Hospital Trends and Program Management · hospital owner study FMI Corp was engaged by a hospital...
Transcript of Hospital Trends and Program Management · hospital owner study FMI Corp was engaged by a hospital...
1
Hospital Trends and
Program Management
Jay Snyder, MBA, CHC
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
2
Background on our
hospital owner study
FMI Corp was engaged by a hospital client to develop processes and an
operating plan to support cost control and project risk management
throughout budgeting/planning, design and construction. FMI’s
management consulting team assessed the clients current state, interviewed
internal and external sources, brought forth industry best practices from past
research and conducted a detailed hospital owner study in order to deliver
evidence based solutions and program improvements.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
3
The Project Team
Scott Humrickhouse – Managing Principal
Jay Snyder – Senior Consultant, Strategy & Operations
Kevin Haynes – Senior Consultant, Research
Stahler McKinney – Analyst, Research
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
4
The Case for Knowledge Shar ing
• Shared Interest among hospital PDC programs to adopt owner best practices.
• Establish Staffing Models that are based on owner industry productivity data and standard work.
• Adoption of technology is lagging the rest of the industry despite similar needs to be more efficient and precise in how we manage project financials and execute work.
• Trends indicate a desire to understand the most effective/evidence based project delivery and contracting methods.
• The risks and impact that a bad project has on a hospital are universally the same.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
5
Hospital Program Management Best Practices (self-reported)
02
Our Roadmap
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
01 03 Staffing Insight
Use of Technology in PDC Programs
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
Owner Financial Controls
Key Takeaways
6
In i t ia l Observat ions
Our Framework For Today
Key Takeaways
Your To Do L i st
VFMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
7
The Study Participants
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
8
Study Participants
Demographics
Our hospital owner study gathered data from 78 hospitals across OH, VA, NC, SC
which represents 19% of all hospitals in those states. It includes hospitals that are
considered rural and urban, acute care and trauma centers, public and private,
local and regional.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
78
HospitalsRural &
Urban
Acute Care &
Trauma
Centers
Public &
Private
Local &
Regional
19% of
HospitalsOH, VA, NC, SC
9
Program Management
Best Practices
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
10
In i t ia l Observat ions
• The study revealed that hospital owners are not aligned or similar in their perceived best practices.
• A few respondents noted standards and protocol as a best practice, however later many others cited a lack of structure and standards as a significant weakness.
• Although change order management and audit compliance were not ranked by many as a best practice, some identified project accounting and capital panning as a best practice.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Program Management Best Practices
11
10%
10%
13%
13%
13%
16%
Project closeout
Prequalification process
Project accounting
Capital budget planning
A/E/C selection process
Standardized project managementprotocol/processes
Self-reported best practices within the organization
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Program Management Best Practices
“Lack of Consistent perceived Best Practices indicates a lack of shared learning and knowledge sharing”
12
Key Takeaways
• There is a lack of industry peer collaboration in owner program/project management. Potentially, NCHEA Districts could encourage/facilitate communities of practice among the members.
• Of the choices available in the study, there was no sizeable representation for best practices in core project management functions such as Vendor management, RFI or Change Order management or project auditing. Hospitals must consider developing industry expertise in these critical functions.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Program Management Best Practices
13
Your To Do L i st
• Network with your fellow owners. Plan to tour each other's facilities and share your processes and procedures. Today, to meet two of your hospital peers at their office to discuss each other's program.
• Over the next month, search available resources to develop your team’s capabilities in Vendor management, RFI or Change Order management or project auditing. Consider:
• Online continuing education
• Talking to one of your preferred GC’s to offer a shadow program
• Face-to-face training programs (PMI, FMI, AGC, etc.)
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Program Management Best Practices
14
Staffing Insights
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
15
In i t ia l Observat ions
• Hospitals are feeling the “War for Talent” with their staffing needs and when sourcing design, engineering and construction services.
• Changes in the workforce including the abilities and desires of Millennials are impacting hospitals just as it is impacting A/E/C’s.
• Analysis suggests that the use of technology can mitigate low staffing.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Staffing Insights
16
Number of staff within PDC departments
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Staffing Insights
----
------------ ------0
5
10
15
20
25
30
PM staff Admin staff Accounting staff Purchasing staff
“Respondents with more than $25 million
in capital construction projects per year
have an average projects to project
manager ratio of 28:1.
Respondents with $25 million or less in
capital construction projects per year
have an average projects to project
manager ratio of 8:1. “
17
How do we address the ta lent shortage?
How do we make the job more att ract ive?
How do we bui ld the bench with Mi l lennia ls?
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Staffing Insights
18
Staffing Insights
We need to tell them how they are relevant!
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
19
Staffing Insights
We need to change the way we give feedback!
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
20
Staffing Insights
We need to care about their career!
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
21
Key Takeaways
• Owners must consider making changes that attract the best and brightest not only to their organization, but to the construction industry.
• The talent shortage is likely to continue while the current workforce continues to build tenure and retire.
