Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

download Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

of 43

Transcript of Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    1/43

    Calculating the Effects of a

    Nuclear Explosion at aEuropean Military Base

    Matthew McKinzie, Ph.D. (NRDC), Erwin Polreich, Ing. Mag. (ZAMG)

    Dlia Arnold, Ph.D. (ZAMG), Christian Maurer, Ph.D. (ZAMG),

    and Dr. Gerhard Wotawa (ZAMG)

    ZAMG: Zentralanstalt fr Meteorologie und Geodynamik , Vienna, Austria

    NRDC: Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    2/43

    What are the effects of a nuclear explosion?

    Crater Blast Overpressure

    Blast Dynamic Pressure

    Thermal Radiation

    Initial Nuclear Radiation

    Local Fallout

    Global Fallout

    Electromagnetic Pulse

    important

    effects in

    military

    planning

    important

    widespread

    humanitarian

    effects

    50%

    35%

    5%

    10%

    Energ

    ypartition

    ofa

    nuclearexplosion

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    3/43

    A Hypothetical Scenario

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    4/43

    A Standard Military Target

    46.031278 N, 12.596778 E

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    5/43

    Choosing a Nuclear Yield

    Data Source: Kristensen, Hans M., and Robert S. Norris. "Russian nuclear forces, 2014." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists70.2 (2014): 75-

    85; and US nuclear forces, 2014." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists70.1 (2014): 85-93.

    US Mk-12A

    ICBM

    US Mk-21 SERV ICBM

    US Trident MK -4, -4A

    US Trident Mk-5

    UK Trident

    French

    M45 SLBM

    RF 12M Topol

    RF 12M1, M2 Topol-M

    RF RSM-50

    SLBM

    RF RSM-54SLBM

    RF RSM-56 SLBM

    RF SS-18 M6 ICBM

    RF SS-19 M3 ICBM

    RF SS-25 ICBM

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    Yield

    (kt)

    768

    220250

    384

    225 384

    150 68

    192

    460

    144

    100

    144

    180

    117

    384

    240

    150 68

    Numberof

    Nuclear

    Weapons

    Type of

    Nuclear

    Weapon

    200 kt

    3,690 Nuclear Weapons Shown: 1 Million Kilotons

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    6/43

    Choosing a Height of Burst

    0

    2.000

    4.000

    6.000

    8.000

    10.000

    12.000

    14.000

    0

    0,05

    0,1

    0,15

    0,2

    0,25

    0,3

    0,35

    0,4

    0,45

    0,5

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

    Nuclear Explosion Height of Burst (meters)

    PercentofActivityin

    LocalFallout

    Overpressurenear*

    GroundZero(ps

    i)

    *Overpressure at 100 meters from ground zero

    200 kt Nuclear Explosion

    Red: Overpressure

    Blue: Activity

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    7/43

    Crater

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    8/43

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    9/43

    Blast

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    10/43

    Initial Radiation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    11/43

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    12/43

    Thermal Radiation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    13/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:4 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    14/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:8 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    15/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:12 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    16/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:16 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    17/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:20 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    18/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:24 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    19/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:36 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    20/43

    HPAC Local Fallout Dose Calculation:48 hours after detonation(historical November winds)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    21/43

    U.S. DoD HPAC Model (Hazard Predication

    and Assessment Capability)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    22/43

    U.S DoD HPAC: Casualty Tables

    For an Unsheltered Population

    For a Sheltered Population

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    23/43

    ZAMG Emergency Activities FLEXPART model

    Examples for ZAMG emergency activities using the FLEXPART model

    Nuclear emergenciesTAMOS Model

    Plume transport and

    nuclear fallout

    computation Accumulated deposition

    Time-integrated concen-

    trations

    Weather bulletins

    Volcano eruptions

    Calculation of fine ash at

    flight levels

    Calculation of SO2

    pollution

    Integration of satellite

    information, source term

    estimates

    Atmosphericbacktracking

    Investigation of

    interesting

    measurements

    CTBT Verification

    WMO designation

    (RSMC)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    24/43

    Developing a Source Term for FLEXPART:

    Fallout Cloud Geometry

    View of Fallout

    Cloud Model

    40 km from

    Ground Zero

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    25/43

    Developing a Source Term for FLEXPART:

    Fallout Cloud Geometry

    View of Fallout Cloud Model from within Austria

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    26/43

    Developing a Source Term for FLEXPART: Radionuclides

    Total activity from a nuclear explosion: 450 megacuries per kiloton of fission yield

    at 1 hour after detonation.

    Our Scenario: 200 kt x 450 megacuries/kt x 75% fission x 50% in local fallout =

    33,750 megacuries initial source term.

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    27/43

    October 09, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    28/43

    October 10, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    29/43

    October 11, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    30/43

    October 09, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    31/43

    October 10, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    32/43

    October 11, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    33/43

    November 12, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    34/43

    November 13, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    35/43

    November 14, 2014

    Precipitation

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    36/43

    November 11, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    37/43

    November 12, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    38/43

    November 13, 2014

    Cesium-137 Deposition

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    39/43

    Concluding Thoughts:

    Open-source information can be used to calculate the effects of a nuclearexplosion in terms of crater, blast, thermal, initial radiation and fallout

    effects.

    Military targeting requirements for destruction of hardened objects

    involves surface or near-surface bursts, maximizing fallout.

    For a 200kt nuclear explosion, the prompt nuclear weapons effects are far

    more localized than the fallout effect, which were shown to extend across

    international boundaries for this hypothetical scenario.

    Variations on fallout patterns with weather conditions are a motivation for

    non-nuclear weapon states to develop a capability to model nuclear

    explosive effects to mitigate humanitarian impacts of nuclear conflict.

    Humanitarian impacts of nuclear war continue to be relevant to oursocieties, given the large nuclear arsenals retained decades after the end of

    the Cold War, and new nuclear weapons development in many states.

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    40/43

    Nuclear emergencies standard protocol used

    Unknown source term: usage of 1 Bq release (3 hours)

    Known source term: usage of source term

    Weather bulletin: discussion of weather situation and development with regard to

    accident

    Standard computations include 137Cs accumulated deposition (24/48 hrs), 137Cs

    time-integrated concentration (24/48 hrs)

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    41/43

    ZAMG Austria

    Zentralanstalt fr Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG)

    Weather Forecasts, warnings and advisories

    National seismological Service, CTBT Verification

    Meteorological, climatological and seismic monitoring

    Environmental emergencies nuclear accidents, chemical accidents,

    volcano eruptions

  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    42/43

    FLEXPART model

    Lagrangian particle dispersion model

    Source code and documentaiton can be downloaded from internet:

    http://flexpart.eu

    Users include research institutions, private companies, weather services (ZAMG)

    and operational organisations (CTBTO)

    Many different meteorological input data can be used:

    ECMWF

    NCEP

    Aladin/Alaro

    Mesoscale Model WRF

    El t ti P l

    http://flexpart.eu/http://flexpart.eu/
  • 8/10/2019 Il rapporto presentato a Vienna

    43/43

    Electromagnetic Pulse