I Hydrogeological Investigation I · adjusted to a pH of 11 or greater, followed by three serial...

36

I1^

Results of, . .iI Hydrogeological InvestigationI| for . . .

I ____• ^^^^TF" Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co

Battle Creek, Michigan

I

1

November, 1983• Project 20225

I

I

I EDI ENGINEERING & SCIENCE• cMftiKiciTQQ / rspni rvsiSTc i aim oniCTQ / rt-iPUMT.Q

II 0000743

ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS / BIOLOGISTS / CHEMISTS611 CASCADE W. PKWY, S.E , GRAND RAPtOS. Ml 49506 1616)942-0970

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTIONBackgroundScope of thisLocationMethods

Study

RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONGeologyGroundwater Flow ConditionsGroundwater Qual HySoil Quality

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

APPENDICES

A - Methods for Observation Well Construction and Sample Collection

11122

55610

B - Construction Records for Wells

FIGURES

12

34

56789101112

TABLES

1234567

General Location MapPlan of Study Area Showing Location of Wells andSoil SamplesConfiguration of the Bedrock SurfaceCross Section Showing Relationship between GlacialDrift and BedrockWater Table Configuration, August, 1982Groundwater Flow Direction, September, 1983Probable Distribution of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane

ofofofof

ProbableProbableProbableProbableProbable

DistributionDistributionDistributionDistributionDistribution of

1,1-DichloroethyleneTetrachloroethylene1.1-DichloroethaneTrichloroethylene1.2-Dichloroethane

Follows Page

2

in pocket6

9131313131313

Groundwater Elevation Measurements, September 2, 1983Results of In Situ Permeability TestsResults of Volatile Organic Compound Analyses of Groundwater 12Base Neutral Fraction Compounds Detected in On-Site Wells 13Results of DNR Analysis of Soil Samples from Well 1 14Description of Soil Sampling SitesResults of Chemical Analysis of Soils

911

1618

0000744

I

I4

i• i4

*ii

INTRODUCTION

Background

Contaminated water wells in and near the Verona well field were discovered bythe Michigan Department of Public Health in September 1981. Subsequentinvestigations by the State of Michigan and USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protec-tion Agency) showed that numerous organic compounds, principally volatilehalogenated organic compounds, had impacted groundwater in both the glacialdrift and bedrock aquifers. The highest concentrations were found in an areanorth of Emmett Street and west of the Grand Trunk Western Railroad (GTW).

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Michigan Department ofNatural Resources suggested that three local firms might be potential sourcesof the lost chemicals. The MDNR, and later the USEPA, under the authority ofthe Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and LiabilityAct of 1980, requested these firms to voluntarily initiate investigations todetermine whether or not they were a source of contamination and if remedialmeasures were necessary. [n cooperation with those requests, the GTWconducted a study in July 1982 to evaluate a localized groundwater contamina-tion incident near their heavy repair shop where a solvent leak had beendiscovered and subsequently repaired. The investigation summarized in thisreport expands upon the July, 1982 study and also examines soil quality on GTWproperty closer to the Verona well field.

Studies conducted by other agencies are proceeding more or less concurrentlywith the GTW investigation. These include studies by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey for the City of Battle Creek and a study by CH0M H i l l for the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.

Scope of this Study

Field work for this study phase was conducted during July, August andSeptember of 1983 and was limited to property owned by the Grand Trunk WesternRailroad. The objectives of the study were to:

-1- 0000745

0r 1. Refine knowledge of the vertical and horizontal extent of groundwater

contamination in the glacial drift aquifer near the Heavy Repair Shop.

2. Verify the direction of groundwater flow in both the g l a c i a l drift andbedrock aquifers near the repair shop.

3. Evaluate the hydraulic connection between the drift and bedrock aquifersat the shop.

4. Expand upon knowledge of groundwater quality near the old round house.

5. Evaluate the quality of soils near the old roundhouse and the marshallingyard.

Location

The area included in this study is in the eastern portion of the Battle Creekmetropolitan area and occupies portions of Section 5, Emmett Township (T2S,R7W) and Section 32 and 33, Pennfield Township (T1S, R7W). Emphasis wasplaced on the narrow zone along the railroad tracks extending from the heavyrepair shop northward through the marshalling yard. Figure 1 shows thelocations of important features in this area.

The study area is a flat terrace which separates ml ling h i l l s to the eastfrom the Battle Creek River and its floodplain to the west. Surface drainageon the terrace has been highly modified by storm sewers and artificialditches.

Methods

The principal data collection activities during this study phase and theearlier phase involved construction of exploration borings and observationwells, collection of soil and water samples for chemical analysis, measurementof water levels and determination of in situ permeability. Each of thesetasks was supervised by, or conducted by. Environmental Data Inc. (EDI) staff.

000074ft-2-

•I

1VERONA

1 WELL

FIELO*

&

^ i

1

Jt\f

.

(,

^

$

f

^

?

***** sr

! > ^OLD ROUND HOUSE

»

J

?

5rt£>> "^vT *

^

i

i >,

iN

0 1000 2000 3000i r —— ™ —— i iSCALE IN FEET

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY

SEPT 1983 20325

0000747

iIIIIcI

—r*

1

I

i

I

4

Iai4

Two d r i l l i n g methods were used for exploration borings and well construction.The sha Mow glacial drift holes were constructed using a hoi low stem augermachine. Deep bedrock holes were constructed using hydraulic rotary methodsto bedrock and air rotary methods through the bedrock. Considerable care wasexercised to prevent contamination of the aquifer by dirty equipment or fromchemicals in soils or groundwater above the aquifer. Appendix A describes themethods used in more detail. Figure 2 shows the locations of the we! Isconstructed for this study and other wells of interest.

Observation wells constructed for this study have been numbered sequentially(e.g. 1 through 9). Wel Is with a number and no letter suffix are theshallowest wells in a well cluster. The wells are referred to °itner by theterminology used by the U.S. Geological Survey (i.e. G-l for Grand TrunkWestern we!Is) or without the letter prefix. The prefix "GT" is used todesignate production wells owned by Grand Trunk Western. The numbering ofwells constructed by others conforms to the system used by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey (e.g, T-13 is the 13th wel 1 constructed by the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency "TAT" investigation contractor).

Almost all of the water samples collected during this phase were obtained witha Kemmerer type sampling device after five casing volumes of water had beenpurged with a centrifugal pump. The sampling device was cleaned prior tosampling each well. Each sample was placed on ice immediately after collec-tion and the samples were delivered to EOI laboratories the same day.Appendix A contains a more complete description of the techniques used.

Soil samples were collected with a standard metal agricultural soil sampler.The sampler was washed with soapy water and rinsed with clean water betweeneach sampling. Two samples were collected at each site. One sample wasstored in a wide mouth glass bottle for laboratory evaluation with an organicvapor analyzer. The second sample was analyzed with gas chromatograph massspectrometer.

000074%-3-

II All volatile organic compounds were analyzed by the purge and trap gas

chromatographic/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) method as described in the USEPApublication "Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and IndustrialWastewater" (method No. 624). At the beginning of each day that analyses areperformed, the GC/MS system is checked to ensure that acceptable performancecriteria are achieved for bromofluorobenzene. Five m i l l i l i t e r sample aliquotswere purged for 22 minutes followed by 6 minutes of desorption onto a 1%SP-1000, 80/60 Carbopack B chromatographic column. The GC was programmed from60 to 215°C at a rate of !2°C/m1n to achieve effective separation of volatilecompounds. Solid sediment samples were analyzed as above, except the purgingchamber was immersed in a water bath held at 70°C to aid in transferringpurgeable organics onto the trap. The internal standard method of analysiswas employed for both solid and liquid samples.

All base-neutral compounds were detected and analyzed by the gas chromato-graphic/mass spectrometer EPA method #625, taken from the same USEPA pub-lication cited in the volatile procedure above. Mass spectrometer performancewas assured on each day of analysis by meeting the performance criteriarequired for decafluorotriphenyl phosphine. One liter volunes of sample wereadjusted to a pH of 11 or greater, followed by three serial extractions in aseparatory funnel with 100 ml. aliquots of methylene chloride. The extractswere combined and dried by pouring them through a column containing about 10cm. of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was then concentrated to a finalvolume of 2 mis. in a water bath adjusted to 60 to 65°C. Immediately beforeinjection, deuterated anthracene was added to each sample as an internalstandard. The samples were then injected onto a DB-5 fused silica capillarycolumn (30 m. x 0.25 mm) with the GC temperature programmed from 50 to 280°Cat a rate of 12° C/min. Base-neutral priority pollutant compounds weredetected and quantified from the data collected by the mass spectrometer.

The elevation of each observation well was determined using a self-levelinglevel. U.S. Geological Survey well number E-28 was used for a referencedatum. Survey circuit closure was within ±0.02 feet.

0000749-4-

Iii

3I

Ii1

Ii

Water level measurements were made using the chalked-steel tape method. Thesemeasurements were made on the same day as U.S. Geological Survey measurementsin other observation wells.

In situ permeabi1i ty measurements were made wi th a specia1ly constructedinstrument consisting of a float operated rheostat, vacuum or pressure pump,and a portable computer. This device allowed the measurement of water levelchanges of ±0.01 foot at 0.2 second intervals. Interpretation of test resultsrelied upon the method described by Schmid (1967).

RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION

Geology

Two types of geologic formations underlie the study area. The oldest forma-tion of interest is the Marshall Sandstone, which forms the bedrock. Overly-ing this sandstone bedrock are glacial deposits consisting of unconsolidatedsand, gravel and clay. Alluvial material is 1ikely present in the BattleCreek river floodplain located west of the study area, but the nature of thesedeposits has not been examined.

The Marshall Formation near the heavy repair shop is a fine to very finegrained, silty to clayey sandstone. Interbedded with the sandstone is darkgrey and black shale. North of the repair shop (e.g. near the old roundhouse) the sandstone is somewhat coarser gained. The sandstone strata of theMarshall Formation are an important aquifer in this area. The shale layersmay divide the sandstone formation into several distinct aquifers, but mostbedrock wells are open to more than one sandstone layer.

The sandstone and shale strata are inclined toward the north. The rate of dipis approximately 16 feet per mile (.003 feet per foot). This inclination ofthe bedrock formation means that an individual stratum would be about 24 feetdeeper at the Verona well field than it would be at the heavy repair shop.

0000750-5-

Bedrock fractures are an important feature since water w e l l s which intersectfractures are known to produce more water than w e l l s that do not intersectfractures. Well 8A was the only well constructed for t h i s st^dy that pene-trated an obvious fracture. The location or orientation of individualfractures cannot be predicted with the available information.

The bedrock surface is quite irregular and several buried bedrock valleys havebeen mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey. One of these valleys exists underthe Heavy Repair Shop. Material penetrated during the construction of recentwells suggests that this particular bedrock valley has been partly filled-inwith clay or clayey material. Figure 3 depicts the location of this valley.

Overlying the bedrock throughout the study area are glacial deposits. Thesedeposits range from well sorted material (e.g., clay, sand, gravel) to verypoorly sorted material (e.g. , sandy, si 1ty clay). In general , the materiallying directly on the bedrock near the heavy repair shop is clay or clayeymaterial, but near the old round house, bedrock is overlain by sand or saridand gravel. The sand or sand and gravel formations are high yielding aquiferswhere saturated.

