Incoherent Scatter Radar Measurements of Ionospheric Modification by Chemical Releases
description
Transcript of Incoherent Scatter Radar Measurements of Ionospheric Modification by Chemical Releases
Incoherent Scatter Radar Measurements of Ionospheric Modification by Chemical Releases
Paul A. BernhardtPlasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory
Phil J. Erickson, Frank D. Lind, John C. FosterMillstone Hill Observatory, MIT Haystack Observatory, MA
Mike P. SulzerArecibo Observatory, Arecibo, Puerto Rico
E KudekiDept. of Elec. and Comp. Eng., UIUC, Urbana IL 61801
J. Chau, R. WoodmanJicamarca Radio Observatory, Jicamarca, Peru
Craig HeinselmanSRII, Menlo Park, CA
AMISR Science Planning Meeting, Asilomar, CA12 October 2006
ISR Diagnostics of Chemical Release Experiments in the Ionosphere
• Ionospheric Modification– High Power Radio Waves
• ISR Detection of Density Cavities and Irregularities• Enhanced Ion-Lines and Plasma-Lines in ISR Spectra
– Chemical Releases• Electron Attachment and O+ Charge Exchange
– ISR Detection of Heavy Ions with Modified Ion-Line Spectra– Non-Thermal Velocity Distributions from Supersonic Chemical
Injections (i.e., Space Shuttle Exhaust - SIMPLEX) » ISR Ion-Line Spectra» Scatter from Ion-Acoustic Turbulence
• Nano-Particle Injections (Charged Aerosol Release CARE)– Artificial Dusty Plasmas in the Upper Atmosphere– Radar Scatter from Charged Dust Turbulence– Echoes from Artificial Mesospheric Cloud
• Conclusions
HAARPHAARP
SIERRA SEE Detector Network
HAARPHAARP
SIERRA SEE Detector Network
HAARPHAARP
SIERRA SEE Detector Network
AMISR Support of Ionospheric Heating
MUIR/AMISR
HIPAS
POKER/AMISR
Radio/Radar Based Diagnostics Facilities for HF Ionospheric Modification
HAARP HF Transmitter, AK
Kodiak SuperDARN Radar
SIERRA Spectrum Monitor
AMISR UHF Radar (MUIR)
F-Region Ionosphere
HAARP Radar Backscatterand Enhanced Ion/Plasma Lines
SuperDARN HAARP Transmitter AMISR
1a 0 ROTSI
0 0 0 1b 0 R
R
1 0 IAR RPDI0 0 0
1 IAR R
2 0 IAR RPDI1 0 IAR R
2 IAR R
LW (ω , -2 )
EM (ω , 0) LW (ω , 2 )
Dens. Irreg. (0, 2k )
LW (ω ω , 2 )EM (ω , 0)
IA ( ω , 2 )
LW (ω 3ω , 2 )LW (ω ω , 2 )
IA ( 2ω , 4 )
k
k k
kk
k
kk
k
2 0 IAR RPDI2 0 IAR R
2 IAR R
LW (ω 5ω , 2 )LW (ω 3ω , 2 )
IA ( 2ω , 4 )
kk
k
Backscatter Radar Spectra (R,kR):Generation of HF (0) Pumped Plasma-Lines and Ion-Lines in
AMSIR Data
0 Time (S) 1
R
R+ 0
R - 0
Pump Wave
Electrostatic Waves
Electrostatic Waves
Shuttle Ionospheric Modification withPulsed Localized Exhaust (SIMPLEX)
• Objectives– Study Regions of Large Relative Neutral-Plasma Convection– Examine Hyper Sonic Ion-Beam Injections for Enhanced
Plasma Turbulence
• Method– Release Shuttle Exhaust in Orbit– Charge Exchange with Ambient O+ Ions– Detect Effects with Radar Scatter
• Observations– Non-Thermal Ion Line Spectra– Effects of Ion Ring Velocity Distribution– Scatter of Electrostatic Waves Produced by Instabilities
Incoherent Scatter Observations During SIMPLEX
• SIMPLEX I– Jicamarca Observations, 4 October 1997– Ionospheric Hole Formation and Re-Filling– Ambipolar Diffusion Theory Does NOT Match Observations
• SIMPLEX II– Arecibo Observations, 27 July 1999– Ion Beam Formation– Non-Thermal Ion-Line Spectra– Indirect Evidence of Low Hybrid Instabilities
• SIMPLEX III and IV– Millstone Hill Observations
• 16 December 1999
• 8 April 2002
– Ion Beam Formation– Strongly Non-Thermal Ion-Line Spectra– Evidence of Ion Acoustic Instability
SHUTTLE IONOSPHERIC MODIFICATION WITH PULSED LOCALIZED EXHAUST SIMPLEX
56° Inclination Limit to Space Shuttle Orbit
Space Shuttle OMS Engine Exhaust Parameters
Auroral Ionospheric Disturbances
Exhaust Species
Mole Fraction
CO 0.050
CO2 0.122
H2 0.241
H2O 0.274
N2 0.313
