How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements_ _ The Economist
Transcript of How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements_ _ The Economist
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 1/6
More from The Economist Subscription Log in or register
World politics Business & finance Economics Science & technology Culture Blogs Debate Multimedia Print edition
Our cookie policy has changed. Review our cookies policy for more details and to change your cookie preferences. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to
our use of cookies.
Jul 21st 2013, 23:50 by G.F. | SEATTLE
The Economist explains
How do smartphones reveal shoppers’movements?
NORDSTROM, an American fashion retailer, is known for its high-touch customer service,
which has engendered customer loyalty ever since it was founded to supply prospectors for
the Yukon gold rush. It has a liberal returns policy, pays commission in a way that
discourages sales staff from being pushy and offers an enormous range of products. It also,
apparently, likes to keep tabs on its customers and potential customers without the need for
human intervention. For several months Nordstrom tested a system that tracked the
movements of people carrying Wi-Fi-enabled smartphones and other devices as they
wandered through 17 of its stores or merely walked by. The firm posted a public notice of
the monitoring, prompting a report by a television station in Dallas in May, at which point the
retailer pulled the plug. Then the New York Times picked up the story, igniting a privacy
debate about passive monitoring via Wi-Fi and other technologies. The system used by
Nordstrom and several other firms, provided by Euclid Analytics, can precisely track the
movements of individual phones, even though they never actually connect to a Wi-Fi
network. How does it work?
The Economist explainsExplaining the world, daily
Sponsored by
Previous Next Latest The Economist explains Latest from all our blogs
Tweet 77
About The Economist explains
On this blog, our correspondents explain subjects
both topical and timeless, profound and peculiar,
with The Economist's trademark clarity and brevity
RSS feed
Comment (16)
Permalink
Reprints & permissions
Does global shale gas production really have the potentialto reduce climate change over the long-run?
Yes No
Mar 6, 2014
The hottest new fuels of 65 millionyears ago
EXPAND
Down under, Australia cleans upEXPAND
From sunset to new dawn Capitalists, not just greens,
are now questioning how signif icant the benefits of shale
gas and oil w ill be for America. The new sceptics ar
454Like
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 2/6
412
View all comments (16) Add your comment
The technique takes advantage of the fact that Wi-Fi wireless networking protocols are
"promiscuous": the Wi-Fi adaptors in laptops, phones and base-stations reveal a lot of
information about those devices as they attempt to negotiate connections with other devices
nearby. Even before a device hooks onto a Wi-Fi a network, it continuously spews
identifying information, including a unique, factory-set identifier, over the air. Most devices
send "probe requests" akin to a town crier shouting out the names of networks which the
device has previously connected to, so that a nearby base-station that matches any of these
requests can respond. The requests run unremittingly across all available frequencies until
a connection is made. Even devices that are seemingly turned off, such as sleeping laptops,
send out such probes, though at a slower rate. Place several Wi-Fi base-stations in a shop,
then, and you can pick up these probe requests, extract the device IDs, trilaterate the
positions of the devices sending them, and thus track the movements of individual
shoppers, seeing which racks or displays they stop at, and what paths they follow through
the store.
This is arguably just the latest development in the well-established field of "retail science", in
which the movement of shoppers is tracked and analysed. This was once done using video
cameras, with footage examined by operators to determine where best to place new
products or displays. Analysis of video is now heavily automated, and computers grind
through the data to work out when stores are busiest, when queues are longest and how the
positioning of products and promotional displays affects sales. The use of Wi-Fi tracking
allows merchants to anonymously track individual shoppers more accurately than is
possible with video, particularly in crowded stores. It also means returning customers can
be spotted without the need for facial recognition, by looking out for known device IDs.
All this is convenient for retailers, but worries privacy advocates. It is true that shoppers are
on private property, and signs announce the use of tracking technologies. But improvements
mean that Wi-Fi signals travel much farther than they did in the 1990s, so that people who
merely walk past a store or look in a window may be picked up by internal tracking systems.
