iFILE NO - Aris B.C. · 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 i - ii - iii - table of contents...

61
NTS: 104B 9 LATITUDE: 56 d 43'N LONGITUDE: 130° 07‘ m \ on behalf of 1, iFILE NO: MR. F. SCHOMIG P.O. Box 675 Squamish, B.C., VON 3G0. D.F. SYUONDS, B.8C.s F.G.A.C. Burton Consulting Inc. December 24, 1990 901-626 West Pender Street VanCoWer, B.C., V6B lV9 e;E@k[jGgcA;, YRWiLNCki A. f& s E s '7 -!;i '7: pi '!p "'F >.~. 73 e-9 p 'y- GEOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT on the BSKAY CREEK AREA PROPERTY Skeena Mining Division Upper Unuk River Area, B.C. BURTON CONSULTING INC.

Transcript of iFILE NO - Aris B.C. · 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 i - ii - iii - table of contents...

NTS: 104B 9 LATITUDE: 56 d 43'N

LONGITUDE: 130° 07‘

m \

on behalf of 1, iFILE NO:

MR. F. SCHOMIG P.O. Box 675

Squamish, B.C., VON 3G0.

D.F. SYUONDS, B.8C.s F.G.A.C.

Burton Consulting Inc. December 24, 1990 901-626 West Pender Street VanCoWer, B.C., V6B lV9

e;E@k[jGgcA;, YRWiLNCki A. f& s E s '7 -!;i '7: pi '!p "'F >.~. 73 e-9 p 'y-

GEOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

on the

BSKAY CREEK AREA PROPERTY Skeena Mining Division

Upper Unuk River Area, B.C.

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

I -

II -

III -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IHTRODUCTION

SUMMARY 6 CONCLUSIONS

LOCATION 6 ACCESS

CLAIM: INFORMATION

PROPERTY HISTORY & PREVIOUS WORK

GEOLOGY

6.10 Regional Geology

6.20 Local Geology

GEOCHEMICAL SOIL SURVEY

7.10 Geochemical Results

7.20 General Discussion of Geochemical Results

RECOMMENDATIONS~

COST STATEMENT

CERTIFICATE

APPENDICES

Analytical Certificates ( Soil Samples) ,

Data Analysis Printouts ~

References J'

1 i

2 /"

3

5 I~

7 ('

8 .

8

16

17,

18 ,;

20 ,'

LIST OF FIGURES

3 -1

4 - 1

6 - 1

I - 1

I - 1A

I - 1B

7 - 1c

7 - 1D

I - IE

I - 1F

I - 1G

I - 1H

I - 1J

7 - 1K

Location Map

Claim Map

Regional Geology Map

Topography & Geochemical Grid Location Map

Geochemical Plan - Au in

Geochemical Plan - Ag in

Geochemical Plan - Co in

Geochemical Plan - Cu in

Geochemical Plan - Fe in

Geochemical Plan - Mn in

Geochemical Plan - MO in

Geochemical Plan - Ni in

Geochemical Plan - Pb in

Geochemical Plan - Zn in

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Pase

4

6

9

Pocket

1.0 INTRQDUCTION

This report has been written on behalf of Mr. F. Schomig of Squamish, B.C. It describes field work, including geochemical soil and silt sampling, which was carried out on the Eskay Creek Area Protaerty , located approximately 300 kilometres north of Prince Rupe t, B.C. The field work was carried out on September 17 th 1990. Mobilization costs were shared with another project'in the same area.

A statement of costs incurred directly as a result of the 1990 work program is included.

Recommendations are made for further work on the property. This work should include further prospecting and qeochemical sampling programs.

L

2.0 SUKNARY & CONCLUSIONS

The Bskav Creek Area Prouerty owned by Mr. F. Schomig of Sguamish, B.C. consists of 2 m&ric claims totalling 40 units in the Skeena Mining Division, B.C.

The property is located approximately 300 air- kilometres north of Prince Rupert, B.C. Access to the property is by helicopter :from Bell II. Bell II is on Highway #37, approximately 265 kilometres north of Kitwanga, which is on Highway #16.

The property area has not been mapped in any detail by government geologists. The area is shown as being possibly underlain by Jurassic Hazelton Group sediments, in particular Upper Jurassic Nass Formation Rocks. The exact location of Lower Jurassic Mt. Dilworth Formation rocks in the map area is unknown. These Mt. Dilworth rocks host the Calpine Resources Eskay Creek gold orebody to the west.

Field work carried out during 1990 consisted of geochemical soil and silt sampling. A total of 92 samples were taken and analysed for 25 elements. A 100 metre long section of Grid Line lOON, from Station 250W to 350W contains anomalous cobalt and silver values. The sample taken at Station 325W is anomalous in iron, molybdenum, zinc, manganese, copper, cobalt Andy silver. Other anomalous values are scattered over the survey area.

Further work is recommended on the property, including prospecting and geochemical sampling programs.

