HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

download HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

of 7

Transcript of HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    1/7

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OFMATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

    Volume 2, Nos. 1-2, January-December 2011, pp. 147-152

    HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    Kovid Sharma*, Sukhpal Singh Chatha, Hazoor Singh & Harkulvinder Singh

    Department of Mechanical Engineering,Yadavindra College of Engineering, Punjabi University,

    Guru Kashi Campus, Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda, Punjab-151302, India

    E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

    Abstract: The Hot corrosion is the main and severe problem which can be controlled by thermal spray coatings. The various

    Corrosion control measures include Surface Heat Treatment, Engineering Paints, Vitreous Enamelling, Cladding, Powder

    coatings, Zinc coatings, Tin Plate, Electroplating, Cadmium Plating, Anodising (Anodizing), Thermal Spray Coatings., Plasma

    Nitriding/Carburising/Boronising., Pack Cementation, Ion Implantation, Ceramic and Cermet materials., Chemical Vapour

    Deposition, Physical Vapour Deposition. The demand for protective coatings has increased recently for almost all types of

    super alloys with improved strength, since high-temperature corrosion problems become much more significant for these

    alloys with increasing operating temperatures of modern heat engines. The Major areas where coatings have the application

    are Power generation Industries, Ceramics Industries, Chemical Industries, Iron & steel Industries and Mining Industries etc.

    Open or closed porosity in thermal spray coatings can originate from several different factors: partially or totally unmolten

    particles, inadequate flow or fragmentation of the molten particle at impact, shadowing effects due to lower than the optimal

    spray angle, and entrapped gas. The interconnected (open) porosity allows the corrosive media to reach the coating-substrateinterface, which eventually leads to delamination of the coatings. Although the development of the modern thermal spray

    processes has decreased coating porosities, the transport of corrosive species to the substrate can still only be prevented by

    coating post treatment. Therefore its of actual significance to develop an effective method to post treat the thermal spray

    coatings to enhance their life in corrosive environment. In this paper author has reviewed the significance of heat treatment in

    thermal spray coatings for improving their properties and has made an attempt to explore the potential of heat treatment

    process in thermal spray coatings.

    Keywords: Corrosion, Coatings, Thermal Spray, Heat Treatment.

    International Science Press, ISSN: 0976-6243

    * Corresponding Author: [email protected]

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Corrosion is a natural phenomenon. All natural processes

    end toward the lowest possible energy states. As described

    in the corrosion cycle of the steel shown in Fig. 1. The

    iron and steel have a natural tendency to combine with

    other chemical elements to return to their lowest energy

    states & they frequently combine with oxygen and water,

    both of which are present in most natural environments,

    to form hydrated iron oxides (rust), similar in chemical

    composition to the original iron ore (ASM International,

    2000).

    Corrosion is the deterioration of a material by its

    reaction with the surroundings. It adversely affects those

    properties that are to be preserved. At higher temperature,this mode of degradation is known as oxidation or dry

    corrosion (Sidhu T. S. et al., 2006).

    Metals and alloys sometimes experience accelerated

    oxidation when their surfaces are covered with a thin

    film of fused salt in an oxidizing atmosphere at elevated

    temperatures. This mode of attack is called hot corrosion

    (Sidhu T. S. et al., 2006; Sidhu, H.S. et al., 2006).

    Sidhu Buta Singh and Prakash S. observe that

    although corrosion problems cannot be completely

    remedied, it is estimated that corrosion-related costs can

    be reduced by more than 30% with development and useof better corrosion control technologies (Sidhu Buta

    Singh and Prakash S., 2006).

    Xue-mei OU.et al evaluates that main reason for hot

    corrosion on the boiler tube surface is the impurities,

    such as Na, K, and S, present in the coal being burned

    (Xue-mei OU.et al., 2008).

    The demand for protective coatings has increased

    recently for almost all types of super alloys with improved

    strength, since high-temperature corrosion problems

    become much more significant for these alloys with

    Figure 1: The Corrosion Cycle of Steel (ASM 2000)

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    2/7

    148 International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering ( IJMSE)

    increasing operating temperatures of modern heat engines

    (Sidhu Buta Singh and Prakash S., 2005).

