Hydrated Lime - Solution for Acid Gas 7-19-12 - · PDF fileHydrated Lime DSI - Solution for...

download Hydrated Lime - Solution for Acid Gas 7-19-12 - · PDF fileHydrated Lime DSI - Solution for Acid Gas Control (SO3, HCl, and HF) MARAMA /ICAC SO2/HCl CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES WEBINAR HOWARD

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Hydrated Lime - Solution for Acid Gas 7-19-12 - · PDF fileHydrated Lime DSI - Solution for...

  • Hydrated Lime DSI - Solution for Acid Gas Control (SO3, HCl, and HF)

    MARAMA /ICAC SO2/HCl CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES WEBINAR

    HOWARD FITZGERALD - LHOIST NORTH AMERICA

    July 19, 2012

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Chemical Lime and Franklin Industrial Minerals merged to form Lhoist North America

    Lhoist Group Worldwide, 22 countries in Asia, Europe and the Americas

    Lhoist - Largest lime company in the world

    Calcium Focused

    Calcium R&D Centers throughout globe

    Chemical Lime to Lhoist (Luh-wost)

  • CLCMAP 9/28/2000 Rev.3

    Langley

    Tenmile

    Grantsville

    Natividad

    Redding

    Stockton

    Denver

    City ofIndustry

    Gallup

    Belen

    Douglas

    Nelson

    ApexHenderson

    McKinney

    Arcola

    CliftonNew Braunfels Port Allen

    Ste. Genevieve

    Brooklyn Junction

    AlabasterONeal

    Brooksville

    Pompano Beach

    Redmond

    Carlin

    Hurst

    La Porte

    Marble Falls

    Kimballton

    Ft Worth

    Scottsdale

    High Calcium PlantDolomitic PlantHical / Dolo PlantTerminalSales OfficeHydratorHeadquarters

    Montevallo

    Lhoist North America- Plant Locations -

    St. Matthews

    Butte

    Shoshoni

    Portland

    CLC FACILITIES

    Valley

    Hutchins

    Holland

    Baker City

    Port Arthur

    Sebree K1 & K2

    Lakeland

    West Palm Beach

    FIM Anderson

    FIM Crab Orchard

    FIM Dalton

    FIM Alabaster

    FIM Lowell

    FIM AlabasterFIM NolanvilleFIM Crawford

    FIM Facilities

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Presentation Objectives

    Provide brief explanation of Calcium Products and Production

    Present a summary of coal-fired boiler test data to show the performance of DSI using hydrated lime as an effective emission control option

    SO2 explain the temperature relationship in capture HCl

    SO3 HF

    Hg - removal enhancement Trace metals

    Compare the effectiveness of a standard hydrated lime to a high surface area high porosity optimized hydrate produced specifically for acid gas control applications

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    CaOLime

    Ca(OH)2Calcium Hydroxide

    Hydrate

    CaCO3Limestone

    Heat

    Im a Calcium Missionary

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Hydrated Lime Properties

    SorbacalSP and SPS

    SSA - >40 m2/gPorosity - ~.23 cm3/g

    Standard Hydrate

    SSA - ~20 m2/gPorosity - ~.07 cm3/g

    Chemically the hydrated limes evaluated are basically the same

    Their difference lies in their physical properties

    Production in Europe and Japan since early 1990s.

    Commercially Available in US April 2013

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    CSAPR SIP Compliance StrategySO2 Data Summary

    Testing at SRI Birmingham Combustion Research FurnaceHigh S - ~2000 ppm in flue gas (furnace injection)

    Low S - ~600 ppm in flue gas (duct injection)

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    SO2 Removal Chemical Reactions

    WFGD Limestone - SO2 Removal CaCO3 + SO2 +1/2O2 CaSO4 + CO2

    WFGD Quicklime - SO2 Removal CaO + SO2 +1/2O2 CaSO4

    SDA/CDA/DSI Hydrated Lime - SO2 Removal Ca(OH)2 + SO2 CaSO3H2O + H2O

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Hydrate FSI SO2 Control Furnace Injection w/ ESPTemperature Impact on SO2 Removal

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb/lb SO2)

    % S

    O2

    Rem

    oval

    Sorbacal SPS @ 2100 FSorbacal SPS @ 1700 F

    2000 ppm SO2ESP Operations

    ~28%

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    At 2100F

    Hydrate DSI SO2 Control Furnace Injection w/ ESPComparison of Sorbacal SPS and Standard Hydrate

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb/lb SO2)