The general relationship between glacial deposits and bedrock formations isshown in Figure 4.

The original land surface has been regraded throughout the study area. F i l lmaterial was encountered during the construction of several observation wellsto depths of about 15 feet.

Groundwater Flow Conditions

Local aquifers are recharged by precipitation which infiItrates the landsurface. Some of the water found in aquifers below GTW property may haveresulted from recharge taking place in the uplands more than one mile east.The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the average annual precipitationhere is 33 inches and that 8 to 12 inches of this total infiltrates andrecharges local aquifers.

Water level measurements made during this study and studies by the USGS showthat groundwater moves toward the Battle Creek River except for an area

-6- 000075!

SCALE IN FEET

NOTE; THIS FIGURE IS A MODIFICATION OF A MAPPRER6RED BY THE U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1982.THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT THE MODIFICATIONS.

t

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMFfcNY

SURFACE CONFIGURATION OF THEMARSHALL FORMATION

FIG. 3SEPT. 1983 20225

0000752

<' C «'

m m

c

!0

SOUTH

•90-

K-tOm PW

•30-

•M-

•lO -

•00-

7M-

770-

7tO-

790-

740-

730-

720-

1 TIO-

700-

WO —

K HEAVY *CMm SHOP j1

HORIZONTAL SCA

SKIMMim^^

^^^V^e G-3 a-i &* _____ Jj

/

/I-;:f,y,--

&&&&

\:::.:r.:-:i

\

\

^^^^. .•, . .'.-. ri • •• • •

:;:::;:;>:;>>:;:;:;x;:>

__ — -T

.

A4VP

SAND

Oft FILL

'8\m$!*>^Oft SAND

GLACIAL Win

•-•is

ma^ ^

—— ? —

GENERALIZED CROSS-SECTION SHOWING THEBETWEEN GLACIAL DRIFT AND BEDROCK

LE: lln* «OOft.

- i>4V/? SUfiFACZ

* r ————

^^-— 'S^^^

^^^

4A!9 £M4KA -a=AQUIFER

m-:::'-:--'-:--:-'-- :--^^^ TOP OFix^ BEDROCK AQUIFER

ss

-RELATIONSHIPFORMATION

E-*^^^

•^^Tv1

**-^^*

M61

3

*»

SM

SM

NORTHOLD

. HOUMO HOUSC .p n -MO

-2 T-*GT- ~ **°

- «20

^***^ - wo

-770

-760

1-74O

-750

— 720

-7|0


CROSS -SECTION

FIG. 4SEPT. 1983 2O225

.surrounding the Verona well field. Pumpage from the well field has created acone of depression which appears to divert the flow of groundwater as much as0.5 to 1 mile away from the well field. The regional flow pattern as itexisted in August 1982 is shown in Figure 5 which is reproduced from a USGSreport (USGS 1982, Fig. 3). Of special interest is the groundwater dividewhich extends approximately parallel to and just south of Emmett Street.Groundwater south of the divide flows westerly toward the river, but north ofthe divide the flow is toward the Verona well field. The position of thisdivide will change in response to changes in groundwater pumpage and precipi-tation.

Groundwater elevation measurements (see Table 1) made on September 2, 1983,confirm that groundwater flow in the glacial drift aquifer is westerly at theheavy repair shop and moves directly toward the Battle Creek River. Thegradient at this location is about 10 feet per mile (.002 feet per foot).Figure 6 illustrates the Inferred flow direction in the glacial drift aquifer.The flow in the sandstone bedrock aquifer is westerly to southwesterly at therepair shop with a gradient of 21 feet per mile (.004 feet per foot).

The water level measurements show that the water level elevation is differentin the bedrock aquifer compared to the glacial drift aquifer. A water leveldifference between two aquifers shows that there is a potential forgroundwater to flow from the aquifer having the higher water level to theaquifer having the lower water level. The bedrock aquifer water level isabove the glacial drift aquifer water level at some locations and below atothers.

From past measurements near the repair shop, it is anticipated that thevertical water level gradient and gradient direction may change with time, andany change w i l l be due to variations in local precipitation and pumpage. The

0000754

vertical gradient near the Verona well field is typically downward in responseto pumping from the Verona well field. This fact, coupled with the absence ofclayey material between the shallow glacial drift aquifer and the sandstonebedrock aquifer, means that groundwater can readily move downward into thebedrock aquifer. While movement between the two aquifers is possible at theVerona well field, this type of movement is greatly inhibited near the heavyrepair shop because of the clay which separates the two aquifers.

-8- 0000755

_ __ GROUNOWATER DIVIDE

NOTE : THIS FIGURE IS REPRODUCED FROM"GROUNDWATER FLOW AT VERONA WELL HELD

BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN" US GEOLOGICALSURVEY PROVISIONAL REPORT,1982 FIGURE 3.FAGE I3A

1000 3000 3000

SCALE IN FEET

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRXNY

WATER TABLE CONFIGURATION, A'JG,82

FIG 5SEPT. 1983 20225

0000756

TABLE 1GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

September 2, 1983

Aquifer andWell No.

Glacial Drift1

1AIB2

2A3

3A44A578

T-13

Bedrock1C5A67A8A9

9AT-16

TOCElevation

833.47834.18834.58836.43836.24834.94834.74935.06835.12827.95828.32835.30831.88(1)

833.64828.76829.69829.18834.11838.45838.89841.19 '

Water DepthBelow TOC

15.2015.9916.3617.6017.3316.8516.6717.1517.2510.6511.6417.3913.18

14.9610.456.7513.1615.7410.8911.3412.78

WaterElevation

818.27818.19818.22818.83818.91818.09818.07817.91817.87817.30816.68817.91818.70

818.68818.31822.94816.02818.37827.56827.55828.41

NOTE:TOC refers to "top of casing"(1) The measuring point used for these wells was the top of 2-inch

casing. The TOC elevation of T-16 determined in this study differsfrom previous reported elevation (841.19 vs 841.36).

0000757

' I;

- t

r.r0 1000_ 2000 3000I—————I—————I—————ISCALE IN FEET

0000758


DIRECTION OF GROUNOWATER FLOW IN THESHALUM GLACIAL DRIFT AQUIFER, 9/2/83

SEPT. 1983FIG 6

20225

*

pi

During the September 1983 water level measurement, the water level of the oilskimming pond was higher than adjacent groundwater by 1.28 feet. The waterlevel of the Battle Creek River oxbow west of the repair shop was 0.17 feetbelow the water level in Well No. 5.

One of the important aquifer characteristics which influences the rate atwhich water can move through an aquifer is permeability. Permeability (orhydraulic conductivity) is a measure of the ability of water to pass throughthe aquifer. Twelve in-situ permeability tests were performed during thisstudy to provide an estimate of the permeability of both the bedrock andglacial drift aquifers. The results of these tests, as summarized in Table 2,show that the glacial drift aquifer at the repair shop is considerably morepermeable than the underlying bedrock aquifer. However, the bedrock at well9-A is very permeable.

The average velocity of groundwater in the glacial drift aquifer at the repairshop can be estimated by the following relationship:

Where:v » average velocity

K = permeability (average 60.1 ft/day)

^ h » hydraulic gradient (0.002)

S a porosity (0.2)

With this relationship, the calculated average velocity is .6 feet per day.At this rate, a molecule of water would require over 360 days to migrate fromthe repair shop to the west side of the railroad tracks.

Groundwater Quality

A considerable number of water samples have been analyzed by government andprivate laboratories since the contamination problem was first discovered.These analyses have refined the understanding of the area impacted bycontamination and the types of contaminants. The principal contaminants

0000759-10-

TABLE 2RESULTS OF IN SITU PERMEABILITY TESTS

Aquifer andWell No.

Glacial Drift1-A2

3-A578

Bedrock(2)1-C5-A67-A8-A9-A

centimetersper second

0.0320.0050.0270.0080.034(1)

0.0040.00150.00030.0050.00020.228

Permeabilityfeet

per day

90.714.276.522.796.4(1)

11.34.38.514.2

6646

gal Ions per dayper square foot

678106572170721(1)

84.831.86.361064.244834

(!) The permeability of the zone screened in Well 8 is too low to measurewith the equipment available during this study,

(2) For this analysis, it was assumed that only the sandstone section of thebedrock wells yielded water and the shale sections were impermeable. Theaverage permeability of the entire thickness of the Marshall Formationwould be less than the values shown here.

0000760

-11-

SCALE IN FEETGROUNOWATER GCNCRAILY EXCCC09 < MICROGRAM/LlTERGROONOWATER OCNCRALLY EXCCCOS 10 MICROGRAMS/LITERGROUMOWATER GENERALLY EXCECOS 100 MICROGRAMS/LITER


PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFI, I, I TRICHLOROETHANE

FIG .7SEPT. 1983 20223

THE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN HERE is O A S E O ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S I S PERFORMED f-ROM OCIOBtn, JOOlTHnOUGH S C P T C M U P R I9B3

0000761

' I

*• t . I "

LEGEND

toGROUNOWATER SCNCRALLY EXCCIOS I MICftOORAM/LlTCNGROUNOWATER SCNERALLY EXCEEDS 10 UICR06RAMS/ LITER(3ROUNOWATER OENERALLY EXCEED* '00 MICROGRAM3/ LITER

NOTETM? 3S*S ieU~ :ON SHOWN MERE IS 3iSED O'J

Ci^ A. ' , i_rSES P^^^CfiMEO '^CM 3CT03E9,-QH S£P*£MaEH .963 (lt)00762

0 1000 ZOOO 3000I———I———I———ISCALE IN FEET

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMF&NY

PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF1,1- PICHLOROETHOTENE

FIG. 8SEPT. 1963 20323

found are in a class described as volatile chlorinated organic compounds.These compounds are primarily used as solvents for fats, waxes, oils andgreases.

Early information on the area near the heavy repair shop suggested thatcontamination was principally restricted to the shallow glacial drift aquiferbecause of the clay material which separates the shallow sand and gravelaquifer from the sandstone bedrock aquifer. This hypothesis has been con-firmed by recently collected geologic and water quality information. Table 3contains the results of recent chemical analyses for volatile organic com-pounds. These analyses show that the glacial drift aquifer has been impactedby spills or leaks, but the sandstone bedrock aquifer is virtually unimpacted.

Samples from each of the 22 on-site wells listed in Table 3 were also analyzedfor 47 base-neutral fraction priority pollutants. These compounds were notdetected (at a detection limit of 0.01 milligrams per liter) in most of thesamples except as shown in Table 4. Except for naphthalene, the other com-pounds found are classified as "plasticizers" which are not used in the repairshop. The presence of phthalate in the bedrock aquifer* but minimal distri-bution in the glacial drift aquifer, suggests that this material did notoriginate on GTW property.

-12- 0000763

TABLE JRESULTS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COVOUM) AMALVMS Of CROUWHAIEH

Aquifer • Vinyl Chloro- 1Nell No. Chloride eth«M

Cl*ci*l Drift1 0.01 0.02

I-A1-82

2-A3 0.09 0.0*

3-A 0.0**

*-A5 0.01 p7 0.01a

T-11

BedrockI-C5-A

7-A P8-A

9S-AT-16E-2B

CT-ICT-2

1,1-Dlchloro-•thylene

l.i--

0.002--•

0.0090.02*--

0.00*—

0.0010.008--

----

----—--—----

1,l-0ichlor«-•tfune

4.90.0170.003--—

0.850.0970.0010.0110.0050.01*0.067--

--•-

0.002—------——

t-l,2-Dlchlon>- 1,2-Dichloro-ethylene etnene

0.98 0.080.016 0.001

0.002—--

0.021 0.0020.057 0.005..

