How Will You Know That a Change Is An...
Transcript of How Will You Know That a Change Is An...
9/15/2014
1
How Will You Know That a Change Is An Improvement?
Robert Lloyd, PhD
John Boulton, MD
Day 2Concurrent Breakout Session15 September 2014
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a true
improvement? If you have sustained
improvement?
2. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
3. If it is time to spread the change(s) to other
areas?
4. If it is time to stop measuring?
9/15/2014
2
“There are many hazards to the use of
common sense. Common sense cannot be
measured. You have to be able to define
and measure what is significant. Without
statistical methods you don’t know what the
numbers means.”
Source: Dr. W. E. Deming as quoted by N. Mann, The Keys to
Excellence: The Story of the Deming Philosophy. Mercury Books,
London, England, 1989: 62.
An Option: Use Common Sense? 4
1. By understanding the variation
that lives within your data
2. By making good management
decisions about this variation (i.e.,
don’t overreact to a special cause and don’t
think that random movement of your data up
and down is a signal of improvement).
How will we know that a
change is an improvement?
9/15/2014
3
Understanding Variation:
You have a choice!
5
STATIC VIEW
Descriptive StatisticsMean, Median & Mode
Minimum/Maximum/RangeStandard Deviation
Bar graphs/Pie charts
DYNAMIC VIEWRun Chart
Control Chart
(plot data over time)
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Rat
e pe
r 100
ED
Pat
ient
s
Unplanned Returns to Ed w/in 72 Hours
M
41.78
17
A
43.89
26
M
39.86
13
J
40.03
16
J
38.01
24
A
43.43
27
S
39.21
19
O
41.90
14
N
41.78
33
D
43.00
20
J
39.66
17
F
40.03
22
M
48.21
29
A
43.89
17
M
39.86
36
J
36.21
19
J
41.78
22
A
43.89
24
S
31.45
22
Month
ED/100
Returns
u chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
UCL = 0.88
Mean = 0.54
LCL = 0.19
6
How will we know that a
change is an improvement?
Which time period
is better?
Now, which time
period is better?
2013
2013
2014
2014
Percent of
patients
assessed
for
pressure
ulcers
Percent of
patients
assessed
for
pressure
ulcers
This is the difference
between static and
dynamic displays of data!
Source: R. Lloyd. Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and
Using Indicators. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2004.
9/15/2014
4
Walter
Shewhart
(1891 – 1967)Joseph Juran
(1904 - 2008)
W. Edwards Deming
(1900 - 1993)
The Pioneers of Statistical Thinking 8How do we analyze variation for
quality improvement?
Run and Control Charts are
the best tools to determine
if our improvement
strategies have had the
desired effect.
9/15/2014
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Point Number
Po
un
ds o
f R
ed
Ba
g W
aste
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
Median=4.610
Measu
re
Time
Four simple run rules are used to determine if
non-random data patterns are present
X (CL)~
Elements of a Run Chart
The centerline (CL) on a
Run Chart is the Median
Jan01 Mar01 May01 July01 Sept01 Nov01 Jan02 Mar02 May02 July02 Sept02 Nov02
Month
Nu
mb
er
of
Co
mp
lain
ts
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
A
B
C
C
B
A
UCL=44.855
CL=29.250
LCL=13.645
Elements of a Control Chart
X (Mean)
Me
as
ure
Time
An indication of a
special cause(Upper
Control Limit)
(Lower Control
Limit)
9/15/2014
6
11
AIM (How good? By when?)
Concept
Measure
Operational Definitions
Data Collection Plan
Data Collection
Analysis ACTION
But, you need a Roadmap for your
Quality Measurement Journey
Source: R. Lloyd. Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and
Using Indicators. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2004.
12
AIM (How good? By when?)
Concept
Measure
Operational Definitions
Data Collection Plan
Data Collection
Analysis ACTION
The Quality Measurement Journey
Source: R. Lloyd. Quality Health Care: A Guide to Developing and
Using Indicators. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2004.
9/15/2014
7
13
Types of Variation
Common Cause VariationIs inherent in the design of the process
Is due to regular, natural or ordinary causes
Affects all the outcomes of a process
Results in a “stable” process that is predictable
Also known as random or unassignable variation
Special Cause Variation
Is due to irregular or unnatural
causes that are not inherent in
the design of the process
Affect some, but not necessarily all aspects of the process
Results in an “unstable”
process that is not predictable
Also known as non-random or
assignable variation
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a
true improvement?
2. If you have sustained improvement?
3. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
4. If it is time to spread the change(s) to other
areas?
5. If it is time to stop measuring? SPSP
9/15/2014
8
Source: The Data Guide by L. Provost and S. Murray, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2011.
A Shift:
6 or more
An astronomical
data point
Too many or
too few runs
A Trend
5 or more
Run Chart Rules are used to determine
if a change has occurred
Use the run chart rules to determine if a change has
occurred
A shift = 6 or more data points above or below the
baseline median (centerline)
A trend = 5 data points constant going up or down
16
Random Variation (common cause)
Nothing has changed here!
9/15/2014
9
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a true
improvement?
2. If you have sustained improvement?
3. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
4. If it is time to spread the change(s) to other
areas?
5. If it is time to stop measuring? SPSP
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
LO
S (
min
ute
s)
2/16/11 3/16 4/13 5/11 6/8
Week
Measu
re
Time
Median
A downward shift in the
data (6 data points below
the median)
Sustained Improvement
• First identify a shift or a trend in the data
• Then look to see if 3 or more data point have stayed at
the new level.