More worryingly, because most Wi-Fi devices broadcast a list of known networks, a
monitoring system could, in theory, collect the list and match it against databases of known
Wi-Fi networks, which are used as a rough and ready alternative to satellite positioning in
built-up areas. Shoppers' stored list of connections could thus reveal where they live or
work, and possibly their identities. (Euclid says its system does not gather lists of network
names, only device IDs, which are then anonymised.) Google faced worldwide scrutiny from
regulators, and had to pay fines, after it emerged that its Streetview mapping vehicles had
collected massive amounts of data broadcast publicly by Wi-Fi networks, computers and
mobiles in many countries. Accordingly, Wi-Fi tracking firms now seem to be trying to get
ahead of regulators. The day after the New York Times story appeared, Euclid and other
firms announced a plan to partner with the Future of Privacy Forum to set rules about Wi-Fi
tracking. In the meantime, if you are worried, there are two absolutely effective ways to
prevent such tracking: turn off Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on your phone and laptop when out and
about, or turn the devices off altogether.
Correction: This post originally stated that Nordstrom does not pay its staff commission,
which was incorrect. The text has also been amended to make it clear that Euclid's tracking
system does not gather the network names broadcast in probe requests. These changes
were made on July 23rd.
Previous
The Economist explains: Who
owns your data when you're
dead?
Next
The Economist explains: Why is
Latin America cooling on
Catholicism?
Recommend Tweet 77 Share 26 46
Recommended Commented
Follow The Economist
Latest blog posts - A l l times are GMT
Most popular
Development in Africa: How to make it
last
Baobab - 50 mins ago
The week explained: March 7th 2014:
Voting and violence
The Economist explains - Mar 7th, 00:01
EU, Russia and Ukraine : Embracing Yats
Charlemagne - Mar 6th, 22:20
"Ruin Lust": Hip wrecks
Prospero - Mar 6th, 18:01
Mario's message : Masterly inactivity
Free exchange - Mar 6th, 17:47
Stephen Lawrence and the police :
More inquiries to come
Blighty - Mar 6th, 17:10
French politics: Sarkoleaks
Charlemagne - Mar 6th, 16:55
More from our blogs »
European economyguideTaking Europe’s pulse
1
454Like
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 3/6
More related topics:
Sort: Newest first Oldest first Readers' most recommended
donna bella Jul 23rd 2013, 13:04
Accrux Jul 22nd 2013, 21:14
Related items
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other
readers. Review our comments policy.
Add a comment (up to 5,000 characters)
POST
Solution? Turn off wifi ;)
More from The Economist
Ukraine's crisis: A tale oftwo countries
Working hours: Get a life—or face theconsequences
Global warming: Whopressed the pause button?
Gay weddings and religious liberty:The dignity of toleration
China’s parliament: The smog of war
EU, Russia and Ukraine : EmbracingYats
The Crimean war: The key to conflict
Jordan and the Palestinians: Akingdom of two halves
European economy guide : TakingEurope’s pulse
TOPIC: »Wireless and mobile networking
Wireless networks: Whatever happened tomunicipal Wi-Fi?
Wi-Fi offloading: f93gHPaz!w120K;6afyHB. Got it?
Babbage: May 15th 2013: Code for propaganda
TOPIC: »Technology
The Economist on China: Weekly round-up
In-flight apps: Socialising in the sky
The radical power of the web: Online, underground
TOPIC: »Internet
Police and social media: Inspector calls
Online commerce: Shop like an e-Gyptian
Escalating cyber-attacks: It's about time
TOPIC: »Wi-Fi
Babbage: July 24th 2013: Fighting trolls
In-flight Wi-Fi: The airlines with widespread Wi-Fi
Railway wireless: Amtrak speeds up its Wi-Fi
Science and technology Wireless technology
7 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
Economist blogs
Analects | China
Americas view | The Americas
Babbage | Science and technology
Banyan | Asia
Baobab | Africa
Blighty | Britain
Buttonwood's notebook | Financial markets
Cassandra | The World in 2014
Charlemagne | European politics
Democracy in America | American politics
Eastern approaches | Ex-communist Europe
Erasmus | Religion and public policy
Feast and famine | Demography and development
Free exchange | Economics
Game theory | Sports
Graphic detail | Charts, maps and infographics
Gulliver | Business travel
Newsbook | News analysis
Prospero | Books, arts and culture
Pomegranate | The Middle East
Schumpeter | Business and management
The Economist explains | Explaining the world, daily
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day
Get e-mail newsletters
Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail
newsletters and alerts.
