1

IEEE Energy Storage and Stationary Battery (ESSB)

Committee General MeetingJune 24, 2019

Hilton @ Santa Fe Plaza

Welcome!

2

Opening ESSB Committee House Business• Payment for Meetings if not Prepaid

– see Tom Carpenter• Formal Welcome/Introductions of Members &

Guests– see next slide for new members

• Determine Quorum Exists for Committee Business• Approval of the Phoenix Meeting Minutes• Sign-in and Meetings Attendance Registration

3

IEEE ESSB Committee New Members• Ken Hill

– Enersys

Congratulations and

Welcome to Official ESSB Committee Membership!

4

Host Supporter/Sponsor: Sandia National Labs• A special note of thanks and appreciation is due to:

– Babu Chalamala– Sharon Ruiz– David Sokoloff– David Rosewater– Ben Schenkman– Frank Curri– Jaci Hernandez

5

Supporter/Sponsor: PNM• Public Service of New Mexico:

– Sponsoring Tuesday luncheon• Tom Fallgren

– VP of Generation• Speaker: Dean Brunton

– Resource Planning Group– NM 2045 Clean Energy Mandate, etc.

6

Activities in and Around Santa FeCanyon Road

7

Activities in and Around Santa FeSanta Fe Opera House

8

Activities in and Around Santa FeMuseum of International Folk Art

9

Activities in and Around Santa FeMeow Wolf

10

Activities in and Around Santa FePalace of the Governors & NM History Museum

11

Activities in and Around Santa FeLoretto Chapel

12

Activities in and Around Santa FeCathedral Basilica of St Francis of Assisi

13

Activities in and Around Santa FeGeorgia O’Keeffe Museum

14

Log-In to Register Attendance• Sign into ‘Attendance

Tool’ from myProject– …or go to: imat.ieee.org

• After sign-in, select:– PE/ESSB WM2019

Note: You do not have to be an IEEE Member to register Attendance

15

Log-In to Register Attendance (continued)• For ESSB General Meeting:

– PE/ESSB/MCATT Attendance

• Time bar will be Yellow when Sign-in is Available– Click Time Bar –

– It Will turn Green

• Exit

16

In Memoriam• Tim “Uncle Timmy” Bolgeo

– a true “Character”• LibertyCon1-25 Founder and

FanZine Editor for 10 yrs• Revenge of Hump Day

Newsletter Editor for over 20 yrs– 40 yrs with TVA as Electrical

Engineer and Battery specialist– Active and “Vocal” SCC29 Member

• including 450 Working Group Chair for many years

17

Projector Sign-Out Process• Single point of contact will be Kurt Uhlir

– Text or call Kurt at (630) 606-3887– Email – kurt@standbypowersys.com

• If you are doing comment resolution you may use 2 projectors• Do not keep a projector overnight unless your WG has a session

first thing the next day – but advise Kurt if doing so– Return projector and all accessories when you are finished using it.

• All projectors are to be returned to Kurt (who will get them to their original owners) no later than Noon Friday at the wrap-up meeting

18

IEEE ESSB Committee Officers– Curtis Ashton – ESSB Chair

Training Director, American Power Systems (Deka Services division)– Babu Chalamala – ESSB Vice Chair

Director, Energy Storage Technology and Systems, Sandia Labs– Steve Vechy – ESSB Secretary & PR/Marketing rep

Battery Consultant and Real Estate Agent – Tom Carpenter – ESSB Treasurer & Meeting Registrar

NERC/FERC Reliability Program Manager for TVA– Chris Searles – ESSB Past Chair (& ESCT co-chair)

National Director of Business Development, BAE Batteries USA– Jim McDowall – ESSB Standards Coordinator

Business Development Manager, Saft America

2019-2020 ESSB Officers:

19

IEEE ESSB Committee Officers (cont.)– Executive Officers plus -– Brandon Bartling – Chair, SBEE Subcommittee– Rich Hutchins – Chair, DC Power & Related Systems (DCRS) Subcommittee– Dan Martin – Secretary, SBEE Subcommittee– David Franklin– Secretary, DCRS Subcommittee– Lesley Varga– Chair, Awards Committee – Ray Byrne – IEEE Fellows Coordinator– Paul Hectors – ESSB Webmaster– Charlie Vartanian – co-chair of Energy Storage Collaboration Team (ESCT)– Ralph Masiello - Tutorials

2019-2020 ESSB ExCom:

