Improved Lifetime Pressure Drop Management For DuraTrap® RC … · 2014-03-10 · Krishna...
Transcript of Improved Lifetime Pressure Drop Management For DuraTrap® RC … · 2014-03-10 · Krishna...
Krishna AravelliKrishna Aravelli, Josh Jamison, Kim Robbins, , Josh Jamison, Kim Robbins, Natarajan Gunasekaran, Achim HeibelNatarajan Gunasekaran, Achim Heibel
24 August 2006
Diesel Technology DevelopmentDiesel Technology DevelopmentScience and Technology,Science and Technology,
Corning Inc.Corning Inc.
Improved Lifetime Pressure Drop Management ForImproved Lifetime Pressure Drop Management ForDuraTrapDuraTrap®® RC FiltersRC Filters
With Asymmetric Cell Technology (ACT)With Asymmetric Cell Technology (ACT)
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20062
OverviewOverview
• Introduction & Objectives
• Materials & Testing Methodology
• Results & Discussion– Engine Testing– Post Test Analysis
• Conclusions
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20063
Tightening of future emission legislationTightening of future emission legislation-- After treatment & advancements in engine technologyAfter treatment & advancements in engine technology
US legislation (on-road HDD) requires PM reduction to 10% of its current levels by 2007
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20064
Diesel Emissions Control SystemsDiesel Emissions Control Systems
Integrated system Integrated system ““FutureFuture””
HC & CO
FiltersFilters
CatalyzedCatalyzed
SubstratesSubstrates
Catalyzed
SubstratesSubstrates
CelcorCelcor®® LFA substratesLFA substratesCell geometries:Cell geometries:
DuraTrapDuraTrap®® filtersfiltersCO 100/17, 200/12CO 100/17, 200/12
RC 200/19, 270/16 ACT*RC 200/19, 270/16 ACT*200/12, 300/8,200/12, 300/8,300/5, 400/7300/5, 400/7
CelcorCelcor®® LFA substratesLFA substratesCell geometries:Cell geometries: 300/5, 300/8, 300/5, 300/8,
400/4, 400/7400/4, 400/7
* Asymmetric Cell Technology* Asymmetric Cell Technology
PM NOx
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20065
Diesel Particulate Filters needed for low PM emissionsDiesel Particulate Filters needed for low PM emissions-- WallWall--flow monolith filters as primary choice of industryflow monolith filters as primary choice of industry
• Honeycomb substrate with checkerboard plugging
• PM trapped on/inside walls
• Periodic regeneration of combustible fraction of the PM
© Corning Inc.© Corning Inc.
Source: Diesel Technology Forum websiteSource: Diesel Technology Forum website
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20066
Ash accumulation in DPFAsh accumulation in DPF-- NonNon--combustible fraction of PM accumulates in the filtercombustible fraction of PM accumulates in the filter
•• Typical Ash components areTypical Ash components are– Sulfates, phosphates, oxides of calcium, zinc, magnesium etc
• formed by combustion of lubricating oil additives like detergents, acid neutralizers, anti-wear agents, corrosion inhibitors …
– Metal oxides (Fe, Cu, Cr, Al) from wear • From the engine or the exhaust system
•• Ash accumulation & composition varies significantly, depending uAsh accumulation & composition varies significantly, depending uponpon– engine type and runtime– Operating conditions,– type of fuel & additives, – lubricating oil & additives– metallurgy of the exhaust system components
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20067
Ash implication on performance & mitigationAsh implication on performance & mitigation• Accumulated ash increases the flow resistance through the filter
– Increased back pressure• Higher fuel consumption• Lower power output & dynamic response• Lower heat rejection (exhaust)
• Reduction of effective filter volume – Lower soot capacity
• Higher regeneration frequency
• Mitigation– Filter design
• Filter geometry • Channel geometry
– Periodic Ash cleaning
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20068
Asymmetric Cell TechnologyAsymmetric Cell Technology-- Channel design for improved ash storage capacityChannel design for improved ash storage capacity
• Larger inlet channel volume• Equal bulk density similar regeneration performance• Similar physical properties• Equal mechanical and thermo-mechanical durability
performance compared to Standard, due to proprietary design
• Potential to use a smaller filter volume
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 20069
Service interval for DPFsService interval for DPFs-- Impact of DPF design aspectsImpact of DPF design aspects
Filter Volume
DPF
Cle
anin
g In
terv
al
ACT design
Standarddesign
Significant increase in service interval for ACT design than standard.