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

r

3.0 L0CATION L ACCESS

The Eskay Creek Area Property is located approximately 300 kilometres north of the Prince Rupert, B.C. Access to the property is by helicopter from Bell II. The property is approximately 30 kilometres west-southwest from Bell II. Bell II is a small settlement and staging area located on Highway #37, approximately 265 kilometres north by road from Kitwanga, the turn-off on Highway #16. The property includes most of Little Teigen Lake, which is approximately 3 kilometres in length.

Access to the property area may be improved in the future after the completion of a planned road to the Calpine Resources Eskay Creek gold property.

--

4.0 CLAIM INFORMATION

The Eskav Creek Area Property consists of 2 metric claims totalling 40 units in the Skeena Mining Division, B.C. Claim information is shown on Figures 4-l and 7-1 and on the following table:

CLAIM NAME # UNITS RECORD # RECORD DATE EXPIRY DATE

VAN 3 20 7104 23JAN89 **23JAN92 VAN 4 20 7105 23JAN89 **23JAN92

**Expiry dates shown are after the application of assessment work in 1989.

.

5.0 HISTORY h PRBVIOUB WORK

Interest in the Eskay Creek/Unuk River/Sulphurets Creek area has reached an unprecidented level as the result of 1988 drilling results and subsequent development on the Stikine Resources/Calpine Resources Eskay Creek property. The last hole of the 1988 drilling program intersected 29 metres grading 25.8 grams/tonne gold and 38.7 grams/tonne silver (96.5 feet grading 0.752 oz./ton gold and 1.13 oz./ton silver). Recent reserve figures' for the 21A and 21B Zones total 1.55 million tons, averaging 1.34 oz./ton gold and 36.21 oz./ton silver at a cut-off grade of 0.25 oz./ton gold. More ore is being developed as drilling continues. Hundreds of mining companies have staked thousands of claim units, blanketing the entire area.

Exploration activity at Eskay Creek dates back to 1932, when Tom MaCXay staked the area which now covers the recent Calpine/Stikine discovery.

No previous work has been carried out on the VAN 3 b 4 claims which comprise the EskaV Creek Area Property, except for some prospecting by the owner of the claims, Mr. F. Schomig.

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

6.0 GEOLOGY

6.10 Regional Geology

The regional geology of the area was compiled in 1988 by the B.C. Resources2

Ministry of En-n, Mines 8 Petroleum in Bulletin 63, entitled "Geology and Mineral

Deposits of the Unuk River-Salmon River-Anyox Area". The pertinent portion of this map is shown on Figuure 6-l. In addition, Open File Map 1988-4, entitled *'Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Sulphurets Area" somewhat updates the regional geology coverage of the area immediately to the south of the Eskay Creek Area Property.

The regional .geology of the area immediately surrounding the property has not been mapped in any detail by government geologists. The area is thought to be underlain by Middle to Upper Jurassic Hazelton Group sediments. These rocks are mapped as Upper Jurassic Nass Formation sediments (Unit 17) in the earlier mapping and as Middle Jurassic Salmon River Formation siltstone sequences (Unit 16 or equivalent Unit 5) on the later maps. Typical rock types in these two units would include siltstone, greywacke (sometimes fossiliferous & pyritic), sandstone, calcarenite, limestone argillite, conglomerate and some metamorphosed equivalents. The sediments are typically well-bedded and dark grey in colour.

The Lower Jurassic Mt. Dillworth Formation, which hosts the Calpine /Stikine deposit is mapped to the south of the claim area. However, the exact location of this important formation is not known. The formation is characterized by large scale folding and has been displaced by numerous faults with a large horizontal component of displacement.

6.20 Local Geology & Mineralization

The claim area is largely covered with overburden and swampy areas. No systematic geological mapping has been carried out. Some dark grey sediments were observed as float and sub-outcrop in soil sample holes on the soil grid.

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

I”

LEGEND

(To Accompany Figure 6-11

SEDIMENTARY h VOLCANIC ROCKS

JURASSIC

HAZELTON GROUP

Upper Jurassic

17 Nass Formation: siltstone, qreywacke, sandstone, some calcarenite, arqillite, conglomerate, minor limestone, minor coal: metamorphosed equivalents.

Lower Jurassic

12c Unuk River Formation: conglomerate.

PLUTONIC ROCKS

EOCENE & OLDER

8f Feldspar porphyry stocks etc.

.

7.0 GEOCHEMISTRY

7.10 Geochemical Results

A total of 92 soil and stream sediment samples were taken on a grid consisting of four liaes spaced 100 metres apart. The baseline was put in at 315 and the cross-lines at 225'. Topography and grid location is shown on Figure 7- 1. Sample grid, assay results and anomalous values are shown on Figure 7-2. Nominal sample spacing was 25 metres. Samples were taken from "B" horizon material wherever possible. at an average depth of 30 cm. The samples were ground to -150 mesh (treated as rock samples) before being analysed. The samples were assayed for gold (atomic absorption finish) and analysed for cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead silver and zinc using the Induced Coupled Plasma technique (nitric-aqua regia digestion). A discussion of results follows:

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Fire Assay (10 gram sample)

Atomic Absorption Finish Detection Limit: 5 p.p.b.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.b.

Data Treatment: Visual examination of data.

Results: All gold values were below the detection limit of 5 p.p.b.

SILVER (Ag):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: induced coupled Elasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 0.5 R.P.rn.