20

ESSB Master Level SubCommittees / WGs• SBEE (Stationary Battery and Electrochemical Energy Storage)

– see following slide for all of its working groups• DCRS (DC Power & Related Systems)

– see slide to come for all of its working groups• ESCT (Energy Storage Collaboration Team)

– works with SCC 21 and others (SCC 21 chair is Mark Siira of ComRent) - see related slide• 1725 (Batteries in Laptops and CellPhones – Entity) – Chair: Glen Scales (consultant)

• 1881 (Stationary Battery Glossary) – Chair: Chris Belcher (CellWatch)

• Nuclear Working Group – Chair: Sal Salgia (Exelon)

• Codes Working Group – Chair: Bill Cantor (TPI Engineering)

21

ESSB Structure

22

Stationary Battery & Electrochemical Energy Storage (SBEE) WGs• 450 (VLA Maintenance & Testing) – Chair: Jason Wallis (Enersys)• 484 (VLA Installation) – Chair: Joe Stevens (Duke Energy)• 485 (Lead-Acid Sizing & Selection) – Chair: Jim Midolo (Trojan/C&D)• 535 (Nuclear Battery Qualification) – Chair: Bob Beavers (Sargent & Lundy)• 1106 (NiCd Installation, Maintenance, & Testing) – Chair: Jim McDowall (Saft)• 1115 (NiCd Sizing) – Chair: Jim McDowall (Saft)• 1184 (UPS Batteries) – Chair: Bansi Patel (consultant)• 1187 (VRLA Installation) – Chair: Eric Lehmann (C&D)• 1188 (VRLA Maintenance) – Chair: Bill Cantor (TPI Engineering)• P1189 (Battery Selection – Scope Expanded) – Chair: Jason Wallis (Enersys)• 1657 (Battery Tech Qualification) – Chair: Curtis Ashton (Deka Services)• 1660 (Cycling Applications) – Chair: Chris Searles (BAE)• P2685 (Engine Starting Batteries/ESS) – Chair: Rick Raczak (Caterpillar)

23

DCRS Working Groups• P946 (DC Systems – Scope Expanded) – Chair: Haissam Nasrat (Primax)• 1375 (Battery Electrical Protection) – Chair: Chris Belcher (CellWatch)• 1491 (Battery Monitoring) – Chair: Dan Lambert (ZincFive)• 1578 (Spill Containment) – Chair: Jeff Donato (EnviroGuard)• 1635 / ASHRAE 21 (Battery Room Ventilation) – Chairs: Curtis A. & Deep G. • 1679 (Evaluating Emerging Battery Technologies) – Chair: Jim McDowall (Saft)

– 1679.1 (Characterizing/Evaluating Li-Based Batteries) – Chair: Mike Nispel (Phi Sci)– 1679.2 (Characterizing/Evaluating Na-Beta) – Chair: Andrew M. (FZSonick)– P1679.3 (Characterizing/Evaluating Flow Batteries) – Chair: Vish V. (PNNL)– P1679.4 (Evaluating Alkaline Batteries besides NiCd) – Chair: Dan Lambert (Zinc5)

• P2405 (Utility Battery Chargers [from NEMA PE5]) – Chair: Art Salander (Hindle)• P2686 (Battery Management Systems [BMS]) – Chair: David Rosewater (Sandia Labs)

24

ESCT / SCC 21 (Transitioning) Working Groups• 937 (PV Lead-Acid Installation & Maintenance) – Chair: Chris Searles (BAE)• 1013 (Standalone PV Lead-Acid Sizing) – Chair: Mark Siira (ComRent)• 1144 (NiCd PV Sizing – Inactive)• 1145 (PV NiCd Installation & Maintenance – Inactive)• 1361 (Lead-Acid Selection for Standalone PV – SCC21)• 1526 (Testing Standalone PV) – Chairs: M. Siira (ComRent) & C. Ashton (Deka Services)• P1547.9 (Connecting ESS to the Grid – joint w/SCC21) – Chairs: Jim M. & Mike R.)• 1561 (Optimizing Lead-Acid Life in Hybrid Systems) – Chair: Curtis Ashton• 1562 (Standalone PV Array Sizing) – Chair: Mark Siira(ComRent)• 1661 (Testing Lead-Acid in Hybrid Systems) – Chair: Charlie Vartanian (PNNL)• BESS Tutorials – Chair: Ralph Masiello (Quanta)

