The MSR mode took place around 9 h and 25 h of
milling in systems (1) and (2), respectively. At the end of milling (15 h for system (1) and 30 h for system (2)) the grain
size of about 35-50 nm was obtained in both systems.
Keywords: nanocomposites; powders; alumina; titanium diboride; mechanical alloying
1. IntroductionTitanium diboride (TiB2) has an attractive combina-
tion of good electrical and thermal conductivity, high hard-
ness, and inertness with the melting of nonferrous metals.
However, its applications are presently limited due to low
sinter ability and poor mechanical properties, such as flex-
ural strength and fracture toughness [1-4].
Addition of secondary phase, such as Al2O3 to
TiB2matrix, widely improves its sinter ability and mechan-
ical properties [2]. Accordingly, TiB2-Al2O3 nanocom-
posite is synthesized by several methods, such as self-
propagating high-temperature synthesis [5], pressureless
metal infiltration [6], exothermic dispersion [7], and me-
chanical alloying [8-9]. Mechanical alloying (MA) is a pow-
der technique that allows production of homogeneous ma-
terials from blended elemental powder mixtures. MA in-
volves repeated cold welding, fracturing, and rewelding of
powder particles in a high-energy ball mill. The transfer
of mechanical energy to the powder particles leads to the
introduction of strain into the powders through the gener-
ation of dislocations and other defects that act as fast dif-
fusion paths. In addition, refinement of particle and grain
sizes occurs, and consequently, the diffusion distances are
reduced. Furthermore, a slight rise in powder temperature
occurs during milling. This method is well known for fab-
rication of novel materials, such as nanocomposite [10-12].
Recently, TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite has been pro-
duced from a mixture of Al, B2O3, and TiO2 as raw mate-
rials via mechanical alloying [8]. In this research, the prod-
ucts were synthesized after 60 h of milling, while the ball to
powder weight ratio (BPR) and the rotational speed (RS)
of vials were 10:1 and 500 r/min, respectively. In another
research [9], this nanocomposite was synthesized from Al,
H3BO3, and TiO2 mixture in which the formation of prod-
ucts occurred after 1.5 h due to the high energy of milling
media (BPR = 20:1 and RS = 600 r/min). In the above-
mentioned researches, there is no report about the effect of
B source materials on the mechanism of synthesis reaction
of this composite. Furthermore, the events during milling
of the raw materials powder mixture were not completely
Corresponding author: Majid Abdellahi E-mail: [email protected]
c© University of Science and Technology Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
![Page 2: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
M. Abdellahi etal., Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite ... 1215
studied in mentioned researches.
The present research was focused on the synthesis of
TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite via mechanical alloying of Al,
B2O3 and TiO2 (system (1)) and Al, H3BO3 and TiO2
(system (2)). Effect of B source materials and milling time
were also investigated on the mechanism of synthesis reac-
tion of this composite.
2. ExperimentalTitanium dioxide (TiO2, Merck, 99%, 1-3 µm), alu-
minum (Al, Merck, 99%, 10-50 µm), boron oxide (B2O3,
Merck, 99.99% , 5-100 µm), and boric acid (H3BO3, Merck,
99.9%, 20-30 µm) were used as raw materials in two sys-
tems (1) and ( 2). The raw materials were mixed according
to reaction (1) and (2) for systems (1) and (2), respectively:
10Al + 3TiO2 + 3B2O3 = 3TiB2+ 5Al2O3, ΔH�298 =
–2725 kJ/mol (1)
10Al + 3TiO2 + 6H3BO3 = 3TiB2+ 5Al2O3 + 9H2O,
ΔH�298 = –2519 kJ/mol (2)
A high-energy planetary ball mill with two hardened
stainless steel vials was used for MA experiments. The
BPR of 10:1 and the main disk speed of 250 r/min were
used for both systems. Sampling was performed in various
intervals. The surface temperature of the vial was mea-
sured by a digital thermometer at different milling time
The morphology of milled powders was monitored us-
ing a Hitachi S4160 SEM operated at 15 kV and ZEISS EM
10C TEM operated at 100 kV. Phase identification of the
milled samples was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD)
with Cu Kα radiation at 30 kV and 25 mA. The mean
grain size and micro-strain were calculated on the basis of