Upper Limit: 200 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Visual observation.

Results: The upper two "populations" as observed on the histograms are anomalous. This represents values of 1.0 p.p.m. or greater (3 samples).

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

COBALT (CO):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Lnduced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 1 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A lognormal data distributition Was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on nprobability paper" and interactively partitioned into 5 populations as follows:

Population l:(Background I) detection limit to 4 p.p.m. ,I 2 (Background II) 4 p.p.m. to 7 p-p-m. II 3 (Background III) 7 p.p.m. to 10 p.p.m. II 4 (Anomalous I) 10 p.p.m. to 27 p.p.m. 31 5 (Anomalous II) over 27 p.p.m-

Results: The upper population as partitioned is moderately anomalous. This represents values of 28 p.p.m. or greater (9 samples).

COPPER (CU):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Lnduced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 1 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A lognormal data distributition was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 5 populations as follows:

Population l:(Backqround I) detection limit to 14 p.p.m. II 2 (Background II) 4 p.p.m. to 15 p.p.m. II 3 (Background III) 9 p.p.m. to 25 p.p.m. ,I 4 (Anomalous I) 25 p.p.m. to 40 p.p.m. II 5 (Anomalous II) over 40 p.p.m.

Results: The upper population as partitioned is moderately anomalous. This represents values of 43 p.p.m. or greater (8 samples).

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

P.

.

r

r IRON (Fe):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 0.10 %

Upper Limit: 15.00 %

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. An arithmetic distributition was observed. Arithmetic data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 3 populations as follows:

Population l:(Background I) detection limit to 3.00 % ,I 2 (Background II) 3.00 % to 6.00 % I, 3 (Anomalous I) over 6.00 %

Results: The upper population as partitioned is moderatelv anomalous. This reoresents values of 6.01 % or greater (5 samples).

MANGANESE (MnZ:

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Reqia Digest Detection Limit: 5 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

ion)

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A logarithmic distributition was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 3 populations as follows:

Population l:(Background I) det. limit p.p.m. Z

225 p.p.m. I, 2 (Background II) 225 340 p.p.m. n 3 (Background III) 340 p-p.m to 1090 p.p.m. II 4 (Anomalous I) 1090 p.p.m. to 2500 p.p.m. ,I 5 (Anomalous II) greater than 2500 p.p.m.

Results: The upper population as partitioned is moderately anomalous. This represents values of 2501 p.p.m. or greater (5 samples).

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

MOLYBDENUM (MO):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 1 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Data was visually examined.

Results: Values of 4 p.p.m. or greater are moderately anomalous (5 samples).

NICKEL (Ni):

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Elasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 1 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A lognormal data distributition was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 4 populations as follows:

Population l:(Anomalous I) detection limit to 23 p.p.m. I, 2 (Background II) 23 p.p.m. to 34 p.p.m. n 3 (Background III) 34 p.p.m. to 48 p.p.m. II 4 (Background III) 48 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m.

Results: The lower population as partitioned is anomalously low. Upper populations represent background populations and there are no anomalously high values as such.

BURTON CONSULTING INC. _

15

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Plasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 5 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p,m.

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A logarithmic distributition was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 3 populations as follows:

Population l:(Background I) det. limit to 1 p.p.m. II 2 (Background II) 1 p.p.m. to 3 p.p.m- II 3 (Backgr. III) 3 p.p.m to 13 p.p.m.

Results: There is one weakly anomalous sample of 18 p.p.m.

ZINC (an) :

Number of Samples: 92 Analytical Method: Induced Coupled Elasma

(Nitric Aqua-Regia Digestion) Detection Limit: 2 p.p.m.

Upper Limit: 10,000 p.p.m.

Data Treatment: Arithmetic and logarithmic histograms were examined. A logarithmic distributition was observed. Logarithmically-transformed data was plotted by computer on "probability paper" and interactively partitioned into 4 populations as follows:

Population l:(Background I) det. limit to 50 p.p.m. II 2 (Background II) 50 p.p.m. to 130 p.p.m. II 3 (Backgr. III) 130 p.p.m to 155 p.p.m. II 4 (Anomalous I) greater than 155 p.p.m.

Results: The upper population is weakly anomalous and is represented by 11 samples greater than 155 p.p.m.

I BURTON CONSULTING INC. -

This repon may not be reproduced in whole 01 in parl without the wrillen permission 01 Burton Consulting Inc.

7.20 General Discussion of Geochemical Results

The following table summarizes anomalous geochemical samples:

ELEMENT ANOMALOUS THRESHOLD # OF ANOMALOUS VALUES

Au

Ag cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn

no anomalous samples 0 1.0 p.p.m. 3

41' p.p.m. 8 6.01 % 3

2501 p.p.m. 5 no anomalous samples 0

18 p.p-b. 1 155 p.p.m. 11

A 100 metre long section of Grid Line lOON, from Station 250W to 350W contains anomalous cobalt and silver values. The sample taken at Station 325W is anomalous in iron, molybdenum, zinc, manganese, copper, cobalt and silver. Other anomalous values are scattered over the survey area.

