History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.
-
Upload
deborah-cross -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.
![Page 1: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
History of Management
Bus 20Section 72192
Class 15
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
![Page 2: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History of Management ApproachesHistory of Management Approaches
1) The universal process approach
2) The operational approach
3) The behavioral approach
4) The systems approach
5) The contingency approach
6) The attributes of excellence approach
![Page 3: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is Management?What is Management?
• Act of organizing people to accomplish desired goals and objectives using available resources efficiently and effectively
• It’s comprised of planning organizing, staffing, leading and controlling to accomplish goals
![Page 4: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evolution of Management Techniques
Early 20th century: America characterized by heavy industrial business
Mid-20th centruy : Shift begins from heavily dominated industrialized society to a mix of industry and services
Late 20th century: More manufacturing outsourced outside US. Rise of high tech fosters larger services sector
![Page 5: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1) The Universal Process 1) The Universal Process ApproachApproach
• Universal Process Approach– Assumes all organizations require the
same rational management process.• Core management process remains the
same regardless of the purpose of the organization.
• The management process can be reduced to a set of separate functions and related principles.
![Page 6: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1) Henri Fayol1) Henri Fayol’’s Universal s Universal Management ProcessManagement Process
• Fayol published Administration Industrielle et Générale in 1916.– Divided the manager’s job into five
functions:• Planning• Organizing• Command• Coordination• Control
![Page 7: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1) Henri Fayol1) Henri Fayol’’s Universal s Universal Management Process Management Process (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Lessons Learned from the Universal Process Approach– The management process can be
separated into interdependent functions.– Management is a continuous process.– Management is a largely, though not an
entirely, rational process.– The functional approach is useful because
it specifies what managers should do.
![Page 8: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Operational Approach The Operational Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Frederick W. Taylor’s Scientific Management– Developing performance standards on the basis of
systematic observations and experimentation.• Standardization of work practices and methods
reduce waste and increase productivity• Time and task study of workers’ efforts to
maximize productivity and output.• Systematic selection and training of workers to
increase efficiency and productivity.• Differential pay incentives based on established
work standards.
![Page 9: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Operational ApproachThe Operational Approach
– Describes the production-oriented area of management dedicated to improving efficiency, cutting waste, and improving quality.
– Covers the technical and quantitative approaches to management :• Management science• Operations research• Production management• Operations management
![Page 10: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
TaylorTaylor’’s “Disciples”s “Disciples”
• Frank and Lillian Gilbreth– Refined time and motion study methods
for use in work simplification.• Henry L. Gant
– Refined production control and cost control techniques.
– Developed the Gantt chart for work-scheduling of projects.
– Early advocate of the importance of the human factor and the importance of customer service over profits.
![Page 11: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Quality AdvocatesThe Quality Advocates
• Walter A. Shewhart– Introduced the concept of statistical quality
control [SPC]• Kaoru Ishikawa
– Proposed a preventive approach to quality.– Developed fishbone diagram approach to
problem-solving.• W. Edwards Deming
– Based his principles on reformed management style, employee participation, and striving for continuous improvement [CQI]
![Page 12: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Deming’s Impact on Japanese Auto Deming’s Impact on Japanese Auto IndustryIndustry
• Post WW II Japan – just surviving• 1960’s Japan – cameras & electrtonics• 1970’s Japan – learned Deming techniques• 1980’s Japan to present – self-explanatory
• Shift from Japan to Taiwan to Korea to mainland China to ……
![Page 13: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Quality Advocates The Quality Advocates (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Joseph M. Juran– Proposed the concept of internal customers,
teamwork, partnerships with suppliers, and brainstorming.
– Developed Pareto analysis (80/20 rule) as a tool for separating major problems from minor ones.
• Armand V. Feigenbaum– Developed the concept of total quality control
[TQC]• Philip B. Crosby
– Promoted the idea of zero defects (doing it right the first time). IBM’s six sigma program.
![Page 14: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Operational Approach The Operational Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Lessons Learned from the Operational Approach– A dedication to finding a better way is still
important.– Using scientific management doesn’t dehumanize
workers.– Quality advocates, inspired by the scientific
approach, have been right all along about the importance of quality and continuous improvement
– The operational approach fostered the development of operations management.
![Page 15: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Normal Curve Standard Deviation
![Page 16: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
A six sigma process is one in which 99.99966% of the products manufactured are statistically expected to be free of defects (3.4 defects per million).
Six Sigma seeks to improve the quality of process outputs by identifying and removing the causes of defects (errors) and minimizing variability in manufacturing and business processes
Six Sigma Approach
![Page 17: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
3) The Behavioral Approach3) The Behavioral Approach
• The Human Relations Movement– An effort to make managers more sensitive
to their employees’ needs.
– It arose out the influences of:• the threat of unionization.• the Hawthorne studies.• the philosophy of industrial humanism.
![Page 18: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Behavioral Approach: Human The Behavioral Approach: Human Relations MovementRelations Movement
![Page 19: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Behavioral Approach The Behavioral Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• The Threat of Unionization– The Wagner Act of 1935 legalized union-
management collective bargaining, promoting the growth of unions and union avoidance by firms.
• The Hawthorne Studies (1924)– The study’s results that productivity was
strongly affected by workers’ attitudes turned management toward the humanistic and realistic viewpoint of the “social man” model.
