ICT Research on the Internet of the Future Future Internet...

17
ICT Research on the Internet of the Future Future Internet Experimental Facility and Experimentally-driven Research Budapest J 2009 January 2009 Dr Max Lemke Marek Kolodziejski Deputy Head of Unit Deputy Head of Unit European Commission DG Information Society and Media New Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities ••• 1 "The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission"

Transcript of ICT Research on the Internet of the Future Future Internet...

ICT Research on the Internet of the Future

Future Internet Experimental Facility and Experimentally-driven Research

BudapestJ 2009January 2009

Dr Max LemkeMarek Kolodziejski

Deputy Head of UnitDeputy Head of UnitEuropean Commission

DG Information Society and MediaNew Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities

••• 1

"The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission"

ICT in FP7: 7 Challenges + FET

Socio-economic goals

ICT in FP7: 7 Challenges + FET

4. Digital5. ICT for health

6. ICT for bilit &

7. ICT for i d d t

g

4. Digital libraries & content

health mobility & sustainable growth

independent living and inclusion

1 Network and ~10% ~9% ~8% ~4%

mer

ging

s

(FET

)1. Network and service infrastructures

nee

ds

~30%

e an

d Em

nolo

gies2. Cognitive

systems, interaction, roboticsst

ry/T

ech

~10%

Futu

reTe

chnrobotics

3. Components, systems,

Indu

s

~9%~9%

~10%

••• 2••• 2

engineering ~9%~20%

Budget share

Terabyte networks

Complexity

Support investments: backward

compatibilitp y

Mobility

Internet of things

Clean slate approaches

compatibility

Need for (open) standards

EconomicTechnological

Clean slate approaches Security for commer-cial services and

applicationsSocietal/Political

European competitiveness on future Internet (act where market forces fail)European competitiveness on future Internet (act where market forces fail)

Consumer protection / empowerment

Social responsibility: preserve neutrality, openness, fairness, social role

B l th d f it / t bilit d th i ht t i

••• 3

Balance the need for security/accountability and the right to privacy

Internet of Services, Service Web 3D Internet

T tTrust

Security

N t k f th F t

Security

••• 4

Networks of the Future

Internet of Things

Facebook

GOOGLEYAHOOYAHOO

MYSPACEMICROSOFT netlog

SKYPEFLICKR

PAYPAL

SKYPE

BitTorrentKazaA

INTERNET

BitTorrentCISCO AKAMAIJUNIPER NETWORKS

FUTURE INTERNET WILL BE THE KEY

INTERNET1986 1996 2006 2026

FUTURE INTERNET WILL BE THE KEY ENABLER FOR THE UPCOMING SERVICES

GENI/ /N tSE USGENI/FIND/NetSE, USNew Network Architecture Forum, AKARI Project, Japan j , pFuture Internet Forum, KoreaANR, FranceG b GG-Lab Initiative, GermanySHOK, Finland Ambient Sweden InitiativeAmbient Sweden InitiativeInternet del Futuro, SpainNL: Report “The Future of the Internet pEconomy” for Ministry of Economic affairsHU ?

••• 6

Challenge 1: Network and Service Infrastructures Infrastructures

Challenges Expected ImpactChallenges Expected Impact

• Strengthened position of European industry

• Current Internet: severe limitations in terms of scalability, mobility, flexibility, security, trust and robustness of networks and services

• European leadership in supply of integrated business solutions Need to:

• rethink networking architectures

• Global standards, interoperability and European IPRs

• Wider market opportunities from new classes of

• support an “Internet of Services”

• support an “Internet of Things” ppapplications taking advantage of convergence

• Integrated large scale Experimental Facility• be trustworthy

• support a “3D Media Internet”• Improved coordination and integration of research

activities in Europe

support a 3D Media Internet

• bridge the gap between long-term research and large-scale experimentation

••• 7

large scale experimentation • federate research activities across Europe

557 M€

Call 5≥2IP

37M€

557 M€(~30%of total budget)

≥2IP,STREP, CSACall 4

IP, STREP,NoE, CSA

80M€

Call 5IP, STREP,CSA

50M€

Call 5IP STREP

Call 5IP STREP

90M€ 110M€

IP, STREP,CSA

IP, STREP,NoE, CSA

80M€

Call 4IP STREP

Call 5IP, STREP,NoE, CSA

110M€

80M€

••• 8

IP, STREP

– EC –European Future Internet

Science&

ProjectsBased

Approach Industrial&ScientificApproach

EUProjects

&CommercialRelevance

EIFFEL(with links to FIRE,

FIND/GENI,…)