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

17

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Further work is recommended on the claims including:

- aerial photograph interpretation - prospecting - geochemical (soil, stream sediment, rock) surveys

r.

L

F.

.

I

18

9.0 COST STATEMENT

The following costs were incurred as a result of field work and subsequent report preparation (cost information marked ** was supplied by the client):

PERSONNEL:

TRANSPORTATION:

Doug Symonds

-Sept. 16 to 20 (Field Work) 1 l/3 days @ $350.00

-Dec. 23 to 24 (Report) 2 days @ $350.00

Dennis Wager

-Sept. 17 (Field Work) 1 day @ $200.00

Alex Burton

-Sept. 17 (Field Work) 1 day @ $425.00

Fred Schomig

-Sept. 16 to 19 (Field Work)

4 days @ $200.00

Total Personnel: ~2.595.00

-Sept. 17 Northern Mtn. Helicopters

-Sept. 17 Truck Rental

-Sept. Motor Home Rental

Total Transportation:

$470.00

700.00

200.00

425.00

**800.00

$481.22

50.00

**750.00

$1.281.22

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

F.

.

w

r

,

COMMUNICATIONS: -sept. 28

Long Distance $0.56

Total Communications: $0.56

ASSAYING: -0ct. 9 Chemex Labs.

-Dec. 13 Chemex Labs.

$1,058.00

529.00

Total Assaying: $1.583.00

DRAFTING/REPRODUCTION: -Dec. 24

DFS Enterprises (drafting) 225.90 -Dec. 30

Reproduce Report (estimate) 50.00

Total Drafting/Reproduction: $275.90

TOTAL OF ALL COSTS: $5.735.68

20

10.0 CERTIFICATE

I, Douglas Frederick Symonds, of #313 - 1750 west 13th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. do hereby state:

1) I am a geologist and a graduate of the University of B.C. (B.Sc. - 1972).

2) I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada. (Registration #F5496).

3) I have practised my profession since graduating in 1972.