25

IEEE Support Staff for ESSB• Michael Kipness – SA Program Mgr

– m.kipness@ieee.org• Shana Pepin – PES Technical Activities Program Mgr

– s.pepin@ieee.org• Dean Fiorino (d.fiorino@ieee.org) runs PES Resource Center

• LaToya Gourdine – Education (Webinars, Tutorials, etc.)– l.gourdine@ieee.org

• Phyllis Caputo - IEEE Smart Grid– p.caputo@ieee.org

• Shanon Nason - PES Awards– s.nason@ieee.org

26

More from Paul on Website Transition

27

Current ESSB Website• General documents

• PDH form• ESSB Policies and Procedures Manual

• General minutes• Technical papers and presentations from 2015 - 2019

28

Current ESSB “Members Only” Website• Draft standards• Working group minutes• Task force documents• Nuclear group documents

29

Legacy ESSB “Private” Website• Historical documents for:

• Task force groups (MSDS and NERC)• Nuclear group• Codes• Adcom minutes 2011-2016• Draft standards 2008-2016

• Technical papers and presentations from 2016-2008

30

ESSB Documents for iMeet• 2019 Winter meeting (Phoenix):

• Drafts• Minutes

• If the Phoenix meeting documents are not there, contact your working group chair

31

ESSB Documents for MyProject• Ballot draft standards

32

ESSB Website Transitions

33

What Ends Up Where in the Future?

34

ESSB Website Links• ESSB Main Website• ESSB Members Website• Legacy ESSB Private Area Website• IEEE iMeet• IEEE myProject

35

Summary on New/Old WebTools, + …• iMeet for Working Group Document Posting

– Get with DCRS or SBEE officers or Exec officers for help if needed– Show and Tell on How to Migrate Old Minutes and Drafts?

• MyProject– MyProject User Guide link & Vechy “interest” signup screenshots on ESSB site

• Transitioned out of ListServ → MyProject, IMAT, and iMeet• New Committee Website:

– https://cmte.ieee.org/pes-essb• old URL addresses still get you there

– https://sites.ieee.org/pes-essb– http://www.ewh.ieee.org/cmte/PES-SBC

» Content Being Migrated from Here by Paul & WG Officers

36

Latest Announcements , & Items up for ESSB “Members Only” Vote, or General Discussion

• Generic Working Group P&P approved by AudCom– Reminder to some WG to put their name on it and upload to

their iMeet space• ESCT-Related Issues

– Status of Moving PV Standards to us From SCC 21– Potentially Transitioning ESCT into Also Being a Standards-

Sponsoring Sub-Committee of ESSB?– Status of IEEE Energy Stoprage “Activity Scan”

37

Energy Storage Collaboration Team (ESCT)• Continue to Serve as Liaison w/ SCC 21 but remain under ESSB • Continue Co-Chairs, & Develop Scope for Both Groups to Approve

– ESSB Appoints One Co-Chair– SCC 21 Appoints One Co-Chair

• Continue Activity Scan (Inventory Survey) of IEEE and Industry Energy Storage Activity– Standards Development– White Paper – Tutorials & Seminars Activity

• Continue Collaboration Role across IEEE Societies and External ES Standards Making Groups

38

Assign Following Working Groups to ESCT?IEEE 1679Emerging Technologies

IEEE 1679.1 – Lithium IEEE 1679.2 – Sodium

IEEE 1679.3 – Flow IEEE 1679.4 non-NiCd Alkaline Secondary

IEEE P2686 - BMS

IEEE 1660Cycling Batteries

IEEE 937 – Maintenance of LAin PV Systems

IEEE 1013 – Sizing LA inPV-only Systems

IEEE 1561 – LA Performance,Life in Hybrid PV Systems

IEEE 1562 – Array/Battery Sizing of PV-only Systems

IEEE 1661 – Test & Evaluationof LA in Hybrid PV Systems

IEEE 1361 – Selecting Lead-Acid in PV-only Systems

IEEE 1526 – PV-only SystemsTesting and Performance

(IEEE 1547.9 – Co-Sponsor ofESS & Grid (SCC21 Primary)

IEEE TBD – Energy Management Systems (EMS) for ESS – Co-Sponsor w/SCC21 (ESSB Prime)

39

Energy Storage Subcommittee Role• The ESSB Co-Chair serves as the Chair of this Subcommittee• ESSB Agenda for Future Subcommittee WG meetings:

– Coordinate reports and efforts within ESSB AdCom Domain• Will function in a unique way (sort of like a matrix reporting role

similar to what some corporations fashion within certain operating situations)