Follow The Economist on Twitter
Subscribe to The Economist's latest article
postings on Twitter
Follow The Economist on Facebook
See a selection of The Economist's articles,
events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.
Advertisement
› Doctorate Degree Online
› Best Savings Account Rates
› High Yield Savings Account
› Top 10 MBA Colleges
› Best Annuity Funds
› Top Mutual Funds to Invest
Russia, Ukraine and the West: How will theWest read Putin’s playbook?
Crisis in Ukraine: Kidnapped by the Kremlin
Russia and Ukraine: Edging closer to war
Deadly knife attack: Terror in Kunming
2
345
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 4/6
VahciYQ3od Jul 22nd 2013, 20:39
MySetDancer in reply to VahciYQ3od Jul 23rd 2013, 01:31
G.F. - The Economist in reply to VahciYQ3od Jul 23rd 2013, 04:09
Canadian Engineer 1917 Jul 22nd 2013, 18:27
dalax Jul 22nd 2013, 16:39
1) "If you want to be sure your'e not tracked, pull out the battery!" (Johan Sterk)
2) "The only way you can turn your phone off completely from being a personal tracker is to remove
both the battery and the SIM." (TonyF2)
3) "But they might have a chip or something. If you want to be 100% sure, do not own a smartphone
—or own it, but don't take it with you when you go to Nordstrom." (Anonymous)
Nordstroms are collecting anonymous data - why is this not clearly mentioned in the article? It's no
difference to having a member of staff standing around with a hand-held clicker counting people as
they go past.
Theoretically if you were to sign up to a store's loyalty program using your smartphone, and there
was a lot of work done to integrate with the stores CRM system, then you can be individually tracked
as you walk around the store - but no one is doing this, yet.
There are no privacy issues in this implementation, it's just a technically advanced hand-held clicker
for all intents and purposes.
Note that while the article is generally accurate to begin the latter part is technically incorrect, and
should not be taken at face-value.
Nordstrom can pay to have the WiFi network names your device is probing-for matched against
what Google has collected by driving by your home and business. Then, your address is
matched against a database of addresses to resident, so Nordstrom knows exactly where you
live, and perhaps work, shop, eat, worship, and probably your name or family name at least.
Remember, your device is constantly broadcasting the name of the networks you have
connected, to, so since they can all be matched-up, there is nothing anonymous about it.
Firms make all sorts of assertions about the use of data they collect, and some of those
assertions would be actionable if proven otherwise. There is no supposition that Nordstrom or its
provider is misusing data. Rather, the issue is explaining the richness of data collected and what
could be done with it.
Expand 1 more reply
It’s just one shock after another. We ought to request from our governments a free public
anonymizing internet/cell phone network of sorts. The kind that is inherently anonymous without
having to trust the network provider. The increase in taxes would be offset by eliminating our own
internet/mobile bills.
My wife is a Nordstrom salesperson and I promise you that she works on commission - which is
11 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
8 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
8 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
6 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
6 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 5/6
T.S. - The Economist in reply to dalax Jul 23rd 2013, 10:31
TonyF2 Jul 22nd 2013, 15:55
Accrux Jul 22nd 2013, 10:13
Accrux in reply to Accrux Jul 22nd 2013, 20:52
Johan Sterk Jul 22nd 2013, 08:03
surfson in reply to Johan Sterk Jul 22nd 2013, 09:40
often negatively impacted by the companies' "liberal return policy."