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200610
ObjectivesObjectives
Characterize Pressure drop with ash accumulation Characterize Pressure drop with ash accumulation for DuraTrapfor DuraTrap®® RC (onRC (on--engine)engine)
Demonstrate performance benefit of ACTDemonstrate performance benefit of ACT
Evaluate the impact of long term engine exposure Evaluate the impact of long term engine exposure on material stability/durabilityon material stability/durability
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200611
MaterialsMaterials-- DPFs evaluated in current studyDPFs evaluated in current study
–– DuraTrapDuraTrap®® RC RC •• Uncatalyzed Uncatalyzed •• Filter Volume :17 LitersFilter Volume :17 Liters•• Filter dimensions Filter dimensions
ØØ10.510.5””x12x12””•• ddh,inleth,inlet / d/ dh,outleth,outlet = 1.0= 1.0
–– DuraTrapDuraTrap®® RC ACT*RC ACT*•• Uncatalyzed Uncatalyzed •• Filter Volume :17 LitersFilter Volume :17 Liters•• Filter dimensions Filter dimensions
ØØ10.510.5””x12x12””•• ddh,inleth,inlet / d/ dh,outleth,outlet = 1.3= 1.3
INLET CHANNEL
OUTLET CHANNEL
DuraTrap®RC 200 19 27 0.053 0.053
DuraTrap®RC ACT* 270 16 34 0.051 0.038
Cell Diameter [in.]Design/Geometry Cell Density
[CPSI]
Web Thickness
[mils]Inlet OFA [%]
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200612
Test Cells specificationsTest Cells specificationsAsh Loading Test Cell:Ash Loading Test Cell:
Cummins N14 Cummins N14 –– 6 cylinder6 cylinder--InlineInline–– Rated Power :460 HP @ 1800RPMRated Power :460 HP @ 1800RPM–– Torque at rated : 1300lbTorque at rated : 1300lb--ft.ft.
•• MidMid--west Eddywest Eddy--current Wetcurrent Wet--gap dynamometergap dynamometer
•• UEGO SensorsUEGO Sensors
Characterization Test Cell:Characterization Test Cell:Volvo D12 (MY2003)Volvo D12 (MY2003)
–– 6 Cylinder6 Cylinder--InlineInline–– Rated Power :460 HP @ 1800RPMRated Power :460 HP @ 1800RPM–– Torque at rated : 1300lbTorque at rated : 1300lb--ft.ft.
•• MidMid--west Eddywest Eddy--Current WetCurrent Wet--Gap dynamometerGap dynamometer•• UHEGO SensorsUHEGO Sensors•• EmissionsEmissions--RawRaw ((CO, CO2, NO/NOx, O2,THC)CO, CO2, NO/NOx, O2,THC)
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200613
System laySystem lay--out for DPF evaluationout for DPF evaluation
CDPF(∅10.5”x12”)
DOC(∅10.5”x6”)
AirAir
Crankcase Crankcase ventilationventilation
IntercoolerIntercooler
LFELFE
TurboTurbo SFISFI
AirAir
Crankcase Crankcase ventilationventilation
IntercoolerIntercooler
LFELFE
TurboTurbo SFISFI
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200614
Ash accumulation cycleAsh accumulation cycle-- accelerated by load profile and low DPF volume/engine power outaccelerated by load profile and low DPF volume/engine power outputput-- high load factor ~0.74; >70% of accumulation time in Mode 3 high load factor ~0.74; >70% of accumulation time in Mode 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
10
20
30
Time [Hours]
Speed[RPM]
Torque[lb-ft]
Exh. Flow[Kg/hr]
DPF Inlet Temp[°C]
∆p[kPa]
Mode 1
Mode 3
Mode 2 Mode 4SF I SF I
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200615
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Ash Cycle Number
∆p
[kPa
]
Mode 1 (High Speed Low Load)Mode 2 (Med. Speed Med. Load w/SFI)Mode 3 (High Speed High Load)Mode 4 (Med. Speed Med. Load w/SFI)
Pressure drop development with ash accumulation Pressure drop development with ash accumulation -- Initial pressure drop increase moderate Initial pressure drop increase moderate -- More pronounced pressure drop impact with higher cycle number More pronounced pressure drop impact with higher cycle number
Failed Failed injectorinjector
DuraTrap ® RC-ACT
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200616
Ash accumulation vs. Oil ConsumptionAsh accumulation vs. Oil Consumption-- Ash accumulation tracks well with oil consumptionAsh accumulation tracks well with oil consumption-- Ash finding rate in the DPF about 55Ash finding rate in the DPF about 55--60%60%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000Cummulative Oil Consumption [g]