• Will require revision to ESSB O&P and P&P

40

Summary of Potential ESCT Transition?• To be one of three subcommittees in ESSB• Responsibilities include:

– ESSB PARs & resulting WGs that have significant AC-side and/or Grid-Tie scope• e.g., future EMS PAR• eventual Home for all Stationary Battery Standards used primarily for Cycling

– 1679 family, PV stuff from SCC21, 1660, and 2686 (BMS)– May need to Rename SBEE

» How About SBSA (Stationary Batteries for Standby Applications)?– ESCT Chair is ESSB Chair’s support and/or delegate for SCC21 liaison activities– Manage the ESSB’s IEEE PES ES Tutorial resources and execution

• Chris and Charlie to remain co-Chairs

41

ESCT Re-Organization Vote?

42

IEEE Energy Storage Activity Scan• Request Responses to 7 Questions

43

Activity Scan Contacts & Responses so FarIEEE Society/Group

1 Aerospace & Electronic Systems (AESS) 12 Oceanic Engineering Society (OES)2 Circuits and Systems Society (CAS) 13 Power Electronics Society (PELS)3 Communications Society (ComSoc) 14 Power and Energy Society (PES)4 Computer Society 15 Product Safety Engineering Society (PSES)5 Consumer Electronics Society 16 Technology & Engineering Mgmt (TEMS)6 Control Systems Society (CSS) 17 Ultrasonics, FerroElectrics, & Frequency

Control Society (UFFC)7 Engineering in Medicine & Biology (EMBS)8 Industrial Electronics Society (IES) 18 Vehicular Technology Society (VTS)9 Industry Applications Society (IAS) 19 SCC 21 (Fuel Cells, PV, Dispersed

Generation, and Energy Storage)10 Instrumentation & Measurement (IMS)11 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSS) 20 SCC 18 (Coordinating Cmte to NFPA)

44

Activity Scan Timeline2/11/2019 IEEE PES ‘Ok’ to proceed, release Staff to assist3/14/2019 ESCT meet with IEEE Staff

Confirm audience, structure, and mechanism for the surveyShana Pepin, IEEE PESMichael Wehrman, IEEE Strategic Research

5/1/2019 Announcement Email from IEEE PES VP, Technical Activities6/5-17/2019 Activity Scan questionnaire active online7/3/2019, Followup plan with IEEE staff10/2019 Report findings to ESSB2/2020 Report findings to IEEE

45

P1547.9 (joint ESSB / SCC 21 Standard) Report

• Jim McDowall (and Michael Ropp?)

46

More Announcements , & Items up for ESSB “Members Only” Vote, or General Discussion

• Proposal to Sponsor Entity-Based PAR on PV-BESS Vehicle Charge Stations– We Already Sponsor 1625/1725 (CellPhone/Laptop) Entity-

Based Standard(s)• We have very Little to Do as a Sponsor, other than Ensure No

Overlap

47

Recommended Practice for Performance Testing of an Electrochemical Energy Storage System (ESS) in Electric

Charging Stations, in Combination with PhotoVoltaic (PV)– Proposed Scope

This recommended practice focuses on the performance test of energy storage systems in the application scenario of PV-Storage-Charging stations with voltage levels of 10kV and below. The test methods and procedures of key performance indexes, such as the stored energy capacity, the round-trip energy efficiency, the response time, the ramp rate and the reference signal tracking, will be proposed based on the duty cycle deriving from the operation characteristic of the energy storage systems.

48

Recommended Practice for Performance Testing of an Electrochemical Energy Storage System (ESS) in Electric

Charging Stations, in Combination with PhotoVoltaic (PV)– Proposed Purpose

The standardization of the performance test for the energy storage system will not only promote the advanced applications of the energy storage technology with complex strategies, but also fill in the standard gaps in the application scenario of PV-Storage-Charging stations. The duty cycle-based test protocol will be referenced, and the engineering practice experiences and previous research works will be considered.

49

Proposed Need for the Aforementiond ProjectWith the improvement of the manufacturing process of energy storage modules and converters, as well as the development of energy storage application technology, the use of energy storage system in the power system is gaining more popularity. As one of the new issues related to energy storage applications, the PV-Storage-Charging stations, which help relieving the load pressure of rapid and random charging load from a large number of Electric Vehicles (EVs) and supplying low carbon power with renewable energy resources, become more and more popular. In this way, energy storage systems can not only guarantee the safe, reliable and low-carbon operation of the power grid, but also improve the overall energy efficiency of the charging station and make obvious economic benefits by means of multiple operation modes such as the power smoothing, the peak shaving and the price arbitrage.