That beef aside, as an InfoSec professional I'm not sure what the concern is here. Perhaps Nordies
will use this information to lay out its' stores more conveniently for shoppers and we will spend more
money there?
Yes, we were wrong to say that Nordstrom sales staff are not paid commission. We've fixed it.
Thanks.
The only way you can turn your phone off completely from being a personal tracker is to remove both
the battery and the SIM.
They 'trilaterate' customers and try to see where they are, and then follow them.
What would come next, consider them as NORAD would consider UFOs, trying to find out whether
they are from the Earth or from Rigel? And what would happen if they [the customers] actually are
from Rigel?
Anyway, it smacks of Big Brother.
"And what would happen if they [the customers] actually are from Rigel?"
------
Allow me to answer my own question: well, as long as the EBEs pay cash or have a valid credit
card...
If you want to be sure your'e not tracked, pull out the battery!
Thank you !!! Apparently some harassing entity knows when I go by my old welding shop. They
show up to block my way into my driveway with uncanny precision. When I call the cops at 10
pm they're too busy to come lend a hand!!!
They're mad because I sued a Dr. friend of theirs who butchered a young woman. The Mayor was
an Insurance Salesman.
5 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
5 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
5 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
8 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
6 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
17 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
3/7/2014 The Economist explains: How do smartphones reveal shoppers’ movements? | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-13 6/6
ARMED FORCESPAY REVIEWBODY – ECON…
Jobs.economist.com
FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES
Jobs.economist.com
Deputy CountryRepresentative
Jobs.economist.com
Director General
Jobs.economist.com
OperationsOfficers (CivilEngineer)
Jobs.economist.com
[+] Site Feedback
Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2014. All rights reserved.
Classified ads
edwardong Jul 22nd 2013, 02:11
MoJos in reply to edw ardong Jul 22nd 2013, 09:52
Or, Nordstrom et. al. could offer shoppers discounts in return for turning on their Wi-Fi. Win-win! :-D
Same as they do with loyalty cards? Which are the absolute pits when it comes to privacy.
I for one would like to see a list of all shops that employ such underhanded tactics in order to
make sure to never leave a frigging cent at those premises.
I don't mean loyalty cards, where I can (and do) chose not to have one. But sleazy, sneaky
outfits that snoop on me, abusing a device owned by me and most certainly not being authorized
by me to do so and even then when I'm not on their premises.
A tiny notice in grey, 3 point font on a dark grey background those make me neither informed nor
consenting.
20 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
17 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
15 PermalinkRecommend Report Reply
Sections
Debate and discussion
Blogs Research and insights
Contact us
Help
My account
Subscribe
Print edition
Digital editions
Events
Jobs.Economist.com
United StatesBritainEuropeChinaAsiaAmericasMiddle East & AfricaBusiness & financeEconomicsMarkets & dataScience & technologyCultureMultimedia library
The Economist debatesWhat the world thinksLetters to the editorThe Economist Quiz
Americas viewAnalectsBabbageBanyanBaobabBlightyButtonwood's notebookCassandraCharlemagneDemocracy in AmericaEastern approachesErasmusFeast and famineFree exchangeGame theoryGraphic detailGulliverNewsbookPomegranateProsperoSchumpeterThe Economist explains
TopicsEconomics A-ZSpecial reportsStyle guideThe World in 2014Which MBA?The Economist GMAT TutorReprints and permissions
The Economist Group »
The Economist Intelligence UnitThe Economist Intelligence UnitStoreThe Economist Corporate NetworkIdeas People MediaIntelligent LifeRoll CallCQEuroFinanceThe Economist Store
View complete site index »
Contact us Help About us Advertise with us Editorial Staff Staff Books Careers Site index
Accessibility Privacy policy Cookies info Terms of use