Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm...

53
Guyton at the bedside S Magder Department of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre Hemodynamic monitoring: Guyton at the Bedside CC 2012

Transcript of Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm...

Page 1: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Guyton at the bedside

S Magder

Department of Critical Care,

McGill University Health Centre

Hemodynamic monitoring: Guyton at the Bedside CC 2012

Page 2: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

What did Arthur Guyton teach us?

• Paradigm shift:– Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was

thought of in terms of HR, Stroke Volume, and contractility

• Little thought given to how blood gets back to the heart

• Credited Ernest Starling for realizing that :– Filling of the heart is dependent upon venous

return (VR)

– VR is dependent upon upstream pressure which Starling called “mean systemic pressure”

Page 3: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Guyton Am J Physiol 1957;89:609-15

• “When a change occurs in the hemodynamics of the circulatory system one cannot predict what will happen to the cardiac output unless he takes into consideration both the effect of this change on the ability of the heart to pump blood and also the tendency for blood to return to the heart from the blood vessels.”

Page 4: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Increase the initial

volume

Greater flow

Stressed volume

Stressed VolumeCv x Rv

Q =

Determinants of flow

Cv

Rv

Volume creates venous elastic recoil force

Page 5: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Heart has a “restorative”

function

Volume stretches the veins and creates the “recoil” pressure that drives flow back to the heart

Heart has a “permissive”

function. It lowers the outflow

pressure and allows veins to

empty

which refills the veins

Page 6: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

The height of the water determines the outflow

MSFP

Page 7: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

In contrast to your tub, the veins are the source of fluid in the circulation

In contrast to your tub, the veins are the source of fluid in the circulation

MSFP

Page 8: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

If there is no venous blood to return…..

… the heart has nothing to pump

Page 9: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

MSFPMSFP

Unstressedvolume

Concept of Stressed and Unstressed Volume

Page 10: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

MSFP

Stressed volume

Unstressed volume

Pra

Cardiac function

Return Function

Rv

Page 11: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

If cardiac function becomes limited a volume infusion will not increase cardiac output

Pra

“Plateau”Q

Volume does not increase cardiac output

= ‘wasted preload”(excess volume)

Page 12: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Pra

Q

-1/Rv

Pra = MSFP

A

Pra < MSFP

B

MSFP

Page 13: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Q

Pra

Lowering Pra further will not increase Q

VR =-Pra

RvMCFP

max

Page 14: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Return Function

“working CVP”

Cardiac Function

Pra

Q

“Cardiac limited”

“Return limited”

Page 15: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Pra

Q

Increase in Cardiac Function Curve

↑ Heart Rate↑Contractility↓Afterload

Higher Q for a given Pra

Page 16: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Increase Cardiac Function

Q

Pra Increase in gradient for venous returnIncrease in gradient for venous return

gradientgradient

Page 17: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Decrease Cardiac Function

Q

Pra decrease gradient for venous returndecrease gradient for venous returngradient

Fall in cardiac output with rise in Pra

Page 18: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Increase in VolumeIncrease in Volume

P

MSFP ↑

MSFPQ

Pra

Q

V

Page 19: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Decrease in VolumeDecrease in Volume

PMSFP ↓

MSFPQ

Pra

V

Fall in Q with fall in Pra

Page 20: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Volume (ml)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

MC

FP

(m

mH

g)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Volume (ml)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

MC

FP

(m

mH

g)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Change in Capacitance(can change by 10-15 ml /kg)

Change in Capacitance(can change by 10-15 ml /kg)

Page 21: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Change in CapacitanceChange in Capacitance

MSFP

Q

Pra

Q

PMSFP

MSFP

↑ MSFP

V

Can recruit ~ 10 ml/kg of unstressed to

stressed

Page 22: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Compare changes in Cardiac and Return functions

• Change in Cardiac Function

– Changes in Q and Pra are in

opposite directions

• Changes in Return Function

– Changes in Q and Pra are in the

same direction

Page 23: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

CVP is not useful

TRUE ….

If you do not know how to use it!

!

Page 24: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

CVP does not indicate the magnitude of vascular volume. But why would you expect it to!?

Marik, Baram, & Vahid Chest 2008

Page 25: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Reasons for low CVP Q

Pra

1. Normal cardiac function and blood volume

Pra

Q = 5 L/min

Pra = 0 mmHg

Q = 3 L/min

Pra = 0 mmHg

2. Depressed cardiac function but low blood volume

Q Give volume and inotrope

Page 26: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Low CVP (3)

Decrease in volume with normal cardiac function

Q

Pra

Give volume

Page 27: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

1. Increased volume -normal cardiac function

Q

Pra

2. Decrease cardiac function normal volume

Q

Pra

3. Decrease RVR without change in cardiac function (?sepsis)

Q

Pra

Reasons for High CVP

Page 28: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

The CVP value by itself can make some diagnosis unlikely

• LOW CVP makes dx of cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, RV failure unlikely causes of shock

– But cannot rule out LV dysfunction

• High CVP means that fluids are unlikely to help (exceptions – high PEEP, chronic pulmonary hypertension

What is a high CVP?