50

Proposed Need (continued)The test protocol of energy storage systems based on duty cycle was proposed in the “Protocol for Uniformly Measuring and Expressing the Performance of Energy Storage Systems” (PNNL22010) published by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in 2012. This protocol defines the duty cycle of different application scenarios such as the peaking shaving, the frequency regulation, the voltage support and the renewable energy source firming and further proposes the test methods and procedures based on the duty cycle. However, the duty cycle of energy storage systems in the PV-Storage-Charging scenario is not mentioned. Currently, standards on the performance test of energy storage systems for the complex application scenarios that refer to both PV smoothing and load regulation of EVs are still in the blank stage.

51

More Announcements , & Items up for ESSB “Members Only” Vote, or General Discussion

• P1679.4 Proposal (non-NiCd Alkaline)– Proposal from Dan Lambert

52

P1679.4 (Guide to non-NiCd Alkaline Secondary Battery Technologies Used in Stationary Applications) Proposed Scope

This document provides guidance for an objective evaluation of aqueous alkaline energy storage technologies by a potentiPl user for a stationary application. This document is to be used in conjunction with IEEE Std 1679, Recommended Practice for the Characterization and Evaluation of Emerging Energy Storage Technologies in Stationary Applications.For the purpose of this document, these alkaline battery technologies include those secondary (rechargeable) electro-chemistries with aqueous alkaline electrolyte. Examples of secondary alkaline chemistries are Nickel-Zinc, Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH), Nickel-Iron (NiFe), and Zinc-Manganese Dioxide (ZnMnO2). Primary (non-rechargeable) alkaline batteries are beyond the scope of this document. Secondary Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd, aka Ni-Cad) batteries are also beyond the scope of this document, as they are already well-covered in other IEEE standards (such as 1106, 1115, etc.).

53

P1679.4 Proposed Scope (continued)While this document does not cover alkaline batteries used in mobile applications, the information provided is applicable to electric vehicles or similar batteries that are repurposed for use in stationary applications. This document also applies that are stationary while in operation, but are intended to be relocated; for example, containerized or trailer-mounted systems.

54

P1679.4 Proposed PurposeNickel-iron batteries were developed more than 100 years ago, and have both a very high cycle life and a very long calendar life, but had mostly been supplanted by NiCd technology due to the heavy maintenance required (extremely frequent watering). Recent advances have reduced watering intervals for some of these NiFe batteries, giving them new market.Nickel-zinc batteries were also developed more than 100 years ago, but until recently were used as primary (single-use) cells due to separator penetration by zinc dendrite growth during recharge. Zinc-manganese dioxide cells were introduced about 50 years ago, and represent about 80% of all the batteries sold in the world (think of common alkaline AA, AAA, C, and D cells), but until recently have mostly been used in non-rechargeable (primary) applications, also because of the zinc dendrite separator penetration problem. Recent material science advances have allowed both of these technologies to be built as secondary cells with capabilities of hundreds of cycles, and as such, their market share is growing in the rechargeable market due to their common, relatively inexpensive materials.

55

P1679.4 Proposed Purpose (continued)Nickel-metal hydride secondary batteries have been used in various (electric vehicles, and earlier versions of cellphones, camcorders, and powered hand tools, etc.) non-stationary applications for about 30 years. They are also well-suited for stationary applications, and have been and are available for such stationary duty.There is a need to provide appropriate information on safety and operating conditions related to these applications. End-users would benefit from having a guide to assist in evaluation of these technologies for stationary applications.Used with IEEE Std 1679, this guide describes a format for the characterization of non-NiCd aqueous alkaline secondary battery technologies in terms of performance, service life and safety attributes. This format will provide a framework for developers and manufacturers to describe their products. The resulting information will assist users, integrators, and servicing organizations in evaluating the possible use of these batteries in stationary applications, and to provide objective criteria for comparative evaluation.