Cum
mul
ativ
e A
sh a
ccum
ulat
ed [g
]
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200617
Reason for lower ash finding rateReason for lower ash finding rate
0.8890.921Sulfur Content, wt%1.831.69Ash Content, mass %
Aged (500 hrs) Ash OilFresh Ash Oil
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Al Sb Ba B Ca Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni P Si Ag Na Sn Zn K Sr V Ti Cd
Fresh Ash Oil Aged (~500 hrs) Ash Oil
PPM
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200618
Pressure Drop: Pressure Drop: Fundamental InfluencesFundamental Influences
Exhaust gas
Exhaust gassootash
1
Key Parameter Filter characteristics
1 Inlet losses (Contraction) Mainly OFA Geometry
Contribution
3 Frictional losses from flow through wall and soot & ash layer
Permeability of wall (also fraction of soot & ash), wall thickness, filtration area Wall properties & geometry
3
4 Frcitional losses along the outlet channel wall Mainly hydraulic diameter of channel, length Geometry
4
5 Outlet losses (Expansion) Mainly OFA Geometry
5
2
2 Frictional losses along the inlet channel walls Mainly hydraulic diameter of channel, length Geometry
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200619
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 15000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 15000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 1500
DuraTrap®RC ACT
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
DuraTrap® RC 200/19
Ø10.5"x12"
Pressure drop effectsPressure drop effects-- Geometric and microGeometric and micro--structural impactstructural impact
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
DuraTrap® RC ACT 270/16
DuraTrap® RC 200/19
Ø10.5"x12"
No Ash
∆p [k
Pa] @
1250
m³/h
r & 2
00°C
Soot Load [g/l]
DuraTrap®RC
∆p [k
Pa] @
200°C
Exhaust Flow [m³/hr]
6g/l Soot
3g/l Soot
0g/l Soot
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200620
Pressure Drop as a function of FlowPressure Drop as a function of Flow-- Increasing advantage of ACT design at all operating flows with Increasing advantage of ACT design at all operating flows with increasing increasing ash & soot in the filterash & soot in the filter
0g/l Ash0g/l Ash
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 15000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 15000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 1500
DuraTrap®RC ACT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 1500
DuraTrap®RC ACTDuraTrap®RC
∆p [k
Pa] @
200°C
Exhaust Flow [m³/hr]
DuraTrap®RC
∆p [k
Pa] @
200°C
Exhaust Flow [m³/hr]
6g/l Soot
3g/l Soot
0g/l Soot
40g/l Ash40g/l Ash
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 1500
∆p [k
Pa] @
200
°C
Exhaust Flow [m³/hr]
DuraTrap®RC ACTDuraTrap®RC DuraTrap®RC ACTDuraTrap®RC
6g/l Soot
3g/l Soot
0g/l Soot
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
500 1000 1500
∆p [k
Pa] @
200
°C
Exhaust Flow [m³/hr]
DuraTrap®RC ACTDuraTrap®RC DuraTrap®RC ACTDuraTrap®RC
6g/l Soot6g/l Soot
3g/l Soot3g/l Soot
0g/l Soot0g/l Soot
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200621
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Cummulative Ash Level [g/L]
Pres
sure
Dro
p [k
Pa] @
125
0m³/h
r & 2
00°C
∆∆p increase with ash loadingp increase with ash loading–– Higher pressure drop for ACT in the clean stateHigher pressure drop for ACT in the clean state–– Roughly 30% increase in the ash capacity with ACT design Roughly 30% increase in the ash capacity with ACT design
0g/l 0g/l SootSoot
6g/l 6g/l sootsoot
Ash membrane prevents Ash membrane prevents deep bed filtrationdeep bed filtration
AshAsh
Reduction in effective Reduction in effective filter volume due to filter volume due to increasing ash plug increasing ash plug AshAshAshAsh