    Hot corrosion has been observed in boilers, internal

    combustion engines, gas turbines, fluidized bed

    combustion and industrial waste incinerators since the

    1940s. However, it became a topic of importance and

    popular interest in the late 1960s when gas turbine enginesof military aircraft suffered severe corrosion attacks

    during the Vietnam conflict while operating over and near

    sea water. During operation, blades and vanes of gas

    turbines are subjected to high thermal stresses and

    mechanical loads. In addition, they are also attacked

    chemically by oxidation and/or high-temperature

    corrosion. Only composite materials are able to meet such

    a demanding spectrum of requirements; the base material

    provides the necessary mechanical properties and coatings

    provide protection against oxidation and corrosion (Sidhu

    et al., 2006).

    2. THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS & PROCESSES

    Methods for the deposition of protective coatings on heat-

    resistance alloys (HRA) can be separated into two basic

    groups : thermal diffusion, based on processes leading

    to a change in the composition and structure of the

    surface layer of the HRA as a result of its contact and

    reaction with alloying chemical elements; and non-

    diffusional, based on processes in which an external

    (overlay) coating is deposited on the surface with little

    inter-diffusion of elements only that necessary to

    guarantee adherence (Podchernyaeva I. A. et al.,2000).

    Sidhu T. S. et al. suggests that Nickel-based alloy

    coatings show good high-temperature wear and corrosion

    resistance. Wear resistance improves after adding W and

    Mo elements to the alloy. Ni-based coatings are used in

    applications when wear resistance combined with

    oxidation or hot corrosion resistance is required. When

    nickel is alloyed with chromium, this element oxidizes to

    Cr2O

    3at rates which could make it suitable for use up to

    about 900C (Sidhu T. S. et al., 2006).

    Abdi S. and Lebaili S. deposits NiCrBCSi metal (Fe)

    to hard reset show better properties and performance

    compared to hard chromium deposits. Including the filing

    NiCrBCSi (Fe) type A, this may be an appropriate

    alternative to hard chromium and enable better protection

    of the environment. This is due to the existence of

    microstructure, composed of the Ni3B nickel boride and

    matrix reinforced by nano precipitates rich in chromium

    (Abdi S. and Lebaili S. 2008).

    Uusitalo M.A. deposits St35.8 steel, 13CrMo4-5 steel,

    St35.8 steel with chromium and aluminium diffusion

    coatings, and St35.8 steel with different kinds of thermal

    sprayed coatings were used as test materials. In general,

    spraying systems using high particle velocities produce

    dense coatings with small splat size, high bonding strength

    and large contact area between individual splats (M.A.

    Uusitalo, 2002).

    The most common coatings are WC-Co, WC-CoCr,

    and Cr3C

    2-NiCr systems. Cr

    3C

    2-NiCr coatings show

    comparatively poorer tribological properties, but they aremuch more resistant at high temperatures and in

    aggressive environments: for these reasons they are used,

    for example, in steam turbine blades or in boiler tubes

    for power generation (Kaur Manpreet et al., 2009).

    On the other hand Aalamialeagha M. E.et al. reveals

    that high Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) spray techniques

    can produce high performance alloy and cermet coatings

    for applications that require wear resistant surfaces.

    HVOF coatings require the careful matching of the

    powder feed material to the process variables e.g., fuel

    type, fuel/oxygen ratio, together with the design andgeometry of the spray gun. (Aalamialeagha M. E.et al.,

    2003).

    Among the different thermal spray processes, Super

    D-Gun and HVOF have different features, such as

    geometry and powder feed respectively. For the Super

    D-Gun process the gases (acetylene and oxygen) are

    mixed along with a pulse of powder introduced into the

    barrel. Detonation using a spark generates waves of high

    temperature and pressure which heat the powder particles

    to their melting point or above. (V.A.D. Souza, A. Neville,

    2007).

    So lot of techniques, such as Air plasma spray (APS),

    Vacuum plasma spray (VPS), Solution-precursor plasma

    spray (SPPS), Electron-beam physical vapor deposition

    (EB-PVD), High velocity oxygen fuel spray (HVOF),

    Magnetron sputtering, have been used to deposit MCrAlY

    bond coat on super alloys (Zhiming Li, Z et al. 2010).

