Hydrologic Data Assimilation with a Representer-Based Variational Algorithm Dennis McLaughlin,...
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
eugene-mason -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Hydrologic Data Assimilation with a Representer-Based Variational Algorithm Dennis McLaughlin,...
Hydrologic Data Assimilation with a Representer-Based Variational Algorithm
Dennis McLaughlin, Parsons Lab., Civil & Environmental Engineering, MITDara Entekhabi, Parsons Lab., Civil & Environmental Engineering, MITRolf Reichle, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
• Problem context - Mapping continental-scale soil moisture from satellite passive microwave measurements. Problem is spatially distributed, nonlinear, and has many degrees of freedom O(106). Available models of hydrologic system and measurement process are highly uncertain.
• Variational data assimilation• Results from a synthetic experiment (OSSE)
Soil Moisture
Soil moisture is important because it controls the partitioning of water and energy fluxes at the land surface.This effects runoff (flooding), vegetation, chemical cycles (e.g. carbon and nitrogen), and climate.
Precipitation
Runoff
Infiltration
Evapotranspiration
Soil moisture
Soil moisture varies greatly over time and space. Measurements are sparse and apply only over very small scales.
Soil moisture
Solar Radiation
Ground Heat Flux
Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes
Microwave Measurement of Soil Moisture
L-band (1.4 GHz) microwave emissivity is sensitive to soil saturation in upper 5 cm. Brightness temperature decreases for wetter soils.Objective is to map soil moisture in real time by combining microwave meas. and other data with model predictions (data assimilation).
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
saturation [-]
mic
row
ave
emis
sivi
ty [-
]
sandsiltclay
Relevant Time and Space Scales
Plan ViewEstimation pixels (small)Microwave pixels (large)
Vertical SectionSoil layers differ in thicknessNote large horizontal-to-vertical scale disparity
5 cm
10 cm
5 km
5 km
Typical precipitation events and measurement times
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
50
100
150
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12radiobrightness observation times
Prec
ipita
tion
[mm
/d]
day of year
For problems of continental scale we have ~ 105 est. pixels, 105 meas, 106 states,
State equations are derived from mass and energy conservation Soil moisture is governed by a 1D (vertical) nonlinear diffusion eq (PDE). Soil temperature and canopy moisture are linear ODEs.
Essential Model Features
)(0(0)τ],),(),([)(
αyy0t tν,αyAty
),,,( iii tyMz
Canopy moisture, soil moisture and temperature
States:Canopy moistureSoil moistureSoil temperature
Soil properties and land use Land Surface Model
(State equations)
Uncertain initial conditions
Uncertain land-atmosphere boundary fluxes
Radiative transfer model(Measurement equations)
Microwave radiobrightness(deg. Kelvin, L-band)
Random meas. errors
The Estimation (Data Assimilation) Problem
Some options:• Variational Approaches:
Derive mode of p[y(t)| Zi] . Good for smoothing problems (t < ti) . Requires adjoint model, limited capabilities for handling model error (process noise), does not give info. about accuracy of state ests.
• Extended Kalman Filtering:Uses Gaussian assumption to approximate conditional mean and covariance of p[y(t)| Zi]. Good for filtering/forecasting problems (t ti ). Requires computation and storage of very large covariance matrices. Tends to be unstable. Provides some info. about estimation accuracy.
Suppose we are given a vector Zi = [z1, ..., zi] of all meas. taken through ti. Ideally, we wish to derive the posterior density p[y(t)| Zi] at any time t . . . . . In practice, we must settle for partial information about this density
Is there a more efficient and complete way to characterize p[y(t)| Zi] ?
Operating System Simulation Experiment (OSSE)
“True” microwave radiobrightness
“Measured” microwave radiobrightness
Canopy moisture, soil moisture and temperature
Soil properties and land use Land surface
model
Mean initial conditions
Mean land-atmosphere boundary fluxes
Radiative transfer model
Random model error
Random initial condition error
Random meas. error
Data assimilation algorithm
Estimated microwave radiobrightness and soil moisture
Soil properties and land use, mean fluxes and initial conditions, error covariances
Estimation error
OSSE generates synthetic measurements which are then processed by the data assimilation algorithm. These measurements reflect the effect of random model and measurement errors. Performance can be measured in terms of estimation error.
Synthetic Experiment (OSSE) based on SGP97 Field Campaign
Synthetic experiment uses real soil, landcover, and precipitation data from SGP97 (Oklahoma). Radiobrightness measurements are generated from our land surface and radiative transfer models, with space/time correlated model error (process noise) and measurement error added.
SGP97 study area, showing principal inputs to data assimilation algorithm:
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
ABC
top node saturation rms error [-]
day of year
reference experiment (rms = 0.029)3 assim. intervals A (rms = 0.03)12 assim. intervals B (rms = 0.032)12 assim. intervals C (rms = 0.038)radiobrightness observation times
Window configurations
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
50
100
150
Pre
cipi
tatio
n [m
m/d
]
day of year
Effects of Smoothing Window Configuration
Position and length of variational smoothing window affect estimation accuracy. Estimation error is less for longer windows that are reinitialized just after (rather than just before) measurement times.
Variational algorithm performs well even without precipitation information. In this case, soil moisture is inferred only from microwave measurements.
Effects of Precipitation Information
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
50
100
150
Pre
cipi
tatio
n [m
m/d
]
day of year
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
top node saturation rms error [-]
day of year
reference experiment (rms = 0.014)est - precip. withheld (rms = 0.034)prior - precip. withheld (rms = 0.19)
Estimation of Model Error
170 172 174 176 178 180 182-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
pixel 283: model error in moisture flux upper b.c. [mm/d]
day of year
open looptrueEnKF Ne = 500variational benchmark
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 0
50
100
150
Pre
cipi
tatio
n [m
m/d
]
day of year
Representer-based variational algorithm is able to estimate a smoothed version of time-dependent model error:
1. Developed and tested an efficient variational smoothing algorithm based on an indirect representer solution technique. Method is able to accommodate time-dependent model errors.
2. Developed and applied an approach for assessing accuracy of soil moisture and temperature estimates (computation of radiobrightness prediction error variances).
3. Used variational method to study soil moisture mission design issues, including spatial resolution/downscaling, length of smoothing interval, and effects of precipitation withholding.
4. Developed and tested an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) which is able to handle highly nonlinear models.
5. Compared the performance of the variational and EnKF approaches.
Summary of Recent Progress
Publications:
Reichle, R. H., 2000: Variational Assimilation of Remote Sensing Data for Land Surface Hydrologic Applications, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.Reichle, R., D. Entekhabi, and D. McLaughlin, Downscaling of Radiobrightness Measurements for Soil Moisture Estimation: A Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Approach, Water Resources Research, in press.Reichle, R., D. McLaughlin, and D. Entekhabi, Variational data assimilation of microwave radiobrightnes observations for land surface hydrologic applications, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, in press.Reichle, R., McLaughlin, D., and D. Entekhabi, Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter, Monthly Weather Review, in press.