HL7s Clinical Document Architecture Liora Alschuler HIMSS Dallas, Texas February, 2005.
-
Upload
diego-james -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of HL7s Clinical Document Architecture Liora Alschuler HIMSS Dallas, Texas February, 2005.
HL7’s Clinical Document Architecture
Liora AlschulerHIMSS
Dallas, Texas February, 2005
About me Liora Alschuler
alschuler.spinosa, consultants Co-chair HL7 Structured Documents TC Co-editor, CDA Member, 2005, HL7 Board of Directors Project manager for Operation Jumpstart,
(initial design of CDA) past Chair, XML SIG [email protected]
Also contributing: Bob Dolin, MD, Kaiser-Permanente; John Madden, MD, Duke University Medical Center
Clinical Document Architecture: CDA
What is it? How does it allow you to:
Do simple things simply Invest in information (doing complex
things carefully)
What is CDA?
ANSI/HL7 CDA r1-2000 (Release one) On CD, includes prose spec, RMIM, DTDs
December 2004 ballot (Release two) Structured Documents Tech Cmte, zip file on
HL7.org – PASSED, will be published shortly A specification for document exchange
using XML, the HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM) Version 3 methodology and vocabulary (SNOMED, ICD, local,…)
CDA: A Document Exchange Specification
This is a CDA and this and this and this and this and this and this
CDA: A Document Exchange Specification
A CDA can be a Discharge Summary Referral (CCR is one such) Progress Note H&P Public health report
… any content that carries a signature
XML is Extensible Markup Language (www.w3c.org)
In XML, structure & format are conveyed by markup which is embedded into the information
CDA: XML
Sample CDA
CDA = header + body
CDA Header Metadata required for document
discovery, management, retrieval CDA Body
Clinical report Discharge Summary Referral Progress Note H&P Public health report
… any content that carries a signature
CDA Header
The header describes: The document itself (unique ID, document
type classification, version) Participants (providers, authors,
patients…) Document relationships (to orders, other
documents…) Metadata sufficient for document
management
CDA Body: two types of markup Human-readable “narrative block”, all
that is required to reproduce the legal, clinical content
Optional machine-readable CDA Entries, which drive automated processes
CDA Body: Human-readable
paragraph list table caption link content revise (delete/insert) subscript/superscript special characters (e.g., symbols, Greek letters) in
Unicode emphasis line break renderMultiMedia (non-XML graphics, video…)
required
CDA Body: Machine Processible
Clinical statement Observation Procedure Organizer Supply Encounter Substance Administration Observation Media Region Of Interest Act
Optional
“Dr. Dolin asserts that Henry Levin manifests hives as a previously-diagnosed allergic reaction to penicillin”
“hives”: SNOMED CT 247472004
CDA Body: Why isn’t XML + SNOMED enough?
First: human readable
Next: series of related statements
Allergy to penicillin
Observation: RIM-defined
Prior dx: SNOMED Allergy to penicillin: SNOMED
HivesPrior dx: SNOMED Hives: SNOMED
Hives is a manifestation of a reaction to penicillinRelationship: RIM-defined
Who is the subject?
Target: RIM-defined
Id: local
Then: supply context
ExtlRefsCDA EntriesCDA Header CDA Body,
Section, andNarrative Block
CDA RMIMHow are these concepts, relationships defined?
Investing in Information
CDA XML can be simple CDA XML can be complex Simple encoding relatively inexpensive Complex encoding costs more You get what you pay for:
like charging a battery, the more detailed the encoding the greater the potential for reuse
CDA: Return on Investment
Low end: Access to documents “please send referral letter to…” “please get me the discharge summary…” “what imaging reports are available from
the last episode?” High end: Reuse
Send synopsis to tumor board Attach to claim for automated adjudication
of payment Extract data for clinical research
Low End Applications for CDA Persistant, accessible, human-readable
documents Document requirements:
CDA header Release One or Two body
Narrative block Non-semantic markup (HTML-like)
Document options: More complex markup can be inserted,
to be used or ignored
Low End Investment in CDA Many forms of document creation
technology Voice (dictation, transcription) eForm EHR (CDA is output as “report”)
What is the simplest way to create a CDA document?