0.026 0.0020.00*0.0150.068 0.002

—

--—

0.001

--—--

0.001"--

1,1,1-Irl-chloroethene

«90.700.0*10.1*

--0.200O.*000.0210.09*"

0.0020.00*

--

---•

----------—--

Tr ichloro-ethylene ften/ene

11 P0.710.0450.68--

0.050 0.00*0.180 0.003--

0.350 0.001"

0.0010.067 0.001"

..

--

,.

------

0.038----

Ietr*chloro- Ethyl Methyleneetny 1 ene Benzene Ch 1 or i or ( 1 1 Chl orot or* la ' uene

0.03 0.19 0.02 0.0! 0.010.020.0510.006-'

0.097 0.0150.160

—0.02*

—

"O.OOt"

p--

-,--- ---

0.00!----

MIE;All reiulti ihowi *r* in >i 1 I igr«*» per liter or p*rti p«r Billion.

Detection limit n4» 0.01 ejg/l for constituent* with *nilytes reported to hundredth* and 0.001 *g/l for conttituent* Kith unify 1*1 reported to thounndlhi.

-- indlc«te» th*t th* indicated constituent «*i nut found or was below detect*t»i Hty."P" indicate* th*t th* constituent »*i present but be I CM the 4Ccept4tile detectibi lity lieiit jnd therefore tjnnut De dccur^tely 40*1111 f isil.

Thirty vuletlle orgenic co*poundi mere included in the analytic*! lean. Coapound* not detected *re nut >tumn tit tnii t#ble.

jl) Hethylene chloride My be due to l*bor*tory cont*eiin*tion.«o*ulti reported here *re fro* *«Bple* collected in August dnd Septeeitier 1983, SdMplei tra* Helli CT-I 4 rid CT-2 h*vn been undlyied nu-eruui limes in the lilt ye J

<=>

O

TABLE 4BASE-NEUTRAL FRACTION COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN ON-SITE WELLS (mg/1

BIs-Aquifer and (2-ethyl hexylWell Number Naphthalene Acenaphthene Phenanthrene Phtha1 ate

Glacial Drift1 0.32

1A3A 0.17

T-13

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.010,03

0.08

Bedrock1-C8-A9

0.040.060.35

The available chemical analyses from all groundwater samples collected in theVerona well field and surrounding area were examined to determine if plumepatterns might provide a clue to the source of chemicals. A separate map wasprepared showing the distribution of wells Impacted by each chemical found todate. It is not currently possible to subdivide the analyses to show theextent of chemical plumes in different aquifers or at one point in time. Theresults of this effort are summarized in Figures 7 through 12. These figuresare Interpreted to show the following:

1. The plume of chemicals impacting the Verona well field is separate anddistinct from the plume found at the heavy repair shop. Therefore, theheavy repair shop contaminants are not contributing to the problem at theVerona well field.

2. The groundwater divide which roughly parallels Emmett Street has beenlocated south of the Thomas Solvent Annex site most of the time but thelocation has shifted at times to allow southwestward migration of somechemicals.

000076")

-13-

LEGEND1000 2000 3000_i

SCALE IN FEETG ROUND WATER GENERALLY EXCEEDS I hHCROGRAM/LITERGROUNOWATER GENERALLY EXCEEDS 10 MlCROGRAMS/LITERGROUND WATER OCNERALLY EXCEEDS 100 MlCROGRAMS/ LITER

NOTETHE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN HERE is SAseo ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S E S PERFORMED CRQM OCTOBER, 1981THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1963 .

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRXNY

PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFTETRACHLOROETHYLENE

FIG 9SEPT. 1993 20225

0000766

SCALE IN FEET

GMOUNOWtTCH WHtBALLT CXCCC03 I MlCHOGHAM/UlTCK6ROUNOWATCH OCNKRALLT CXCCtOS 10 MICMQMM3/ UlTM«WUHO*»T«« aiNeWtLLY UCIC08 100 t*IC«OORAM»/UTM


PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION 0I, I- DlCHLOROETHANt

FIG.10THE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN MSRE is disto ON

AN4\.tSES PERFORMED *ROM OCTOBER,'981THROUGH SEPTEMBER

0000767

1000 gOOO 3000

SCALE IN FEET——— I ——— GROtJNOWATER GEMeMLLT EXCEEDS I MIWOGIMM/LJTEH———10—— GHOUNOWATEB GENEBALLf CXCCE03 10 MlCWWHAMS/LITEH—— 100—— G«OUNOWATE« GENERALLY EXCEEDS 100 MICBOGHAMS/LITER

NOTET^e DisrRiBur;or( SHOWN HEBE is SiSEO ONOEM CAL ANit'SES PERFORMED "OM CCT03EB, 1981 - . _THBOUOM 5EPTEM8EH 1983 0000768

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMR4NY

PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFTRICHLOROETHYLENE

FIG. IISEPT 1983 20223

- I:

-I ——— SROUNOWATER GENERALLY EXCEED! I MKROGRAM/LITER-10—— QHOUNOWATEM QCNCRALLT EXCEEDS 10 MICftOGHAMS/ LITER100—— QROUNOWATER OCNERM.LY CXCFEDS 100 MICftOQRAMS/ LITER

NOTE.THE DISTRI8JTION SHOWN M£»E IS 8ASEO ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S E S PERPQRMED FROM OCTOBER, 1981THROUGH SEPTEMBER I9B3.

0 1000 2000 3000I—————I—————1—————ISCALE IN FEET

GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRVNY

PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF1,2 - OICHLOROETHANE

FIO. iaSEPT. 1983 20225

00007G9

I

IIIIIII

^

M

H

Soil Quality

Soil samples were collected and analyzed by MDNR from GTW property prior tothis study phase. The first samples were collected adjacent to the heavyrepair shop from well number 1 which is located near a leak from a solventstorage tank. The soils to a depth of 16 feet were found to be contaminatedby solvents, principally 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), as shown in Table5.

TABLE 5RESULTS OF ONR ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FROM WELL 1.

Location

Site of Well II2'4'7'6"10'12'14'16'

NOTE:

1,1,1-TCA TCE CHCL, PCE 1,1-DCA

1.515.09.82.18.2

16.06.3

0.032--——

0.0250.750.55

0.0015

0.150.69

Results are milligrams per liter (parts per million)1,1,1-TCA - 1,1,1-Trichloroethane

TCE • Trichloroethylene

I CHCL. » ChloroformPCE » Tetrachloroethylene

1,1-DCA = l,l-D1chloroethane

In addition, surface soil samples were collected along 6 railroad switchesnorth of Emmett Street by DNR. These locations are shown in Figure 2.Analysis of these samples did not detect the presence of any volatile organiccompounds.

-14- 0000770

iAn expanded soil sampling program was implemented by GTW because of thepossibility that materials carried by the railroad may have been lost in theMarshal 1 ing Yard.

Soil sample sites were selected where large spills or leaks would likelyaccumulate. The samples were collected in open ditches near the discharge endof pipes which drain adjacent areas both on and off Grand Trunk Westernproperty. Soils directly below the railroad tracks were not sampled becauseof the thick ballast. The sites are described in Table 6 and general loca-

*H( tions are shown in Figure 2.

^B Eleven of the twelve soil samples collected during this study phase containedlow levels of volatile organic compounds. Trichloroethylene was the compound

J found most often as shown in Table 7. These results suggest that volatileorganic compounds may have been lost in the area of the old roundhouse andmarshalling yard, but the observed concentrations are so low that they may be

B background levels. These low levels of chemicals may also come from propertyadjacent to the railroad property as samples 9, 10 and 12 were collected at

mm locations which receive off-site runoff.

•i

0000771-15-

r • mmTABLE 6

DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLING SITES

EDISoilSampleNumber

1 Dry ditchbasins in

Site Characteristics Odor

. Downstream of 8-inch pipe which drains catch Nonesouthwest portion of marshalling yard. Ditch

SampleDescription

Dry Sand

Depth

12"

drains north toward sampling location 15.

2

3

4

As above.

As above,

Dry ditch

Musty

but track area drained is larger. None

. Next to 12-inch pipe which drains catch basins None

Dry Sand

Moist Sand

Dry Sand

12"

12"

12"in northwest portion of marshalling yard.

Dry ditch. Upstream of concrete junction box. This ditchbegins about 700 feet south of sample location #1 andturns west to the river at this site.

None Moist ClayeySand

3"

oooo

Dry ditch. Upstream of concrete junction box. This loca-tion is the southern end of the ditch before it turns westto the river.

Dry ditch. Next to discharge of 12-inch pipe which drainscatch basins in the northeast portion of marshallinn

Musty

None

Dry Sand

Dry Sand

12"

12"

m m m mTABLE 6

DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLING SITES(Continued)

EDI

SoilSampleNumber

8

Site Characteristics

Ditch with standing water.drains entire southeastern

Next to 24-inch pipe whichportion of marshalling yard,

SampleOdor Description

None Black Clayand Silt

Depth

12"

including the car repair shop. Clear oil droplets on watersurface.

Dry ditch. Upstream of dry well. Ditch receives runofffrom residential (and commercial?) area south of thislocation.

Musty Sandy Clay 12"

10 Ditch with standing water. Next to culvert which drainsoff-site area.

Fuel Oil Clayey Sandand Black Clay

24"

11

oo

OJ

12

Dry ditch. Next to pipe which drains "car cleaningtracks".

Ditch with rapidly flowing, clear water. Next to pipewhich drains area to east.

FamiliarChemical

None

Moist Clayey 12"Sand, Some

White Material

Sand and Gravel 12"

m u m mTABLE 7

RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SOILS

EDISoil

Sample Methylene Trichlorof luro-No . Ch 1 ori de methane

12 0.037 0.033(1*34567891011 0.01512

Trans 1,2-Dichloro- 1,1,1-Trl- Trichloro-e thy 1 ene chloroethane ethylene

0.050—

0.0060.015

--—

0.0130.009

0.034--—

0.007

Tetrachloro- Chloro-ethy 1 ene To 1 uene benzene

0.0270.006—

0.0060.007

--—

0.009—

0.012 O.OJ2--— — — — _ _

^J (1) A second "freon" compound, l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane, at 0.31 mg/kg was found In this sample•^ This compound is not an ERA priority pollutant.

t<: ^ PP in nil 1 ] "j \fil nnram nr- na »*t-r nnr- mi 1 1 •>/-.«

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found during this investigation that chemicals found ingroundwater at the heavy repair shop have contributed to the contaminant plumeimpacting the Verona well field. The plume at the heavy repair shop ismigrating toward the Battle Creek River, and is restricted to the generalvicinity of the shop. In addition, the chemicals are almost exclusivelylimited to the glacial drift aquifer because of the clay zone which separatesthe glacial drift aquifer from the sandstone bedrock aquifer.

Soil samples collected during this study contain low levels of volatileorganic compounds but these levels may be only background levels. Some ofthese compounds have migrated to GTW property from off-site sources.