    % S

    O2

    Rem

    oval

    Sorbacal SPSStd Hydrate

    2100F

    2000 ppm SO2ESP Operations

    ~33%

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Hydrate DSI SO2 Control Air Heater Inlet (670F) w/ FFBH Comparison of Sorbacal SPS and Standard Hydrate

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb/lb SO2)

    SO2

    Rem

    oval

    %

    SorbacalSPSStandard Hydrate

    600 ppm SO2

    ~33%

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    SO2 Test Conclusions

    Higher Temperatures are better for SO2 removal

    SorbacalSPS performs better than standard hydrate by ~30%

    70+% removal is achievable with SorbacalSPS at a feedrate of ~2 lbs SorbacalSPS/lb SO2 with in furnace injection (2100F) with proper dispersion and an ESP. A baghouse should perform better.

    ~ 50% removal is achievable with SorbacalSPS at the air heater inlet temperatures (700F to 650F)

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    MATS Compliance StrategyHCl Data Summary

    High Cl Tests (3300 ppm Cl in Coal, 200 ppm HCl in flue gas)

    Moderate Cl Tests(~800 1000 ppm in coal, 63 ppm in flue gas)

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Other Acid Gas Chemical Reactions

    HF Removal Ca(OH)2 + 2 HF CaF2 + 2 H2O

    SO3 Removal Ca(OH)2 + SO3 + H2O CaSO42H2O

    HCl Removal Ca(OH)2 + HCl CaClOH + H2O CaClOH + HCl CaCl2 + H2O

    Note Lhoist has demonstrated in multiple tests Hydrated Lime reacts more strongly (or quickly) with HF, then SO3, then HCl.

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    Impact of competing acid gases

    Temperature

    % C

    ontr

    ol

    SO2

    SO3

    HClHF

    HighLow

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    ESP Operations for High Cl Coal(~3300 ppm in coal

    200 ppm HCl in flue gas)

    Temperature Impacts on HCl Removal Sorbacal SPS

    HCl Removal Better at Low T

    Temperature Effects for Sorbacal SPS

    0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

    100.0

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HCl R

    emov

    al (%

    )

    350 F700 F

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    ESP Operations for High Cl Coal(~3300 ppm in coal

    200 ppm HCl in flue gas)

    HCl Removal Better at Low T

    Temperature Effect for Sorbacal H

    0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

    100.0

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HC

    l Rem

    oval

    (%

    350 F

    700 F

    Temperature Impacts on HCl Removal Standard Hydrate

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    SorbacalSPS vs. Standard HydrateHigh Chloride Coal, ESP Operations, DSI @ 350F

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    100.0

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HCl R

    emov

    al (%

    )

    Sorbacal SPSStandard Hydrate

    200 ppm HCl in gas3300 ppm Cl in coal

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    HCl Removal - Baghouse vs. ESP

    0102030405060708090

    100

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    lb Hydrate per lb Acid Gas

    HC

    l Rem

    oval

    Baghouse w ith SPS

    ESP w ith SPS200 ppm HCl in gas3300 ppm Cl in coal

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    High S, High Cl Test Summary

    SorbacalSPS performed better than the standard hydrateBetter performance was shown at the air heater outlet temperature (300 - 350F) than the inlet temperature (650 -700F)~90% HCl removal was achieved with an ESP and 97% removal with a baghouseThe utility MATS limit of 0.002 lb/MM Btu was not achieved with this high Cl coal

    DSI can be an effective way to limit Cl corrosion in FGD systems and also reduce

    waste water treatment costs.

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    HCl Removal Across Baghouse

    60.0

    65.0

    70.0

    75.0

    80.0

    85.0

    90.0

    95.0

    100.0

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HCL

    Rem

    oval

    (%)

    Sorbacal SPStandard Hydrate

    63 ppm HCl in gas800 - 1000 ppm Cl in coal

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    HCl Removal Across Baghouse

    60.0

    65.0

    70.0

    75.0

    80.0

    85.0

    90.0

    95.0

    100.0

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HCL

    Rem

    oval

    (%)

    Sorbacal SPStandard Hydrate

    63 ppm HCl in gas800-1000 ppm in coal

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    HCl Removals Across ESP

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    100.0

    0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

    Hydrate Feedrate (lb hydrate/lb acid gas)

    HC

    l Rem

    oval

    (%

    Sorbacal SP

    Standard Hydrate`

    63 ppm HCl in gas800-1000 ppm Cl in coal

  • VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT

    Confidential Lhoist

    HCl Emissions Across Baghouse

    0

    0.001

    0.002

    0.003

    0.004

    0.005

    0.006

    0.007

    0.008

    0.009

    0.01

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5