In Situ Remediation Technologies and Site Reuse ConSoil 2005 October 4, 2005 Bordeaux, France Carlos...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of In Situ Remediation Technologies and Site Reuse ConSoil 2005 October 4, 2005 Bordeaux, France Carlos...
In Situ Remediation Technologies and Site Reuse
ConSoil 2005October 4, 2005
Bordeaux, France
Carlos PachonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3
Why Innovate?
Key drivers in contaminated site restoration:» Cost» Uncertainty
Still a relatively young industry experiencing change in several areas, mainly:» Technology innovation» Advances in project management» Shifting market drivers
This presentation touches on each of these areas» Snap shot of the drivers for innovation» The Triad: Synthesizing practitioner experience in smart
project management to reduce cost and uncertainty» Technology innovation: Demand and supply side information» Brownfield Technology & Redevelopment Support Center
4
Innovative Site Management Approaches & The Land Reuse Equation
Purchase Costs + Redevelopment
Costs
•Transaction costs•Site prep•Construction•Development•Taxes/admin.•Marketing•Etc., etc., etc.
•Revenues•Resale/asset value•Social/political$$$
$$$
$$$$$$
$
Clean Valuevs.
5
Innovative Site Management Approaches & The Land Reuse Equation
•Transaction costs•Site prep•Construction•Development•Taxes/admin.•Marketing•Etc., etc., etc.
•Assessment•Cleanup•Liability issues
+
•Revenues•Resale/asset value•Social/political$$$
$$$
$$$$$$
$$$$ $
$$$$$
$
$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Purchase + Redevelopment
Clean Valuevs.
6
Real-Time Analytical and Sampling Technologies
Field analytical, rapid sampling, mobile labs, quick turnaround off-site all allow real-time or near real time analysis
Rapid turnaround results support dynamic decision making
Lower costs of field methods support increased density (address sampling uncertainty)
Field results guide confirmation (address analytical uncertainty)
Decision support software can help organize and process data, plan field activities
8
Subsurface CSM from high density data (DP-MIP sensing)
Slide adapted from Columbia Technologies, Inc., 2003
10
Treatment of Both a Source and
Groundwater (365)24%
Treatment of a Source Only (176)
12%
Containment or Off-Site Disposal of a
Source (202)13%
No Action or No Further Action (88)
6%
No ROD (158)11%
Other Source Control (72)5%
Non-Treatment Groundwater Remedy
Only (48)3%
Treatment of Groundwater Only
(390)26%
Remedy Types at NPL Sites (FY82-02)* Total Sites(a) = 1,499
Treatment (931) 62%
No Decision (158) 11%
Containment and Other (410) 27%
ROD = Record of Decision*Includes information from an estimated 70% of FY 2002 RODs.(a) NPL sites include current sites and former NPL sites that were deleted or removed from the NPL between FY 1982 and 2002.
11
Trends in NPL Soil Remedies
25%
14%19%
30%
55%
71%73%67%
73%73%70%
61%
51%
39%
75%
86%
74%68%
45%
28%27%32%
25%23%29%
33%
40%46%
32%
7%2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 4%
14%
22%
12%
39%40%
49%
52% 52%47%
35%42%
36%
51%
44%
20%21% 18%9%6%4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 0 1 02*Fiscal Year
Per
cen
t o
f S
ou
rce
Co
ntr
ol R
OD
s
Treatment
Containment/Disposal Only
Other (Institutional Controls,Monitoring, Relocation)
12
NPL Soil Treatment Projects
Bioremediation (48)6%
Incineration (off-site) (104)12%
Chemical Treatment (10)1%
Thermal Desorption (69)8%
Soil Vapor Extraction (213)25%
Physical Separation (20)2%
Incineration (on-site) (43)5%
Bioremediation (54)6%
Solidification/Stabilization (48)
6%
Chemical Treatment (12)1%
Flushing (16)2%
Other (in situ) (27)3%
Other (ex situ) (42)5%
Solidification/Stabilization (157)
18%
In situ 364 (42%)
Ex situ 499 (58%)
13
In Situ Technologies for Soil Treatment
31%33%
21%
29%
43%
34%
47%
36%
45%
34%33%
62%
51%
43%
57%
40%
59%
45%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02*
Fiscal Year
Per
cent
age
of S
ourc
e C
ontr
ol
Trea
tmen
t Pro
ject
s
Percentage of Source Control TreatmentTechnologies that are In SituLinear Trendline (In Situ Projects)
* Includes information from an estimated 70% of FY 2002 RODs.
15
Groundwater Remedies
We’ve broken the P&T “monopoly”
» In situ remedies are more mature, diverse and specific
— In 1991, 5% in situ GW remedies; in 2002, 24%
» Time, experience, and technology are allowing us to
optimize the pumping, treating, and monitoring
components of long term P&T systems.