Page 29: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Some Patients at all values of CVP fail to respond to fluids

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

cvp 0-5 cvp 6-10 cvp 11-15 cvp 16-20

total

res

non res

Num

ber

of P

t

mmHg

25% 45% 82% 100%

Bafaqeeh & Magder JICM 2007

Page 30: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

CVP by itself has limited value

• Major value is by looking at changes in relation to changes in perfusion

– ie indicating position on the cardiac function curve.

• Trends are critical

Page 31: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

CVP should not be considered alone

CVP is best considered in relation to Q

When given a value of CVP, the next question should be …

what is the cardiac output or a surrogate ?

or simply does the pt look normal!

Page 32: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Fluid ChallengeFluid Challenge

1 Assess the value of Pra ( NOT the wedge).

2 Give sufficient fluid to raise Pra by ~2mmHg and observe Q.

Type of fluid is not of importance if given fast enough

Pra

Q

+ve

-ve

Page 33: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Change in CVP of even 1 mmHg should be sufficient to test the Starling response

Pra (mmHg)

Q (l/min)

0 10

5

Slope = 500 ml/min/mmHg

plateau

Page 34: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

BP = Cardiac Output x SVR

Page 35: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

BP = Cardiac Output x SVR

First Question to ask: Is the cardiac output decreased

Or Is the cardiac output normal or increased

Measured variable

Page 36: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

BP = Cardiac Output x SVR

Heart RateStroke Volume

AfterloadContractilityPreload

Stressed volumeComplianceResistancePra

Cardiac Function Return Function

Page 37: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Volume responsiveness does not mean volume need

Your CVP sitting in this lecture is likely < 0 mmHg

You do not need a saline bolus!

Page 38: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

0

4

8

12

16

20

No InspFall

+ve InspFall

mmHG

Initial Right Atrial Pressure

Page 39: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Wedge Pra

Approach:1. Assess adequacy of inspiratory effort from wedge

2. Evaluate the change in Pra

Eg of no fall in Pra with inspiratory effort

Magder et al JCCM 1992

Page 40: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Pra

Q Q

Pra

Magder et al JCCM 1992

L/m

in (

delta

)

-1 .0

-0 .5

0 .0

0 .5

1 .0

1 .5

2 .0

2 .5

+ve R esp -ve R esp

Page 41: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Crit Care Med 2010 Vol. 38, No. 11

Page 42: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Fluid ProtocolCI < 4 and CVP < 12 ?

Protocol Fluid Bolus

Check CI andCVP

CVP incr. > 2and

CI incr. < 0.3

CVP incr. < 2and

CI incr. > 0.3

CI < 2.2 or

MAP < 70 or

SBP < Target or

CVP <3or

UO < 20

Total Protocol

Fluid >1L/24hr?

CatecholamineProtocol

Yes

Yes

NoCVP incr. < 2

and

CI incr. < 0.3

CVP incr. > 2and

CI incr. > 0.3

Inadequatechallenge

Cardiac response ok

Pt not volume responsive

Review fluid criteria

NoObserveor wean

Saline

YES

CI < 2.2or

MAP < Targetor

SBP < Targetor

CVP < 3or

Urine < 20 cc/hr

triggers

Page 43: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Primary OutcomeCatecholamines between 8:00 and 9:00 AM

HES119

Crystalloid118

YES 13 34

10.9% 28.8 %

.38 ( 0.21, 0.68)

p = 0.001

Page 44: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Serum Creatinine over time

Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 Last

S C

reat (m

mol/l)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Saline

HES

Page 45: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Part = Q x SVR (+K)

CircuitStressed volumeComplianceResistancePra

SepsisDrugsSpinal

HeartHeart RateAfterloadContractilityPreload

DobutamineMilrinone

VolumeNE NE

Page 46: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,
Page 47: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

MSFP

RvHeart

unstressed volume

stressed volume

Circulatory Model

Page 48: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,
Page 49: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Concept of arterial pressure driving the flow around the circuit

Concept of arterial pressure driving the flow around the circuit

MCFP

Page 50: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Question 1

The term mean systemic pressure was first used by:

1. Ernest Starling

2. Mathew Levy

3. Arthur Guyton

4. Sol Permutt

Page 51: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

• Patient comes back from aorto-coronary bypass surgery. The initial hemodynamics are:

– Q = 2.2 l/min/m2, Pra = 8 mmHg, Pw = 6mmHg, Part = 110/70 mmHg

• One hour later

– Q = 1.8 l/min/m2, Pra = 12 mmHg, Pw = 8mmHg, Part = 80/60 mmHg

1. Give fluids

2. Give norepinepherine

3. Give dobutamine

4. Give dopamine

Page 52: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

• Post operative cardiac surgery

• Initial blood pressure is 80 mmHg

What do you want to know next?

1. CVP

2. LV size

3. LV ejection fraction

4. Cardiac output

• CI = 3.2 l/min/m2, Pw= 12 mmHg, Pra= 10mmHg,

Page 53: Guyton at the bedside - Siti-Isic Magder.pdf · What did Arthur Guyton teach us? • Paradigm shift: – Prior to Guyton, control of cardiac output was thought of in terms of HR,

Results from the previous patient indicate:

CI = 3.2 l/min/m2, Pw= 12 mmHg, Pra= 10mmHg

What would you do next (remember BP =80)

1. Give a fluid bolus

2. Give dobutamine

3. Give Norepinepherine

4. Just observe