Helical pier
Transcript of Helical pier
OVERVIEW OFHELICAL PIERS
History
Terminology
Installation
Advantages/Disadvantages
Axial Capacity
Helix Spacing
Bearing/Pullout Capacity
Torque Verification
HELICAL PIERS
History of Helical Piles(Alexander Mitchell, 1836)
History of Helical Piles(U.S. Patents)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1860
-186
9
1870
-187
9
1880
-188
9
1890
-189
9
1900
-190
9
1910
-191
9
1920
-192
9
1930
-193
9
1940
-194
9
1950
-195
9
1960
-196
9
1970
-197
9
1980
-198
9
1990
-199
9
2000
-200
9
US
Pa
tan
ts
Marine Agriculture Utilities Construction1. 1830-1875, Marine Era
(Moorings, Lighthouses)
1
2
3
4
2. 1875-1920, Aggriculture Era(Fences)
3. 1920-1985, Utility Era(Guy Anchors, Pipelines)
4. 1985-Present, Construction Era(Mobile Homes, Retaining Walls,
Underpinning, Piling)
Periods of Use
Patent Category
Common Terms
Central Shaft
Pier Cap
Extensions
Coupling
Lead Section
Helical Blades
Pitch
Pilot Point
Machine Installation
Advantages Low noise and vibrations Small, maneuverable
installation equipment Removal and replacement Ease of transport Compression or tension All-weather installation Rapid installation Does not produce drill spoil Immediate post tensioning Shorter bond length Do not require casing
Disadvantages Cannot penetrate very hard
rock (SPT N>100) Concrete and construction
debris is problematic Difficult in cobble and
boulders Ease of installation means
contractor pre-qualification important
Slender shaft makes lateral bracing imperative
Axial Capacity
Limit States:
Cylindrical Shear& Individual Bearing
Helix Spacing
Most efficient spacingwhere:
Cylindrical Shear= Individual Bearing
Generally occurs at2 to 4 Helix
Diameters
Bearing Capacity
Traditional Soil Mechanics:
Individual Bearing
Q = R2(1.3cNc+Nq)
Cylindrical Shear
Q = 2RL(c+Ktan) +
R2(1.3cNc+ Nq)
Limit State = Cylindrical Shear
or Individual Bearing,whichever is less.
Pullout Capacity
Generally 18% < Bearing Capacity
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Displacement (in)
Te
st
Lo
ad
(k
ips
)
-180
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-100 -50 0 50 100
Displacement (mm)
Te
st
Lo
ad
(k
N)
Compression TestPu=36 kips [160 kN]
Tesnion TestPu=30 kips [130 kN]
Hoyt and Clemence (1989)
-91 Full-scale tension load tests
-Torque is statistically a strong verification of capacity
-Capacity:torque ratio depends mostly on hub diameter
Torque Verification
April 2008