Single OMS Burn at NightSymmetrical
Dual OMS Burn in DaylightNonuniform
Dual OMS Burn
Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS)
Flow Rate: 2.5 x 1026 Molecules per Second per Engine
Technique: Radar Scatter from Plume Ion Beams in Rocket Exhausts
NOZZLENOZZLE
WATER VAPOR, HWATER VAPOR, H22OOMOLECULAR IONS, HMOLECULAR IONS, H22OO++
10 m 100 m 1000 m
IONOSPHERE (O+, e-)
EXPANSION-COOLING-CHARGE EXCHANGE
RADAR BEAM
FIELD ALIGNED BEAMSAND GYRO ORBITS
ION ACOUSTIC ANDLOWER HYBRID WAVES
Ion Beam Formation Through Exhaust Molecule Reactions with O+
ION-MOLECULE CHARGE EXCHANGE:
O+
+ H2O H2O+
+ O Rate Constant: k1
ION-ELECTRON RECOMBINATION:
H2O+
+ e- OH* + H Rate Constant: k2 = 6.5 x 10-7 [300/Te]
0.5 cm3/s
NET REACTION
O+
+ e- + H2O OH* + H + O .
SpeciesMole
FractionThermal Rate Constant k1
(cm3/s)
Thermal Rate Product Ion
Species (Fraction)
Orbital Speed Rate Constant
k1 (cm3/s)
Orbital Speed Product Ion Species
(Fraction)
CO 0.050 0.0 CO+ (0.00) 6.0 x 10-11 CO+ (0.00)
CO2 0.122 9.0 x 10-10 O2+ (0.10) 6.0 x 10-10 CO2
+ (0.06)
H2 0.241 1.7 x 10-9 OH+ (0.36) 1.7 x 10-9 OH+ (0.33)
H2O 0.274 2.3 x 10-9 H2O+ (0.55) 2.4 x 10-9 H2O
+ (0.53)
N2 0.313 1.0 x 10-12 NO+ (0.00) 3.0 x 10-10 NO+ (0.00)
SIMPLEX I 4 OCTOBER 1997 GMT OMS BURN
78 W 77 W 76 W
12 S
11 S
SIMPLEX IJicamarca Radar During STS-86 SIMPLEX Burn
West East
B
North
South
UNMODIFIED FLUX TUBES
MODIFIED FLUX TUBES
OMS BURN
RADAR BEAMS
Nor
mal
ized
Ele
ctro
n D
ensi
ty
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
East Radar Beam
Space Shuttle
JRO ISR, 4 October 1997, 20:32:15 GMT
West Radar Beam
Density Depression
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Time (minutes)
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
Alt
itu d
e (k
m)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
10 m/s Vertical Drift
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
dezilamroN
nortcelE
ytisneD
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
dezilamroN
nortcelE
ytisneD
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7 1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
Nor
mal
ized
Ele
ctro
n D
ensi
ty(a) West Radar Beam
(b) East Radar Beam
4 October 1997, 20:32:15 GMT, 350 km
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (minutes)
Shuttle Echo
Exponential Fit to Data
Diffusion Theory
SIMPLEX IISTS-93 Ion Beam Injection Experiment Arecibo Radar Observation Geometry
Relative-0.5 0.0 0.5 Longitude
0
.5
Re
lati
ve
L
ati
tud
e
Mag
netic F
ield L
ine
Dip
An
gle =
49o
Burn Start
Stop
Rad
ar B
eam
81.4
o Ele
vatio
n
AreciboObservatory
STS-93 Orbit 276 km Altitude
280 km Altitude
430 MHz Radar Spectra, 27 July 1999, 00 AST
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204955
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3205000
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3205005
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3205010
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204935
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204940
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204945
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204950
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204915
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204920
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204925
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204930
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204855
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204900
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204905
-10 -5 0 5 10240
260
280
300
3204910
320
300
280
260
240
320
300
280
260
240
320
300
280
260
240
320
300
280
260
