High-Level Advocacy Forum on Statistics: The Urgency of Statistics and the Global Enabling...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of High-Level Advocacy Forum on Statistics: The Urgency of Statistics and the Global Enabling...
High-Level Advocacy Forum on Statistics: The Urgency of Statistics and the Global Enabling Development in the Caribbean Community 30 July, 2009, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
Managing bad weather – making greater use and better sense of statistics
Gerald Haberkorn
Manager, Statistics and Demography Programme
Secretariat of the Pacific Community
Noumea, New Caledonia
(www.spc.int/sdp)
Structure of Presentation
1. Introduction: Pacific community2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s
economies and the wellbeing of its people3. How can we contribute to help make greater use
and better sense of statistics?4. Concluding remarks
MAP LAYER
SPC Member countries and territories
Marshall Islands
Kiribati
Tuvalu
French Polynesia
Tokelau
AmSamoa
SamoaWallis etFutuna
PitcairnIslands
CookIslands
Niue
Fiji
Vanuatu
New Caledonia
SolomonIslands
Papua New Guinea
Tonga
Nauru
Palau
Guam
CNMI
Federated States of Micronesia
TEXT LAYER
• 15 countries, 7 territories• Population (2009): 9,7 million• Papua New Guinea (6,7 million -> Pitcairn 57 people)• 3 sub-regions: Melanesia, Micronesia, Polynesia• Substantial diversity: bio-physical environment,
economies, demography, cultural and political– 0.1% of world population – 1/3 of world’s known and
documented languages (700)• Considerable similarities:
– Small size of domestic markets– Heavy reliance on imports– Isolation/transport challenges and costs– Dominance of public sectors– Weak manufacturing base and high cost structure
1. Introduction: the Pacific Community
Challenge:
many available statistics seem less relevant to what is required to:• accurately describe the impact/implications of
this crisis, • effectively contribute to the development of
appropriate policy responses.
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
Contributing factors
• Almost match in conceptual relevance of what is available to what is needed.
• Absence of real-time data in many cases • under-performing administrative databases• Irregularity of major collections• Long lead-time t produce outputs
• General absence of data on direct (tangible/visible) impact on people and communities
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
Illustration: annual GDP growth
• Recognised indicator of performance of economy – feedback on impact of crisis
• Need to determine trickle-down effect on people and households
• Regular labor force surveys very important (absence across most PICs)
• Reliance on censuses/HH surveys -> cannot capture real-time dynamics
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
Illustration: annual GDP growth (ii)
1. Global crisis not fully materializing until the 2nd part of 2008
2007 figures, 2008 estimates not very informative on actual impacts on Pacific island economies today.
2. GDP volatility over past 8 years (Figures 1a-b).
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
Figure 1a: Annual GDP (real) growth in selected Pacific island economies, 2001-2008
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Cook Islands
FSM
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Nauru
New Caledonia
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Figure 1a: Annual GDP per capita (real) growth in selected Pacific island economies, 2001-2008
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Cook Islands
FSM
Fiji Islands
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
New Caledonia
Niue
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Illustration: annual GDP growth (iii)
3. Even the very high GDP growth (>7%) / per capita growth (> 4%) in PNG/SI means little in development terms on the ground, where some 80% of populations live outside the GDP zone
• contribution of subsistence produce, cultural products and traditional wealth remain largely outside such calculations,
• Isolated from most basic government services or infrastructure.
• Lowest MDG achievements across the region
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
Absence of alternative indicators
Challenges• Complement regular statistics on the radar of most
NSOs with measures that capture individual household wellbeing, equity in the distribution of resources and the general welfare of citizens.
• Engage more vigorously with data users and stakeholders
• Meet current and anticipate future data needs
2. Tracking the health of Pacific community’s economies and the wellbeing of its people
What do we need, what can we do?
• Enabling environment, facilitating conditions (Resources, functioning NSS, regular data user-producer dialogue, committed leadership, culture of evidence-based decision making)
• Partnerships between data producers an users (national level, public/private sector; international)
• Delivery on, and management of expectations (provide public service, adapt to changing world)
3. How can we help contribute to help make greater use and better sense of statistics?
• Partnership building, delivering on/managing expectations is ongoing work-in-progress
• Progress in the making (enabled by political mandate: Pacific Plan)
• Development of Minimum National Development Indicator (MNDI) databases
• Core set for all Pacific island countries/territories
• Mix of methodologies/measures (improvement to administrative databases; short/regular HH-based development indicator survey; socio-economic surveillance)
• Development of NSS – build upon/consolidate recent achievements
4. Concluding Remarks