4) I have based this report on field work my direct supervision

~~~~~e2L"3', 1990.

5) I have no interest, either direct or indirect, in the VAN 3 or VAN 4 Claims or in any properties belonging to Mr. P. Schomiq, nor do I expect to receive any such interest.

Signed at Vancouver, B.C. this 24th day of December, 1990.

D.F. Symonds, B-SC., Geologist

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

APPENDIX I

(Laboratory Assay Sheets)

BURTON CONSULTING INC.

APPENDIX II

(Data Analysis Printouts)

##########H################~~############~#~#~######~#~####~*~#~##~~#~:~~~~ SUMPtAF:Y STATISTICS and t!?STOl3F$iM ARITHMETIC VALLIE”:

**

####################~~~~#########u################~########~#~~#~~##~~##~#~:~~ SUMMfi~‘f STATISTKS and HISTOGPAM l.Ji~&F:ITHMI I:: VALL'CS

'Jar iable = AIS Unit = PF’M N= ,qz

Ant i-Lug Mean = 0.138 Anti-Lcq Std. DEY. : C-:1 0. 069 i: + :! 0.278

================================================~~=======~======~=======~~~

% cum x ant ilcq cl5 int (#of bins =:20 - bin size = (2. gj619! --___ -____ _-----__ ---____ ---------------_-----------------------~

0 . Cl 0 0.54 0. 033 - 1.0303 61.5” 81. io 0. 107 -0.363: **+*****~***I*~*++****~*~**~*~~~ --:::. 75

0.00 81. 18 0. 124 -0.3r372 0. 00 8 1 . 18 0.143 -0.8453 0. 130 81. 18 0. 165 -0.7834 0.00 81. 18 cl. 1’30 -0. ,215 0.00 81.18 0 . 2 1’3 -0. 6596 ‘j _ OC’ 8 1 . 18 0. 253 -0.5977 0. 00 El . 18 0.291 -0.5358 0.00 81. 18 0. 236 -0.4733 il.00 81.13 0.387 -0.4I20 0.00 81. 18 0. 447 -0. 3;lj 1

15.22 ‘36.24 !3.515 -0. 2882 *+**+**I+***** 0. 00 96. 24 0. 594 -r:, . 2263

0. cm 96. "'4 0. 685 -0. 1644 0. rjsj ‘36. 24 0. 7’30 -0. 1023 r:,. i10 ‘36. ?4 0.311 41. WC& 2.17 ‘33.33 1 . 050 cj.cj113 *I* Ci. ‘3’3 ‘36. 3’3 1.211 0. cm32 Cl . CjCi 93. 33 1.397 0. 1451 1 . !?3 99. 4.5 1.6ii 0. -‘Cj,!j *

I

0 1 2 3

###############H###########################~~##~#######~~#~~######~##~~#~~!

.

.-

.

r.

c

r-

&

-.

2. 23r:,

2.7?4 3.450 4. xc:!

* r;li*-cY++*xI X+-+4+*+++ *+**x* .+,w*X,++*Xr+** *~****I**~***x* t~K-*-is, **+*++ *+-“**X-*+* **x*.* **++*** *+? XY + *

L.

c-

c.

L.

Scsi! Sample Grid - F. Schomig

######W#######~####################p########.~##~#####.~#########~~##.~~~~#~:~

PI?F:AMETEI? SLX?MGPY STkTISTiC:S FOR PRllHRHIL.ITY F’LCT +W!&LiSIS

D&a File Name = B:SOHICP.DOC

Variable = to Unit = PPM 1\, = ‘32 N c: I = 2 r)

Transform = Lugar ithmic Number #of Pcspuiations = 5

# scf Mic,sinr: Observations = 0.

,

Users Visual Parameter Est imater,

Pupul at ion Mean Std Dev PercentagE ---------- ---------- ---------- ---_____--

,

1 3.659 - +

2 4.7’3E; - +

3 8. Cr93 - +

4 15.882 - +

5 36.356 - +

r

De~faul t Thresholds.

Standard Deviaticsn Multiplier = 2.0

Pop . Thresholds ---_ ----------.

Scsil Sample Grid - F. Schnmig

#######################Y####H###########~~#~~#######~#########~*#~~~~~###~~

PfWAMETEF: SUMMAEY STATISTICS FW Pi?OHfiHILITY PLOT GJNALYSIS

Data File Namrr = Ei:SCHICF.DOC:

Variable = 1:: u Unit = FF’M hl = ‘32 N ,:I = 2 i:i

Transfcfrm = Lcjgarithmic Number of Populatic*ns = 5

# nf Missing Dbservations = 0.

. .

_-

Lkerc, Visual rdrdmetet- Estimates

F’q3ul at i 8rm Mean Std Dev Percentage ---__----- --------__ ----___--- -I__---_--

Default Thresholds.

Standard Deviation Mu1 t ipl ier = 2.0

Pnp. Thresholds ---- ----- --.---

Soil Sample l&-id .- F. Srh~rsmig

########w#####################################~*########~~~~##~~###~~~#~##~ SUMMAW STATISTICS and HISTOIXAM LOGABITHMIIC VALUES

cva’r i ab 1 e = ,::u Unit = Fwl N= ‘32

% rcum % ant i 1 ~ng cl5 int I# I:, f b i n 5 = 20 - bin czizp := 0. 1 iy36 :? _ -----__ ----------------------------------------

0. OCI !3. 521 0.881 -O.OF;48 1.03 1.61 1.135 I). 0548 * 0. 00 1.61 i.4m 0.1644 0. 00 1.61 1.880 0.2741 0 _ Cm 1.61 2.41’3 0.3537 0. 00 I.61 3. ii4 0. 4933 1.03 2:. 63 4. 008 c!.g,ci2zy * 1.03 3.76 5.133 0.7125 * 3.26 6233 6. 640 ,, .BpJZ *** 3.26 I(:,*22 5.546 0.3318 *** 6.52 16.67 1 1 ” 000 1 . (14 14 *~~~*x*+