240-10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10
Frequency Shift (kHz)
Alt
itud
e (k
m)
4855 4900 4905 4910
4915 4920 4925 4930
4935
4940
4945 4950
4955 5000
5005
5010 00.20.40.60.81
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.52.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Relative Backscatter
(a) (b) (c)
6.1376.0105.8845.7575.6315.5045.3785.2525.1254.9994.862
17421639153514321329122611231020917813710
1216114510741003932861790719648575505
310
300
290
280
270
49 50 51 52 53 49 50 51 52 5349 50 51 52 53
Alt
itu
de
(km
)
Fitted Electron Density
Fitted Ion Temperature
FittedElectron Temperature
Log10(ne)Ti (K) Te (K)
Time (Minutes) After 0500 UT
Electron Density
Reduction
Ion Heating
Modified Velocity
Distribution
Arecibo SIMPLEX II Experiment27 July 1999, Altitude 287.3 kmOMS Burn Termination at T0 = 05:49:11 UT
Tm= 1000 K, Vm = 0.93 km/s, Vm|| = -0.31 km/s
- 7.5 - 5 - 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10Normalized Offset Frequency
0.5
1
1.5
2
dezilamro
Nrettacskca
Bre
woP
Nor
mal
ized
Ba
cksc
atte
r P
ow
er
Unmodified
Modified
Offset Frequency (kHz)
Tm= 1000 K, Vm = 0.93 km/s, Vm|| = -0.31 km/s
- 7.5 - 5 - 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10Normalized Offset Frequency
0.5
1
1.5
2
dezilamro
Nrettacskca
Bre
woP
Nor
mal
ized
Ba
cksc
atte
r P
ow
er
Unmodified
Modified
Offset Frequency (kHz)
- 7.5 - 5 - 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10Normalized Offset Frequency
0.5
1
1.5
2
dezilamro
Nrettacskca
Bre
woP
Nor
mal
ized
Ba
cksc
atte
r P
ow
er
Unmodified
Modified
Offset Frequency (kHz)-10 -5 0 5 100
0.5
1
1.5
2
Frequency Shift (kHz)
Re
lativ
e B
acks
catt
er
48:50(T0 - 21 s)
49:40(T0 + 29 Sec)
-10 -5 0 5 100
0.5
1
1.5
2
Frequency Shift (kHz)
Re
lativ
e B
acks
catt
er
48:50(T0 - 21 s)
49:40(T0 + 29 Sec)
Measured Spectra Computed Spectra
Recovered Ion Distribution Parameters
vm = 0.68 km/s, vm = 0.93 km/s, vm|| = -0.31 km/s
Ambient and ModifiedIon Line Spectra
SIMPLEX III: STS-108 Burn Location16 December 2001 GMT
Ignition: 18:51:37, Termination: 18:51:47
-74 -72 -70 -68Longitude
41
42
43
44
edutitaL
Block Island
Millstone HillRadar Beam
85o Elevation
Farmington
Ignition
STS-108 Orbit
Longitude
Latit
ude
Termination
SIMPLEX III Radar BackscatterMillstone Hill ISR, 18 April 2002
Burn Time 17:26:19 – 17:26:29 UT2 Second and 24 km Resolution
5 10 15 20 25 30
5
10
15
20
5 10 15 20 25 30
5
10
15
20
5 10 15 20 25 30
20
40
60
80
5 10 15 20 25 30
5
10
15
20
47:00 48:00 49:00 50:00 51:00 52:00 53:00 54:00 55:00 56:00
Time (Minutes: Seconds) after 18:00:00 UT
550
500
450
400
350
300
Ran
ge (
km)
Po
wer
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Burn
Spectral Frequency Shift (kHz)
-25 0 25 -25 0 25-25 0 25-25 0 25
Spectral Frequency Shift (kHz)
-25 0 25 -25 0 25-25 0 25-25 0 25
SIMPLEX IV: STS-110 Burn Location18 April 2002 GMT
Ignition: 17:26:18.95, Termination: 17:26:28.95
Longitude-76 -74 -72 -70 -68 -66
Longitude
40
41
42
43
44
edut
it
aL
Block Island
Millstone Hill
Farmington
Ignition
Termination STS-110 Orbit
Radar Beam 74.6o Elevation
Latit
ude
ISS O
rbit
SIMPLEX IV Radar BackscatterMillstone Hill Radar, 18 April 2002Burn Time 17:26:19 – 17:26:29 UT
2 Second and 24 km Resolution
5 10 15 20 25 3002468101214
5 10 15 20 25 30020406080100
5 10 15 20 25 30051015202530
5 10 15 20 25 3002468101214
26:00 26:10 26:20 26:30 26:40 26:50 27:00 27:10 27:20 27:30 27:40 27:50 28:00 28:10 28:20 28:30
Time (Minutes: Seconds) after 17:00:00 UT
600
500
400
300
Alti
tude
(km
)P
ow
er
Thermal Space International Enhanced TurbulenceIon Line Shuttle Space Station Caused by Exhaust Pickup Ions
Burn
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Spectral Frequency Shift (kHz)
-25 0 25 -25 0 25-25 0 25-25 0 25