Rietveld refinement method [13] by using of X’Pert high
score plus software (developed by PANalytical BV Com-
pany, Almelo, the Netherlands, and version 2.2b). In this
method, peak profile fitting, size broadening, and strain
broadening were calculated based on the following equa-
tions:
Gik= ΓC 0.50 /Hkπ[1 + C0X
2ik]−1 + (1 − γ)C0.5
1 /
H0.5kπ exp[–C1X
2ik],
Hk = (Utan2θ + V tanθ + W )0.5,
Di = (180/π) λ/(Wi − Wstd)0.5,
ηi=[(Ui – Ustd) – (Wi – Wstd)]0.5/
0.04[180/π](2ln2)0.5 ,
where Gik is the Pseudo-Voigt function, C0 = 2, C1 =
4×ln2, Hk is the full width at half maximum of the
Kth brag reflection, Γ is the shape parameter, Xik = (2θi –
2θk)/Hk, Di, ηi, λ, U and W are the grain size function,
strain function, wavelength, strain parameter, and size pa-
rameter of the peak profile, respectively. In the size and
strain functions, i and std are referred to analyzed and
standard samples, correspondingly. In this project, pure
TiB2 and Al2O3 that annealed at 1500◦C for 15 h were
used as standard materials for deconvolution of instrumen-
tal broadening.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Thermodynamic calculations and routeof reactions
Thermodynamic calculation, based on thermody-
namic databases, reveals that reactions (1) and (2) take
place in two and three steps, respectively. For reaction
(1), in the first step, the aluminothermy reduction reac-
tions (3) and (4) take place to form Al2O3, elemental Ti
and B:
4Al + 3TiO2 = 2Al2O3 + 3Ti, ΔG�298 = –500 kJ/mol,
ΔH�298 = –520 kJ/mol (3)
2Al + B2O3 = Al2O3 + 2B, ΔG�298 = –417 kJ/mol,
ΔH�298= –403 kJ/mol (4)
In the second step, released heat from the above re-
actions provides the activation energy for the formation of
TiB2:
Ti + 2B = TiB2, ΔG�298 = –319 kJ/mol, ΔH�
298= –342
kJ/mol (5)
The negative Gibbs free energies of the above reac-
tions confirm that these reactions are favorable at room
temperature during milling [14].
For reaction (2), before aluminothermy reduction and
in the first step, it is required for H3BO3 to decompose to
B2O3 and H2O as follows:
H3BO3= HBO2 + H2O, ΔH�298 = 50 kJ/mol, ΔG�
298 =
–45 kJ/mol (6)
2HBO2 = H2O + B2O3, ΔH�298 = 95 kJ/mol, ΔG�
298 =
–91 kJ/mol (7)
It was reported that mechanically induced self-
sustaining reactions (MSR) take place in highly exothermic
powder mixtures [15]. The MSR is ignited when the pow-
der reaches a well-defined critical state [15]. Once started,
the reaction propagates through the powder charge as a
combustion process. In combustion type reactions, there
is an induction milling time after which the reaction initi-
ates and proceeds at a high transformation rate, producing
a rapid rise in temperature, which can be detected by the
increased temperature at the wall of the mill vial [15-16]
or by XRD patterns with sampling in very small time in-
tervals. A reaction can perform in MSR mode, if ΔH/C,
the magnitude of reaction heat to the room temperature
heat capacity of the products, is higher than about 2000
K [15]. This parameter for reactions (1) and (2) is 5000 K
and 4620 K, respectively. Therefore, these reactions will
take place in MSR mode.
![Page 3: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1216 Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., V ol. 20 , No. 12 , Dec. 2013
Reactions (6) and (7) show that in system (2), about
150 kJ/mol energy must be provided for decomposition of
boric acid to boron oxide. This energy is obtained from two
sources: released heat of reactions (3) and milling media.
It was reported that 2 GPa pressure is required for decom-
position of H3BO3 to B2O3 [17], whereas during milling, 6
GPa pressure is produced [18]. It means that some of the
milling energy in this system is consumed for this event,
and therefore, this system needs more milling time for the
formation of products in comparison with system (2).
3.2. Phase analysis and structural featuresFig. 1 depicts the XRD patterns of the milled powders
in system (1). There is no change in the reflections of start-
ing materials up to 9 h of milling except peak broadening,
which is attributed to crystallite size refinement. By in-
creasing the milling time to 15 h, all peaks of the initial
powder mixture (Al, B2O3, and TiO2) disappeared. On
the other hand, Al2O3 and TiB2 were formed in the range
of 9-15 h of milling.
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Al, B2O3 and TiO2 milled
powders in system (1).
Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the milled powders
related to system (2). The formation of Al2O3 and TiB2
was delayed to 30 h of milling. As discussed, some of the
milling energy in system (2) was consumed for boric acid
transformation to boron oxide. By increasing the milling
time, the required energy was provided and ignition took
Fig. 2. XRD patterns of Al, H3BO3 and TiO2 milled
powders in system (2).
place in the range of 25-30 h of milling caused the forma-
tion of products.
It is well known that boric acid is a layered mate-
rial with a triclinic crystal structure [19], as shown in
Fig. 3. The unique structure of boric acid is similar to
that of graphite that acts as a lubricant [19]. This prop-
erty leads to the delay in the fracture of raw materials
in first hours of milling in system (2). By increasing the
milling time and the formation of metaboric acid (HBO2),
the lubricant property is deactivated in system (2). Fur-
ther milling time leads to the decomposition of metaboric
acid to boron oxide (B2O3). This boron oxide is known as
the glass-like B2O3 [20] and has larger hardness in com-
parison with boron oxide that was spent as raw material
in system (1)[20]. It means that the lubricant property of
Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of the layered-triclinic
structure of boric acid [19].
![Page 4: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
M. Abdellahi etal., Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite ... 1217
boric acid and subsequently formation of glass-like B2O3
in system (2) increase the required energy in system (2)
for the formation of products in comparison with system
(1).
The mean intensity of raw materials reflection (2θ =
45◦) versus milling time is shown in Fig. 4. One can ob-
serve there is no reaction in systems (1) and (2) up to 9
and 25 h milling, respectively. In other words, almost no
chemical interaction between raw materials occurred dur-
ing milling until the self-sustaining reaction. Trapp and
Kieback [21] mentioned that the volume fraction of phases
formed before ignition is very small for higher enthalpy
formation and rapidly approaches 100% for ΔH298 < 5
kJ·cm−3, i.e., the reaction will then be gradual (Fig. 5).
Calculations on systems (1) and (2) based on reactions (1)
and (2) showed that the value of ΔH298 is higher than 100
kJ·cm−3. Therefore, it can be concluded that in the first
stage of milling, the volume fraction of phases formed is
near zero, and the intensity decreasing of raw materials is
attributed to peak broadening and grain size decreasing.
Therefore, it can be argued that the grain size of starting
materials decreases gradually and has approximately same
size up to 9 h and 25 h of milling in system (1) and (2), re-
spectively. With further milling (9-15 h for system (1) and
25-30 h for system (2)), the intensity suddenly decreases
due to the consumption of starting materials in reactions
(1) and (2).
Fig. 4. Mean intensities of raw material peaks in sys-
tems (1) and (2) versus milling time.
For system (1), it was estimated that ignition occurred
between 9-15 h because raw materials peaks were com-
pletely disappeared in this stage of milling. More milling
experiments were performed in this range of milling (Fig.
6). The products were formed after 10 h of milling, while
the small peak of TiO2 was still observable. It means that
reaction (1) took place in MSR mode, but it was not com-
pletely performed after ignition. Incomplete propagation
of reaction (1) by MSR mode can be explained as this:
heating loss of the powders to the milling media and gas at-
mosphere, insufficient mixing of the reactants before com-
bustion, formation of the oxide layer on the Al powders,
and even a little amount of impurity in the reactants.
Fig. 5. Volume fraction of phases formed until ignition
versus the enthalpy of phase formation.
Fig. 6. XRD patterns of the milled powders in the
range of 9-12 h.
As can be seen in Fig. 6, the Al peak was disappeared
after 10 h, and it was appeared again after 12 h of milling.
It seems that incomplete reaction and heat releasing led to
the diffusion of unreacted Al to the lattice of alumina and
titanium diboride. Since reaction (1) is not completely per-
formed, the milled powders are not stable thermodynam-
ically. By increasing the milling time (12 h), the system
tends to reduce its internal energy and reach to a stable
![Page 5: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1218 Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., V ol. 20 , No. 12 , Dec. 2013
condition. Therefore, the unreacted Al diffuses out to re-
act with TiO2 and B2O3 to form more thermodynamically
stable phases. The entire remained Al was consumed after
15 h of milling.
On the other hand, in system (2), ignition occurred
between 25-30 h of milling. Here, it is estimated that the
previous events have occurred. Fig. 7 shows the product
peaks at 10 h and 30 h of milling for systems (1) and (2),
respectively. One can observe that the intensity peaks in
system (1) are more than those in system (2) because more
heat is released from MSR mode in system (1). In other
words, heat released from reaction (1) is more than that
in reaction (2), leading to the formation of larger grains in
Fig. 7. Comparison of heat released from MSR mode
in both systems.
