Improving instruction, policies and outcomes for middle ... · Parent approval . Increased...
Transcript of Improving instruction, policies and outcomes for middle ... · Parent approval . Increased...
Improving instruction, policies and outcomes for middle and high school youth in LAUSD
Hilda Maldonado Executive Director
MULTILINGUAL AND MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT [email protected]
Brussels, Belgium June 2015
Cloze Procedure Fill in the blanks individually.
Although women produce most of the ______ and raise most _____________ in ______ , they rarely have access to __________ , _______ , and ____________ services, and are under-represented in ____________ , ___________, and __________. But by increasing women’s __________ and __________ in these groups, women and men _______ alike can ___________ to improve _____________ , as well as improve their access to ________ and _____________ and ________________. As a result, women are able to _________________, which translates into better ___________ for their families. But women’s voices often go unheard, or even ignored, and that has to change.
Knowledge and skills of proficient readers?
Although women produce most of the food and raise most of the livestock in Africa, they rarely have access to land tenure, credit, and agricultural extension services, and are under-represented in farmers groups, associations, and unions. But by increasing women’s participation and representation in these groups, women and men farmers alike can work together to improve gender awareness, as well as improve their access to loans and agricultural inputs and land tenure. As a result, women are able to earn a greater income, which translates into better nutrition for their families. But women’s voices often go unheard, or even ignored, and that has to change.
Context in which we do our work
• Legal • Court cases • Lau v. Nichols • Castaned v. Pickard
• No Child Left Behind • Federal requirements • State requirements
Professional Ethical Social justice
Guiding Principles 1. ELs are held to the same high expectations of learning established for all
students.
2. ELs develop full receptive and productive proficiencies in English in the domains of listening, speaking, reading & writing.
3. ELs are taught challenging academic content that enables them to meet performance standards in all content areas.
4. ELs receive instruction that builds on their previous education and cognitive abilities and that reflects their language proficiency levels.
5. ELs are evaluated with appropriate and valid assessments that are aligned to state and local standards and that take into account the language development stages & cultural backgrounds of the students.
6. The academic success of ELs is a responsibility shared by all educators, the family and the community.
Adapted from George Washington University
Reclassification Criteria
English language proficiency test
Basic English skills test that is valid and reliable
Teacher evaluation through report card marks (grades)
Parent approval
Increased opportunities to meet this criteria by ensuring LTEL classes are credit bearing
Reclassification Data
Changed the assessments used to CAHSEE and Literacy assessments
English Learner Master Plan
PREVENTION Set a benchmark of
reasonable acquisition of proficiency
LAUSD- at the end of 5 consistent years of instruction students should be able to meet the reclassification criteria
Monitor Literacy Development
Monitor Teacher Marking Practices
INTERVENTION Remove Barriers and
create new pathways Identify the placement,
progress and instructional practices for all English Learners
Establish the difference between the instructional needs of a newcomer and a Long Term English Learner
8
Elementary Strategy 5-12 year olds
Secondary Strategy 13-18 year olds
English Only 216,340
39% Initial Fluent English Proficient
55,654 10%
Reclassified Fluent English
Proficient 144,441
26%
140,291 25%
One in 4 students is
classified as EL
One in 4 students is
classified as EL
Total Enrollment: 556,726
Enrollment by Language Classification
Student National Origin Report
AMERICAS Countries: 33 Students: 9,325
AFRICA Countries: 30 Students: 535
Oceana Countries: 11 Students: 89
ASIA Countries: 44 Students: 4,368
EUROPE Countries: 35 Students: 790
Total Foreign Enrollment: Countries: 153
Students: 15,107
High School 62,668 24%
Middle School 46,402 32%
Elementary 35,371 43%
Reclassified Fluent English Proficient Students 2014-2015
ELs at the secondary level obtain the least number of academic course & advanced course credits and the most intervention course credits *Peggy Estrada UC Santa Cruz
13 *Peggy Estrada UC Santa Cruz
Policy implications
Reframe reclassification as a benchmark.
Prioritize EL academic achievement & long-term success as the goal.
Increase access to academic course in all subjects:
Improve instruction: Provide teachers content-and grade-level specific PD on access to all academic subjects, using academic language and content objectives, and teaching abstract content language.
*Peggy Estrada UC Santa Cruz
Factors potentially impeding reclassification
for students meeting all 3 criteria
Lack of systematic knowledge of reclassification process, timing, and criteria among administrators, teachers, students, and parents.
Use of ELD portfolio as a fourth criterion. Staff judgment trumping district policy to reclassify
students meeting all criteria.
Administrative glitches.
* Peggy Estrada UC Santa Cruz
15
Changes to practice
For students who have met all criteria for reclassification EXCEPT the English Language Arts grade, schools can now convene the Language Appraisal Team (LAT) to examine student work for evidence of meeting grade level standards, and if so, LAT can override grade requirement and reclassify the student.
We reclassified an additional 1,700 students using this method
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
13.3% 13.7%
17.2%
21,551 22,38 27,18
*
District Wide Reclassification Rates 2013-2015
LTEL Rates-Middle and High Schools
2013-2015
70%
75%
80%
85%
Middle School High School
83%
79%
81%
76%
79%
73%
2013 2014 2015
Professional Development Plan
• Teachers, administrators, Title III Coaches, EL coordinators and counselors Design framework and include variety of instructional
materials for teachers to use, • Focus on: Resiliency Lessons to empower students Reciprocal Reading and SQ3R adapted to
student need Novels Understanding the difference between
Language Assessment coupled with Literacy Assessments
Design acceleration
Establish two courses for both MS and HS to target instructional needs of LTELs and ensure they are A-G credit (university eligibility) bearing classes
• Differentiate to provide support for basic literacy vs. support for language development
• Provide alternatives for Students With Disabilities if and when appropriate
Whole System Approach
LTEL Designee at every school- Use counseling portal monitoring program to “flag” questionable placements Meet regularly with counseling coordinators to ensure consistent and accurate program implementation
Strengthen K-12 ELD services Expand and reorganize Secondary ELD structure Provide copy of ELD standards and PD to every teacher Create network of LTEL teacher fellows to study, develop and implement units of study
Policy, Review and Collaboration
Update Elementary English Language Development policy and restructure where necessary Conduct internal audits, research and data analysis to study program fidelity and effectiveness ODA (Office of Data and Accountability) Examine practices of other districts state and nationwide through collaboration with:
Migration Policy Institute CGCS Council of Great City Schools BCN (Bilingual Coordinators’ Network) CORE (California Office to Reform Education)
Invite university researchers to collaborate on studies of our programs
24
We are LAUSD