_19_ 0000775

APPENDIX A

METHODS FOR OBSERVATION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLE COLLECTION

0000776

BEDROCK WELLS

All bedrock wells were constructed using standard hydraulic rotary techniquesto produce an open hole for the four-inch casing and air rotary techniques toproduce an open hole in the bedrock formation after casing had been installed.Procedures that were fol lowed for each of the wells except 1-c were asfollows:

1. The drilling rig and all materials were washed thoroughly and rinsed withclean water prior to entering the job site. The casing was capped withaluminum foil after being washed and was stored on the water truck untilplaced in the hole.

2. All drilling water was obtained from an uncontaminated off-site source(the driller's water well).

No thread compound was used on casing threads or drill rod joints.

The open hole was terminated when solid sandstone was encountered.Casing was installed at this point and grouted in-place. Groutingconsisted of the following steps:

a. The casing was solidly seated on the bottom of the open hole and themud inside the casing flushed using air and clean water.

b. Forty gallons (30 gal in Well 9-A) of neat cement grout was mixedand poured into the casing. The mixture consisted of one 94 poundbag of Portland Type IA cement to 10 gallons of water.

c. A wiper plug was positioned above the grout and forced to the baseof the casing with water pressure and/or the drill rods.

d. The casing was forced into the bedrock several inches with a rigoperated hammer to assure a seal.

e. The casing was filled with clear water, capped and allowed to restfor approximately 24 hours.

A-l 0000777

t5. All equipment, including drill rods and mud pit, were flushed with clean

water.

H 6. After the cement had cured, the water was flushed from the casing and anopen hole constructed below the casing.

^ ^7. Each well was developed by pumping with air until relatively particle-

H free water was produced.

ft 8. A locked, vented cap was installed on each well.

•Well 1-C was constructed in a similar manner except the casing was not groutedin place. The casing In this well was driven several feet into the bedrock.

'ri0 The casing was not cleaned prior to installation.

_ GLACIAL DRIFT WELLS• ———The glacial drift wells were constructed using hollow-stem auger techniques.

JX The procedures used for wells 5, 7, 8 and 9 were as follows:

•• 1. The drilling machine and augers were cleaned with soapy water and thor-oughly rinsed prior to entering the study area. The augers were scrubbed

•with soapy water and rinsed with clean water between each hole. Thecasing was also cleaned and rinsed prior to being brought to the drillsite. The casing was stored on a trailer until placed in the hole.

2. Drilling water was obtained from an uncontaminated source (Grand Trunk• Western water supply).

• 3. No thread compound was used on the casing threads. No pipe was cut orthreaded on-site.

4. An exploration hole to obtain split spoon cores was constructed prior to

a install at ion of the well. This exploration hole was plugged withcuttings and bentonite.

A-2 0000773

5. The well was installed using the following techniques:

a. The augers were advanced to one foot above the desired top of thescreen and sediment in the augers flushed with clean water.

b. Casing and screen were lowered to the bottom of the hole and driveninto undisturbed sediments until the top of the screen was one footbelow the augered hole.

c. The augers were pul led back approximately one foot and bentonitepellets (Volclay) dropped into the annular space as the augers werebeing removed. Approximately three to five feet of annular spacewas filled with the bentonite pellets.

d. The augers were removed from the hole and the annular space abovethe bentonite was backfilled with native soils and bentonite.

6. Each well was developed by pumping it with a rig operated rod pump untilV relatively particle free water was produced.

jfl 7. A vented cap with a padlock was installed on each well.

•J Glacial drift wells 1 through 4A were installed using the same basic tech-• niques except:^

S^ i. Bentonite seals using bentonite pellets were not installed in the annularspace.

^ W

2. The casing and screen were not driven below the augered hole.i3. The augers and casing were not cleaned prior to construction of each

• well.

« 4. Thread compound may have been used on casing joints. Some threads mayhave been cut on-site using thread cutting lubricant.

A-3 0000779

WELL SAMPLING PROCEDURE

—. Water samples for laboratory analysis were collected with care to assure theTjt sample was representative of the formation tapped by the well. With the

exception of Well 8, which was a low producer, the sample was collected after• a minimum of five casing volumes of water had been removed from the well. The

sample collection procedure consisted of the following steps;

1. The quantity of stagnant water in the well was determined.

|2. A centrifugal pump was used to remove at least five times the quantity of

jm stagnant water in the casing (see the_ form following this section).

3. A brass Kemmerer type sampler was used to collect the water sample.Teflon tape was used to cover the rubber stoppers. Each sample wascol lected in the open hole section of the well or directly above thescreen.

II5

1IIII

4. Samples for volatile organic analysis were place in standard 40 ml vials.Care was taken to assure that the bottle did not have an air bubble.Duplicate samples were collected from each well.

5. A one-gallon sample was collected for analysis of base neutral compounds.

6. Samples were stored on ice immediately after collection and delivered tothe EDI laboratory the same day collected.

Three wells could not be sampled as described above because of low yield or anobstructed casing which prevented use of the Kemmerer sampler. For wells 4and T-13, a small diameter copper bailer with an open top and bottom checkvalve was used to collect the sample. Well #8 was both purged and sampledwith the copper bailer.

*-« 0000780

APPENDIX B

CONSTRUCTION RECORDS FOR WELLS

0000781

iI

iVI

OWNER

CITV

{ayne Northern CompanyA Division of Lavne-Wemrn Co.

401 SOUTH DELORENZt AVENUE, P.O. BOX 468. MISHAWAKA, INDIANA 46544

WELL & PUMP INSPECTION REPORTGrand Trunk Railroad

409 W. Jameaon Street, Battle Crekk, MI 49016

WELL NO L'QCAT.ON Round House

OIA. *2" DEPTH 121> SCREEN I D "°ne TYPE _IZlL.UENGTH Caal"^PTM TO TOP * 3 ' *"

DATE DRILLED

DATE INSPECTED 11-24-82

.DATES OF CLEANING

__ PERSON TO

sterilized 1973

DOUK Williamaon 616-966-5233

CONTACT LOCATION

CAPACITY

ORIGINAL

AFTER LASTCLEANING

PRESENT AT LINEPRESSURE

DATE

1940

1978

1982

STATIC

8 . 5 *

9'

10*

GPM

1045

683

692

PUMPINGLEVEL

12.5

11.5

12.5

PRESSURE

w/ tes tDump

71//

55#

SPECIFICCAPACITY

261

273

277

AIRLINE LENGTH Probe

TEST WILL BE COMPLETE THROUGH:

TOP OF CHECK ___ METEfl _ FLANGE OR THREAD SIZE _J1_

TOTAL PUMP SETTING 45'4 '^ MOTOR H P. ^0 PHASE 3 CYCLÛ VOLTS j20/44

PUMP MFG Lavne 12" RKLC-4______________ SER. NO. 22191

RATED CAPACITY 600. .GPM; 200' .TDH; OPERATING PRESSURE

DATE INSTALLED r^fttg pmnp 195.0. DATESOP OVERHAUL 1956^61.66.73.78SIZE OF

IS CHECK VALVE LEAKING' YES_ NO_ DOES STUFFING BOX HAVE SPRING? Y£S_NO__ PACKING

TMJ FOLLOWING i_C TO 5E PERFORMED DURING EACH INSPECTION

_____________ REPACK PUMPCM iNGE MOTOR OIL ft GREASE'Place cêch rârv wn«n c

GREASE PUMP.

PUMP IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPING: 600-GPM;

176'_TOH; SHUT-OFF HEAD FT.

ELECTRICAL DATA WITH PUMP IN OPERATION: 38-38-39 AMPS.

PUMP RUNS ________ HRS. PER DAY UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONSREMARKS (Note any aOnormal condition) _____ _______________ _

VQLTS: PHASE

Pump per fo rmance down 16ff, could wait another year, but is due for overhaul

INSPECTED BY. N. Mago/B. Guy

LNo-14

0000782

6 T " CURVE r O.PT : J

6

i

•

ai*

| l*r i. lie*

1 LOWERLOV/ST7LO-.V2.7LOWSR

.Q°NT.

4210

HUM...

1•>3<>

4f--

1Z5Q__R PM

IAYKC 4 BOWIER, INC.M»aphU. Ten*.

SINGLE STAG€ LA3Oi?ATORYHEAD & HORSE POWER

THRUST "K" =9.0

0000783•H

*aiHT*.O \ri U

X .vt'^ -«i

^ ^ p

Vj v V; *^ S< M ~^ V ^ -g ^ * V^ ts t 4|s|!iM£. •>. vi '* i <" r\j ;sj vvi QO M

" ^ $ v^ ^ t'Hi --> ^ 2 u- <I ^ ir^ :\ c ^ •k- V- Ti ,i • p^ v£ ^.^'x <^ ^>55 $- , 5--V (> = ^ ^}\p ^ ^ $^^ . %• M

^- ^ ^?iv^^0

~l

/•n \%( ti!( I " \viJL L{

i^~ -~

K-^-

'^fc:1:^ 4'•*T*— ' ,

> ».•Vftjl-

F^bI-P\7\IJ]—

-,

• J I

^^

"ci"

VJ

-f••' J

^

5^t-\ ^J

1^s.if-/'r+i/'

*M

^*

1j-.^— r

k—

}>^

1— ft-

- -' ' J

c ^

t5--NK

•

T)i

^K

;-s>

TF4/

3-, HJ^^^^y :•j>Tx

r^"-J

-i?U-IM:t

/T±

T»

trf• iHFnt i

^t--4J^j

T!O~4j^_J*oT)^t

T3Q

O-

O-;' - t r jT>

'«D

"\«V:

^?

«b

"75O

(2

V

V

C.

^

r-V.

:

h>

t)i><i

bj

^>b

ia

sT_^-r— ^ ^«S|

— —— _ ———

J^-l —————

i:«.•*

*^w — -

\TN

c(•I

, ^•.rt-J, ^-

; ^--A-rS*-^-~-\ V "J - • V— i —— •"*• *:- i • r^t~t • ..-=--• y q\

i ^ i'K ! ? : • \ ^ T,. f-rr——r.-1- ———— - yj-

Tl^K-l

-i- '-M ! %/^--- tJ -rt_J_ -^

^ ! ^| ' |t " ". s

t-taQ

>

^ ? o* ^ s^ 5=! 1 ! ~i- ' ^ 3n 1 31 1 1

- QC T<^ >b .n" ———— ' — *~Q

-IaBr«>

-»?•

,n'in

frwt

•

0-•*A

^- t$-T^ »«S5.

% v>^ T —— ^ TA^-h- \!J.. i| **?•; v/^ ^ V /»li^^c

^ ^^ | \

.!>

^1$.'

* *-j ^ -^ q«

--, - o-f -•IT*

————————————— f**-

=H- -1 —————————————

"5KA

^

^

^^

T5^i^

?5! ^! <-rl x

flfe ^f cS§

LLU

>xj

0s1

1 ^> IP ^ ^• & ^

[t 'OH ^ ^ '<^ibr-- * — •- ° ^ °*jki

^^^SFsnSy

0M113°l sfi*«, c^

=w! !s*^ 1J

•X ^~-

1_ 1H ———— .r ^

————— *

r i \f •• -wSBJ | <§ g

^^^ ^ S'' ^ t I? 0p —— Ll^• i1 **vii

vo':^

,' '<J -o £

IItI

Iri

4I

3

E ep

• A -;.j.'ji.":o Lh'/j.:,

—— \

th 1

D3'

,3'U" 1

Depth 121»

n> > , ><v^^T

•- ' u-^

7*6"1 "* Concr-j ta

GrnrjrfxLtf rai

.^ — _ ————— Original

r^ _ |' l^Black *1raarV Pipe

"° Wei^nt 51 Ibs. per ft.Dyers V.'rou^ht Iron Pipe

8 ——— 12I! welded teo with 12^ standard coupling flan

• — Steel Drive Shoe

4 ———— 12" Rock Hole

StatJPunpcat_l2

Dril]Date

C/j^^

B

I AY!