    Porosity or voids in the coating micro structure is

    an important issue in thermal spraying, as due to this

    physical property, corrosion resistance of different

    thermal spraying coatings differs. Dense coatings usually

    provide better corrosion resistance than porous coatings

    (Sidhu et al., 2006).

    To reduce the interconnected porosity and inter splat

    boundaries, coatings are post treated by various methods

    such as heat treatment, sealing, laser remelting etc.

    (Sundararajan et al., 2009, Ahmaniemi et al., 2002,

    Serresa, 2011).

    The Heat Treatment process is one of the post

    treatment processes and widely used to reduce the

    interconnected porosity and inter splat boundaries. Hence

    to be reviewed and further helpful in the post treatments

    of thermal spray coatings.

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    3/7

    Heat Treatment of Thermal Spray Coatings: A Review 149

    3. HEATTREATMENT OFTHERMAL

    SPRAY COATINGS

    Heat treatment is a process of heating the metals or steel

    alloys at high temperature for some fixed time which

    changes the microstructure of the substrate. With

    increasing heat treatment temperature, the density of

    weakly/ unbounded inter-splat boundaries and porositydecrease with a corresponding increase in elastic modulus

    (Sundararajan G. et al.2009).

    When the alloys were thermally annealed, these

    irregularities in the grain boundaries disappeared

    (Gonzalez-Rodriguez J.G. et al., 2008). Generally, heat

    treatment of thermally sprayed deposits can release

    residual stress, decrease the porosity and improve the

    microstructure and properties of the deposits (Wang H.T.,

    2009).

    4. SOME STUDIES ON HEATTREATMENT OF

    THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS

    As we found that Porosity or voids in the coating micro

    structure is an important issue in thermal spraying, as

    due to this physical property, corrosion resistance of

    different thermal spraying coatings differs and to reduce

    the interconnected porosity and inter splat boundaries,

    coatings are post treated by various methods such as

    heat treatment. Here are some studies on the heat

    treatment of thermal spray coatings.

    Gff L.et al reveals the results regarding the effect of

    both carburizing flame and argon atmosphere post-heat

    treatments on the microstructure and corrosion resistanceof NiCrWBSi coatings are reported. Both micro structural

    characterization and porosity determination were carried

    out before and after the heat treatments. It was determined

    that both treatments had reduced the porosity considerably,

    and this reduction was accompanied by pronounced micro

    structural changes regarding the disappearance of the initial

    lamellar structure, a more uniform distribution of the hard

    phases, and a decrease in the number of micro cracks

    and unmelted particles. Results from potentiodynamic

    studies carried out in a 5% NaCl solution have indicated

    an increase in the corrosion resistance of both heat-treated

    coatings (Gff L.et al., 2011).

    The hardness and wear resistance of a thermal-

    sprayed self-fluxing alloy (Ni-17wt. % Cr-3. 3wt.%B-4.

    3wt.%Si-4.2wt.%Fe-0.9wt.%C) is improved by adding

    20 wt.% of B13

    C2

    to the powder and heating the coating

    at 1030C in a vacuum of 102 Torr. Porosity is decreased

    from 20 to 0.3 vol. % by the heating if pre-heating at

    950C is carried out to facilitate the escape of trapped

    gases. The presence of numerous precipitates of

    Cr3C

    2 and CrB in the coating is consistent with a Rockwell

    hardness of HRC 63. The abrasive wear resistance is

    much improved compared with that of Stellite 6 (Shieh

    Yune-Hua et al., 1993).

    Sundararajan G. et al. evaluates the response of cold

    sprayed SS 316L coatings on mild steel substrate to

    aqueous corrosion in a 0.1 N HNO3

    solution as determined

    using polarization tests. The corrosion behaviour of the

    SS 316L coating was studied not only in the as-coatedcondition, but also after heat treatment at 400, 800 and

    1100C. Heat treatment reduced the porosity, improved

    inter-splat bonding, increased the elastic modulus and

    more importantly increased the corrosion resistance of

    the cold sprayed SS 316L coating (Sundararajan G. et al.

    2009).