Rapid increase Rapid increase in PD due to in PD due to significant significant reduction in dreduction in dhhwith soot due to with soot due to ashash AshAsh
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200622
Detailed view of the bottomDetailed view of the bottom-- Low density ash/voids present in between ash plugsLow density ash/voids present in between ash plugs-- Lower concentration of high density ash in near skin channelsLower concentration of high density ash in near skin channels
Skin
AA
D
B
11””
C
A
D
B
11””
C
A
BB CC DD
OutletOutlet
44””
DuraTrapDuraTrap®® RCRC
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200623
Inle
t
Out
let
Ash distribution evaluation after dissectionAsh distribution evaluation after dissection-- Large low density ash plug near the outlet of the filter Large low density ash plug near the outlet of the filter -- High density ash layer on the wall (increasing from inHigh density ash layer on the wall (increasing from in-- to outlet)to outlet)
DuraTrapDuraTrap®® RCRC--ACTACT
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200624
Chemical Analysis of ash in the filterChemical Analysis of ash in the filter-- Similar ash composition over the length of the filterSimilar ash composition over the length of the filter
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Al Ca Fe Mg Mn P Pd Zn
%w
t.
Inlet Middle Outlet
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200625
Time Temperature distributionTime Temperature distribution--1720 on engine hrs. [DuraTrap1720 on engine hrs. [DuraTrap®® RC] >> equivalent to number of regenerations for ~300k milesRC] >> equivalent to number of regenerations for ~300k miles-- 2640 on engine hrs. [ACT] >> equivalent to number of regenerati2640 on engine hrs. [ACT] >> equivalent to number of regenerations for ~420k milesons for ~420k miles
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
0 200 400 600 800 1000Temperature[°C]
Cum
mul
ativ
e Ti
me
[H]
DuraTrap®RC - 200/19DuraTrap®RC- ACT -270/16
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0-100
100-2
0020
0-300
300-4
0040
0-500
500-6
0060
0-700
700-8
0080
0-900
900-1
000
Temperature [°C]
Tim
e [H
]
DuraTrap®RC-200/19 DuraTrap®RC- ACT -270/16
DPF
1111””
DPF
1111””
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200626
PostPost-- testing physical Integritytesting physical Integrity-- Both filters showed no integrity degradationBoth filters showed no integrity degradation
Shown: DuraTrapShown: DuraTrap®® RC ACTRC ACT
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200627
Smoke Number Smoke Number -- DuraTrapDuraTrap®® RC ACT filterRC ACT filter-- excellent filtration performance over ash accumulationexcellent filtration performance over ash accumulation-- filtration improves with ash accumulationfiltration improves with ash accumulation
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Ash load [g/l]
FSN
[-]
Soot slip during clean-out650-700ºC
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200628
Summary & ConclusionSummary & Conclusion• On-engine ash accumulation testing of DuraTrap® RC
– Highest oil consumptions at high speed & load– Lube oil consumption linearly correlated to ash acc. in DPF– Lifetime ∆p for DPF includes three phases:
• Conditioning, filter volume reduction, inlet channel throttling
• Successful demonstration (on-engine) durability of DuraTrap® RC filters• Std: 1720 engine hours [regen. equivalent of ~300Kmiles]• ACT: 2640 engine hours [regen. equivalent of ~420Kmiles]
• 30% ash storage advantage of DuraTrap® RC 270/16 ACT compared to standard design
Deer Conference 2006Deer Conference 200629
ReferencesReferences• Young D M, et. Al., “Ash Storage Concept for Diesel
Particulate” SAE 2004-01-0948• Merkel G A, et al., “Thermal durability of wall-flow ceramic
diesel particulate filters” SAE 2001-01-0190• Diesel Technology Forum website
http://www.dieselforum.org• EPA – website http://www.epa.gov