IHC in breast CA

19
Defining the clinical Defining the clinical challenges – Pitfalls of IHC challenges – Pitfalls of IHC testing in Breast cancer testing in Breast cancer Dr. Ashutosh Mukherji Associate Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, JIPMER

Transcript of IHC in breast CA

Page 1: IHC in breast CA

Defining the clinical challenges – Pitfalls of Defining the clinical challenges – Pitfalls of IHC testing in Breast cancerIHC testing in Breast cancer

Dr. Ashutosh Mukherji Associate Professor,

Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, JIPMER

Page 2: IHC in breast CA

• Histologic subtype• Axillary lymph node status• Tumor size• Grade• Age• Comorbidities

Page 3: IHC in breast CA

Molecular pathways in pathogenesis of breast cancer

Page 4: IHC in breast CA
Page 5: IHC in breast CA

Breast Cancer Subtypes• Breast cancer is classified into clinical subtypes

based upon receptor expression• These subtypes dictate possible therapeutic

options and vary in their prognosis– Luminal: derived from the luminal cells

• TYPE A:ER+, PR+,HER-2-• TYPE B:ER+,PR+,HER-2+• Can use hormonal therapy• Less aggressive

– Basal: derived from myoepithelial cells• ER-, PR-,HER-2-,ck 5/6+ or HER -1+• No specific target for therapies• More aggressive

– HER2-enriched• More aggressive

Luminal A

Luminal B

Claudin-Low

HER2-enrichedBasal

Page 6: IHC in breast CA

Luminal and Basal Characteristics

Basal• Low ER• Low HER2• High CK5/6• c-KIT higher• High EGFR• High p53 mutation• High p53 protein• High cyclin E• Very high vimentin

Luminal• High ER• Higher HER2• Low CK5/6• Low c-KIT• Low EGFR• Low p53 mutation• Low p53 protein• Low cyclin E• Low vimentin

Basement membraneMyoepithelial Cells BasalLuminal Cells Luminal

Page 7: IHC in breast CA

ER Receptors

• Weak prognostic marker for clinical outcome• Strong marker for tamoxifen response• Results can be affected by method of processing (tissue

fixation/ choice of antibody / interpretation of results)• Alred scoring important• Score of more than or equal to 3 means atleast 1% cells

expressing – puts result in St Gallen uncertain group where hormone therapy may / may not help.

7

Page 8: IHC in breast CA

HER 2 NEU

• Positive result means more than 6 copies per tumour cell or a HER2 / Chromosome 17 ratio of 1.8 – 2.2

• Positive in 15-30% cases of breast carcinoma• Associated with increase disease recurrence and poor prognosis• expression of HER2 is regulated by signaling through estrogen receptors.• Normally tamoxifen down regulate HER2

8

Page 9: IHC in breast CA

Role of Ki67

• Prognostic indicator for high risk patients; indicates cellular proliferation

• helps decide on whether to add chemo to endocrine therapy

9

Page 10: IHC in breast CA

10

Page 11: IHC in breast CA

• Thus Ki67 is used for adding chemo based on risk assessment:<15% means low risk16-30% means intermediate>30% is high risk

11

Page 12: IHC in breast CA

Others……..KiS2/Ki67 (ratio)•Indicates relative fraction of proliferative cells; % of cells in the SM phase.•KiS2 improves accuracy and identifies low risk patients not requiring adjuvant therapy.

Bcl2 / p53•Indicates tumour growth / high risk•No recommendations for p53.•Bcl2 indp of group / stage / tm size improved survival

Anti angiogenetic / fibroblastic factors•For decision regarding addition of bio-molecules to therapy•Supposedly increases PFS•Not validated.

12

Page 14: IHC in breast CA

Evaluated the analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility of two approaches.

Page 15: IHC in breast CA

Levels of Gene Expression Determine Recurrence Score

21-gene assay = 16 outcome-related genes + 5 reference genes

Higher expression levels of“favorable” genes = ↓ RS

Higher expression levels of“unfavorable” genes = ↑ RS

A risk score is calculated from 0 -100Cutoff points chosen based onResults of NSABP trial B-20

Page 16: IHC in breast CA

Targeted therapy ER + ER-

Hormonal Herceptin EGFR BRCA 1 C-kit

Therapy Geftinib, erlotinib, DNA damage Imatinib

lapatinib PARP inh

Luminal A Luminal B HER 2 + Basal Like

Page 17: IHC in breast CA

Predictive relevance of molecular classification

Goldhirsch et al. Ann Oncol June 2011. St Gallen 2011

Page 18: IHC in breast CA

NCCN guidelines include Oncotype DX® testing in the treatment-decision pathway for node-negative and

micrometastatic disease

18

•Tumor 0.6-1.0 cm, moderately or poorly differentiated, intermediate or high grade, or vascular invasion•Tumor > 1 cm with favorable or unfavorable pathologic features

Consider Oncotyp

e DX

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease

pT1, pT2, or pT3 and pN1mi

No testRS <

18RS 18-

30RS ≥ 31

Adjuvant endocrine therapy

± adjuvant chemotherapy

Adjuvant endocrine therapy

endocrine therapy ± adjuvant chemotherapy

Adjuvant endocrine therapy

+ adjuvant chemotherapy

Page 19: IHC in breast CA

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

19