    The in-situ co-deposition of Cr-Si into Cr17

    Ni2

    stainless steel (similar to AISI 431) was achieved using a

    pack cementation process. Through the optimum

    parameters, a coating containing approximately 27 wt.

    % Cr and 2 wt.% Si was obtained, with a layer thickness

    of approximately 120 mm. Studies showed that thethermal treatment of the coating resulted in a reduction

    of tensile strength, but the improvement of impact

    toughness, although the coating had little effect on the

    mechanical properties of the bulk. Tempering at 300 or

    450C improved the tensile strength and the impact

    toughness of the steel at 9 and 55C, while tempering

    at 550C reduced these mechanical properties. (Wei P.,

    Wan X.R., 2000).

    The corrosion performance of several NiAl alloys

    in 62 mol% Li2CO

    338 mol% K

    2CO

    3at 650 C has been

    studied using the weight loss technique. Alloys included

    50Ni50Al at. % (NiAl) and 75Ni25Al at. % (Ni3Al)

    alloys with additions of 1, 3 and 5 at. % Li each one,

    with or without a heat treatment at 400 C during 144 h.

    For comparison, AISI-316L type stainless steel was also

    studied. The tests were complemented by X-ray diffraction,

    scanning electronic microscopy and micro-analyses.

    Results showed that NiAl-base alloy without heat

    treatment presented the lowest corrosion rate even lower

    than Ni3Al alloy but still higher than conventional 316L-

    type stainless steel. In general terms, by either by heat

    treating these base alloys or by adding Li, the mass loss

    was increased. This effect was produced because by

    adding Li the adhesion of the external protective layer

    was decreased by inducing a higher number of

    discontinuities inside the grain boundaries. When the

    alloys were thermally annealed, these irregularities in the

    grain boundaries disappeared, decreasing the number of

    paths for the outwards diffusion of Al from the alloy to

    form the external, protective Al2O

    3layer (Gonzalez-

    Rodriguez J.G. et al., 2008).

    It is difficult to deposit dense intermetallic compound

    coatings by cold spraying directly using compound

    feedstock powders due to their intrinsic low temperature

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    4/7

    150 International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering ( IJMSE)

    brittleness. A method to prepare intermetallic compound

    coatings in-situ employing cold spraying was developed

    using a metastable alloy powder assisted with post heat

    treatment. In this study, a nanostructured Fe (Al)/Al2O

    3

    composite alloy coating was prepared by cold spraying

    of ball-milled powder. The cold-sprayed Fe (Al)/Al2O

    3

    composite alloy coating was evolved in-situ to FeAl/Al2O

    3intermetallic composite coating through a post heat

    treatment. The effect of heat treatment on the phase

    formation, microstructure and micro hardness of cold-

    sprayed Fe (Al)/Al2O

    3composite coating was investigated.

    The results showed that annealing at a temperature of

    600C results in the complete transformation of the

    Fe (Al) solid solution to a FeAl intermetallic compound.

    Annealing temperature significantly influenced the

    microstructure and micro hardness of the cold-sprayed

    FeAl/Al2O

    3coating. On raising the temperature to over

    950 C, diffusion occurred not only in the coating but

    also at the interface between the coating and substrate.

    The micro hardness of the FeAl/Al2O

    3coating was

    maintained at about 600HV0.1

    at an annealing temperature

    below 500C, and gradually decreased to 400HV0.1

    at

    1100C (Wang Hong-Tao et al.2009).

    A method to prepare intermetallic composite coatings

    employing the cost-efficient electric arc spraying twin

    wires assistant with suitable heat treatment was developed.

    In this study, a FeAl composite coating was produced

    by spraying twin wires, i.e. a carbon steel wire as the

    anode and an aluminum wire as the cathode by Chen

    Yongxiong et al. The inter-deposited FeAl coating was

    transformed in-situ to FeAl intermetallic compositecoating after a post annealing treatment. The effect of

    annealing treatment conditions on phase composition,

    microstructure and mechanical properties of the coating

    was investigated by using XRD, SEM, EDS and OM as

    well as micro hardness tester. The results show that the

    desirable intermetallic phases such as Fe2Al

    5, FeAl and

    Fe3Al are obtained under the annealing condition. The

    main oxide in the coating is FeO which can partially

    transform to Fe3O

    4up to the annealing condition (Chen

    Yongxiong et al., 2009).