![Page 20: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• Elton Mayo– Believed emotional factors were more
important determinants of productive efficiency than were physical and logical factors.
• Mary Parker Follett– Advocated that managers become aware
of how complex each employee is and how to motivate employees to cooperate rather than to demand performance from them.
The Philosophy of Industrial The Philosophy of Industrial HumanismHumanism
![Page 21: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Hawthorne & Scientific ManagementHawthorne & Scientific Management
• Time & Motion studies – breaks down tasks into simple chunks
• Effects of physical environment on workers. Variables modified to maximize worker productivity
• Lessons Learned: – Experimenter Effect – workers interpreted that
management cared– Social effect – studies had positive effect on
worker’s feeling that they were receiving special treatment. This increased camaraderie and increade productivity
![Page 22: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Douglas McGregor– Developed Theory X and Theory Y
• Theory X: management’s traditionally negative view of employees as unmotivated and unwilling workers.
• Theory Y: the positive view of employees as energetic, creative, and willing workers.
The Philosophy of Industrial The Philosophy of Industrial Humanism Humanism (cont(cont’’d)d)
![Page 23: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Therory X and Y
![Page 24: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Behavior
• Organizational Behavior– A modern research-oriented approach
seeking to discover the causes of work behavior and to develop better management techniques.
• Lessons Learned from the Behavioral Approach– People are the key to productivity.– Success depends on motivated and skilled
individuals committed to the organization.– Managerial sensitivity to employees is
necessary to foster the cooperation needed for high productivity.
![Page 25: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
4) The Systems Approach4) The Systems Approach
• What is a System?– A collection of parts that operate interdependently
to achieve a common purpose.• Systems Approach
– Posits that the performance of the whole is greater that the sum of the performance of its parts.
• Analytic versus synthetic thinking: outside-in thinking versus inside-out thinking.
• Seeks to identify all parts of an organized activity and how they interact.
![Page 26: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The Systems Approach The Systems Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Chester I. Barnard’s Early Systems Perspective– Wrote Functions of the Executive.– Characterized all organizations as
cooperative systems.– Defined principle elements in an
organization as•willingness to serve.•common purpose.•communication.
– Strong advocate of business ethics.
![Page 27: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
General Systems TheoryGeneral Systems Theory
• General Systems Theory– An area of study based on the
assumptions that everything is part of a larger, interdependent arrangement.
• Levels of systems– Each system is a subsystem of the
system above it.– Identification of systems at various
levels helps translate abstract systems theory into more concrete terms.
General Systems Theory (cont’d)General Systems Theory (cont’d)
![Page 28: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
General Systems Theory General Systems Theory (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Closed Versus Open Systems– Closed system
• A self-sufficient entity.– Open system
• Something that depends on its surrounding environment for survival.
– Systems are classified open (closed) by how much (how little) they interact with their environments.
![Page 29: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
General Systems Theory General Systems Theory (cont(cont’’d)d)
• New Directions in Systems Thinking: Organizational learning and knowledge management
• Organizations are living and thinking open systems that learn from experience and engage in complex mental processes.
• Chaos theory– Every complex system has a life of its own,
with its own rule book.• Complex adaptive systems
– Complex systems are self-organizing.
![Page 30: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
5) The Contingency Approach5) The Contingency Approach
• Contingency Approach– A research effort to determine which
managerial practices and techniques are appropriate in specific situations.• Different situations require different
managerial responses.• Can deal with intercultural feelings in
which custom and habits cannot be taken for granted.
![Page 31: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Contingency Approach The Contingency Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Contingency Characteristics– An open-system perspective
• How subsystems combine to interact with outside systems.
– A practical research orientation• Translating research findings into tools and
situational refinements for more effective management.
– A multivariate approach• Many variables collectively account for
variations in performance.
![Page 32: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Contingency Approach The Contingency Approach (cont(cont’’d)d)
• Lessons Learned from the Contingency Approach
– Approach emphasizes situational appropriateness rather than rigid adherence to universal principles.
– Approach creates the impression that an organization is captive to its environment.
![Page 33: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
6) Attributes of Excellence: A Modern 6) Attributes of Excellence: A Modern Unconventional ApproachUnconventional Approach
• Peters and Waterman’s Approach– Attacked conventional management
theory and practice as outmoded in almost every dimension.
– Replaced conventional management terminology with new catch phrases.
– Made key points with anecdotes and stories rather than quantifiable objective data and facts.
– Academics hate it: too “unscientific”– “In Search of Excellence” topped the
bestseller list
![Page 34: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Jim Collins, Jim Collins, ““Good to GreatGood to Great””: Common : Common Attributes of Great CompaniesAttributes of Great Companies
• Similar to the “excellence” approach• Defined rigorous criteria to select “great”
companies• Found characteristics common to these
companies across industries• Proposes that emulating these
characteristics will increase the chances of becoming great
![Page 35: History of Management Bus 20 Section 72192 Class 15 Tuesday, October 18, 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649dde5503460f94ad6cce/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SummarizingSummarizing
• Early management characterized by single theories, granular research
• Later “systems” approaches combined theories
• Current bestseller approach concentrates on attributes and anecdotes
• Good managers learn from it all, adopt what works for them and their organization, and try new things