ProjectsAssembly

onFuture Internet

ETPs(SRA)

Science based approachPeer-review and peer-discussion

Long-Term, High-Risk, ExploratoryAdvice & Challenge

Gather Projects Together,Exchange Ideas, VoluntaryCoordination on Message

and Cooperation Disseminate

Provide larger view onthe stakeholders view,

Gather larger view,Commercial reality, Industrial

••• 9

Advice & Challenge and Cooperation, DisseminateProject centric

Commercial reality, IndustrialOpportunities and Requirements

Horizontal Interaction: data delivery, opinion delivery

P2P NEXTTA22020 3D MediaNAPA WINE

ASPIRECOINCuteLoopiSURF

TRILOGY4WARD EFIPSANSE

SAPIRVICTORYPetaMedia

NAPA-WINESEAADAMANTIUM

CASAGRAS

k

e a

nd

y a

tio

n

ryof

” s res

IRMOSNEXOF RA

E3SENSEICHIANTIPSIRPN-CRAVEMOBITHIN

CONTENT4NEM

etw

ork

tect

ure

Mo

bil

ity

nt

cre

ad

de

liv

e

tern

et

oT

hin

gs”

erv

ice

sh

ite

ctu

r NEXOF-RARESERVOIR SLA@SOISOA4ALLOPENSHAPE

MOMENTAUTOISMOOTH-IT SOCRATESETNASENDORA

Ne

Arc

hit M

Co

nte

an

d

Int

“T Se

Arc

h m CIUDADPERSISTSERVFACES-CUBEService WEB 3.0NESSI 2010

SENDORAEURO-NF (NoE)sISIEIFFELeMOBILITYMobileWeb2.0

Trust, Security, Privacy

NESSI 2010

MASTERTAS3PRIMELIFETECOM

ONELAB2PIIFIREWORKPARADISOOPNEXT

FIRE Future Internet Res & Exp

TECOMAVANTSSARAWISSENETWOMBATPRISMSWIFTPICOS

ECODEN4CSmartNetPerimeterEchosResumeNet

••• 10eMobility - NEM - NESSI - ePosss - ISIIPSTPNOESA

PICOSeCRYPT IIFORWARDTHINK-TRUST

ResumeNetSelfNetVITAL++WISEBED

FEDERICA

FP7 – WP 2009/10: Building the facility

FP6: Early design &

FP7 – WP 2007/08: Prototyping the b d

Testbed

b d

Testbed

Building the facility and stimulating its use

• building the prototype

design & prototyping

Prototyping the federation concept Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

FIRE Facility based on open coordinated federation of testbeds

• supporting FI ResearchPII

WISEBEDWISEBEDVITAL++VITAL++

supporting FI Researchat different stages of R&D cycle

• expanding scope d i

OneLab2FedericaFederica

FIRE-ResearchNetwork of

h F

Other ProjectsFP7 MSs . . .

towards service architectures

• operati0nal prototype of FIRE Components to

• open and dynamic• focus on network connectivity layers

FIRE Researchthe Future FP7, MSs, …

FIRE Components to be gradually expanded

• Stimulating innovativeuse of the FIRE Facility

TESTBED PROJECTS• supporting academia and industry• proof-of-concept → pre-commercial tbs• understanding the socio-economic dim.• availability and gradual expansion of

••• 11

• availability and gradual expansion ofprototype services starting in 2008

“creating a research environment for investigating and experimentally validating investigating and experimentally validating highly innovative and revolutionary ideas“

To investigate, test and compare, at large scale, new g p gparadigms and future internet architectures, and their socio-economic impact

• e.g. transport/routing paradigms, dynamic topologies, e.g. transport/routing paradigms, dynamic topologies, service architectures ...

