Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz...

38
Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio

Transcript of Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz...

Page 1: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts

AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015

Donald M. ScheetzAssistant Disciplinary CounselThe Supreme Court of Ohio

Page 2: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

PROPER HANDLING OF FLAT,ADVANCED, AND NON-REFUNDABLE FEES

Page 3: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Board Advisory Opinion 96-4

In Advisory Opinion 96-4, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline stated that a flat fee, paid in advance, could be deposited into the attorney’s business account and that it did not need to be placed in the attorney’s client trust account.

Page 4: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

However, the opinion further stated that, just because the flat fee was deposited into the business account doesn’t mean that it is non-refundable.

Page 5: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Board Advisory Opinion 96-4 was issued during the period of time that Ohio was governed by the former Code of Professional Responsibility.

Effective February 1, 2007, the Supreme Court of Ohio adopted the Rules of Professional Conduct, which are modeled on the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

Page 6: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Although the Board has not withdrawn Advisory Opinion 96-4, its continued viability after the adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct is questionable.

Page 7: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Rule 1.15(c) of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct

“A lawyer shall deposit into a trust account legal fees and expenses that have been paid in advance, to be withdrawn by the lawyer only as fees are earned or expense incurred.”

Page 8: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Unless there is an applicable exception to Rule 1.15(c), any fees that are paid to the lawyer in advance that have not yet been earned must be deposited into the lawyer’s client trust account.

Is there an exception for “flat fees” or “non-refundable” fees?

The answer is “YES” – but only in two situations.

Page 9: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Types of Advance Fee Payments

“True” or “Classic” RetainerAdvance Fee or Retainer“Flat Fee”“Earned Upon Receipt Fee”

Comment [6A] to Rule 1.5 of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct

Page 10: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

“True” or “Classic” Retainer

The “true” or “classic” retainer is a fee paid in advance solely to ensure the lawyer’s availability to represent the client and precludes the lawyer from taking adverse representation.

Page 11: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Advance Fee Payment or Retainer

What is often called a “retainer” is, in fact, an advance payment to ensure that fees are paid when they are subsequently earned, on either a flat fee or hourly fee basis.

Page 12: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Flat Fee

A flat fee is a fee of a set amount for performance of agreed work, which may or may not be paid in advance but is not deemed earned until the work is performed.

Page 13: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Earned Upon Receipt Fee

An “earned upon receipt” fee is a flat fee paid in advance that is deemed earned upon payment regardless of the amount of future work performed.

Page 14: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

“When a fee is earned affects whether it must be placed in the attorney’s trust account.”

Comment [6A] to Prof. Cond. R. 1.5Thus, the only two situations in which the

attorney is NOT required to deposit the fees into his or her client trust account are (1) a “true” or “classic” retainer; and (2) an “earned upon receipt” fee.

Page 15: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Limitations on Charging or Collecting an“Earned Upon Receipt” or “Non-

Refundable Fee”

Prof. Cond. R. 1.5(d)(3) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

“A lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect any of the following:

Page 16: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

(3) a fee denominated as ‘earned upon receipt,’ ‘nonrefundable’ or in any similar terms, unless the client is simultaneously advised in writing that if the lawyer does not complete the representation, the client may be entitled to a refund of all or part of the fee based upon the value of the representation pursuant to division (a) of this rule.”

Page 17: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Summers,131 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-1144

“When a lawyer agrees to represent a client through the conclusion of the case for a flat fee, and that lawyer withdraws from representation without cause before the work is completed, he cannot retain the entire flat fee by resorting to a mathematical calculation of his billable hours.

Page 18: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

To hold otherwise would leave clients at the mercy of lawyers who charge significant flat fees to provide complete representatoin only to withdraw when the demands of the case become too onerous.”

Page 19: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Assn. v. Gruttadario,

136 Ohio St.3d 283, 2013-Ohio-3662The lawyer charged a flat fee of

$4,000 to represent grievant’s son in a criminal proceeding but failed to perform the agreed-upon services and refused to refund any portion of the fees, claiming that he had expended more than 70 hours on the case.

Page 20: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

The Supreme Court of Ohio rejected the lawyer’s claim, stating in part as follows: “But the key flaw in Gruttadario’s position

is that he did not accept representation on an hourly fee basis – he agreed to a flat fee for the work and then he did not complete it. Therefore, he could not have been entitled to retain the entire flat fee.”

Page 21: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

TRUST ACCOUNTGUIDELINES

Page 22: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Trust Account Requirements

Rule 1.15, Rules of Professional Conduct

Lawyer shall hold client or third person property:

In connection with a representationSeparate from lawyer’s propertyDuty to safeguard

Page 23: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Prompt notificationPrompt deliveryFull accounting upon requestIdentify and labelMaintain complete records

Page 24: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

What Funds belong in Trust Account

Funds belonging to client Funds belonging partly to client and

partly or potentially to lawyer (i.e. settlement proceeds)

Funds belonging to 3rd party, related to handling of case (medical bills payment)

Page 25: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Funds in which a third party has an interest

Rule 1.15 (d)Board of Commissioner Opinion #

2007-7

Page 26: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Funds claimed by two or more persons

Rule 1.15(e)

Page 27: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

What Does NOT belong in Trust Account

Funds belonging totally to the lawyerFunds not related to the

representation of a client

Page 28: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Safeguarding OTHER property

For property other than funds, lawyer is required to maintain for seven years a record: That identifies the property; The date received; The person on whose behalf the property

was held; The date of distribution.

Page 29: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Rule 1.15: Safekeeping Property

A lawyer may deposit his/her own funds in a client trust account for the sole purpose of: Paying bank service charges OR Obtaining a waiver of bank service

charges but only in the amount necessary for that purpose.

Page 30: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Common Violations in Maintenance of Trust Account Records

Failure to maintain individual client records or equivalent

Failure to maintain duplicate deposit slips

Failure to reconcile individual client records to bank statements and the general trust account record

Failure to maintain records after completion of the lawyer’s fiduciary duty

Page 31: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Common Violations in the Use of Trust Accounts

Improper transaction processed through the trust account

Using the trust account as an operating account

Using the trust account for family and non-client related transactions

Depositing earned fees into the trust account

Page 32: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Assuming bank’s decision to grant immediate credit on deposited item is the equivalent of the funds actually being collected

Failing to withdraw earned fees from the trust account

Maintaining a large balance of lawyer or law firm funds in the trust account

Page 33: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

When do I deposit funds

As quickly as possible, since you have a duty to safeguard them

Page 34: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

When do I transfer fees

Within a reasonable time after they are earned

Once earned, fees do not belong in a trust account

You can’t spend your money UNTIL it is moved from trust account to operating account

Page 35: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Staff Assistance

Staff may assist – employees must be competent and properly supervised

Internal controls must be adequate to safeguard client funds and property

ODC v. Ball, 67 Ohio St.3d 401; Rule 5.3

Page 36: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

The Lawyer MUST

Train and supervise staff; andRegularly review records.

Page 37: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Regular Review of Records

Lawyer most familiar with client matters: Most likely to spot errors i.e.: wrong amount recorded to wrong

client Knows to safeguard amounts that need

special attention – those involving unresolved disputes

Page 38: Handling of Advance Fees and IOLTA Accounts AILA Seminar – October 9, 2015 Donald M. Scheetz Assistant Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio.

Can non-lawyers be signers on trust account

Technically yes; management considerations:

Since attorney is responsible is it worth the risk?

It is necessary?