Staffing Insights
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
22
Your To Do L i st
• Do the following:
• Develop Career Path Models
• Establish a regular cadence for feedback
• Display an active interest in their career progression
• Adopt technology and work smarter not harder
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Staffing Insights
23
Use of Technology
in PDC Programs
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
24
In i t ia l Observat ions
• Hospitals have a general lack of awareness of available technologies, how they are relevant to their work and how to adopt them.
• Hospitals may be able to envision the widespread advantage to their program for incorporating technology into their PDC processes, particularly 3D modeling.
• Data suggests that a lack of internal capability to utilize technology is holding hospitals back from considering technology solutions and understanding value/ROI.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Use of Technology
25
The degree which PDC departments use technology for….
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Use of Technology
All respondents
> $25 million annual capital
construction spending
≤ $25 million annual capital
construction spending
26
Key Takeaways
• Technology is moving faster than contractor adoption but MUCH faster than owner adoption (e.g. Use of Drones Policy/Insurance liability, Augmented Reality, new materials, LiDAR, etc.).
• The benefits of 3D Modeling are tremendous and reach far beyond the construction planning and execution. Hospitals need to catch up.
• The lack of IT solutions to assist owners with project management is also a detractor for recruiting and retaining PM professionals.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Use of Technology
27
Your To Do L i st
• Reach out to an industry software provider and ask for presentation on industry emerging technology. Suggested sources for this presentation are:
• E-Builder
• JB Knowledge Inc.
• RPA Pulse
• Conduct a simple technology assessment to find low risk opportunities to adopt IT solutions. Get the ball rolling and start thinking about it as an enabler rather than a nuisance.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Use of Technology
28
Project Delivery &
Contracting Methods
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
29
In i t ia l Observat ions
• Qualitative aspects of a contractor matter most in the selection process (staff experience, previous relationship between contractor and owner, etc.).
• Design-Bid-Build delivers the worst performance in budget and schedule, but it is used the most.
• Evidence shows that hospitals are most comfortable and experience better performance using lump sum contracts.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
30
Number of firms on preferred vendor list / Typical number of firms invited to bid on a project
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
31
The most important criteria for organizations when selecting a contractor
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
15%
15%
15%
19%
23%
An existing or prior relationship (i.e., previous projects)
The most competitive price
The breadth of assets, resources and services at the contractor's disposal
The reputation of the contractor
The specific individuals assigned to the project
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
32
Percent of the organizations’ capital construction projects
delivered via the following methods
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
------------
------ ------
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CMAR DBB DB IPD
33
Percent of the organizations’ capital construction projects
contracted via the following methods
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
--------
--------
--------
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
GMP Lump-sum Time and materials
34
Rating of the following project delivery methods in terms of the price paid and the quality received
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
CM-at-risk
Design-bid-
build
Design-build
Integrated
project
delivery
Guaranteed
max price
Lump sum
Time and
materials
Qu
ali
ty
Price
Poor
Excelle
nt
Significant cost overruns Significant cost savings
35
Rating of the following contracting methods in terms of the price paid and the quality received
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
CM-at-risk
Design-bid-
build
Design-build
Integrated
project
delivery
Guaranteed
max price
Lump sum
Time and
materials
Qu
ali
ty
Price
Poor
Excelle
nt
Significant cost overruns Significant cost savings
36FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
1, 50%
2, 40%
3, 50%
4, 40% 5, 20%
Respondents with ≥ 50% DBB project delivery
Respondents with < 50% DBB project delivery
1, 50% 3, 25%
3, 60%
4, 25%
4, 20% 5, 20%
Respondents with ≥ 50% DBB project delivery
Respondents with < 50% DBB project delivery
Preliminary budget and final project costs are the same.
Preliminary schedule and actual schedule are the same.
Shared savings programs are used on GMP contracts.
1, 33% 2, 44% 3, 11% 4, 11% All respondents
AlwaysAlmost AlwaysAlmost Never
AlwaysAlmost AlwaysSometimes
Almost Never Sometimes
Never Sometimes Almost Always
Never Almost Never
37
Key Takeaways
• Professional certifications aren’t important, but completing some sort of structured healthcare training is.
• DBB is not delivering acceptable budget and scheduling outcomes. DBB is likely implemented because of board or C-suite pressure. Educate your leadership on the organizations historical performance with DBB.
• In general, hospital owners are most comfortable and find better value with lump sum contracts regardless of the project delivery method.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
38
Your To Do L i st
• Conduct an assessment of completed projects over the last 5 years. Assess the following to determine your organizations performance by delivery method, contract method, project type, project location etc.:• Assess contract value savings/creep.• Objectively compare the results of project delivery methods using data, not
your guy, as your guide.• Evaluate and compare the project performance of your PM staff and
identify opportunities to improve their success.
• Schedule a presentation for your C-suite/Board to learn about industry trends and pressures.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Project Delivery & Contracting Methods
39
Owner Financial
Controls
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
40
In i t ia l Observat ions
• Change Order and RFI management are significant challenges for hospitals.
• Department executives are empowered with substantial financial authority and accountability.