Fig. 8. Changes of vial temperature during milling of
the powder mixture in both systems.
system (1) and, hence, more intensity peaks. To confirm
this, the temperature of vials was measured during milling
of the powder mixture, which is shown in Fig. 8. Clearly,
the vial temperature shows a sudden increase, suggesting
that exothermic combustion has occurred after 9 and 25
h of milling in systems (1) and (2), respectively. As we
expected, the vial temperature in system (2) is lower than
that in system (1) because of the more milling energy con-
sumption in system (2).
3.3. Morphology and MicrostructureFigs. 9 and 10 show that the morphology of powder
Fig. 9. SEM micrographs of the milled powders in sys-
tem (1): (a) 3 h, (b) 9 h, and (c) 30 h.
![Page 6: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
M. Abdellahi etal., Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite ... 1219
particles after different milling time is related to systems
(1) and (2), respectively. The agglomeration can be seen
in both systems at 3 h of milling (Figs. 9(a) and 10(a)),
and it is likely because of the ductility of aluminum. This
property gives way to the diffusion of TiO2 and B2O3 pow-
der particles through the ductile aluminum and hence the
agglomerates form. In addition, due to the increase of
temperature during the first few hours of milling, the ther-
mally controlled dynamic recovery is dominant. This leads
Fig. 10. SEM micrographs of the milled powders in
system (2): (a) 3 h, (b) 9 h, and (c) 10 h.
to the fact that fracturing is prevented because of the an-
nihilation of generated dislocation during the deformation.
On the other hand, since the milling energy in system (2) is
less than one in system (1), this system has larger agglom-
erates compared to system (1) at 3 h of milling (Figs. 9(a)
and 10(a)). In fact, a higher energy leads to a more work
hardening and fracturing of agglomerates. By increasing
the milling time to 9 h, work hardening of the milled pow-
ders leads to the decrease in particles size (Figs. 9(b) and
10(b)). As can be seen in Figs. 9(c) and 10(c), after the
products formed by MSR mode, the released heat led to
the reagglomeration of the powder particles.
Table 1 shows the mean grain size of the milled pow-
ders for both systems. In the same condition of milling,
the mean grain size of the milled powders in system (2) is
larger than that in system (1). This difference is due to the
more milling energy consumption for the transformation of
acid boric to boron oxide. On the other hand, in system
(1), the whole of milling energy in the first stage of milling
(0-9 h) was consumed for microstructural refinement, such
as grain size decrease. Based on the values in Table 1, it
is concluded that immediately after the formation of prod-
ucts, the crystallite size is increased in both systems. This
is due to the heat released by the ignition of reactions (1)
and (2), which leads to grain growth during milling. In
general, in both systems, the longer the milling time is,
the smaller the mean grain size is. It means that in both
systems, nanostructure powders with the mean grain size
less than 50 nm were obtained at the end of milling.
A bright-field TEM image for the 15 h milled prod-
uct in system (1) is shown in Fig. 11. There are very fine
grains less than 50 nm in this figure, which is consistent
with Reitveld analysis results. In the image, TiB2 appears
as the dark phase and Al2O3 as the bright phase.
4. ConclusionsAn Al2O3-TiB2 nanocomposite was successfully syn-
thesized with two mixtures of starting materials. This com-
Table 1. Mean grain size of both systems in various
milling time nm
System Milling time / h TiO2 B2O3 Al Al2O3 TiB2
System (1)
3 46 41 62 — —
6 40 35 51 — —
9 34 28 37 — —
10 — — — 54 49
15 — — — 46 40
25 — — — 38 37
30 — — — 23 35
System (2)
3 53 51 69 — —
6 47 41 54 — —
9 39 34 39 — —
10 35 29 32 — —
15 — — — — —
25 30 27 29 — —
30 — — — 44 40
![Page 7: Influence of B source materials on the synthesis of TiB2-Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022020212/5750967e1a28abbf6bcb1a2d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1220 Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., V ol. 20 , No. 12 , Dec. 2013
Fig. 11. TEM bright field image of the 15 h milled
product in system (1).
posite was formed after 15 and 30 h in system (1) (B2O3
source) and system (2) (H3BO3 source), respectively. In
system (2), a more milling energy was required for the
formation of this composite because of transformation of
boric acid to boron oxide. SEM results confirmed that at
the beginning of milling, the size of agglomerates in sys-
tem (2) is larger than that in system (1). Furthermore,
particle adhesion was seen when the products were formed
due to MSR mode. The vial temperature shows a sud-
den increase, suggesting that exothermic combustion has
occurred after 9 and 25 h of milling in systems (1) and
(2), respectively. As we expected, the vial temperature
for system (2) is less than that for system (1) because of
a more energy consumption in system (2). In both sys-
tems, nanostructure powders with the mean grain size less
than 50 nm were obtained at the end of milling, which is
consistent with the TEM image.