Static Level 0'6"CPU

at 12* 'buaoigg Level

Driller" JAL3S NESSDate Finishedl2-22-39

C<r .

LAY1TE ROCK WELL ;^2For

"AA2-iD TaUI-iK V^STISN PJVILROAD CO.Battle Creek, VJ.chi-ftn

UYHE HORTHERil GO, IMG,MISHAWAKA. IMDIAMA

Sot drawn to scaleAll depths measured from Ground Level

DRAWN OY

Appnovco OY H«KsithDATE 1-Q-liO

ONAWINO NO.

0000785

LAYNE-NORTHERN COMPANY

1IIII

1

I

I

MtSHAWAKA, INDIANA

i ...•..-.:,.•, 7 <* i -iWELL LOG No._2 _„ City _T.'ri.E C7^;'K,_

Owner ^7.-.::p T3"re '.'.l-'T l" 7..'.I'."V.Y rQ;?A:."Y

Location of Well _l*L--I7_AT_ JVOj;:iD_i:Qu*ii3__ ___

_ _County .. 7.U/V"Township _^A. M.

___Section ___<5State

FORMATION FOUND

Pit

Soft Scmd Sock

2rol:cn S^r.i 7,ock

Sar.d 3ocl:

•3 oft Shala

3hal*

THICKNESSOK

STRATUM

30'

_ 30'

IS'

17'

1'

27' ...

1' _,

DEPTH TOBOTTOM OFSTRATUM

30'

£-0.

75*

>:o-

1 STATICWATERLtVEL

Gt 5't

._.. .——

TEMP. REMARKS

Date Started !2rlj5-39 Finished^ 12-22-j3 _ _ _ _ _DRILLER

(iKETCH OF LOCATION ON SACK OF THIS LOG SHEF.T)

0000786

II

III

v

Company

OWNER

CITY

A Oiviiion of L*vn*-Weit»rn Co,40t SOUTH DELORENZI AVENUE, P.O. BOX 468, MISHAWAKA. INDIANA 46544

WELL & PUMP INSPECTION REPORT

Grand Trunk Railroad _____ ___

409 Wesc Jameson Street, Battle Creek, MI 49016

WELL NO LOCATION Round Hous«

0'* 16" DEPTH H6' SCR6eN, Di None TYP6 Rock LENGTH casing 0£PTH TO Tnp & 3'I*.

DATE PRILLED 12-^g-3 9/jr.*-'- ••,',. QATEsopfi EAMMr. None S t er il ized 1973__________

DATE INSPECTED 11-24-82_____ _ ___ pgRsoN TO CONTACT Doug WilltaiTison 616-966-5233

CONTACT LOCATION

CAPACITY

ORIGINAL

AFTER LASTCLEANING

PRESENT AT LINEPRESSURE

DATE

1939

1978

1982

STATIC

8'

9 (

10'

GPM

1100

710

703

PUMPINGLEVEL

11(

11'12f

PRESSURE

W/testpump

760

40#

* SPECIFICCAPACITY

366

355

351

AIRLINE LENGTH

TEST WILL BE COMPLETE THROUGH:TOP OP CHECK __ METER _ FLANGE OH TH«E*O SIZE _8

TOTAL PUMP SETTING ^5 * ___ MOTOR HP *Q PHASP 3 CYCLS 60 VOLTS 220/440

Layne 12" RKLC-4 _____________ SER. NO. __2811A __________________

RATED CAPACITY

OAT6 INSTALLED

600 .GPM; 200' .TDH; OPERATING PRESSURE 54 to 58#

1-3-40 DATES OP OVERHAUL 1951.56.new bowl 61. 66. 73. 78SIZE OF „,„

IS CHECK VALVE LEAKING? YES_NOJL DOES STUPPlNQ BOX HAVE SPRING? YES_NOX_ PACKING _3_Zfl_

THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE »ERPQRMEP OUR INC EACH INSPECTION

______5_____ REPACK PUMP.CHANGE MOTOR OIL & GREASE(P'dct c^eck mark whtr>

GREASE PUMP.

PUMP IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPtNG: 600 .GPM; 132* TPH: SHUT-QPF HEAP 65tf 160*

^ PHASE

FT.

ELECTRICAL DATA WITH PUMP IN OPERATION: 39-A1-43 AMPS; 440 vrti Tg

PUMP RUNS ________ HRS. PER DAY UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONSREMARKS (Nott anv »bnOfmil condition) _____________„„____________________________

Note - 36tf drop In pressure - sec attached curve

1978 report indicates discharge column should be replaced at next overhaul

I

INSPECTED BY, N. Mago/B. Guy

LNO-U

0000787

f CURVE NO.; Tit.)

1 LOWERi LOWERLOWER

. LOWER 1

Q*

A

z10

.......1z34

CI75Q R PM

SINGLE STAGE LABORATORYHEAD & HORSE POWER

THRUST "K" =9.0

$.f

»"»lNTtO Ifl U i

NORTHERN COMPANYINDIANAPOLIS • MrSHAlYAKA • LANDING

PUMP INSTALLATION REPORTFH«N«.98U_A

Salei Order No. .

Pump Mlg. T^

Date _ 1-13-78

5«rlolNo.98UA_ Well No. C.f'2

Owner —Gr^fid Trunk Railroad

Loco I Ion of Well _____________

MOTOt: Moke ______________

Ciry__Batr._le_Cree_k_ stot» Michigan

Typo r.FM Frome

HP 40 volti 220/440 Unt v0ih,g«

Wat Motor Taken lo a repair ihop at thli Mmo?.GEAtDRIVE: Moke ____ _________

_ ___ .„ PSoi.Ser No. 192182

1800RPM

_._.,_ Where?

ENGINE: Moke'.

_ Serial No. __ _______ _ ._.

_ Model ________________

Gear Ratio _.

Serial No. __

PUMP HEAD Tvp* ^]H T.ayne Head8"Diicharg* Pip* Slie

Ue0f.J ....abOVe °b°** groundDelow •

Ftongarf .,_ x . , — Thr»nH»d

Separate •*•• Plata? YfiS

H.0d Shaft r.ngtk 64"

PI, 1LH f i j «bflv« ^JJ. . . ,Ola. JJ»1! ——— Coupled h-)aw

MOTOR SHAFT: Oio. m" L*ngth

Thread Silo In Heod J^Key way 3/3

WJMF ftOWl Type pj,LC

Dla. 12" Na. of Staa** *

Bowll - Catt Iran ar Bran>a> „ . .CI_ _ _

Shaft .55 X « Length

COLUMN pipe <•'• 8"X

flnng»d CtJupl*d

$p»rial Point? .

Oil Lube Wal*r tube X-

ShaftSlr. IV SS x «r«

Tubing Site .. ,. ,., $ll . qr Br

SUCTION PIPE SIT- 8"

l.nglk 10 ?ptCl«l Pnifif)

Ihreodt an BaHamf . . . .

Slrainar «[>•

ffuhb*r BumfMrT

W.H S.al»

NOTE — All moatvromonttfrom top ol pump foundation.Intido Ote. _______ Depth115 Static _:

GrovelTubulor

Typo: Roek

Stropped to Column?.Air Lino Ungth none________

Typo Airline _________ Ploilie _____ .Copper Tubing ____ Sleet Plpo _

PUMPING TEST • Pumped Z12______ GPM at ________ Ft. Pumping level .with __3J______ Ibi, discharge pr«ijure after ________________ houri.

Pump lo Woile Ou'iide _ _.__ Intlde Site THO.O.

PUUING INSHUOIONS

Length of Polos required Re8ular

Irntrtictlons ________________

Special equipment or pulling

Power Llnof: _.

0000789 Imtaller

( (-- r - c X *tefl* VP "4VHfrB.

S

)

Cd

i S

I

IIIII

/T

Depth

Ground

iolo-.v

16 "Blaclc Steel PipeWeight SUbs. per ft

Steel Drive Shoe

Rock Hole

Not drawn to scaleAll depths measured n Ground Level

Static Level G1

Pumped UCO GPJJatil1 pumplnj Level

Driller J« 1'ocr & ;',Date Finished l--lu.-y

ROCX 7/ELLFor

900' South oj' :u.v>

LAYilE NOITHERN CO, KIOP.nSHAWAKA, INDIANA

,DRAWN orAPPBOVCO ovH. Keith

Dfuwma no.

0000791

LAYNE-NORTHERN COMPANYMI5HAWAKA. INDIANA

rera. Wlf-t Ic" Kock T/ell\VELL LOG No._1__. City r.ttlg. Creel:

Q-.vn.er. -^ - '-"^ Yr^3TS::HAIU?.AD

County _Cc_--"-n"rrTownship _L^Jn.Section ____JState__Uchij;r.

Location of Well. L"Il*3

Finished 12-12*39

FORMATION FOUND

Fill

Dirty Sft=d

Snnrf

fHr*y ?,*nA

•^hpl*

5 And Pock

Sand Rock

£&nd EocV-

SATI^ Softt

S<im«4 Prt**lp

,?^nj«

Sind-Roolc ————————————— i

Shnln

THICKNUSOF

STRATUM

l4-~ -

Jfc.__

.12

9

2 -

7

6

uklll),

DEPTH TOBOTTOM OF

STRATUM

J4.

Tfl

30-39

U3 ———

— PO ——

-57 ——AJ

-6?__JOP.

11?116

STATICWATERLEVEL

At— $1 _____

TEMP. REMARKS

5}Vlftl« {'ir«d

Stall •

DRILLER

iSKF.TCH OF LOCATION ON SACK OF THIS LOG SHEET)

0000792

o

«* MJ N(9m) B^oiin jg^ jfjgjnc.

oaruPPT

I mrATinN Battle Creek Yard

pnt;iPuPMT Stearns - Acker AO II

•G STFCHwiciAN . _ „;.:•_,

| pORINIrt MO 1

II ftinira ELEV .Casing: 833.47

SHPPT OP ,.

r:LiPMT Grand Trunk Western Railroad

PROJPCT NH 20129

OATP June 22, 1982

PPHMIT wr> /w oz- 8zz - *4 1 3

BORING LOCATION

i

\ *T^-> "^\ •** /V: - ;

f /i*' *

HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonite

STOPFEET

FROM

0.0

1.0

1.77.0

13.5

TO

1.01.77.0

13.516.0

Sand and gravel

NO, BLOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 1« 8 IN.

DEPTH Of TEST

Wood - old R.R. tiesSand and cinders, very soft, black, oilySand, brown, fineSand, fine, gray, wet

O1

2'4'6'8'10'12'14'

*EC( VERl50%25*50%75%75%70%70%

60%

——

hit sto

GROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER \/2 HRS -

BORING CAVE IN ——

13.7

13.5

,FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED:

Screen set @14*5-17*5'

*Pumps some silt

TVPP galvanized

IV

LENGTH 16'°"

0000793

SCREEN LENGTH.,.,& SLOT SIZE ™fex36x42

7 s otHT. ABOVE GROUND —Ls—

I

I

USGSELEVATION

g 3.?. tT

CAP WITH tOCK

S/7- V

£(3.5

y

rt

1

1

3

1

*•*

' *

•••4

5

]

i

9'

1

kt

'L**r —W.t

i0'

f

•i ,

V'

b * •

.•*'•;•'

* >

•::

*" ' •i * '• ••:*»*.*

•••

• i* 4* 1

•••4

EBd-

;"-v1 . •

, .% **,"*>-"*. ^

*\•**!