• Project budget reconciliation relies heavily on the project manager.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Owner Financial Controls
41
Weekly, 29%
Weekly, 13%
Weekly, 17%
Weekly, 30% Biweekly, 30%
Monthly, 13%
Monthly, 43%
Monthly, 50%
Monthly, 50%
Monthly, 30%
Quarterly, 29%
Quarterly, 14%
Quarterly, 13%
Quarterly, 17%
Quarterly,10%
Semi-annually,13%
Annually, 29%
Annually, 14%
Annually, 17%
Never, 29%
Never, 13%
Board of directors
PDC director
Corporate accountant
PDC department accountant
Project manager
Frequency that some sort of formal project budget reconciliation performed at various levels
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Owner Financial Controls
We also found that the lower the ratio of Projects to PM, the more often budget reconciliation is done.
42
Key Takeaways
• Of PDC departments which indicate having substantial project budget authority, only 20% identified change order management as a best practice. There is work to be done to align effective change order management with the financial responsibility given to the department.
• Over ¼ of the study indicate department directors reviewing project financials at a frequency of quarterly or longer. This highlights the possibility for significant financial risk and exposure that can develop from poor reporting and analysis.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Owner Financial Controls
43
Your To Do L i st
• Meet with your team and discuss the effectiveness of your team review contract scope, change orders, use of contingency. Identiy where/how you can improve.
• Ensure that your PM staff reviews project budgets and schedule of values monthly and ensure that a second level of review happens at least quarterly (by department director for example).
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Owner Financial Controls
44
Greatest Strengths &
Weaknesses
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
45
Self-Reported Greatest Strengths
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Greatest Strengths & Weaknesses
• Pre-qualification process of general contractors
• Our in-house construction team. They can present us with a cheaper option
for construction and eases schedule
• Small group to work with
• Lean. We accomplish many projects on time and on budget
• Contract management, Project Management Procedures, Design and
Construction Standards, BIM, relationship management with A/E/C
• Integrity, aggressiveness towards process improvement, engagement with
senior leadership, and customer service
• Our versatility
46FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Greatest Strengths & Weaknesses
Self-Reported Greatest Weaknesses
• Lack of architectural and engineering firms that specialize in healthcare
• Getting a project finally approved
• No internal department structure
• Setting internal priorities
• Number of projects per project manager exceeds 30 per PM, labor shortage of
qualified A/E/C
• Standards development and weakness associated with master planning
• Material handling/ ordering
47
F ina l Thoughts and Observat ions
• There is considerable variability among hospital programs; even those that have organizational and construction volume similarities.
• The healthcare sector as a whole and especially owners want more collaboration on program best practices and benchmarking.
• The strategic objectives and varying degrees of involvement of hospital executive leadership will impact opportunities for standardization and benchmarking.
• Opportunities to share knowledge and standardize processes within PDC programs will depend on internal advocacy by PDC leaders.
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Greatest Strengths & Weaknesses
Now, go handle that To Do List!
48
Thank you for your t ime th is a f ternoon
FMI Corporation Copyrights 2016
Questions
?
49© 2016 FMI Corporation
JAY SNYDER | SENIOR CONSULTANT
Jay has been working in the engineering and construction industry throughout his career. He has
industry experience as a construction project manager, project sponsor and senior executive as both a
commercial general contractor and within an owner organization.
Jay has an extensive background in operational logistics, strategic sourcing and healthcare
construction. Clients gain an advantage from Jay’s expertise in strategic planning, leadership training,
technology implementation, financial restructuring and market strategy. He has provided services to
commercial developers, general contractors & construction managers, specialty subcontractors,
hospital systems & healthcare providers, government agencies and others.
As a speaker, Jay presents on business best practices, critical facilities, owner-client relationships and
emerging technology. Through his speaking engagements, Jay delivers information and case studies
that allow his audience to understand how they may adopt insight and industry capabilities into their
businesses. He has been a speaker to professional associations and conferences such as the
Associated Builders and Contractors, Associated General Contractors of America, American
Subcontractors Association, American College of Healthcare Executives and the Critical Facilities
Summit.
Jay earned a bachelor’s degree in construction management from SUNY ESF at Syracuse University
and a Master of Business Administration from Emory University. Jay is credentialed by the American
Hospital Association as a Certified Healthcare Constructor. Jay also holds a seat on a Planning &
Zoning committee and is a member of the Board of Adjustments in his local municipality.
Jay Snyder, MBA
Senior Consultant, Management
Consulting
5171 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27612
919.785.9221
50
www.fminet.com
Denver
210 University Boulevard
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80206
T 303.377.4740
Houston
9303 New Trails Drive
Suite 350
The Woodlands, TX 77381
T 713.936.5400
Phoenix
7639 E Pinnacle Peak Road
Suite 100
Scottsdale, AZ 85255
T 602.381.8108
Raleigh (headquarters)
5171 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27612
T 919.787.8400
Tampa
308 South Boulevard
Tampa, FL 33606
T 813.636.1364