56

KEPIC Discussion• Korean version of EPRI Proposes Translating Existing Korean Standards

as Base to Start Work on More Li-ion Battery Standards– Original Visit and Discussions at February Meeting– Request for 4, but we’re not interested in Class 1E Nuclear Li-ion Batteries

for now• Performance & Safety of Stationary Li-ion Batteries & Additional Equipment

– This may have some Overlap with IEEE 1679.1 (wait for translation)• Installation Design and Installation of Stationary Li-ion Batteries• Maintenance of Li-ion Batteries for Stationary Applications

– They’ll be coming back with either individual-based or Entity-based PARS• Advantage to us of Encouraging Individual PARS with ESSB involvement rather

than Entity-Based with Just Sponsorship

57

KEPIC Week AirFare Funding?• They would like ESSB Chair, its Nuclear Working Group

Chair, and a BESS guru to Speak to them at KEPIC Week– August 28-29, 2019 in Jéonsung, Korea– They’ll Cover Travel and Lodging in Korea– Funding Air Travel for 3 to KEPIC Week

• $7,500 (approx. $2,500 each)• Request for ESSB Funds

58

Even More Announcements , & Items up for ESSB General Discussion

• Maintenance Frequencies/Tasks by Criticality - Proposal for VLA, NiCd, etc.– Examples from draft of next edition of IEEE 1188 (VRLA

Maintenance)

59

Proposed draft update to 1188 section 5.1• Proper maintenance will prolong the life of a battery and will aid in assuring that it

is capable of satisfying its design requirements. A good battery maintenance and testing program will serve as a valuable aid in determining the need for battery replacement. The users must consider their particular application and reliability needs if maintenance and/or testing procedures, other than those recommended in this document, are used. For example, for less critical sites/batteries, the user may choose to maintain the battery less frequently than what is described in sections 5.2 and 6.2 through 6.4, or may choose to not perform all of the tasks listed in these sections. Annex G gives some guidance around tasks and frequencies for less critical sites/batteries. The user may also determine because of criticality, expense, or other factors to do battery replacements proactively on a periodic time base rather than actually basing replacement on capacity test results, as directed in sections 6 and 7. Battery maintenance should be performed by personnel knowledgeable of batteries and the safety precautions involved.

60

Proposed 1188 Annex G.1 – Less Maintenance• Not all battery applications are equal. A small 12V 7Ah battery in a UPS that backs up a TV

screen in an office conference room isn’t as important as a backup system battery in a nuclear station. There are huge differences between the cost of those 2 batteries, and monthly maintenance on a battery that costs US $20 is not justifiable for the former application where regulation, safety, and reliability are not nearly as important.

• Design of the battery system can also impact how frequently maintenance is necessary to ensure reliability. Four parallel strings of 24 lead-acid cells, providing 8 hours of backup in a nominal 48V battery plant is inherently more reliable than a single long string of 240 lead-acid cells in a UPS designed for 5 minutes of backup. Assuming equal reliability needs for those systems, the latter application requires far more monitoring and maintenance to achieve the same reliability as the former. Nominal 48VDC plants in telecom applications are often maintained no more frequently than twice a year, as suggested by Telcordia GR-513; whereas most important UPS applications have permanent monitoring (see IEEE 1491), and quarterly manual maintenance.

• With these considerations, this Annex is offered as an informative guide to alternative (less frequent) methods of maintaining and testing VRLA batteries than what is found in Chapters 5 and 6 (which is the best maintenance for the most critical VRLA batteries).

61

Proposed 1188 Annex G.2 – Criticality Class• It can be difficult to determine where to draw the lines between levels of criticality

when there is no regulatory authority to tell the user what the minimum maintenance is. Therefore, that determination is left to the individual users, since they know better than the authors of this document the criticality of their individual sites.

• For purposes of differentiation between maintenance levels, this Annex allows the user to pick criticality levels from 1 to 4, with 1 being the most critical, and 4 the least. Level 1 maintenance/testing in the following tables follows the descriptions in chapters 5 and 6. In the table, I refers to initial/install/replace, M refers to monthly, Q to quarterly, SA to semi-annual, A to annual, and BA to bi-annual. If a spot is left blank, the recommendation is not to even check it for that criticality level.

62

Proposed 1188 Table G.1 – Task Frequency

63

ESSB Awards

Lesley Varga, Curtis Ashton, and Andrew Miraldi

64

Working Group Awards• 1679.1 recently awarded PES working group of the year

– PES has more than 600 working groups, so this is a BIG deal!!!– Most Significant Contributions of Document:

• The development and use of Lithium based batteries is accelerating in many applications in our world today, e.g. consumer products, electric vehicles, energy storage. The traditional standby stationary application where lead acid and nickel cadmium batteries have been utilized is now seeing lithium based batteries promoted and sold for the stationary application. There is a strong, growing demand for IEEE Standards/Guides/Recommended Practices to address the use of lithium based batteries in the stationary application. This Guide is the first IEEE Std. to provide the industry with the guidance and technical basis for evaluating and understanding the use and risks associated with lithium based batteries in the standby stationary application.