3 more data
points staying
at the new level
of performance
9/15/2014
10
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a true
improvement?
2. If you have sustained improvement?
3. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
4. If it is time to spread the change(s) to other
areas?
5. If it is time to stop measuring? SPSP
Degree of Belief When
Making Changes to Improve
Developing a change Testing a change - cycle 1,
cycle 2, cycle 3Implementing a Change
Degree of
belief that a
change will
result in
improve-
ment
LOW
MO
DE
RA
TE
HIGH
Change needs
further tesing
Unsuccessful
change!
Successful
change!
Source: The Improvement
Guide, Langley, J. et al,
Jossey-Bass, 2009: 145.
9/15/2014
11
Implementing a Change
Baseline
Testing
Successful
Testing
Begin implementation
on pilot unit
Evidence of improvement
during implementation
Note that when you move to full implementation things may
actually get worse for a little bit.
Current Situation Resistant Indifferent Ready
Low
Confidence that
current change
idea will lead to
Improvement
Cost of
failure
large
Very Small
Scale Test
Very Small
Scale Test
Very Small
Scale Test
Cost of
failure
small
Very Small
Scale Test
Very Small
Scale Test Small Scale
Test
High
Confidence that
current change
idea will lead to
Improvement
Cost of
failure
large
Very Small
Scale Test Small Scale
Test
Large Scale
Test
Cost of
failure
smallSmall Scale
Test
Large Scale
TestImplement
Conditions for Implementing a Change
Note the conditions for Implementing a change!
Risk of not
succeeding
large
Risk of not
succeeding
large
Risk of not
succeeding
small
Risk of not
succeeding
small
Risk of not
succeeding
small
9/15/2014
12
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a true
improvement?
2. If you have sustained improvement?
3. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
4. If it is time to spread the change(s) to
other areas?
5. If it is time to stop measuring? SPSP
Collaborative
John Whittington OSF Healthcare
Holding the Gains
Spreading a Change
• First identify a shift or a trend in the data.
• Then look to see if 6 or more data point have stayed at the new
level.
• This indicates that you are ‘holding the gains.’
A downward shift in the
data (6 data points below
the median)
6 more data
points staying
at the new level
of performance
9/15/2014
13
How will you know…
1. If the change(s) you have made signal a true
improvement?
2. If you have sustained improvement?
3. If it is the right time to implement the
change(s)
4. If it is time to spread the change(s) to other
areas?
5. If it is time to stop measuring? SPSP
Two Simple Rules for Measuring
Outcome Measures – always!
Process Measures – it depends!
9/15/2014
14
How often do you need to measure?
It is not uncommon for a team to want to stop
collecting data, especially after they have
been at it for a year or two!
The reliability of the process and your
need to know how the process is
functioning should drive the frequency of
data collection and analysis.
A Simple Rule for Outcomes
Outcome Measures – Always!
As long as you are concerned about the quality and
safety of the care that you deliver, you should
continue to track the outcomes!
For example, how long should these outcomes be measured?
• When do you stop measuring your financial results?
• When should a diabetic patient stop tracking his or her blood glucose?
• How long should we monitor the vital signs of an ICU patient ?
• When should airport security stop assessing passengers for weapons?
• How long does a local water authority need to measure the quality of the
water going through its pipes?
• When should schools stop measuring the progress of students?
9/15/2014
15
Process Measures – it depends!• Process measures usually demonstrate improvement before
outcome measures.
• Process measures may be revised during an improvement
project; new data will then need to be collected and tracked.
• A process measure should demonstrate improvement
(against the run chart rules) and then STAY at the new level
of performance for at least 3 reporting periods to be
considered “sustained.”
A Simple Rule for Processes Frequency of Process Measures
Regularly (daily, weekly or monthly)Done to improve a specific measure (reduce variation or shift the
centerline of process performance)
Periodically (once every 2 - 3 months)Done when statistical improvement has been noted, sustained AND
the process is highly reliable (audit approach can be used here)
Once or twice a year (why bother?)
Stop measuring! Done when performance is so reliable, stable and capable that it is
time to move on to measure something new.
9/15/2014
16
Process Improvement: Isolated Femur Fractures
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64Sequential Patients
Min
ute
s E
D t
o O
R p
er
Patient
Holding the Gain: Isolated Femur Fractures
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64Sequential Patients
Min
ute
s E
D t
o O
R p
er
Patient
3. Determine if we are
holding the gains
Current Process Performance: Isolated Femur Fractures
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64Sequential Patients
Min
ute
s E
D t
o O
R p
er
Patient
The Steps in
Statistical
Thinking
2. Determine if a change is an improvement
1. Make process performance visible
Baseline
Data
Change
Introduced
here
Sustained
Improvement
The Statistical Thinking Framework
Systems Thinking
Analysis ActionPhilosophy of
Measurement
Statistical Methods
Process ImprovementVariation Data
Statistical Thinking will be found in all aspects of
organizational behavior and performance
Source: American Society for Quality, Statistics Division.
9/15/2014
17
Attributes of a Person Who
Understands Variation
They understand the different ways in which variation is viewed (static versus dynamic).
They explain changes in terms of common causes and special causes.
They use graphical methods to plot data over time, learn from data and expect others to consider variation in their decisions and actions.
They understand the concept of stable and unstable processes and the potential losses due to tampering.
They understand the capability of a process or system before changes are attempted.
34
Sustaining improvements
and Spreading changes to
other locations
Developing
a change
Implementing a
change
Testing a
changeTheory and
Prediction
Test under a
variety of
conditions
Make part of
routine
operations
The Sequence of Improvement
requires Measurement