17.34 33.87 14.158 l.lSlCl ******+*******+* 14.13 47.85 18” 224 1.2606 *+*********** 11. 36 5’3. 65 23.456 1 . 3703 **x******** 21.74 81.18 30 . 1’3 1 1.47’33 **********+*********

7.61 88.71 30.8% 1.58’35 +*+*r*+ 7.6:1 ‘36.24 50.017 1.6’3’31 ******* 1 . ‘I3 97 . 3 1 64.378 1.5087 + 1 . 03 ‘38. 39 $32.562 1.3184 * 0. 00 48. 3’3 1 C&u 634 2. r:LSCi 1 . 03 ‘33. 46 137.276 2.1376 *

__________-_____________________I_______--------------------------------

0 1 2. <I 3 4

.

v-

_-

.

######~#####~##########################H~######~~###~~#~~##~###~~~?~~~~~#~~ SUMMARY STRTISTICS and HISTOGF:AM AF!I THMET! I:: VALUES

Mean = 4.146 Min = 1. t34jO i5.t QLmr t i 1 e = 2 ~ zy<y,

Std. Dev. = 1.803 Ma:,: = 15. 1:>00 Median = 4, !:?3i:,

-----‘“_“_:----~~:4’~Ei=_-Slf~~pls = 3:.:y3 3rd T”“T”II:.... 4” :i:- __-____-_____-__---_____________________

% I..Llrn % cl5 int i# of bins = 20 - bin size = -! 7’7’! __--- ----- -------_.

0. I30 0. 54 0.632 2.17 2.63 1.368 ** 4.35 6. ‘33 2. 105 **s* 7.61 14.52 ‘-842 *c,**+*

16.30 30.65 3.57’3 ********+***x*+ 32* 61 ‘“.‘j<> 4.316 ***+*****+**~X*+****f)r++*X%YX 21.74 84.41 5.053 ******~****c**++*~***

4. 78 ‘34. 03 5.783 *x*****x* 2.17 ‘36.24 6.526 +* 0. 00 36. 24 7.263 1.04 ‘37.31 a. Cl00 *

0. 1x1 ‘37. 31 a.737 0. 00 ‘37. 31 ‘3.474 0. 0~) ‘37. 31 10.211 0. 00 37. 31 10. ‘347 0. 00 ‘37. 31 il.684 i . 0.3 ‘38. 33 12.421 + 0. i10 98. 39 13.158 0. 00 ‘38. 3’3 13.8’35 0. 00 ‘38. 33 14.632 1.03 33.46 15.368 *

cs 1 2 3 4

##############~#######:~#######H##############################~~~~#~~*#~~~~~~~

.

--

Soil Sample IGrid - F. Sczh*rsmi,g

###############################################~~#####~~#######~###~##~~#~~~

FAf?,XlETER SUMMAF’Y STAT1 STICS FOR F’F’OfiAB IL I TY ?LOT ZWLYSIS

Data File Name = H:SCHICP.D@C

Vxriable = FE Unit = FCT “,Z ‘32 N c: I = L: r;!

Transform = Ar ithmet imr Number er#f Fopulations = 3

# of IMis+inq q bse~rvationr = 0.

Users Vieiual Parameter Estimates

Std Dev Percentage - ----------

Standard Deviatim Multiplier = 2.0

F’op . Threshcxlds -.--- _.---------

1 1.015 3. Z&c:,

2 2.7-q a- 5.583 3 0. ‘343 16. 530

L-

r-

. .

.

--

, -

_

Sail Sample Grid - F. Schomig

##############################################~###################~*#~*~#~~~ SUMMAEY STAT1 STIC:S and HI STOWAM LOOAF: I THMI!: VXES

Variable = MN Unit = FFW N= .j2

Ant i-Lug Mean = 47'3.573 Anti-Log Std. Dev. : I:-:) 1g7.683

===== - ---- - I------------ -- -=====_ --- .-..._-_-=====--... --- -.-- --..--.--===:=====_:=

---------------------------IIIIIII1:II- % cum % ant ilog cl5 int (# ,,f IJins = ;2!, -. bin .;.ize = C!. 12:1?!

_---_ ----- -------- ------- 0 . 0 0 0.54 43 497 . .a 1.6384 1 . 0'3 1.61 57.481 1.7595 + 0. cm i.61 75. '968 1.8806 0 . r:, 0 1.61 100. 401 2.@<117 4.3; 5.91 132.6'3r: 2.1228 **s-* 9.78 15 59 175.368 2.244n ********+ (j.52 22.0 - 4 "3 1.770 ~.3651 ****** El. 70 30. G5 306.313 2.4862 *s******

18. 48 48 '97 . - 404.82'3 2.6073 *cxx**+******+++* 15.22 63. '99 535. 030 2. ,284 ********x*Yx++

8.70 72.58 707. 107 2.8495 ******** 7.61 80. I1 934.527 ".9706 ****x** 4.35 84.41 1235.0w 3.cj'j17 *+** 2.17 86.56 1632.321 3.2128 .* 5.43 '91.94 2157.309 ': -37.3 xx*** 3.26 '95.16 Z!g51,14‘1 3: "4;;o *** 1 . 0'3 96. 3 3768.122 3.5761 + 1. !I'3 '37. 31 4980.041 3.gg,2 * 1.09 98.39 6581.725 3.8183 + 0. 00 '98. 34 8698.544 3. '33'34 1. w 99. 46 114%. 176 4.0606 *

___-________---___--------------------------------------------~.----~---- !_> 1 2 ,>?

Soil Sample Grid - F. Schomig

######################~#~###############~~~##~####~~#########~~###~~~l##~###~

PARAMETEI;! SUMMAl?Y STAT ISTICS FOR FF:OE<AHIL ITY FLOT ANAL% IS

Data File Name = B:SC:HIC:F.DOC:

L...

L,.

-~

,

Variable =

users Visual Parameter Estimates

Population Mean Std Dev Percentage --_------- _------.--- ---__----- --------.--