65

Working Group Awards (continued)• 1679.2 individual awards

– Presented by Andrew Miraldi

66

Working Group Awards (continued 2)• 1578 individual awards

– Presented by Jeff Donato

67

Individual Awards• 1184 Working Group Chair Bansi

Patel was recently recognized for his contributions to the Product Safety Engineering Society– For more than 15 years of service

to the Product Safety Engineering Society, including key roles on the Board; leadership at the annual Symposia, including General Chair, co-Chair, and Track Chair roles; and leadership in Southern California Chapter activities

68

ESSB ExCom/AdCom Chair Reports1. ESSB Treasurer’s Report – Tom Carpenter

2. ESSB Standards & Codes Working Group – Bill Cantor

3. PES Tech Council Update – Babu Chalamala

4. SBEE Subcommittee Report – Brandon Bartling

5. DCRS Subcommittee Report – Rich Hutchins

69

IEEE PES ESSB Committee Financial ReportCategory #s Income Expenses Balance CommentsChattanooga

6/17 mtg90

$27,528 $14,486 $13,042 1st mtg to use 12Signup. $8k from TVA.

Tutorial 80 26 were not Meeting attendeesJacksonville

1/18 mtg101 $29,616 $12,846 $16,770

Competitive bidding lowered AV $.$5k SAFT support.

NJ 6/18 mtg 102 $29,062 $17,622 $11,440 IEEE eliminated AV $. Hoppecke $5k

Phoenix2/19 mtg

134$40,075 $14,638 $25,437

CenturyLink eliminated AV $, &reduced F&B. $5k from SRP.

Dinner Cruise 94 15 not mtg attendees

Santa Fe6/19 mtg

95 $9,471 $408 $9,063Thru mid-June - doesn’t include AVor F&B payouts. $3k Sandia support

General Funds $901 $755 $146 Interest income. Expenses mostlysigns, audit, donations in memoriam

AccountBalance

$136,653 $60,755 $75,897ESSB ExCom established goal ofapproximately $50K in reserve forexpenses (seminars, tutorials, etc.)

70

2019 (Aug 4-8) PES General Meeting (Atlanta)

ESSB Program and Storage Super Session

Babu Chalamala

71

2019 PES GM Energy Storage SuperSession• Theme: Making Energy Storage Commercially Routine• Discuss Implementation Today and Practical Experience –

Gaps and Barriers, What is Happening– Resolving State & Federal Regulatory Issues– Technology and Cost Improvements– Interconnection Standards– Siting / Fire / Safety Standards– Planning and Operational Analytics– Markets and Storage Business Models

72

Composition of the Energy Storage SuperSession

• 3 Panel Sessions of 60 to 75 min each• Each panel with panel chair/facilitator• Panels Organized around Themes

73

Business Models/AnalyticsRalph Masiello, Quanta Technologies

• Enabling Successful ESS Business Models for Utilities, Developers, Customers– State Regulations

• Mohsen Jafari, Rutgers (confirmed)• Bill Ackers, NY-BEST (confirmed)

– Utility Panelists• Jessica Harrison or Jeff Bladen, MISO (confirmed)• Yoichiro Tashiro, Tokyo Electric Power Co (confirmed)• Susan Mora, Pepco/Exelon (confirmed)• Ken Seiler, PJM (confirmed)

74

Engineering and Siting of StorageBabu Chalamala, Sandia

• How to deploy GW of storage, especially distributed storage– Safety, Testing, and Standards:

• Bill Cantor, TPI / Penn State• Hideki Satake, Japan National Institute of Technology & Evaluation• Wei Jen-Lee, University of Texas at Arlington

– Utility / Manufacturing Industry Panelists• Brian Clark, Pepco / Exelon• Jim McDowall, Saft Batteries• Kavita Ravi, Mass DOER (alternate)

75

State of the Art ProjectsDon Hall, Pepco

• Interesting State of Art Projects– Large Off Shore Wind Integration

• Babak Enayati, National Grid (confirmed)– Project Developers with MW scale Projects

• Mike Hoff, NEC (confirmed) • Craig Horne, Swinerton (confirmed)

– Rural and Microgrid Projects• Venkat Banunarayanan, NRECA (confirmed)

– Energy Storage Project Finance and Contracts/PPAs• Richard Baxter, Mustang Prairie (confirmed)

PES GM 2020 - Super Session Topics and Theme

Big Data & Machine Learning in Power Sys • Big data collection and storage• Machine learning applications & efficacy• Data & model – unique power sys engrg• Advantages gained, new lessons learned

Energy Systems Integration• Electricity, heat and fuel systems• Integrating multiple energy systems• Enable clean, reliable, affordable energy• Opportunity for 0 marginal cost energy• Decarbonizing transport, building, industry

Theme: Are Big data, Machine Learning and Electric Transportation Transforming the Grid?