• e.g. socio economic impact of putting intelligence into the core, changing the end-to-end principle, ...core, changing the end to end principle, ...

validation

long-termresearch

large scaleexperiment. T tb d

Testbed

Testbed

T tb d

Testbed

Testbed

••• 12requirements

research experiment. Testbed Testbed

experimentally-driven, multi-disciplinary research

OPNEX ECODE N4C SmartNet

validation

long term large scaleOPNEX ECODE N4C SmartNet

PerimeterNanodata

centers ResumeNet SelfNetrequirements

long-termresearch

large scaleexperiment.

Building the experimental facility

WISEBEDVITAL++

Testbed Testbed

PII

OneLab2Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

Testbed

Federica

support actionsFIREWORKS PARADISO

••• 13

FIRE Launch Event, Paris, 10 September 2008

••• 7(from Call2 Objective 1.6: Community Funding 40 M€)

Industries/SMEs: Albentia, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Dimes, Nokia, Thales, Intel, Italtel, NEC Europe, Thomson , Norut, Solinet, BCT, PLA OCTOPLA, OCTO

Operators: BT, France Telecom, Deutsche Telekom, Cosmote, OTE, RBB Telefonica Telekom Austria Telekomunikacja Polska Turkcell RBB, Telefonica, Telekom Austria, Telekomunikacja Polska, Turkcell, VoiceGlobe, Vodafone-Panafon

Research Centers: ETH, Fraunhofer, WIT, Create-Net, RACTI, , , , , ,CNIT, EURESCOM, CERTH, INRIA, CNRS, KTH, CTRC, IBBT, Club of Rome, MIT, NICTA

U i iti h l li h i hUniversities: Athens, Basel, Berlin, Bern, Braunschweig, Bucharest, Delft, Dublin, UPC, Geneva, Jerusalem, KCL, Lancaster, Liege, Lubeck, Lulea, Palermo, Passau, Patras, Madrid, Paderborn, Pisa, Poznan, Surrey, T l A i UPMC U l W

••• 14

Tel Aviv, UPMC, Uppsala, Warsaw

A first attempt comparing FIRE Facility prototypes

• Networking Research• Network technologyagnostic environmentGÉANT NRENs

•Distributed system•IP networking•Research focus

• Converged Telecom/Internet Service & Network Environments• Industry focus

Context

Gigabit transmission equipment and computing nodes both

PlanetLab – both public and private versions

SOA-NGOSS(e.g. to federate IMS b d t tb d

Platform

• GÉANT, NRENs• Industry focus

• Virtual slices composedf ki d

•Shared Resources•Converging network, i l f d

Focus

computing nodes both capable of virtualization

based testbeds among themselves and with others)

of networking and computing resources

• Isolation of experiments in slices

•Real World Environment•Applications enduring over time•Partial Control

service platform and application infrastructures•Complete Control over Dedicated Resources

• Operationalenvironment

• Reproducibility &monitoring

•Partial Control•Variability•Reproducibility

••• 15

monitoring

Building the FIRE experimental FIRE experimentallyBuilding the FIRE experimental facility & stimulating its use

25 M€

FIRE experimentallydriven research

20 M€

Defining the challenges for

the facility25 M€for IPs

20 M€for STREPs

TakingFIRE Components

(gradual expansion)(20%)

FIRE Users(user stimulation)

(20%)

advantage ofthe facility

Co-ordination and support actions - 5 M€ for CSAs

••• 16ICT Call 5

FIRE Challenges for 2009 and beyond

Have a working prototype of the integrated FIRE facility by end of 2010 (9 months into Call 5 projects)

Match the offe of the FIRE p otot pes ith the demand Match the offer of the FIRE prototypes with the demand by research projects across Challenge 1

Establish FIRE Research as the Grand Challenge projects g p jfor the FIRE Facility

Establish bilateral federations between FIRE prototypes and with other EU national or international facilities and with other EU national or international facilities

Establish FIRE as an integral part of a potential Future Internet PPP

••• 17

cordis.europa.eu/fp7/fire