    G. Bolelli et al. evaluated the effect of a 600C, 1 h

    heat treatment on the corrosion performance of threeHVOF-sprayed metal alloy coatings by electrochemical

    corrosion tests and corrodkote test. In general, the heat

    treatment has two major effects on the tested coatings: it

    improves interlamellar cohesion, reducing active corrosion

    along interlamellar boundaries, but can also trigger

    galvanic microcells at intralamellar level, because of the

    formation of secondary phases. The first, beneficial

    effect prevails in the case of Co800 and D4006 coatings,

    so that an overall improvement in their corrosion

    resistance is found and they have lower corrosion current

    density, less active corrosion at interlamellar boundaries

    and improved corrodkote test resistance. The heat

    treatment is therefore an effective way to improve the

    overall performance of the Co800 and D4006 coatings.

    The properties of the heat-treated Co800 coating are

    particularly significant when compared to those of

    electrolytic hard chrome (EHC). By coupling the corrosion

    test outcomes to former results on tribological behaviour,

    we find that the corrosion resistance of heat-treated

    Co800 is comparable to that of EHC and its tribological

    characteristics far surpass EHC under various contact

    conditions. By contrast, the effects of the heat treatment

    on the corrosion resistance of Ni700 are less obvious.

    Most importantly, after the heat treatment, the Ni700

    coating shows greater sensitivity to crevice corrosion,

    so that its overall corrosion resistance may seem to be

    reduced by the heat treatment (G. Bolelli et al. 2008).

    G. Bolelli and L. Lusvarghi examined the tribological

    behavior of HVOF sprayed Co-28%Mo-17%Cr-3%Si

    coatings, both as deposited and after heat treatments,correlating it with microstructural and micromechanical

    features. A significant degree of splat boundary oxidation

    exists in the as-sprayed coating, because of exothermic

    oxidative reaction occurring at T > 810C. This coating

    is mainly amorphous due to splat quenching; thus, it has

    low hardness and toughness, resulting in poor tribological

    performanceparticularly, its low hardness promotes

    adhesive wear against 100Cr6

    steel pins. Adhesion causes

    a rapid increase in friction coefficient, and consequently

    the contact point temperature reaches a critical value

    where rapid oxidation occurs. Oxides decrease the friction

    coefficient, but they are not particularly adherent to thecontacting surfaces and mostly form debris. Therefore,

    friction increases again and continues to oscillate

    periodically because adhesive wear continues to raise flash

    temperature up to the critical value. Most of the wear

    loss occurs in the first stage, where adhesion is particularly

    severe due to direct contact between metallic surfaces.

    In the tests against alumina pin, the sample wear rate is

    smaller because less adhesion takes place; abrasive wear

    is prevalent, but the Co-base alloy has sufficient intrinsic

    plasticity to withstand it without undergoing too much

    cutting wear. However, the fast oxidation process, with

    peculiar friction coefficient behavior, still takes place.While the 200 and 400C heat treatments do not cause

    any major change (the former one even degrading the

    coating properties), the 600C treatment causes the

    appearance of sub-micrometric crystalline regions

    improving hardness and elastic modulus. Adhesive

    phenomena between coating and steel pin are thus

    definitely reduced; the wear loss is negligible for the

    coating and decreased by two orders of magnitude for

    the pin; no friction coefficient peaks occur nor is fast

    oxidation started. Instead, friction coefficient soon gets

    to a steady value. The coating wear rate against alumina

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    5/7

    Heat Treatment of Thermal Spray Coatings: A Review 151

    pin is not significantly changed because abrasive wear

    still prevails, so there are no major changes in the wear

    process. However, adhesive phenomena are further

    reduced, preventing the appearance of friction coefficient

    peaks and of fast oxidation. Thus, performing a 600C,

    1 h heat treatment in air could be suggested as a way to

    improve the sliding wear performance of the present alloyat room temperature. The 600C heat treated coating wear

    rates are lower than those recorded by the authors for

    hard chrome platings at room temperature under the same

    testing conditions (G. Bolelli and L. Lusvarghi, 2006).

