INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

21
Implementing the Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter INCOSE Washington Metro Area 11 May 2010 presented by Lesley Painchaud

Transcript of INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

Page 1: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

Implementing the Net-Ready Key

Performance Parameter

INCOSE

Washington Metro Area

11 May 2010

presented byLesley Painchaud

Page 2: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

2

Briefing Purpose

Provide an overview of the Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) Implementation Guidebook Background Approach Refined NR-KPP Compliance Statement 4-Step Process

Page 3: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

3

NR-KPP Implementation Guidebook Background

Developed by Office of the Asst Secretary of the Navy (ASN) for

Research, Development and Acquisition (RDA) Chief System Engineer (CHSENG), Oct 2009

Goal Clarify the NR-KPP in measurable-testable terms

Result Four-Step Process that Programs can use to meet

Interoperability & Supportability Requirements

Page 4: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

4

Decomposition of the Compliance Statement

Net-Ready Description

Potential Net-Ready Compliance Measures

Potential Net-Ready Effectiveness and Operational Performance Measures

An Interoperable System Must Address All 3 Components

Program offices typically focus here. Simply completing these elements DOES NOT ensure the KPP will be met.

Page 5: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

5

Overview of the Refined Compliance Statement

Current NR-KPPCompliance Statement

Refined NR-KPP Compliance Statement

Refinement Explicitly Highlights Effectiveness and Performance Measures

Clarification of Measures

Clarification of Measures

Clarification of Measures

Page 6: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

6

NR-KPP Guidebook 4-Step Implementation Approach

1. Mission Analysis NR-KPP operational requirements Mission threads and operational activities a system supports Associated effectiveness and operational performance measures

2. Information Analysis information requirements Information exchanges and associated operational performance

measures

3. Systems Engineering Process applied to NR-KPP operational and information requirements

Results in measurable and testable design and system solution Compliance measures are process constraints

4. Document outcomes of the SE process according to engineering practices and compliance measures

Architectures, Specifications, Traceability matrices, Test Procedures, etc.

Mission and Information Analyses Needed to CompletelySpecify A System’s Operational Requirements

Page 7: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

7

Drawing Out Effectiveness, Performance, and Compliance Measures

SystemsEngineering

ComplianceMeasures*

Performance Measures**- Operational Performance Measures for network entry and management- Operational Performance Measures for information element production and consumption

MissionAnalysis

Support Net CentricMilitary Operations*

Support OperationalActivities*

InformationAnalysis

Enter and Be ManagedIn the Network*

Exchange Information*

Support InformationExchanges*

Documentation* Elements from current NR-KPP Compliance Statement** Elements from refined NR-KPP Compliance Statement in ASN (RDA) CHSENG’s NR-KPP Guidebook

Inputs

Inputs

Out

com

es

Inputs

Inputs

Out

com

es

Con

stra

ints

Outcomes

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Effectiveness and Performance Measures**- Effectiveness Measures for each mission- Operational Performance Measures for each task

NR-KPP Description**- Missions supported by the system- Operational tasks for the mission

NR-KPP Description**- Networks required for the mission- Information elements produced for or consumed by each operational task

AV-1OV-1OV-4OV-5

OV-6c

OV-2OV-3OV-7

SV-1SV-2

SV-4aSV-5a

SV-6/10cSV-7

SV-11

Page 8: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

8

Refined Compliance Statement

Net-Ready Description

Net-Ready Compliance Measures

Net-Ready Effectiveness and Operational Performance Measures

Page 9: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

9

Summary

The NR-KPP Guidebook developed by ASN (RDA) CHSENG proposes a 4-Step process to clarify the NR-KPP in measurable and testable terms, refine the NR-KPP Compliance Statement and incorporate the requirements into system design

Mission Analysis

Information Analysis

SE Process

Documentation

Page 10: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

10

Questions?