*» •,'*'«.*,*•

V.".."";

Lll

*-

GROUND St

--—8' HOLE

^- — - l^SALV. CA!

^ —— NATIVE SOIL

———— JOHNSON "»STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 3

DATE CONSTRUCTED

0000794ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. J__

AUG. 1993 20225

Environmental Data Inc.

SHEET * OF

CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad

PROJECT Kin 20129-87________

DATE August 12, 1982_________

PERMIT NO.

PROJECT .

LOCATION Battle Creek

PQIIIPMPISJT Stearns Acker AD II

TECHNICIAN G.S.

BORING NO. —ii

SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.IB


BORING LOCATION

\ ,,.V

«<i£

m?FEET

PROM

U.O

8.0

15.019.0

TO

8.015.0

19.028.0

Rubble

NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO. SLOWS 3rd fl IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.

NO. BLOWS t« 6 IN.

DEPTH Of TEST

Sand - fine, brownSand - fine to medium, occ stoneSand and gravel

Pumped for 35 minutes 9 3% gpm » 122 gallons

——

-

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 15'

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER ———— HRS _


,FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED TVDC galvanized

2"

LENGTH 26

SCREEN LENGffHfjillQless& SLOT SIZE " x48 7 Slot

0000795HT. ABOVE GROUND 3.0'

usesELEVATION

8 3 />8

831.Z

•CAP WITH LOCK

S'S.Z

-787.7

^

,

t

i

i•, '

\ i

, 1

JSo'

!i

[ i

I'

.0

^-W.T

0'

*V

^\

0

£•'•'*•

* *.1

••**,,%*•

*;j'

;XMil* *

* •

4 «

• :j '+ 4

*i •

• *4

a. j

* •• •

> ** , ~-.'

*<

* J|

-•^*,', »

i\» *,***.

*•

^

GROUND SI

^- —— 8 " MOLE

*- —— 2"GALV. CA«

^^ — NATIVE SOU

1 ———— JOHNSON "«STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 4

DATE CONSTRUCTED

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No- I •<•'

AUG. 1983 Z0223 J

0000796

SHEET. .OF

Environmental Data Inc.CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad

NO. 20129-87

DATE August 12, 1982

PERMIT NO.

PROJECT .

LOCATION Battle Creek, yard

EQUIPMENT. Acker AD II

NO. TW #1B

SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.58

HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte

BORING LOCATION

BORINGDEPTH

FEETPROM

0.0

8.015.020.033.041.5

TO

8.015.020.033.041.5

8-17-f

Rubble

NO. 8tOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 0 IN.

NO. BLOWS 1st 9 IN

DEPTH OF TEST

Sand - fine, brownSand - fine to medium occ cobbleSand and gravelSand - fine to medium, very clayeyClay

2 Pumped 9 19 gpm for 10 minutes

381318232833

41is

9769

1136

26

569

11643

26

——

hit5

1213854

21

roi1121241497

47

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 15

AFTER COMPLETION



FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED: TYPE galvanized

2"

LENGTH ——36 '°"

0000797SCREEN LENGTH stainless& SLOT SIZE ?"YaS" 7 slot

HT. ABOVE GROUND 3'Q"

9$I

Y-I

usesELEVATION63+ 5"8

79*-

CAP WITH LOCK

3'

W.T

53 i#\,* t

I'/. 'A

l.O't

GROUND SURFACE

•'*

a HOLE

2"6ALV. CASING

NATIVE SOILS AND BENTONITE

JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINTt - SLOT, 42" OPENINGS

DATE CONSTRUCTED *- '* •«


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL NQ. /-a

'*3


SHEET.J__ OF *

CLIENT Grand Trunk Western

PROJECT NO.

PATE

20129-87

9' I98a

PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413

PROJECT Qn-Site Hydroeeological Study

LOCATION ________Battle Creek____

EQUIPMENT.

TECHNICIAN

BORING NO.

Klienfelt Cyclone - R300

G.S.

Well #1C


HOLE PLUGGED WITH B*"tonite and Casing

BORING LOCATION

Seated into rock

HWPFEETFROM

0.0-

8.012.015.035.041.043.546.053.054.58497

TO

-

8.012.015.035.041.043.546.053.054.58497

102

6 5/8 bit to 88'3 7/8 bit to 88'-100r

Fill - ballast - wood oily smell

NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO. BLOWS 3rd fl IN.

NO. SLOWS 2nd a IN,NO. BLOWS 1« a IN.DEPTH OF TEST

Lost circulation from 4' - 6*Sand - fine, silty, clayeySand cemented and cinders oily smellGravel and Sand oily smellSand - coarse, sharp, oc 1" stoneClay - gray, sandy firmClay - gray, very sandy, softClay - gray, very firmClay - gray, firm, sandyClay - gray, sandy with pieces of weathered sandstoneSandstone, hardShale

*

!

102 107 Sandstone, hardGROUNDWATER

107 110 ShaleENCOUNTERED AT ———

COMPLETION

AFTER 1/4 HRS 15

IM

FT.

,PT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED:

Rock drilled with airand water injection

TVPC Black Steel

DIAMETER -JLl ———

LENGTH

SCREEN LENGTHA SLOT SIZE —0000799 HT. ABOVE GROUND,

ELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK

8/8-7

748BEDROCK TOP

722- /

/ / '

23

/•$

WT.

GROUND SURFACE

6%"HOLE CONSTRUCTED 3YHYDRAULIC ROTARY

4~«*tV STEEL CASING

NATIVE SOILS ANO SENTONlTE

HC*T CCMCNT GROUT

3 7/8" OPEN MOLE CONSTRUCTED9Y AIR ROTARY

DATE CONSTRUCTEO

f ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No.Jl__

AUG. IM3 20223

0000800


SHEET____OF


t*«*omt*Hr*i. a*aLO*i*ntc»<m*n

DATE

NO-___

August 13, 1982

PERMIT NO.

PROJECT .

uOCATION Battle Creek yard

EQUIPMENT,

TECHNICIAN

Stearns Acker AD II

G.S.

CORING NO- TW n

SURFACE ELEV Casing: 836.43

PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte

BORING LOCATION

\

FEET<OM TO

-.0 0.5).5i.5i.O

6.515.022.0

Sand - fine, black, oily

NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.

NO. SLOWS 1« 6 IN.

DEPTH OF TEST

Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - Fine to medium, gravely binder, brownSand - medium to coarse and gravel, some fines

Pumped for 90 minutes 9 1.7 gpm » 150 gallons

——

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER ____ HRS _


FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED: TVPC galvanized

DIAMETER —— £L~

LENGTH 21'0stainless

HT. ABOVE GROUND

ooooaoi• fVM^.m -*^-"

usesELEVATION •CAP WITH LOCK

831.4

ii

' /<-

i

k ',

»1.0'

J_

GROUND SURFACE

9" HOLE

2 QALV. CASING

NATIVE SOILS ANO BENTONITE

JOHNSON WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT7- SLOT, 41" OPENINGS

DATE CONSTRUCTED


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. J:__

AUG. 1983 20225

SHEET. .OF

Environmental Data Inc.fMVfftOMMfMr«4. SCMMn»TVCM


20129-87•» QMBMi <••» MIMMV. U. P« •Ml

PROJECT NO.__

OATE ____August 12, 1982

PERMIT NO. 7. - >4 i 3

PROJECT

LOCATION Battle Creek yard

EQUIPMENT

TECHNICIAN

BORING NO. TW #2A

SURFACE ELEV Casing: 836.2 +


BORING LOCATION

w• Ot. TO

0.0

O . f j6.5

'.0.5,

0.56.5

15.037.540.0

Sand - fine, black, oilv


NO- BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.

NO- BLOWS 1st 6 IN.

DEPTH OF TEST

Sand - fine to medium, hrnwnSand - fine to medium, binder, brownSand - medium to coarse and gravel, some finesClay - gray, sandy, moist

Well developed and pumped 9 10 gpm for 45 minutes » 450 gal.

3.5

8,5

13*818»}23*328*|

32438H

——

2

410139191230

2

6132212262636

37

17

1810393240

5

13304022655876

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER ____ HRS _


FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED TYPE galvanized

niAUPTFP 2"

.FT. 36'0"

.FT

0000803

LENGTHSCREEN LENGTH,stainless& SLOT SIZE 2 X48"

10 slot,HT. ABOVE GROUND J'u

cUSGSELEVATION

^

^goo

'CAP WITH LOCK

W.T

33

BU

'**,

GROUNO SURFACE

3" HOLE

2"GALV. CASING

NATIVE SOILS AND BCNTONITE

JOHNSON "WATER «ARK SUPER 'STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT , 4l" OPENINGS

DATE CONSTRUCTED •-•*•-»*


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. 2 A

AUG. 1903 20225

IEnvironmental Data Inc.

SHEET____OF ____


PROJECT

OATE

20129

August 16, 1932

PERMIT NO.

PROJECT

LOCATION Battle Creek vard

Stearns - Acker AD II

TECHNICIAN G.S.

TW #3BORING NO.SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.94


BORING LOCATION

»BPFEET

FROM

'o.o1.0

11.016.0

TO

1.0

11.016.021.0

Sand - black. o11v

NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN

NO. BLOWS 2nd 8 IN.

NO. SLOWS 1»t 0 IN

DEPTH OF TEST

Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - fine to sllt^wetSand and gravel strong fuel oil odor

Pumped 3 0.4 gpm for 90 minutes 36Pumped 9 0.9 gpm for 60 minutes 54

90 aallons

——

GROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER ———— HRS -


,FT..FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED TYPE galvanized

2"

LENGTH 20'

SCREEN LENGTH ,. 7& SLOT SIZE z *48 '

HT. ABOVE GROUND 3.0'

0000805

usesELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK

83J.9

8I&.

810.9

_

/

11

.:'

•

I

l!

•••

7 '

'

>

* '

i

,

.9

rL , —WT.

\.0'f

'*".'

*"•*

KN

•;":r«'<• *,••,1 ••;:>••*»»*•. »*'

' .**h * '

••*

^^m

7*

s

•••<

sb -

* *• '

;-\';

^ *i

i*0•*i*

: :

»,*%

*,.•4

> -

GROUND Si

^ — 9 " HOLE

^ —— 2"GALV. CA,

^ — NATIVE sou

- ———— JOHNSON "vSTAINLESS7 - SLOT , A,

DATE CONSTRUCTED


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. _2_

AUG. 1963 20229

0000806

Environmental Data Inc.mrnrmtiHiMUMHM

SHEET____OF


PROJECT NO._

DATE August 13, 1982

PERMIT NO.

PROJECT .


EQUIPMENT Stearns - Acker AD II

TECHNICIAN G-S-___________

BORING NO. TW I3A



BORING LOCATION

T

1

1 9QQ1NG1 DEPTHFEETpI ppnu4

0.01.0

11.016.028.029.0

TO

1.011.016.028.029.032.0

8-16-E

Sand - black, oily

NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN

NO. BLOWS 3rd « IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 8 IN.

