I MPROVING A UTISM A SSESSMENT S ERVICES IN THE S CHOOLS John Prickett Donald Oswald Commonwealth...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of I MPROVING A UTISM A SSESSMENT S ERVICES IN THE S CHOOLS John Prickett Donald Oswald Commonwealth...
IMPROVING AUTISM ASSESSMENT SERVICES IN THE SCHOOLS
John Prickett
Donald Oswald
Commonwealth Autism Service
THE PROBLEM
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) who receive early diagnosis and intervention experience better outcomes (Zwaigenbaum, 2010).
Interdisciplinary diagnostic assessment is the accepted state of the art.
Rural school divisions face particular challenges in providing interdisciplinary assessment and intervention.
Evidence suggests that local teams can be successfully trained to provide high-quality assessments of children with ASDs (McClure, MacKay, Mamdani, & McCaughey, 2010)
OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF ASDS
Barriers to effective early identification include: Long wait time for external evaluationsExternal evaluations may not translate
easily into educational plansExternal evaluations may foster an
adversarial relationship between parents and school personnel
Single-discipline evaluations fail to capture the complexity of the child’s ability / disability profile.
GOAL OF THE PROJECT
To identify students with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) at an earlier age via: A school-based interdisciplinary team trained in
gold-standard, autism-specific assessments . Generate reliable diagnostic decisions. Used by Local Education Agencies (LEAs) for the
purposes of eligibility and IEP development.
COLLABORATORS
Commonwealth Autism Service (CAS) Shenandoah Valley Regional Program (SVRP),
a regional special education program consisting of: Page County Public Schools Shenandoah County Public Schools Rockingham County Public Schools Augusta County Public Schools Harrisonburg City Public Schools Staunton City Public Schools
Virginia Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (Va-LEND)
REGIONAL AUTISM ASSESSMENT TEAM (RAAT)
The Regional Autism Assessment Team (RAAT) is a school-based interdisciplinary assessment service serving six rural school divisions.
The objectives of the collaboration were to train RAAT members in: The use of reliable, gold-standard diagnostic
assessment instruments; Interdisciplinary team functioning and family
centered practice; Integrating multi-disciplinary perspectives and
contributions to the diagnostic assessment process.
RAAT MEMBERSHIP
SVRP school-based interdisciplinary regional autism assessment team: school psychologists speech and language pathologists occupational therapists school social workers behavior analysts
TRAINING ACTIVITIES
RAAT members receive formal training in:Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
(ADOS) administration and codingAutism Diagnostic Interview – Revised
(ADI-R) administration and coding Interdisciplinary team functioningFamily-centered practice Interdisciplinary assessment: Role of the
occupational therapistADOS - Consensus codingEvidence-based interventions
TRAINING ACTIVITIES
Principles of interdisciplinary team assessment:
Ecological validity of assessmentsRecognizing uncertaintyCoordination and non-redundant testingDynamic nature of the assessment Respect for contributions of other disciplines
Cultural competenceRole of the familyRole of community providersInclusion and support
TRAINING ACTIVITIES (2010)
Previously provided trainings: December 9th : ADI Training provided to SVRP
RAAT November 29th & 30th: ADOS Training provided to
SVRP RAAT. October 7th : Consensus scoring for the (ADOS). February 22: Role of the occupational therapist in
assessing, designing and delivering services to support learners with ASD.
School-based assessment team members and trainees regularly observe evaluations at the CAS Transdisciplinary Diagnostic Assessment Clinic.
TRAINING RESULTS
o Trainees achieved the identified objectives and were satisfied with the training provided.
o Survey of Trainees:• Before-session: Participants indicated they were
‘not at all ‘ to ‘somewhat’ informed about assessment issues.
• After-session responses ranged from ‘somewhat’ to ‘well informed’
o Participants showed increased knowledge about the training topics.
o Training participants indicated that training was useful and would change their practice/behavior.
o Training participants indicated that they were satisfied with the overall training and that effective training tools were used.
RA
AT A
DM
INIS
TR
ATIV
E P
RO
CESS
SVRP and CAS staff worked with local school division personnel to devise an administrative process for:• referral to the assessment team • feedback of assessment results to the child’s eligibility team.
REFERRAL TO THE ASSESSMENT TEAM
Student is identified by the student’s local special education director with input from: The school psychologist, social worker, special
education teacher. Special Education Director makes a referral, in
writing, to the RAAT Coordinator. RAAT Coordinator recruits a trans-disciplinary
team from a pool of 22 various team members.
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Referral is made by the relevant Special Education Director
Team is selected by the RAAT Coordinator Classroom Observation is conducted by the
behavior analyst (1.5 to 2 hours) The ADOS is administered at the testing center,
typically, the parent is present (2.5 to 3.5 hours) The ADI is administered at the student’s home
or at the testing center (2 to 3 hours). Review of previous reports (1 to 3 hours) Completion of summaries by the represented
disciplines. Report completion.
FEEDBACK TO THE CHILD’S ELIGIBILITY TEAM. Team members complete discipline specific
summaries. School psychologist combines summaries
and completes report Report is submitted by the RAAT coordinator
to the referring special education director. Behavior Analyst from the referring district
attends the student’s eligibility meeting.
OVERALL PROJECT RESULTS
A functioning Regional Autism Assessment Team consisting of 22 members that has over the period of 14 months, contributed to the eligibility determination and intervention planning of 15 children.
Of 12 parents who responded to surveys, 11 stated the assessment team: Helped them to feel informed about the
assessment process. That they (the parents) were involved in the
assessment process That the assessment team made sufficient effort
to get to know their child.
ENGAGING PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS
Primary care providers in screening and interdisciplinary assessment: Primary care physicians (PCPs) – a critical link in
the process April 14th, 2010: SVRP in conjunction with CAS
hosted a dinner & provided presentations to provide information about the RAAT, screening & assessment issues for ASD.
ADDITIONAL ISSUES
Issues addressed in the implementation of the project included: administrative concerns of participating
school divisions about the quality of the reports from outside assessments, delays, etc.
distinguishing a clinical evaluation from an educational assessment
advertisement / marketing of the serviceadvantages of ongoing contact with the
children and families through school servicespossibility of further comprehensive single-
discipline evaluations (e.g., in-depth OT and Speech/ Language evaluations if needed).
REFERENCES
Guralnick, M.J. (2000). Interdisciplinary clinical assessment of young children with developmental disabilities. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
McClure, I., MacKay, T., Mamdani, H., & McCaughey, R. (2010). A comparison of a specialist autism spectrum disorder assessment team with local assessment teams. Autism, 14, 1–15.
Zwaigenbaum, L. (2010). Advances in the early detection of autism. Current Opinion in Neurology, 23, 97-102.
QUESTIONS / COMMENTS