Page 11: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

11

MissionAnalysis- JCIDS documentation

- ROC/POE- JMETLs and NMETLs- OPLANs, CONPLANs- DPS

Inputs- Missions supported by

the system- Mission effectiveness

measures- Operational tasks for the

mission- Operational performance

measures for each task

Outputs

- Missions and operationaltasks described in termsthe Fleet uses

- Measurable and testablemetrics

ConstraintsStep 1. Mission Analysis

Page 12: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

12

Step 1. Mission Analysis

*Slide from NMETL Program Executive Training, by David Brown, USFF N721B

Operational Performance measures are needed for each mission thread activity

Effectiveness measures are needed for each mission thread

Systems Engineering Requires Performance And Effectiveness Measures

Page 13: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

13

Sample Mission and Associated Effectiveness Measure (From UJTL)

OP 6.1.5 Conduct Joint Operations Area (JOA) Missile Defense To identify and integrate joint and coalition forces supported by national and theater

capabilities to detect and destroy enemy theater missiles directed toward the JOA in flight or prior to launch. This task includes disrupting the enemy's theater missile operations through an appropriate mix of mutually supportive passive missile defense, active missile defense, attack operations, and supporting C4I measures. This task includes providing early warning of theater missile attack to the JOA as well as distribution of this warning to joint and multinational forces within the operational area. The term "theater missile" applies to ballistic missiles, air-to-surface missiles, and air-, land-, and sea-launched cruise missiles whose targets are within the joint force commander’s operational area. (JP 3-0, 3-01.1, 3-01.5, 3-10.1, 3-12, 3-56.1) (JP 3-01.1, 3-01.5, 3-10.1, 3-12.1, CJCSM 3500.05)

Effectiveness Measures Are Needed To Determine Mission Requirements

Page 14: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

14

Sample Operational Task and Associated Operational Performance Measure (From UJTL)

UJTL and UNTL provide a standardized list of tasks with sample measures

NTA 2.2.3.1.1 Provide Cueing. To provide cueing, early warning, or other initial data to

assist in detecting targets. (JP 2-0 Series, MCDP 2, MCWP 2-1, NDP 2, NWP 2-01, NWP 3-01 Series, NWP 3 13, NWP 3-15 Series, NWP 3-15.20 Series, NWP 3-21 Series, NWP 3.51.1)

Operational Performance Can Be Decomposed Into System Performance

Page 15: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

15

METL Contains Performance Measures

Performance Measure: Is the Measure for the Task/Activity Satisfied?

Page 16: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

16

InformationAnalysis- JCIDS documentation

- ROC/POE- JMETLs and NMETLs- OPLANs, CONPLANs- DPS- Outputs of Mission

Analysis

Inputs- Networks required for

the mission- Information elements

produced or consumedfor by each operationaltask

- Operational performancemetrics for network entryand management

- Operational performancemetrics for informationelement production andconsumption

Outputs

- Information Elementsdescribed in standardizedterms

ConstraintsStep 2. Information Analysis

Page 17: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

17

Step 2. Information Analysis

Information Requirements Can Be Produced In The Fleet’s Mission Analysis

*Figure from the Universal Naval Task List Version 3.0

Information exchanges and their performance measures are needed for each activity

Page 18: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

18

SystemsEngineering- Outputs from Mission

Analysis- Outputs from

Information Analysis

Inputs- System requirements

• Technical• IA• Supportability

- Net-ready system- Verification and

validation procedures

Outputs

- DOD EA- Data and Service Strategies- GTG and GESPs- IA Requirements- SupportabilityRequirements

ConstraintsStep 3. Systems Engineering

Page 19: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

19

Document- Outputs from Mission

Analysis- Outputs from

Information Analysis- Outputs from Systems

Engineering

Inputs- Operational requirements- System requirements- Traceability matrices- Verification and

validation procedures

Outputs

- DoDAF- Exposure Verificationtracking sheets

- GTG/GESP compliancematrices

ConstraintsStep 4. Document

Page 20: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

20

Documenting the SE Process DoDAF Operational Views (OV)

OV-1, OV-4

OV-2, OV-3

OV-6c, OV-5

Who are theplayers

What informationdo they exchange(Operational IERs)

What they do withthe information

Bin the information eachplayer needs into 3categories based on how they use the data:

• View the data• Publish the data• Process the data

Categories determine theservices, applications, and hardware required at eachplayer

Page 21: INCOSE WMA NR-KPP: May 11 2010

21

Documenting the SE ProcessDoDAF System Views (SV)

SV-4, SV-5

SV-1, SV-2

SV-6, SV-7

What systemfunctions supportthe mission thread

How are thesystems connected

How well do thesystems perform

Document the available systems and characterizethem in terms of:

• Relation to mission • Connections• Performance

Information can be used toinform systems engineeringactivities, build a systemspec, or to document thecapabilities of an existingsystem