NO. BLOWS 1st 6 IN.

OBFTH OF TEST

Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - fine to sllty, wetSand and gravel *fuel oil - strong odor*Sand - fine, gray, clayeyClay blue, very sandy, very firm

2 Pumped for 90 minutes 9 0.4 gpm - 36Pumped for 90 minutes @ 4.0 awn « 360

39?

3813182328

31

354

15.511

39

366

U.517

40

4

67

252

32

—

7121336

49

GROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14*

AFTER COMPLETION



FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

WELL DATA

CASINO USED TYPE galvanized

DIAMETER

LENGTH

SCREEN& SLOT SIZE

HT. ABOVE GROUND — 3-.°'

0000807

usesELEVATION 'CAP WITH LOCK

9 2 J , - )

a/a- '

80 3. 7

;

2

4

'3

J

V'

.

1 '

•

i

.7

W.t

\.0'|

,*v

;*-*

v *;*

1 *•

i i

;*;»•*k'1,t *

Li

* •

^^m

:

*— *

£L t

;'-.:

^\ A:.:^^* ^\*

•*•*;Jit *

•;";

r^

GROUND SI

-^ — 9 " HOLE

^- —— 2"GALV. CA!

^ —— NATIVE SOU

1 ———— JOHNSON "VSTAINLESSt • SLOT , 1

DATE CONSTRUCTED


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL NO. JUfi-

AUG. 1903 20223

0000808

SHEET. .OF

Environmental Data Inc.CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad

PROJECT NO.

OATE August 16, 1982

PERMIT NO. O L - g 7. 7.

Battle Creek yard

PQIIIPMPMT Stearns - Acker AD II

TW 14BORING NO.

SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 835.0*

BORING LOCATION

J r\ i i"O 1

WtfPFEET

FROM

0.0

5.0

TO

5.021.0

Sand - fine to medium^ brown


NO BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS lit OIN.

DEPTH Of TEST

Sand - medium to fine, brown, binder

Pumped 9 17 gpm for 10 minutes • 170 gallons

——

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5

AFTER COMPLETION


BORING CAVE IN __

FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT

WELL DATA

CASING USED TVPC galvanized

2"

LENGTH M U

SCREEN LENGTH ,RPA SLOT SIZE 2 *48

7 SlotHt ABOVE GROUND

0000809


f

1

\

4

\

t-iIt

•

4V

I

i

>•

•

.0

•**r —

W.T.

0'

•V

•'r> *. ,'0

,/.1 *,•"•!• »

* ii:

,« •>Ar;-;X

• *

^H

: !

j

;'-/»:;• •

*, '

« «

p >

'?*•^/>* •

. V

',*-»/\\

'0» *.

*.*»t •>4 *

^J** •

,•!

*^

-

GROUND SI

^ — a " HOLE

^ —— 2"aALV. CAS

^. —— NATIVE SOU

' ———— JOHNSON %STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 4

DATE CONSTRUCTED «"*•


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. _*

AUG. 1983 20229

00008J0

Environmental Data Inc.(WWMNMWm

SHEET————OF

CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railrnad

PROJECT "ft 2Q129___________

OATP August 16, 1982_________

PERMIT NO. c Z. - S>1 Z -'4

PROJECT .


Stearns - Acker AD II

TECHNICIAN G.S.

BORING NO. I4A



BORING LOCATION

9'

FEETFROM

.0

5.021.030.043.047

TO

5.021.030.043.047.049.5

8-16-88-17-8

Sand - fine to medium, brown


NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.

NO. BLOWS tit 6 IN.DEPTH OF TEST

Sand - medium to fine, brown, binderSand - medium to fine. occ. lens of brown clavSand and gravelSilt - grayClay - gray, sllty

1 Pumped for 30 minutes 9 0.4 gprn « 12 gallons1 Pumped for 3 hours 9 1.0 gpm * 180 gallons

192 gallons

•J-13

232833384349

-L

§76109211»

66109121011112

37JL.12..11168153

•"•

-

13U.22-19281826425

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5 FT.

WELL DATA

CASING USED:

AFTER COMPLETION



.FT.

.FT.

TYPE galvanized

DIAMETER——2!—

LENGTH *0'4"

.FT.7 slot

HT. ABOVE GROUND——1L

00008U


^-79V.fi

3

3

'

i

•

,

\

i i

/<•

••VH

73'

11

'

J 2

iL . —

W.T

0'

*• •.

:-»h, ^

i '*

V.V

* t

:i:.»*»

»**t *.

Ix

VMM

: !V '• *

svA

;-v

V;!

• N

,'f.. ^

^"\

,**

•0fe *%

*c*

• *,'

^

GROUND SI

--—a" HOLE

-- ——— 2" GALV. CA<

^^. —— NATIVE SOIL

———— -JOHNSON "«STAINLESS7 . SLOT , 4

DATE CONSTRUCTED


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No, 4-fl

AUG. 20229

00008 t2

Environmental Data (no.

SHEET____OF


PROJECT NO. 20225______________

DATE __________________________

PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________

PROJECT .

LOCATION

On-Site Hvdrogeloglcal StudyCalhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt 4 Sons. Hydraulic rotary

TECHNICIAN Pierce A Swansor.

BORING LOCATION

drift wells)bedrock)

Sec. 5 T25, R7W

BORING N

SURFACE EL

HOLE PLUG<

W3

r -A

0

6

' U"1

1 20

25

TO

6

11

20

25

30

(Refer to location map)Q 5 and 5A

Well 5A is 5 ft. northPV

of 5.

}FP WITH Cfifllfnt grnut, hentonlfJBand/or cuttings. NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.

NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 0 IN.

NO. BLOWS tst 0 IN.

DEPTH OF TEST

Sand, fine to coarse; oravel . fine to med. and clay brownsllty

as above, but black, some wood chips

Gravel, fine well sorted, some wood chips (base of fillat 15 feet?) Split spoon sample at 20 feet: sand, greyv fine to med, some pebbles (to l*s").

Gravel, fine to med. black shale chins.

Gravel fine; and sand, coarse, faint fuel oil odorsplit samples at 30 feet.' sand, fine to coarse and aravel

——

GROUNDWATER f1ne to med

ENCOUNTERED AT ———— FT.

WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——

AFTER COMPLETION



.FT. DIAMETER.

.FT.

.FT.

LENGTH

SCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——

HT. ABOVE GROUND0000813

No. 5A Client

Project No

Date

- No. Blows last 12"

! Boring| DepthProm

. 30

*45

,/*

50t

60

70

71

75

85

90

94

L'i

To

45

50

60

70

71

75

85

90

94

97

103

No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T«»t

Gravel, fine to coarse. More distinct fuel oil odor.Split spoon, sample at 40 feet: Gravel, fine to coarse, andsand, fine to coarse, silty, clayey.

Gravel, fine to med. with some fine to coarse sand.Fuel oil odor. Split spoon sample at 49 feet: Gravel fineto med, and sand, med to coarse, some silt and clay.

As above, but no odor. Occasslonal sandstone fragment.

Gravel, sandy, slltv. clavev. Grades toifine to coarsegravel at 70 feet. Some thin clay lenses.

Clay, grey, plastic some sand and silt.^

Clay, arev with larne oebbles and Interbedded aravel . fineto med.

Gravel, fine to med. some sand, med to coarse, intebeddded

clay, qrey.

Clay grey, somewhat sandy and slltv.

Gravel. Interbedded with clay as above. Clav is more sandv

Clav. liaht arev. stlckv. clastic, hard drillinn.

Sandstone, grey fine to very fine, siltv. clavev. someblack shale fragments.

—

0000814

iring No. 5A Client.'.

A

BoringDepth

prom

103

123

135

• ———•

-

--''

I

To

123

135

140

Shale, qrev. oilv film on mud o1t

Project No.

Date

No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T«»t

Sandstone, grey, v .v . fine to fine, silty. clayey.

Shale, dark grey, slightly sandy (v. fine to fine)

^

——

-

0000815

usesELEVATION

S2T.9S-

815.9

•CAP WITH LOCK

I3.1

*

•2

I

•v

^'

11

T 1\

3.9'

i

I

^

iL , —w.t

** 'l

* I *

..*>\ '•

V

i?,•*»,* <

.*4

1 •'

•*• *•*^

• *

10'

f>••«!

^•4

|Hmm*

••m***•au. j

GROUND SI

:-v

k*-*,*>»^

£:

'Vs

» %

m*"1

• •'r*>_*«

-^ — 8" HOLE

*- —— 2" GALV. CA

-——NATIVE SOU

r* —— VOLCLAY 8C( 3

^- ———— JOHNSON "* WSTAINLESS10 - SLOT , 3

-

DATE CONSTRUCTED

I ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL NO. _L_

AUG. 1963 20229

I 0000816

usesELEVATION WITH LOCK

825".

Bie-3

aCOMOCK

710.4

685".

\£2i

•'

l*

\

<K

2'

<•

1

•

9

1

^^B

i!

1

r

9

^

1•

i

*&

^

f^»^ •

• \

,*^>\,

i «*

^

GROUND SURFACE

X,VY

t*»'"••

1 ^,i> *..vi .

»s*

^ —— S V4" HOLE CONSTHHYDRAULIC ROTARY

- —— VGALV, STEEL CASI

^. —— NATIVE SOILS AND

^. —— NEAT CEMENT GROU

_^ —— 3 7/9" OPEN HOLE C^^ BY AIR ROTARY


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL Mo ?*•

AUG. I9«3 20225

0000817


SHEET ———— OF


PROJECT NO. 20225________________

DATE _________________________

PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________

PROJECT

[LOCATION

On-Site HvdrogelogicalStudv

Calhoun Countv. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem Auger

'EQUIPMENT Kleinfelt & Sons. Hydraulic rotary

HNICIAN Pierce \ Swanson

w I60RING NO.

SURFACE ELEV.

HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement, grnut. bentnn-it»

BORING LOCATION

(drift wells)[bedrock)

Sec. 5 T2S, R7W(Refer to location nao

J and/or cuttings.

ImpMOM

K n^^"^ U

R 5

TrH16U

rf?0_j

(30f

Vr

TO

5

10

16

20

30

50


NO. SLOWS 3rcj 6 IN.

NO. SCOWS 2nd 0 IN.

NO. BLOWS itt 0 IN.DEPTH OF TEST

Gravel, fine to med. . sandy, very siltv elavpv.

Clav. brown* aravellv. sandv. wood.

Clay, black, sandv. aravellv. wood Chios

Gravel, fine to med.. sandv. slltv. somewhat clavev.

Sand, fine to coarse, some fine gravel, some silt.

Gravtt, fine to med .j and sand, med. to coarse; some fineto very fine sand.

—

QROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT

AFTER COMPLETION

AFTER ———— MRS _

BORING CAVE IN __

FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.


DIAMETER

LENGTH


HT. ABOVE GROUND

0000818

Boring No. LI ienc

,

•

If ——• BoringI Depthr1

.x

prom

Fso

55

60

75

-0

90

95

105

133

136

1—

To

55

60

75

85

90

95

105

133

136

140

Project No.

Date

No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of last

Sand, fine to coarse; and gravel fine to med; some fineto v fine sand.