Spectral Frequency Shift (kHz)
-25 0 25 -25 0 25-25 0 25-25 0 25
Radar Ion-Line Interpretation 436 km Range/420 km Altitude
-20 -10 0 10 200
2
4
6
8
10
12
Frequency Shift (kHz)
Bac
ksca
tter
Pow
er
Thermal Ion-Line Te = 2690 K, Ti = 1480 K Modified
Ion-Line Spectra
ES Waves Driven by
Instabilities
Ring Ion Distribution
TIG + 63 s
TIG - 117 s
0 20 40 60 80
0
10
20
30
0 20 40 60 80
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3Electrostatic Waves Modes
with Radar Scatter Wave
Number k = 18.43
Radians/Second
kCω 22S
22
k
Ωkω
2
2i
2z2
1
ie2
2x2
e2
2z2
3 ΩΩk
k -Ω
k
kω
30
20
10
0
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 20 40 60 80
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 30 60 90
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
f 1 (
Hz)
f 2 (
kHz)
f 3 (
MH
z)
Angle Between k and B, (Degrees)
Ion Cyclotron Waves
Ion Acoustic Waves
Electron Cyclotron
WavesLower Hybrid
Waves
Rad
ar O
bser
vatio
n A
ngle
=
23
Deg
rees
2e
22S
2i Ω kC Ω
ie2
2x2
e2
2z2
3 ΩΩk
k -Ω
k
kω
Comparisons of SIMPLEX II, III, IV and ?
Burn Conditions Radar Pointing
Observations Conclusions
SIMPLEX II
Arecibo
Nighttime
Te = Ti
Offset from Exhaust Trail
Modified Incoherent
Scatter
Ion Acoustic Waves Damped
SIMPLEX III
Millstone Hill
Day Time
Te > Ti
Transverse to Exhaust Trail
Almost No Effect
Looking in the Wrong Place
SIMPLEX IV
Millstone Hill
Day Time
Te > Ti
Quasi- Parallel to
Exhaust Trail
Strong Incoherent
and Coherent Scatter
Undamped Ion-Acoustic Waves
Correct Viewing Geometry
Future
SIMPLEX ?
Jicamarca
Kwajalein
Nighttime
Te = Ti
Damped IA Waves
Quasi- Perpendicula
r to B
Strong Scatter From Lower
Hybrid Waves Expected
Fully Pointable Radar
(ALTAIR/AMISR) Near Equator
Needed
Radar and In Situ Measurements During the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE)
Charged Dust
Chemical Release SourcePrimary
Release Trajectory
t1
t2
t3
t4
Radial Expansion
t0
t5
Instrumented Daughter Payload
Large Time Settling of Charged ParticulatesAuxiliary
Diagnostic Launches
300 km
150 km
Radar Beam
Negatively Charged Dust Cloud from a Spherical Expansion in a Non-Uniform
Atmosphere with Magnetic FieldBackground Atmosphere
120 km Altitude
T = 323.3 K
0 = 2.34 10-8 kg/m3
H1 = 10.2 km
Al2O3 Particles
Mass 100 kg
Density 3.97 g/cm3
Sizes: 10-9 to 10-6 m
Release ParametersVS = 2 km/s
vm = 0.1 km/s
VX0 = 0.7 km/s
VZ0 = 1.4 km/s
Altitude = 250 km
Two-Dimensional Evolution of Dust Acoustic Waves Excited by CARE
CARE Should Stimulate Dust Streaming Instabilities
• Dust Lowers the Critical Drift for the Farly-Buneman Instability [Rosenberg and Chow, 1998]
• Electron Flow Excites Dust Acoustic Waves by the Low Frequency Hall Current Instability (LFHI) [Rosenberg and Shukla, 2000; 2001]
• Primary dust acoustic waves propagate to the right (+x direction). • Secondary waves propagate in the y direction. Scales and Chae, 2003
Scales, 2004
-100 -50 0 50 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-100 -50 0 50 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
VHF/UHF Radar Scatter from Expanding Dust Cloud
300
250
200
150
100
50
0-100 -50 0 50 100
Horizontal Distance (km)
Alti
tude
(km
)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0-100 -50 0 50 100
Horizontal Distance (km)
Alti
tude
(km
)
Turbulent Underdense
Shell
Turbulent Underdense
Shell
Backscatter Oblique Scatter
Summary of AMISR Support for Active Experiments
• ISR is the Primary Diagnostic for Ionospheric Modification Experiments– High Power Radio Waves
• HAARP with MUIR/AMISR• HIPAS with Power AMISR
– Space Shuttle OMS Engine Burns for SIMPLEX• JRO Radar• AMISR 7-Panel Array
– Nano-Particle Release of Dust in Upper Atmosphere for CARE
• Poker Flat AMISR