» As with source control, we are using a “rich” mix of
remedies, with a more robust tool box to address each
scenario
16
Groundwater Remedies in The NPL
72%
89%85%
91%
79%
68%
74%
62%
52%
30%35%
40%
0% 2%6%
3%9%
11%9%
16% 17% 16%
22%18%
28%24%
6%3%
8%3%
19%
36%
48%
27% 28%
9%
2% 2% 3% 5% 3%0%
4% 2%5% 6%
3%0%
24%
12%6%
11%14% 15%
25%
80%
54%
91%88%
30%
37%
89% 90%85%
9%5%
5%
29%23%
35%
16%
8% 7%13%
7%4%
7%6%
91%
7%
20%
5%8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02*
Fiscal Year
Per
cen
tag
e o
f All
Gro
un
dw
ater
RO
Ds
P&T
GW in situ
GW MNA
GW VEB
GW other
* Each ROD may have multiple remedies
17
Trends in the % of GW RODs Selecting In Situ Treatment (FY86- 02)*
0%
5%
2%
6%
3%5%
9% 9%11%
9%
16%17%
16%
22%
18%
28%
24%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02*
Fiscal Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f All
Gro
undw
ater
RO
Ds RODs Selecting In Situ Treatment
Linear (RODs Selecting In Situ Treatment)
* Includes information from an estimated 70% of FY 2002 RODs.
18
GW Treatment Remedies in Superfund
P&T Only (556)65%
P&T and In Situ (63)7%
In Situ Only (31)4%
P&T, In Situ, and MNA (30)4%
MNA Only (96)11%
P&T and MNA (64)8%
In Situ and MNA (11)1%
Sites with P&T, In Situ Treatment, or MNA Selected as Part of a Groundwater Remedy (Total Sites = 851)
19
Becoming “Main Stream”; In Situ Groundwater Treatment Remedies Selected
in2000 -- 2002* N= 66
Technology Number of New Projects
Bioremediation 21
Chemical Treatment 15
Air Sparging 10
Permeable Reactive Barrier
7
Multi-Phase Extraction
4
In-Well Air Stripping 3
Phytoremediation 3
Flushing 2
In Situ Thermal Treatment
1
20
In Situ Treatment TechnologiesGroundwater
Established» Air Sparging (fuels, organics)» Bioslurping (fuels, organics)» Enhanced Bioremediation
(organics, fuels)» Multiphase Extraction (fuels, organics)
Emerging » Chemical oxidation (fuels, organics)» Electrokinetics (metals)» Phytoremediation (organics)» Recirculating Wells (fuels, organics)» Steam stripping (fuels, organics)
Permeable Reactive Barriers (metals, organics)
21
EPA REACH IT System
Meant to be a screening tool to identify potentially applicable innovative technologies and vendors
Open online database released in 1998
Combined VISITT, VendorFACTs, & ITT systems into a web-based, searchable system (www.epareachit.org)
Remediation And Characterization Innovative Technologies
Ongoing updates and periodic streamlining efforts
22
Characterization/Monitoring Technologies Listed In EPA REACH IT
Acoustic Wave Chemical Sensors
Air Measurement (Weather Measurement Technologies Excluded)
Air/Gas Sampling Technologies
Analytical Detectors (Stand Alone Only)
Analytical Traps
Borehole
Chemical Reaction-Based Indicators (Colorimetric)
Chromatography
Direct-push
Downhole Sensors-Vadose Zone
Electrochemical-based Detectors
Electromagnetic
Fiber Optic Chemical Sensors
Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
Ground Penetrating Radar
Immunoassays
Infrared Monitors
Ion Mobility Spectroscopy
Laser-induced Fluorescence
Magnetometry
Mass Spectroscopy (may include GC/MS)
Multimedia Sampling
Non-Specific Screening Tests
Physical Characterization
Resistivity/Conductivity
Seismic Reflection/Refraction
Software
Soil Gas Analyzer Systems
Soil Sampling Technologies
Solid Phase Extraction
Spectroscopy
Thermal Desorption (Characterization)
Water Monitoring Technology
Water Sampling Technologies
X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzers
23
Remediation Technologies Listed In EPA REACH IT
Acid Extraction
Adsorption (in situ)
Air Sparging (in situ) - Groundwater
Bioremediation (in situ) - Lagoon
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Biopiles
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Composting
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Land Treatment
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Slurry Phase
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Solid Phase
Bioremediation (in situ) - Biosparging
Bioremediation (in situ) - GW
Bioventing
Chemical Immobilization
Chemical Treatment - Groundwater
Dechlorination
Decontamination of Debris
Delivery/Extraction Systems
Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction
Electrical Separation/Electrokinetics
Flushing (in situ)
Fracturing - Hydraulic
Fracturing - Pneumatic
In Situ Thermal Treatment
In Well Air Stripping
Magnetic Separation
Materials Handling/Physical Separation
Mechanical Soil Aeration
Multi-Phase Extraction
Off-Gas Treatment
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Phytoremediation
Pump and Treat
Pyrolysis
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption (ex situ)
Vitrification