Gravel, fine to v. coarse (1/2"); and sand, med; some v.fine sand and silt.

Gravel, med. to coarse, sandy, silty, clayey. Gravel becomesfiner with depth.

Clay, grey, sand, silty, gravelly, Gravel decreases withdepth.

Clay, grey, v. sandy; sandstone fragments (top of "rock"?)

Clay, grey, tough, sticky, plastic, somewhat sandy.

Clay. arev. sandv. siltv: Freaucnt sandstone fraamentsr fineto very fine grained.

•

Sandstone, grey, fine to v, fine grained, silty.

Shale, dark arev. somewhat siltv.

Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine, silty.

—

0000819

US3SELEVATION WITH LOCK

8lt>.\

7*3BEDROCK TOT

\1.8

,

I*

, .

5

J

/ 05. •;

n'

•

i

.0

».T.

I.• 1i

^V\ *

»>»* "

Xt*-»X*

* *,

•"••.*.>'.»'.'Vi?%j:>i*, **;;;>*«•«

GROUND SURFACE' ,fX»vk*> x>'*^'•i% •

v1 ^,+»

J*», »

.v;'*•N*OA•» .

1

^ —— « 3/4" HOLE CONSTfHYDRAULIC ROTARY

- ——— 4*GALV. STEEL GAS

^ —— NATIVE SOILS AND

-, —— NEAT CEfclCNT GROi

^ , 3 7/8" OPEN HOLE (^^ BY AIR ROTARY

DATE CONSTRUCTED

TI ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND

WELL

AUG. 1963

WESTERN

20225

0000820

rEnvironmental Data Inc.

SHEET

CLIENT

PROJECT

DATE

OF

Grand Trunk Western Railroad

2Q22

PERMIT NO. 1402-322-413

PROJECT On-Site Hvdroqeloqical StudyLOCATION Calhoun County. Emmet Township

Stearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt A Sons. Hydraulic rotary

TECHNICIAN Pierce A Swanson

BORING NO. 7 and 7A

SURFACE SLEV.

HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement grout, hentonlta

BORING LOCATION

drift wells)bedrock)

Sec. 5 T25, R7W(Refer to location map

Well 7 is 11.4 ft. north of 7A

ROD%&^OM

0

5

9

29

INGTH

TO

5

9

29

46

and/or cuttings. NO BLOWS LAST iNO. BLOWS 3rd 6NO. BLOWS 2nd 6NO. BLOWS Ht 81DEPTH OF TEST

Gravel, fine to med: and sand, fine to coarse, silty.

Clay, brown and black, sandy, gravelly.

Gravel, fine to med .. and sand, fine to coarse, somewhatsilty.

as above, but gravel becoming coarser and s»nd more abundant.Split spoon sample at 29 feet: Sand, fine to coarse andgravel fine to coarse some silt. Split spoon sample at 40feet: Gravel fine to med., sandy, fine to med.Split spoon sample at 45 feet: As above, but gravel rangesto coarse.

2 IN

N.

N.

N

GROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT

AFTER COMPLETION


BORING CAVE IN __

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.


DIAMETER

LENGTH _


HT. ABOVE GROUND

00908*f

rBoring No. Client

Project No

Date

BoringDepth

From

46

55

101

115

To

55

101

115

120

No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T««t

Clay, grey, very sandy, gravelly (fine to med); fragmentsof qrev shale and sandstone, somewhat plastic.Split spoon sample at 47.5 feet: Clay, grey, hard, siltvocc. small (1/8") pebble.

Sandstone, grey, fine to very fine, silty, clayey,(Interval from 61-75 contains gravel?)

Shale, dark grey.

Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine grained

v-

•

0000822

usesELEVATION

v^

•CAP WITH LOCK

9.8

W.T.

t

3.9'

GROUND SURFACE

3 HOLE

2 GALV. CASING


VOLCLAY BENTONITE PELLETS( 3 TO 3 FEET)

JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT, 36" OPENINGS

DATE CONSTRUCTED _1


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No._I_

AUG. 1983 20229

0000823

usesELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK

77ZaCDROCK TOP

752.Q

,

,2

1

\ ,m

" * * • ? *

.a

^

i

L

•

.s

'^w.t

1.r 'i

»\7:(fc<

•\X• *••*.'Vi*.1 *>**ii* ~•V

1.

.*.. • v

GROUND SURFACE

X

^ \t '»*»•

t *-,"«^•i"'., *»x

!»\

A1i

^ —— « 3/4" MOLE CONSTRHYDRAULIC ROTARY

- ——— 4" GALV. STtEL CASl

^ — NATIVE SOILS AND

^ — NEAT CEMENT GROU

^. ——— -3 7/8" OPEN HOLE C^^ 3Y AIR ROTARY

DATE CONSTRUCTED

LENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL I** ""••

AUG. 1983 20229

0000821


SHEET____ OF ____


PROJECT NO.20225______________

DATE ____________________

PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________

PROJECT On-Site Hvdrogelogical Study

LOCATION Calhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt & Sons. Hydraulic rotary

TECHNICIAN Pierre t Swanson

BORING NO. 8 and 8A

SURFACE ELEV.

HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement groutr

BORING LOCATION

(drift wells)[bedrock)

Sec. 5 T2S, R7W(Refer to location man

Well 8 is 4.9 ft. north of 3A

and/or cuttings. NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN

m°PROM

0

5

TO

5

18

j 18 22

22 24

24 42

NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.

NO. SLOWS TSt 6 IN,

DEPTH Of T6ST

Gravel, fine to med.

Sand, brown, fine to v. f1ne;s1ltv. elavey: snnw aravel .fine. Split spoon sample at 18 feet; Sand, brown, fine tov. fine, very clayey and silty.

Clay, brown, silty, sandy; some gravel, fine.

Gravel, coarse to clay, grey, very poorly sorted.

Clay, grey to gravel, fine. Poorly sorted. Sollt sooonsample at 26 feet: Sand fine to coarse very slltv, clayeysome fine gravel.

—

——

-

GROUNDWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT

AFTER COMPLETION



FT.

.FT.

.FT.

,FT.


DIAMETER

LENGTH _


HT. ABOVE GROUND

0000825

• Boring No. __a Client

Project No.

Date

BoringDepth

From

42

60

70

87

* 1 ————1 901( *'

|104IT*120

v ———

V^ ———

**

'

w

:

u

To

60

70

87

90

95

104

120

130

No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T««c

Clay, dark grey, plastic, somewhat sandy, somewhat gravelly.

Clay, as above, but with fragments of sandstone and shale.

Clay, grey, v. sticky, plastic, sandy.

Sandstone (sample mixed with gravel, sand and clay.)Fracture at 87 feet-- lost some fluid.

SUts tone, grey, some fine sand.

Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine grained.

Shale, dark grey.^

Sandstone, greytf1ne to v, ffne grained.

—— —— ——

—

-

——

I 0000826

usesEUEVATIOM

8 3^.30

531.9

CAP WITH LOCK

S/7,9

8/2.3

J

1

1

3

f,y

.

/

••m

/,fc

1

1

9'

•

•

V. o

1

ww.r

,*• v» '

»\*. **>>i •**'jj%:• »1 ••»*»1 .>»N' ,*•»•• %,» •

»*!•*4

, * *

:X•*• •;".»'.•• •'_•_«

^B

•94• <• •

BUj

"-••

»'•• *\< •« •

^/

% '

'V••*5!LX, «*• ^

%0

»•«*

l.»-M"..• »'•"?•%^H

r-

GROUND Si.

- 9" HOLE

*. ——— 2" GALV. CAJ

^- — NATIVE SOU

^- —— VOLCLAY 9E( 3

1 ———— JOHNSON "*STAINLESS10 • SLOT . 3

3 TO 3 FEET)

DATE CONSTRUCTED J:

^r

i0000827


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No. _£__

AUG. 1983 20229

usssELEVATION- WITH LOCK

746BEDROCK TOP

7J7.1/-

1

1

9V

.

•

f2-1'

' '

19.5

1 *

— ^pp——

» r.

.*'

t.i£5

-:v

.«,, w*;•i»N•*••«*>*/I•*»1 •

»(

J'

i\* *

ut1 "V*

t '»*I1.", »4?

•'»,

;*>»*i\^&

X

GROUND SURFACE

<+> —— S 3/4" HOLE CONST?HYDRAULIC ROTARY

———— 4"GACV. STEEL GAS

^ — NATIVE SOILS ANO

^~— NEAT CEMENT OROl

^—— — 3 7/8" OPEN HOLE (BY AIR ROTARY

DATE


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No, •' '••.

0000828

I

Environmental Data Inc.f NvM<MMMwrMjcmn5T»«MaiM«fftvMpiow* rtrcwwnn

SHEET

CLIENT

PROJECT

DATE

OF

Grand Trunk Western Railroad

2Q2?c

PERMIT NO. 1402*822-413

PROJECT

LOCATION

Qn-Site Hydrogelogical Study

Calhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem Auger

gnuiPMPMT Kleinfelt A Sons. Hydraulic rotary

TECHNICIAN Pierce & Swanson_____________

SORING NO. -

SURFACE ELEV.

9 and 9A

HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement arnut.

BORING LOCATION

drift we l ls )bedrock)

Sec. 5 T25, R7W(Refer to location map)

Well <t is 11.6 ft northeast of 9A

and/or cuttings.

im?PROM

0

5

12/

TO

5

12

45

Clay, red to arev. siltv. sandv. oravellv.

MO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN

NO. SLOWS 3rd 6 IN.

NO SLOWS 2nd « tN.

NO BLOWS tst 6 tN

DEPTH of TEST

Gravel, fine to med; and sand, med to coarse:some fine sand.

Sandstone, grey, fine to v.fine grained, soft at surfacebut beconing hard with depth.

Sn11t Sooon Samoles:

15 f MI t: Sand And «Anri«f-nn». blue arev. v. fine to cnar«@.

20 fe«t: Sandstone, grey. v. fine to fine. soft.28 fe€t:s11tstone.qrev. friable, occ. oebble ofsandstone as above. —

-

GROUNOWATER

ENCOUNTERED AT

AFTER COMPLETION


BORING CAVE IN __

FT.

.FT.

.FT.

.FT.


DIAMETER.

LENGTHSCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——

HT. ABOVE GROUND —

0000829

US6SELEVATION

321.8

//

3.1

'CAP WITH LOCK

WT.

l.O

'*>1

*«

GROUND SURFACE

9 HOLE

2 GALV. CASING


VOLCLAY BENTONITE PELLETS(3 TO 5 FEET)

JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT, 36" OPENINGS

DATE CONSTRUCTED "' c •*•


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL No '

AUG. 20225

0000830

ELEVATION

827.1

BEDROCK TO*

1 i

8-1

WITH LOCK

2-1

m.r.

&

GROUND SURFACE

ti,i* 3/4" HOLE CONSTRUCTED 3YHYDRAULIC WTARY

rrea. CASINO


NEAT CEMCNT GROUT

3 7/9" OPEN HOLE CONSTRUCTED9Y AIR ROTARY

DATE CONSTRUCTED


GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

WELL NO. ?-•]

AUG. 1983 20223

0000831

I Hydrogeological Investigation I · adjusted to a pH of 11 or greater, followed by three serial...

Documents

Transcript of I Hydrogeological Investigation I · adjusted to a pH of 11 or greater, followed by three serial...