Enterminimal metadata
Point to document body
See HL7.org NLM Project: freely available application (by 3/1)
What you can do with simple CDA documents: the registry hub
“what imaging reports are available from the last episode?”1. Create documents 2. Register 3. Discover
4. Retrieve
Ubiquitous access to distributed information By class of document, patient, provider, encounter (CDA
header metadata) Documents remain under local control Document creation technology evolves under local control Registry (hub) for access control, identifier xRef
A tip of the hat to…Aluetietojärjestelmä
40% of Finnish population covered including Helsinki
Investing in Information
Simple documents retrieval, display metadata registry
Two examples of higher-level investment: HIMSS 2004, Dr. John Madden, Duke
University Medical Center, created a CDA pathology note that doubles as a tumor board report
Also at Duke, the Starbrite “Single Source” Proof of Concept for clinical trials
A singleA singledata data
REPRESENTATIONREPRESENTATION standard standard
facilitates multiplefacilitates multiple document document
PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION standards !standards !
Pathologist view:Pathologist view:CAP/ACoS standards CAP/ACoS standards compliant, template-compliant, template-
driven data entrydriven data entry
Repository view:Repository view:HL7-CDA standard XML HL7-CDA standard XML
with XQuery-ready, with XQuery-ready, context-linked SNOMED context-linked SNOMED
encodingsencodings
South Hospital
Clinician view:Clinician view:Traditional format, Traditional format,
print/electronic print/electronic deliverydelivery
South Hospital
Tumor registrar view:Tumor registrar view:Irrelevant items Irrelevant items filtered, stage filtered, stage
computed computed automaticallyautomatically
One CDA, many applications: pathology
Source CDA
(pathologist, author’s view)
Display or print (referring physician’s view
Archival CDA XML
Tumor Board, synopsis, meets CAP reporting guidelines
Investing in Information
“Single Source” Create once Use many Reuse clinical data in clinical trials
Duke Clinical Research Institute Proof of Concept Principals:
Landen Bain, Rebecca Kush, Liora Alschuler Microsoft, primary technology partner
The Challenge: Integrate Patient Care and Clinical Research Data
Clinical Research World
The Void
Electronic Medical Record
Patient Care World
Single Source vs Previous Solutions eSource & electronic data capture
redundant with creation of clinic note require information reside in EMR/EHR proprietary data formats
CDA & CDISC in “single-source” capture trial data, merge it into clinic
note (re-use) work with current technology, workflow open, non-proprietary data formats
dblab, ADT, meds, source documents
display manual entry to CRF
re-key CRF
lab, ADT, meds, source documents
display dictate chart note
LIS
LIS
HIS
HIS
Manual creation and re-entry of CRF
Redundant creation of chart note
CLINIC CRO
validation
Current processes (dual source)
CDA in Starbrite Trial
db
LIS
HIS
lab, ADT, meds, source documents
display eCRF
dictate chart note
Merged workflow: electronic CRF re-used in chart note
validation
Proposed processes (single source)
CLINIC ARO
CDA/ ODM
CDA in Starbrite Trial
One CDA, many applications: clinical trials
Source CDA
(principal investigator, author’s view)
Clinic note inserted into patient chart
Archival CDA XML
Case report form submission to research database
See demo here, Microsoft pod!
Investing in Information
cost
benefit
√
80/20
Disecting the curve What is easy:
Header Human-readable body Low degree of coding
What is hard: Concensus on
semantic content requirements
Model/vocabulary interface
Investing in Information
Example of what is hard TermInfo 2004 conference
NASA August 1-4, 2004, Houston, TX Notes posted to the summit’s web page:
http://csd2.no-ip.net/Composition/ and www.terminfo.org
New project within HL7 Looked at issues raised by David
Markwell (and previously identified by others)
Investing in information: what is hard? Issue 1: Code/value dichotomy
abdominal tenderness is observed examination (code) / abdomen tender
(value); abdominal examination / abdomen tender; abdominal palpitation / abdomen tender; abdominal tenderness / present, etc.
Investing in information: what is hard? Strong collaborative effort established
to address issues Most syntatic issues addressed, full
concentration on semantic interoperability
Issues will be resolved, but will take time and experience
Investing in Information: phased approach
Lay groundwork CDA header metadata XML R1 or R2 CDA body
Build Concensus on requirements Understanding of modeling process Vocabulary glossary
Understand Relationship of vocabulary to model
Introduce interoperable semantic content as requirements and business drivers dictate
What can be done now Basic (Level One) CDA (R1 or R2) can be created
with any degree of technical sophistication Document scanner+web form Transcription Electronic health record
What can be done later Increase coding sophistication as business
requirements dictate (return on investment and regulation)
http://www.intersystems.com/mt_washington_vision.pdf
CDA: doing simple things simply, & more complex things slowly
Thank you!
Questions?