Individualized System of Support for Afterschool Programs (ISS-AP)
24
Individualized System of Support for Afterschool Programs (ISS-AP) September 20, 2012 Fairlee, Vermont
description
September 20, 2012 Fairlee, Vermont. Individualized System of Support for Afterschool Programs (ISS-AP). Who’s in the room . . . . Directors & New Directors. Site Coordinators. Program Staff. Who’s in the room . . . . VCAE Team Holly Morehouse Director - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Individualized System of Support for Afterschool Programs (ISS-AP)
Individualized System of Support for Afterschool Programs (ISS-AP)
September 20, 2012Fairlee, Vermont
Who’s in the room . . . •Directors & New Directors•Site Coordinators•Program Staff
Who’s in the room . . . VCAE TeamHolly Morehouse Director
Karen Scott Project Manager for Quality
Tracy Truzansky Project Manager for Training
Erin Ruitenberg Project Assistant for Membership & Development
Cassie Willner Project Assistant for Communications & Partnerships
Who’s in the room . . . ISS-AP Coaches & MentorsKaren Scott Afterschool EssentialsTami Stagner New DirectorsHolly Morehouse YPQITricia Pawlik & Julie PetersonBetsy Stacey YPQI – Middle SchoolLuke Stafford &Christine Graham
YPQI – Elementary
Sustainability
Individualized System of Support for
Afterschool Programs
Agenda9:00 – 9:15 am Welcome
9:30 – 11:45 pm ISS-AP Training – Part I
12:00 – 12:45 pm Lunch(Middle School round table)
1:00 – 1:45 pm Statewide Announcements
2:00 – 3:45 pm ISS-AP Training – Part II
Date: Friday, October 26thLocation: Stoweflake Mountain Resort, StoweEarly-bird special - $25 off until October 1st
Date: October 18th
Goals: 1) Double the number of registered programs!2) Sen. Sanders visiting programs
21C Statewide Evaluation
• Five year evaluation plan
• 2008-09 and 2009-10 – Baseline data
• 2010-11 and 2011-12 – Clear areas of strength and areas in need of attention noted
21C Statewide Evaluation
Three Goal Areas:
1) Serving the neediest students
2) High quality, intentionally designed programs
3) State level support for programs
21C Statewide Evaluation
Serving the Neediest StudentsStrength: Growth in the number of students served
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
21C Participants (school-year and summer)
11,377 13,209 14,638 15,550
21C Regular Attendees
4,290 4,954 5,621 6,176
21C Low-income Regular Attendees(based upon F&R lunch status)
2,324 2,752 3,087 3,352
21C Statewide Evaluation
Serving the Neediest StudentsNeeds Attention:• 43% of sites do not meet target around regular
attendees
• 54% of sites do not meet target for high-risk regular attendees
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
21C Statewide Evaluation
Total 21C Participants - 100
Total Regular Attendees – 6060%
Total F&R Regular
Attendees – 3558%
School F&R Lunch Rate:
45%
21C Statewide Evaluation
Sufficient DosageStrength: • Increase in the number of programs that offer
programming at least 32 weeks per year
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
Needs Attention: • Number of programs operating 5 days per week and
14 hours per week
21C Statewide Evaluation
54%51%
55%61%
50%55% 55%
49%
28% 30% 32% 30%
% of Programs Meeting TargetsTotal Wks./ Yr. > or = 32
Total Days/ Wk. > or = 5
Total Hrs./ Wk. > or = 14
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
21C Statewide Evaluation
Summer ProgrammingStrength:• Increase in number of summer programs• Days per week and hours per week meet targets
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
Needs Attention:• 36% of projects do not offer summer programming• No. of weeks summer programming is offered is low
21C Statewide Evaluation
45%40% 39% 40%
83%76%
84% 84%
62%56%
68% 70%
% of Programs Meeting TargetsTotal Wks./ Yr. > or = 5
Total Days/ Wk. > or = 5
Total Hrs./ Wk. > or = 21
2008-09 2011-122010-112009-10
21C Statewide Evaluation
Program Leadership/ Qualified StaffStrength:• High level of expertise among directors and site
coordinators
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
Needs Attention:• Only 50% of sites meet target around having 1/3
licensed teachers as staff
21C Statewide Evaluation
Community PartnersStrength:• One-half of Vermont’s programs meet the target of
having two or more community partnerships.
Highlights from the 2011-12 Report:
Needs Attention:• National average is six community partners.
21C Statewide Evaluation
Action Items for 2012-13:1) Build up regular attendees, focus on high-risk students2) Add summer programming to all projects and increase the number of weeks offered3) Increase the percent of teachers working in
programs4) Build new community partnerships
21C Statewide Evaluation
Questions:
•Do you see trends that can be explained through programming changes?
•What could you do this year to impact the areas in need of attention?
And review for errors!
21C Statewide Evaluation
Where to go from here . . . .
•Evaluation Technical Assistance
•VTDOE Evaluation Workshop Series
Vermont Center for Afterschool Excellence
Holly [email protected]
Lynne [email protected]
www.vermontafterschool.org