    Hence it has been observed that with the heat

    treatment of thermal spray coatings better results can be

    obtained in post treatment of the coatings for enhancing

    their life for different applications but not much work

    has been done in this field to post treat the coatings and

    by changing the parameters like Temperature and time

    of heat treatment better results can be obtained in post

    treatment of the coatings. Fig. 2 describes the some ofthe work done in the heat treatment in the shape of

    pyramid.

    5. CONCLUSION

    Thermal Spray Coatings are very effective for

    corrosion, erosion and wear applications, but due to

    interconnected porosity the corrosive species are able

    to penetrate and attack the substrate via

    interconnected network of voids and oxide at splat

    boundaries, hence their life is reduced.

    Further the various Post treatments of thermal spraycoatings are effective methods to improve their life.

    Heat treatment is one of them which found to give

    better results in reducing the porosity considerably

    and improves interlamellar cohesion.

    From the literature it has been observed that not much

    work has been done in this field to post treat the

    coatings and by changing the parameters like

    Temperature and time of heat treatment better results

    can be obtained in post treatment of the coatings for

    enhancing their life for different applications.

    References

    [1] ASM International, 2000, Corrosion: Understanding the

    Basics, ASM Int ernational, Materials Park, Ohio, USA,

    (#06691G).

    [2] Buta Singh Sidhu, S. Prakash, Studies on the Behaviour of Stellite-

    6 as Plasma Sprayed and Laser Remelted Coatings in Molten Salt

    Environment at 900 C Under Cyclic Conditions, Journal of

    Materials Processing Technology , 172, (2006), pp. 52-63.

    [3] Buta Singh Sidhu and S. Prakash, Nickel-Chromium Plasma

    Spray Coatings: A Way to Enhance Degradation Resistance of

    Boiler Tube Steels in Boiler Environment, JTTEE5, 15:131-

    140 (Submitted February 17, 2005; in Revised form July 14,

    2005).Figure 2: Pyramid Showing the Summery of the Work Done

    in the Field of Heat Treatment as Post Treatment

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    6/7

    152 International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering ( IJMSE)

    [4] G. Bolelli and L. Lusvarghi, Heat Treatment Effects on the

    Tribological Performance of HVOF Sprayed Co-Mo-Cr-Si

    Coatings, JTTEE5, 15, (2006), pp. 802-810.

    [5] G. Bolelli et al., Heat Treatment Effects on the Corrosion

    Resistance of Some HVOF-sprayed Metal Alloy Coatings,

    Surface & Coatings Technology, 202, (2008), pp. 4839-4847.

    [6] G. Sundararajan, P. Sudharshan Phani, A. Jyothirmayi & Ravi

    C. Gundakaram, The Influence of Heat Treatment on theMicro Structural, Mechanical and Corrosion Behaviour of Cold

    Sprayed SS 316L Coatings,J. of Mater Sci., (2009), 44:2320-

    2326.

    [7] Hong-Tao Wang, Chang-Jiu Li, Guan-Jun Yang, Cheng-Xing

    Li, Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and

    Property of Cold-sprayed Nano Structured FeAl/Al2O

    3

    Intermetallic Composite Coating, Vacuum, 83, (2009), pp.

    146-152.

    [8] I. A. Podchernyaeva, A. D. Panasyuk, M. A. Teplenko, and

    V. I. Podolskii, Protective Coatings on Heat-Resistant Nickel

    Alloys (Review), Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics,

    39, Nos. 9-10, 2000.

    [9] J.G. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, E. Mejia, I. Rosales, V. M. Salinas-

    Bravo, G. Rosas, A. MArtinez-Villafane, Effect of HeatTreatment and Chemical Composition on the Corrosion

    Behavior of NiAl Intermetallics in Molten (Li + K) Carbonate,

    Journal of Power Sources, 176, (2008), pp. 215-221.

    [10] L. Gff, M.A. Pareto and M.H. Staia, Effect of Post-heat

    Treatment on the Corrosion Resistance of NiWCrBSi HVOF

    Coatings in Chloride Solution,JTTEE5, 11:95-99.