? 101.442 - *

7, 1’34. 660 - L +

3 510.‘352 - +

4 1733.111 - +

5 4143.775 - +

Default Thresholds.

Standard Deviation Multiplier = 2.0

Pop. Threshal ds ---- -------,---.

###########~##########################H######~#~~####~~####~###~#~~###~#~~ SUMMr7F:Y STnTISTICS and HISTOI;WG'~ LOGARITHMIC VALLES

Variable = MCI Unit = FFM N= ?rj=

Ant i-Lq Mean = I.235 Anti-Lm:ag Std. Dev. : C-1 Q. 5.75

________-_______--_-___---__-__--____--___-_---___-__--____~21-_.._'.:'"I_ --------------------___________________I--------~-------~-----.---.-----~- % I..Llrn % ant i 1 cq cl5 int I# *f bins = 20 - bin size 5 ij. ijyy:;

----- ----- -------- ------- -----------__--------------------------- 0 . 00 (2. 54 0. i:)8Y -1.0486 7.61 8.06 0.112 -0.9514 **,x*+4 r:, , QQ 8.06 0.140 -cl. 8543 0. CID 8. 06 ii. 175 -0.7572 Q . or:1 8 . 06 Cl. 219 -0. 6601 Q . Cm 8.06 0. 274 -0.5530 0 . 00 8. 06 0. 34; -0. 4659 C? . r:r 0 8. 06 0.428 -0.36538 0. 00 8.06 0.535 -0.2717 Q . cm 8. 06 0. 669 -0.i746 0. O!) a.06 0.837 -Q . 0775

46.74 54.30 1 . iW6 Q . 0197 ~~*+*X*****~*+****C~~~*~**~~~~~~~ --:::. j ; 0. ilc1 54. 30 1 . 308 0.1!68 0.00 54.30 1.636 n.2139

33.70 87 63 0. QQ 87:63

2.046 0.3110 ******+********+X******~*+~~*~~* 2. Fm3 0. 4081

6. 52 94. QY 3.200 0. 5052 ****** 4.35 98.3'3 4. cjc:Q Q. 6023 **** 0. DO '38 " 39 5.005 0. 6994 0. QQ 98. 3'3 G. 260 0. 7965 1 . 0'3 '39. 46 7.828 (3.8937 +

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 1 2 3 -t

c

.

_

.

,

_

.

r.-

Soil Samplr lGrid - F. Schomig

#######~#####################################~#######~#####~#####~~##~#~#~~~ SUMMAFY STATISTKS and HISTOGF:~r! LOBAFt I-WI'! !. 11~ VALUES

Variable = NI Unit = PF'M b, = '32

Mean = I. 76'3'3 ilin = 0.8451 1st n1artiie = 1.6126

Std. Dev. = O.Z646 Max = 2.1762 Median = I. 8388 cv 1: = 14.9518 Sl::c?wness = -1. 1'308 3rd Ouartile = 1. '5542

Anti-Log Mean = 58.872' Anti-Lt>g Std. Dev. : (-:I 32. (j*.s

+ :j 1 Ml .27g

% Cum % ----- -----

!3. :rc> 0. 54 1 . 04 1.61 13 . !jb 1.61 2.17 3.76 rj . cjc‘, 3.76 0, c:,o 3.76 0 . Cm 3.7E 1.03 4.84 4.35 ‘5.14 2.17 11.2’3 3.26 14.52 9.78 24.15 4.35 28.49 3.2’6 31.72

10.87 42.47 11.56 54.30 16.30 70.43 14.13 84.41

a. 70 33. Cri 4.35 ‘37.31 2.17 33.46

antilc#g cls int

6.458 7.588 8.916

10.477 12.311 14.465 16.538 1’5. 373 22.469 27.577 3”. 404 38. 076 44.740 52.572

61.774 72.587 a5 .Z,S”

ifjtj.,221 117.764 138.377 162.5’3’3

.E

**

* **** xx *Ir* ********* 3+x** xx* **+******* *******~k*** +x****+***x**+* *****I+****** *.,****+* **** *.*

0 1 2 3 4

##########~#######~####################################~#######~###~*:~~#~~~~~

r

I

Scil Sample 15rid - F. Schcmig

#######################################t~#####################~##~~~~~~~~

FARAMETEK SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR FRUBAHILITY F’L@T ANALYSIS

Data File Name = B:SCHIW.DEC

Variable = NI Unit = PPM N = ‘3;:

jq ,::I = Z<C!

Transform = Logarithmic Number of F’opulst imzms = 4

# mcqf Missing Observat icons = 0.

Users Visual Parameter Estimates

Popul at ictn mean Std DEV Percentage _______--- .--__---___ __---__--- ----------

Standard Deviat km Multiplier = 2.0

Pop . Thresholds ---- __----.~---

1 4. 803 zfg.234 2 Ia. 145 3,:31* 3 31 . 531 d .18.246

4 47.528 138.835

--

L.

.

r ,.

,

Soil Sample Grid - F. Schomig

#####################################H#####~##~####~~#######~~#t?~~~###~~~ Sl.lMMAi?Y STAT!STICS and HISTOGRAM LOGARITHMIC VAL!JES

Variable = Pi% unit = PPM N =

Mean = 0.68'35 Min = 0. mm0 i-St c!LtartilE = I:). r,i)Z 1 Std. DEW. = 0.2540 Mar. = 1.2553 Median = 0. 7782

!I” % = 36.8436 Skewness = -C! _ 9907 3rd Quartile = !j. 7y?$3=

Anti-Ls,g Mean = 4.832 Anti-tog Std. Dev. : I:-:) ?.7-'E

! +i 3.781

% cum % antilug cl5 int c:lt: ,:4-f bins = ZIj - h.ll size = 0. 0661 2 - -------- ------- ----------------------------------------