Facing the Changing Resource Mix• Mitigate gas uncertainties• Facilitate intermittent resource penetration• Operate with less system inertia • Harness full potential of battery resources• Essential grid services in a changing world• Manage lo inertia grid, econ, reliability, stability

Decarbonization Through Electrification• Impact of electrification of transportation • GHG reduction• Carbon sequestration

76

77

Additional Reports & New Business

• Next Meeting Tech Symposiums1. ????2. ????

• Working Group Flyers for PES mtgs• Still time to get standardized flyers to Curtis so he can

print and bring• July 31 deadline

78

ESSB Tutorials• Ralph report on potential tri-state Tutorial to BPUC of NJ

and surrounding states?• “Meet the ESSB Committee” Free PES Webinar July 16 @

2-3 pm EDT– Curtis Presenting– Anyone can attend

• https://resourcecenter.ieee-pes.org/education/webinars/PES_VID_WEB_ESSB0716.html

• Share it with whomever you’d like

79

First Batch of ESSB Presentations for PES Resource Center• Initial Peer Review Team

– Chris Belcher, Rachel Wood, John Eddins, Mike Nispel, and Rich Hutchins

• Coordinated by Curtis• Goal is to have 5-6 Past SBC-ESSB Presentations

Recommended by July 31• Then we have to get Copyright signoff from the

original author(s)– Does not restrict original authors’ right to use the

material, just allows IEEE to use their material• Then “we” have to put it in the IEEE PES Template

80

Need to Nurture the New Blood

• A PES-Wide Problem• Average Age of Electrochemists• Mentoring Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Students

– Internships?

81

Next Meetings• Open to any participant (you don’t have to be member)

– February 10-14, 2020: • DoubleTree Orlando Sea World

– Florida, USA– Summer 2020:

• Sonoma County California, USA– Winter 2021:

• NERC or SouthernCo HQ in Georgia or Alabama, USA?

82

Winter 2020 Meeting Additional Info• DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, Orlando at SeaWorld

– 10100 International Dr, Orlando FL 32821, USA • Telephone: +1 407 352 1100• Fax: +1 407 352 2632

– $149/night• Rate valid 3 Days Pre and Post mtg• Book by January 21, 2020

– Complimentary:• Parking• WiFi

83

Schedule ReviewDATE TIME Room 1 (Mesa A-B) Room 2 (Canyons 1/A-B) Room 3 (Pecos)

Monday 6/24

10 am – noon Renewables with BESS1:30 – 5:30 pm ESSB General Meeting5:30 – 6:30 pm AdCom

Tuesday 6/25

8 am – noon 1679 (Emerging Tech main doc) 1375 (Battery Protection) P1189 (Battery Selection)noon – 1:30 pm PNM Luncheon1:30 – 5:30 pm P1679.3 (Flow Batteries) P2685 (Engine Starting) 1491 (Battery Monitors)

Wednesday 6/26

8 am – noon P1679.4 (non NiCd Alkaline) 484 (VLA Installation) 1184 (UPS Batteries)1:30 – 3:15 pm NFPA 855 & UL9540A Testing3:45 – 5:30 pm 1660 (Cycling) 1187 (VRLA Install) P2405 (Utility Chargers)6:30 – 8:30 pm Social

Thursday 6/27

8 am – noon P2686 (BMS) SAFETY CODES WG Nuclear WG1:30 – 3:15 pm 937 (PV Lead-Acid) P2405 (Utility Chargers) 1188 (VRLA Maintenance)3:45 – 5:30 pm 485 (Lead-Acid Sizing)

Friday 6/28

8 – 9:45 am 450 (VLA Maintenance) P2685 (Engine Starting) 946 (DC Systems)10:15 am – noon 535 (Nuke Batteries) 1881 (Glossary)

noon – 1 pm Wrap-Up Mtg

84

Summary & Open for Q&AAny Questions

from the Floor? Any Outstanding

Old Business?Any New

Business?

85

Motion to Adjourn