References
[1] H.H. Hausner, Titanium Metallurgy in Modern Materi-
als Advances in Development and Application, Academic
Press, New York, 2(1960), p. 225.
[2] G.X. Liu, D.M. Yan, and J.Y. Zhang, Microstructure
and mechanical properties of TiB2-Al2O3 composites, J.
Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed., 26(2011), No. 4,
p. 696.
[3] Y.H. Koh, S.L. Yong, and H.E. Kim, Oxidation behavior of
titanium boride at elevated temperatures, J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 84(2001), No. 1, p. 239.
[4] L.H. Li, H.E. Kim and E.S. Kang, Sintering and mechani-
cal properties of titanium diboride with aluminum nitride
as a sintering aid, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 22(2002), No. 6,
p. 973.
[5] M.A. Meyers, E.A. Olevsky, J. Ma, and M. Jamet, Com-
bustion synthesis/densification of an Al2O3-TiB2 compos-
ite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 311(2001), No. 1-2, p. 83
[6] A.G. Merzhanov, History and recent developments in SHS,
Ceram. Int., 21(1995), No. 5, p. 371.
[7] H.G. Zhu, H.Z.Wang, L.Q. Ge, S. Chen, and S.Q. Wu, For-
mation of composites fabricated by exothermic dispersion
reaction in Al, TiO2, B2O3 system, Trans. Nonferrous
Met. Soc. China, 17(2007), No. 3, p. 590.
[8] M.A. Khaghani-Dehaghani, R. Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi, N.
Setoudeh, and B. Nasiri-Tabrizi, Mechanochemical synthe-
sis of Al2O3-TiB2nanocomposite powder from Al, TiO2,
H3BO3 mixture, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater.,
29(2011), No. 2, p. 244.
[9] E. Mohammad Sharifi, F. Karimzadeh, and M.H. Enayati,
Synthesis of titanium diboride reinforced alumina matrix
nanocomposite by mechanochemical reaction of Al, TiO2,
B2O3, J. Alloys Compd., 502(2010), No. 2, p. 508.
[10] C. Suryanarayana, E. Ivanov, and V.V. Boldyrev, The sci-
ence and technology of mechanical alloying, Mater. Sci.
Eng. A, 304(2001), p. 151.
[11] C. Surianarayana, Recent developments in mechanical al-
loying, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 18(2008), No. 1, p. 203.
[12] T.P. Yadav, R.M. Yadav, and D.P. Singh, Mechanical
milling: a top down approach for the synthesis of nano-
materials and nanocomposites, Nanosci. Nanotechnol.,
2(2012), No. 3, p. 22.
[13] H.M. Rietveld, A profile refinement method for nuclear and
magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2(1969), p. 65.
[14] E.A. Brandes and G.B. Brook, Smithells Metals Reference
Book. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., London, 1992, p. 87.
[15] L. Takacs, Self-sustaining reactions induced by ball milling,
Prog. Mater. Sci., 47 (2002), No. 4, p. 355.
[16] L. Takacs, P. Balaz, and A.R. Torosyan, Ball milling-
induced reduction of MoS2 with Al, J. Mater. Sci.,
41(2006), No. 21, p. 7033.
[17] A.Y. Kuznetsov, A.S. Pereira, A.A. Shiryaev, J. Haines, L.
Dubrovinsky, V. Dmitriev, P. Pattison, and N. Guignot,
Structural changes and pressure-induced chemical decom-
position of boric acid, J. Phys. Chem. B., 110(2006), No.
28, p. 13858.
[18] C. Suryanarayana, Mechanical alloying and milling, Prog.
Mater. Sci., 46(2001), No. 1-2, p. 1.
[19] L. Yan, R.S. Ruoff, and R. Chang, Boric acid nanotubes,
nanotips, nanorods, microtubes and microtips, Chem.
Mater., 15(2003), No. 17, p. 3276.
[20] V.A. Mukhanov, O.O. Kurakevich, and V.L. Solozhenko,
On the hardness of boron (III) oxide, J. Superhard Mater.,
30(2008), No. 1, p. 71.
[21] J. Trapp and B. Kieback, Solid-state reactions during high-
energy milling of mixed powders, Acta Mater., 61(2013),
No. 1, p. 310.