    [11] M. E. Aalamialeagha, S. J. Harris, M. Emamighomi, Influence

    of the HVOF Spraying Process on the Microstructure and

    Corrosion Behaviour of Ni-20%Cr Coatings, Journal of

    Materials Science, 38, (2003), pp. 4587-4596.

    [12] M.A. Uusitalo, P.M.J. Vuoristo, T.A. Mantyla, Elevated

    Temperature Erosioncorrosion of Thermal Sprayed Coatings

    in Chlorine Containing Environments, Wear, 252, (2002),

    pp. 586-594.

    [13] Manpreet Kaur, Harpreet Singh, and Satya Prakash, High-

    Temperature Corrosion Studies of HVOF-Sprayed Cr3C

    2-NiCr

    Coating on SAE-347H Boiler Steel, JTTEE5 , 18:619-632

    (Submitted January 28, 2009; in Revised form July 3, 2009).

    [14] N. Serresa, Franc., O. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, F. Machi.

    Corrosion Properties of in Situ Laser Remelted NiCrBSi

    Coatings Comparison with Hard Chromium Coatings, J. of

    Mater. Process. Technol., 211 (2011), pp. 133-140.

    [15] OU Xue-mei, SUN Zhi, SUN Min, ZOU Duan-lian, Hot-

    corrosion Mechanism of Ni-Cr Coatings at 650C under

    Different Simulated Corrosion Conditions, J. China Univ

    Mining & Technol , 18, (2008), pp. 0444-0448.

    [16] P. Wei, X.R. Wan, The Effect of a Coating Heat-treatment

    on Cr-Si and Heat-treatment on the Mechanical Properties of

    Cr17

    Ni2Stainless Steel Surface and Coatings Technology, 132,

    (2000), pp. 137-142.

    [17] Pawlowski L., 2008, The Science and Engineering of Thermal

    Spray Coatings Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The

    Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ,

    England., pp. 67-113.

    [18] S. Abdi and S. Lebaili, Alternative to Chromium, a Hard Alloy

    Powder NiCrBCSi (Fe) Coatings Thermally Sprayed on 60CrMn4

    Steel, Phase and Comportments, Proceedings of the JMSM

    2008 Conference.

    [19] S. Ahmaniemi, P. Vuoristo, T. Mantyla, Improved Sealing

    Treatments for Thick Thermal Barrier Coatings, Surf. and

    Coat. Technol., 151-152, (2002), pp. 412-417.

    [20] Souza V.A.D. Neville A., Aspects of Microstructure on the

    Synergy and Overall Material Loss of Thermal Spray Coatings

    in Erosioncorrosion Environments, Wear, 263 , (2007),pp. 339-346.

    [21] T. S. Sidhu, S. Prakash and R. D. Agrawal, Hot Corrosion and

    Performance of Nickel-based Coatings, Current Science, 90,

    No. 1, 10 January 2006.

    [22] T.S. Sidhu, S. Prakash, and R.D. Agrawal, Characterizations

    and Hot Corrosion Resistance of Cr3C

    2-NiCr Coating on

    Ni-Base Super Alloys in an Aggressive Environment,JTTEE5,

    15:811-816 (Submitted April 2, 2006; in Revised form July 2,

    2006).

    [23] Yongxiong Chen, Xiubing Liang, Shicheng Wei, Yan Liu, Binshi,

    Xu Heat Treatment Induced Intermetallic Phase Transition

    of Arc-sprayed Coating Prepared by the Wires Combination of

    Aluminum-cathode and Steel-anode Applied Surface Science,

    255, (2009), pp. 8299-8304.

    [24] Yune-Hua Shieh and Jia-tzann Wang, Han C. Shih and Shinn-

    Tyan Wu, Alloying and Post-heat Treatment of Thermal-

    sprayed Coatings of Self-fluxing Alloys Surface and Coatings

    Technology, 58, Issue 1,18 June 1993, Pages 73-77.

    [25] Zhiming Li, Shiqiang Qian, Wei Wang., Characterization and

    Oxidation Behavior of NiCoCrAlY Coating Fabricated by

    Electro-phoretic Deposition and Vacuum Heat Treatment.

    Applied Surface Science, xxx, (2010), pp. xxxxxx.

  • 7/22/2019 HEAT TREATMENT OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS: A REVIEW

    7/7