lj. 00 0.54 CI.327 -Cl. 0330 5.43 5.31 1 . 073 0,033CI ***** 0 . (j 0 5.31 1.256 0. 039 1 cl . 0 rj 5.91 1.463 '3.1652 0. 00 s. 31 1.703 !). ;'312 0 . I? $3 5.91 1. ‘383 0. “,373 8.70 14.52 2. X'3 0.3634 *x*x+*** C).cm 14.52 2.688 0. 42'34 0 . r:rc, 14 . 52 3. 130 Q.4355 i). (:I0 14 . 5"‘ L 3.644 0. 5616

‘..- A. 4.243 0. 6276 *Xf******~%*X*X**X**I*X(*X $3. 00 42. 47 4.940 Cl. 6’337 0. 00 42. 47 5.751 0.75’38

33.70 75.81 6.6% 0. a258 ***********+t++*~~****~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0. 00 75. 81 7.737 o.ayi4

13.04 88.71 3.078 i:,. ‘358ij ~*****~***,*c~, 7.6i 36.24 10. 56’3 1 . r:,p,il ******* 2. 17 ‘38.313 12.306 1. CEml .*+

0. 00 98. 39 lc+.3Z:8 1. :5s,2 0. I)C) ‘38, 3’3 16.682 1.2222

1 . 09 39.46 19. ‘$23 1.2883 x

0 1 .:, i 3 -*

#M########~##########;###################~###############~~##~t~#~~#~t#~~#~:l?~~

r

Soil Sample Grid .- F. Schomig

#########################################~##~~~#####~~#####~###~~~~#~#####~

PARAMETER SUMNA~Y STATISTICS FOT-: FROBABILITY FLOT XWLYSIS

Data File Name = B:SCHICP.DOC

Variable = FB Unit = FPM N= ‘3” p%j t:: 1 = 2;:’

Transfcarm = Logarithmic Number csf Fopulations = ?

# of Missing Ubservatians = 0. .

______---_---__-----_======================================~=========~==~=

Users Visual Parameter Estimates

Pc~pul at i son Mean Std Dev F’ercentage --______-- __-------- ---------- -_--------

1. 000 - $5. ‘38’3 5. @)Ci + 1 . 0 1 2

1.532 - 1 . 078 5. r:,lJ +~ 2.176

5.360 - 3. 40,:> ‘j C! . !I! 0 + a. 448

Default Thresholds.

Standard Deviation Multiplier = 2.0

hp. Thresholds ---- ----------

I .

r

_

_

-.

Sail Sample (Grid - F. Schnmig

#################################~####~#~#####~###~##~#############~~##### SUMMAFY STATISTICS and !i!STCGEAM LflGAF:ITHtlIC: VALUES

Variable = z 14 Unit = WM N= 92

Mean = 1 . '3526 Min = 1.57'38 1st Quartile = 1.3195 Std. DEIV. = r:,. 1932 Mar: = 2.4~14 d Median = 1335

c:v % = 9.3837 SI::ewness = r:>. 34;2" 3rd Guartile = 1864

Anti-Lug Mean = 89.~57 Anti-Ls:sg Std. DEV. : (3 5e. 797 c: + :> 136.71"

==========================_==I==_===========~=~====~=~=~~====~=======~=~ % 'Z urn % ant i 18cq cls int !+I of bins = 3:) - bin size = 0. 0,448)

_-__- ___-- --___--- --_---- ----------------------------------------

0. on is . 54 36. 08'3 1.5574 2.17 2.63 Jtj. 012 1 , ‘cJ22 ,*.* 1.03 3.75 ++.36,2 1.647':) * 2.17 5.91 49.185 l.C'3lE3 ** 6.52 12.37 54.532 1.7367 **Y**+ 4.35 16.67 60.461 1.7815 ****

10.87 27.4" 67.034 1.8263 *******x+* '3.78 37.10 74.321 I.8711 ********* 8.70 45.70 82.401 1.915-j ******rc?c

10.87 X.45 31.359 1.9608 ********t+ 5.43 61.83 lrJ1.292 2.0056 ***s* '3.78 71.51 112.304 2.0504 ****~***f* 6.52 77.96, 124.513 2. c1.352 *)F***+ 7.61 85.4a 138.04'3 ='. 14ocl .*+xX*** 1.09 86.56 153.057 1.1849 * 2.17 88.71 169.6'37 L.ii - '-""w +$- 6.52 35.16 188.145 2.274.5 x****-* 2.17 97.31 2rjB. 600 2.31'33 *x 1 . 0'3 '38. 3'3 231 .- "713 2.3641 * (3. C,Cl ‘38. 3’3 256.421 2. 4<:1qc> 1. 0'3 '39. 46 284.298 2.4538 +

0 1 2 3 4

###############~###############################################~#ti:#:#i?~t#it#ittt

r

--

--

--

Soil Sample Grid - F. Schomig

########w###############################~####~#####~#~:~####~~~#~~~#~~~###~

PAF:AtlETEE: SUMMAEY STAT1 STICS FDF: FF:OHf%IF ITY PLOT &N&L% IS

Data File Name = E):SCIiIC:P.DOC

Variable = :M Unit = F’PM Nz 0;: N CI = 2;‘c!

Transform = I-cqarithmic Number of F’itpulat ions = 4

# aof Missing Observations = 0.

Users Visual Parameter Estimates

Popul at ion Meal- Std Dev Percentage

Default Thresholds.

Standard Deviation Mctltiplier = 2.0

Pap. Threshcal ds ---- ___------.-

r-

c

L.

. .

APPENDIX III

(References)

,

r

I

r

r

,.

.

r

r.

-

I

REFERENCES

1) Wpdated Reserves Estimate Released for Eskay Creek"; Northern Miner; April 16, 1990; pp. 1 & 24.

2) "Geology & Mineral Deposits of the Unuk River-Salmon River-Anyox Area: B.C.M.E.M.P.R. Bulletin 63; 1988.