Hall v Berry Petroleum Company Pro Hac Vice Letter
1
Sam Glasscock I VICE CHANCELLOR Peter Andrews, Esquire Faruqi & Faruqi 20 Montchanin Road, Suite 145 Wilmington, DE 19807 EFiled: May 23 2013 11:16 Transaction ID 52434393 Case No. 8476-VCG COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE May 23,2013 CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN. DELAWARE 19947 AND NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KINGSTREET. SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON. DELAWARE 19950-3734 RE: David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Co., et al. C.A. No. 8476-VCG Dear Mr. Andrews: I have your Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Juan E. Monteverde in this matter. I have reviewed Mr. Monteverde's Certification of Counsel For Consideration of Admittance Pro Hac Vice. It has come to the Court's attention that Mr. Monteverde is a defendant in litigation the allegations of which may have a bearing on this Motion; however, Mr. Monteverde has made no disclosure in his Certification concerning this litigation.l Before further consideration of this Motion, I ask that Mr. Monteverde amend his Certificaiton to explain (1) why this litigation was not disclosed; and (2) whether, in his opinion, it has any bearing on this Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Sincerely, /s/ Sam Glasscock III Vice Chancellor cc: Register in Chancery 1See.Manning v. Vellardita, 2012 WL 1072233 (Del. Ch., March 28, 2012) (addressing duty of candor in Certification for consideration of motion to appear pro hac vice). David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Company, et al., C.A. No. 8476-VCG, letter (Del. Ch. May 23, 2013) www.chancerydaily.com
description
Pro hac vice letter.
Transcript of Hall v Berry Petroleum Company Pro Hac Vice Letter
Sam Glasscock IVICE CHANCELLOR
Peter Andrews, EsquireFaruqi & Faruqi20 Montchanin Road, Suite 145Wilmington, DE 19807
EFiled: May 23 2013 11:16Transaction ID 52434393
Case No. 8476-VCG
COURT OF CHANCERY
OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE
May 23,2013
CHANCERY COURTHOUSE34 The Circle
GEORGETOWN. DELAWARE 19947AND
NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE500 NORTH KINGSTREET. SUITE 11400WILMINGTON. DELAWARE 19950-3734
RE: David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Co., et al.C.A. No. 8476-VCG
Dear Mr. Andrews:
I have your Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Juan E. Monteverde in this matter. Ihave reviewed Mr. Monteverde's Certification of Counsel For Consideration of Admittance Pro
Hac Vice. It has come to the Court's attention that Mr. Monteverde is a defendant in litigationthe allegations of which may have a bearing on this Motion; however, Mr. Monteverde has madeno disclosure in his Certification concerning this litigation.l Before further consideration ofthisMotion, I ask that Mr. Monteverde amend his Certificaiton to explain (1) why this litigation wasnot disclosed; and (2) whether, in his opinion, it has any bearing on this Motion for AdmissionPro Hac Vice.
Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Vice Chancellor
cc: Register in Chancery
1See.Manning v. Vellardita, 2012 WL 1072233 (Del. Ch., March 28,2012) (addressing duty of candor inCertification for consideration of motion to appear pro hac vice).
David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Company, et al., C.A. No. 8476-VCG, letter (Del. Ch. May 23, 2013)
www.chancerydaily.com
