Group b site analysis

173
- SITE ANALYSIS - TAMAN BOTANI NEGARA SHAH ALAM PREPARED BY GROUP B

Transcript of Group b site analysis

Page 1: Group b   site analysis

- SITE ANALYSIS -

TAMAN BOTANI NEGARA SHAH ALAM

PREPARED BY GROUP B

Page 2: Group b   site analysis

SITE PLAN

Page 3: Group b   site analysis

LOCATION

PLAN

SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM

Page 4: Group b   site analysis

KLANG

SHAH ALAM

TAMAN BOTANI NEGARA

PETALING JAYA

PUCHUNG LOCATION

PLAN

Page 5: Group b   site analysis

KEY

PLANCAR PARK

ENTRANCE

Page 6: Group b   site analysis

Boundary

Road/ TrailsScale 1:750

CACTUS PARKHILL

LAKE 3

LAKE 2

Page 7: Group b   site analysis

CONTOUR /TOPOGRAPHY

50 METER

25 METER

Scale 1:750

Page 8: Group b   site analysis

KEY

PLAN

TOILET

PERGOLA

CACTUS PARK

STOREHOUSE

GREEN HOUSE

PERGOLA

STAIRS

3

2

1

Scale 1:750

Page 9: Group b   site analysis

SECTIONS

1112

13

14

14 13

12 11

10

10

9

9

8

8 7

7

6

6

5

54

4

3

3

22

1

1

Scale 1:750

Page 10: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 1-1”

SECTION 2-2”

ROAD ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 11: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 3-3”

SECTION 4-4”

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 12: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 5-5”

SECTION 6-6”

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 13: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 7-7”

SECTION 8-8”ROAD

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 14: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 9-9”

SECTION 10-10”

ROAD

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 15: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 11-11”

SECTION 12-12”

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 16: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 13-13”

SECTION 14-14”

ROAD

ROAD

Scale 1:750

Page 17: Group b   site analysis

LAKE 3

SStrength

● SUFFICIENT HILL AND TOPOGRAPHY

● A FEW NUMBER OF LAKE LOCATED

● ARTIFICIAL GARDEN BUILT ON THE SITE

OOpportunities

● GOOD SPOT FOR BUILDING A PAVILION

● ATTRACT PUBLIC TO CACTUS GARDEN

● GOOD SPOT FOR ESCAPE FROM A BUSY ENVIRONMENT

WWeakness

TThreats

SITE PLAN

● HIGH TOPOGRAPHY [HILL]● TOPOGRAPHY AFFECT THE

APPROACHING VIEW●

● LESS VISITORS ● EASILY ABANDONED ● EARTH WORK NEEDED IF

NECESSARY

Page 18: Group b   site analysis

CIRCULATION

Page 19: Group b   site analysis

MACRO

CIRCULATIONON FOOTParking Lot - Booth (400m)5 minsBooth - 1 (2.8km)17 mins1 - Skytrek (400m)3 minsSkytrek - 2 (1km)6 mins

Page 20: Group b   site analysis

SHUTTLE BUS SERVICEBooth - SkytrekIntervals of 30 mins3.2 km in 5 minsMax 30 people

PEAK HOURSWeekend 8am - 12pmWeekday 3pm - 4pm

MACRO

CIRCULATION

Page 21: Group b   site analysis

MACRO

CIRCULATIONBICYCLE RENTAL

Booth - 1 (2.8km)To: 7 mins Fro: 8 mins1 - Skytrek (400m)To: 1 min Fro: 1 minSkytrek - 2 (1km)To: 3 mins Fro: 5 mins

Page 22: Group b   site analysis

MICRO

CIRCULATION

Boundary

Road/ Trails

1

53

4

2

-ZONESZONE 1 - ZONE 5 (1.4km)BIKE-To: 3 mins Fro: 4 minsON FOOT-6 mins

Page 23: Group b   site analysis

MICRO

CIRCULATION

Boundary

Road/ Trails

1

53

4

2

-ZONESZONE 1 - ZONE 5 (1.4km)BIKE-To: 3 mins Fro: 4 minsON FOOT-6 mins

Page 24: Group b   site analysis

POINTS OF INTERESTZONE 1 - LAKE 1

ZONE 2 - HILLSIDE WITH LOOKOUT / STAIRCASE

ZONE 3 - LAKE / SERVICE HOUSE

Bicycle

Footpath

Service Vehicle

Page 25: Group b   site analysis

5

4

POINTS OF INTERESTZONE 4 - CACTUS GARDEN

ZONE 5 - LAKE WITH GAZEBO

Bicycle

Footpath

Service Vehicle

Page 26: Group b   site analysis

LAKE 3

SStrength

● CLEAR CIRCULATION PATH● SHARP DECLINES & SMOOTH

INCLINES TOWARDS SITE● CONVENIENCE FOR CYCLISTS● ACCESSIBLE REST AREAS

OOpportunities

● LONGER RESTING PERIODS BY CYCLISTS

● HIGHER CHANCE OF PAVILION EXPOSURE

● PROVIDING AID IN REST & RELAXATION

WWeakness

TThreats

CIRCULATION

● SHARP INCLINES & SMOOTH DECLINES LEAVING SITE

● PHYSICALLY TAXING JOURNEY OUT

● IRREGULARITIES IN PAVEMENT● LIMITED BUS SERVICE

● LOWER TURNOVER● HIGHER CHANCE OF

ACCIDENTS● EARTH WORK NEEDED IF

NECESSARY

Page 27: Group b   site analysis

EXISTING STRUCTURE

Page 28: Group b   site analysis

LEGEND LightingFurnitureBuildingsSignageDrainageMiscellaneousScale 1:750

Page 29: Group b   site analysis

CIRCULATIONAsphalt RoadBrick PavementStone PathConcrete Stairs

Page 30: Group b   site analysis

ASPHALT ROAD

Page 31: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHEconomicalRecyclableLow maintenance

OPPORTUNITYEasy vehicular accessConducive for activities

WEAKNESSLiable to crackWeather pollution

THREATAnimal crossingsMajor heat source

8.0m

Page 32: Group b   site analysis

BRICK PAVEMENT

Page 33: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHHigh durabilityNon-slip surfaceLow maintenance

OPPORTUNITYAlternative attractive entrance to pavilion

WEAKNESSSubject to moss growth

THREATPotential loose bricksSlippery after rainfall

8.0m

Page 34: Group b   site analysis

STONE PATH

Page 35: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHGood weatheringNon-slipLow cost

OPPORTUNITYDirectional pathing to pavilion

WEAKNESSPath to nowhereLack of maintenance

THREATNot visible from main road

Width: 800mm

Page 36: Group b   site analysis

CONCRETE STAIRS

Page 37: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHDurableNon-slipLow cost

OPPORTUNITYDesign own railing

WEAKNESSSingle person useLack of maintenanceNo lighting

THREATSlippery after rainfallPhysically demandingDangerous at night

Narrow stair width: 0.8m Decorative steps Riser height:0.25m Tread depth: 0.6m Width: 6.4m

Page 38: Group b   site analysis

RETAINING WALL

Page 39: Group b   site analysis

RETAINING WALL

Page 40: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHDurableLow cost

OPPORTUNITYMulti-level pavilion

WEAKNESSPermanent installation

THREATSoil erosionOne facade facing retaining wallNo view of trees at the back

Page 41: Group b   site analysis

FOUNDATION

Page 42: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHDoes not hinder plant growthSupports tree from falling, soil from caving in

OPPORTUNITYPotential for foundation extension and modification

WEAKNESSVisually unappealing

THREATMay cause accidents by tripping over edges

Page 43: Group b   site analysis

DRAINAGE

Page 44: Group b   site analysis

36cm

54cm

45cm

9cm

9cm

54cm

20cm

Page 45: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHDirects excessive water flow to retention pondsPrevents flooding

OPPORTUNITYPotential for greywater harvesting

WEAKNESSNo drainage cover

THREATEasily cloggedPotential source of bad smell Dengue outbreak

Drain depth: 1.8m Drain slab thickness: 0.2m Drain area: 2x2 sq m

Page 46: Group b   site analysis

GAZEBO

Page 47: Group b   site analysis

Plan Elevation

Page 48: Group b   site analysis

Column analysis● Function as a main support of the gazebo structure.● The design of the column is inspired by a corinthian column of the

classical order.● Characteristics:

-Made of reinforced concrete.

Roof analysis● The roof of the gazebo is a type of a tented roof that is common in

gazebo construction.● Inspired by medieval religious architecture, widely used as roofs of

churches.

Characteristics : - Hexagonal base. - Six slopes rise steeply to the framing point which is the peak.

Page 49: Group b   site analysis

RESTROOM

Page 50: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHFour toilet cubicles

OPPORTUNITYWater source within walking distance

WEAKNESSPotential source of bad smellMinimal protection from rain

THREATNo lightsPoor maintenance

WC Dimensions: 2.5x3.4x2.5 m3

Walkway to WC width: 0.9mCorridor width: 2.3mPillar dimension: 0.3x0.3x2.5 m3

Page 51: Group b   site analysis

Toilet Watering pipe Dustbin

Ceramic bench Concrete Plant Pots Dustbin

Page 52: Group b   site analysis

SITE FURNITURE

Page 53: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHLocally sourced materialsWeather resistant

OPPORTUNITYPotential recreational area

WEAKNESSPoor location (near drain)Poor maintenanceNo shelter

THREATProne to floodingUnsafe

Page 54: Group b   site analysis

ARCH

Page 55: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHActs as marker and landmark

OPPORTUNITYGreat entry towards pavilion

WEAKNESSPermanent installation

THREATBlocks viewRedirects focal view towards arch instead of pavilion

Page 56: Group b   site analysis

WATER FEATURE

Page 57: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHDirects water flowSense of tranquility

OPPORTUNITYPart of views and vistas

WEAKNESSNo utilityRequires regular cleaning

THREATOverflow of water during rainfallUnusable space

Page 58: Group b   site analysis

GREENHOUSE

Page 59: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHWell concealedOccupies little space

OPPORTUNITYPotential botanical activity area

WEAKNESSDifficult to access

THREATHigh maintenanceGardener’s presence restricts noisy activities

Area: 18.0m x 7.5m

Page 60: Group b   site analysis

MULTI-FEEDER PILLAR

Page 61: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHRegulates electricity consumptionStable foundationOccupies little space

OPPORTUNITYLow cost of electrical cabling

WEAKNESSPermanent installation

THREATClearly visibleBlocks views and vistasPossible danger source (fire, electrical shock)

Page 62: Group b   site analysis

LIGHTING

Page 63: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHStable light sourcePrevention of accidents and increase in safety

OPPORTUNITYChange to LED for better cost savings

WEAKNESSFew in numbers (Total of 5)A single lamp post malfunction severely affects travel at night

THREATLight pollution at nightSingle point light source creates blindspots

Successive distance from each lamp post: 65m

Page 64: Group b   site analysis

SIGNAGE

Page 65: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHProvides information

OPPORTUNITYDirections to pavilion

WEAKNESSSome are placed in unexpected places

THREATPossible misinformation

Signage Dimensions Green Sign: 1100mm (W) x 1300mm (H)Fauna Sign: 1000mm (W) x 2100mm (H)Jln Taat Sign: 1300mm (W) x 1100mm(H)

Page 66: Group b   site analysis

LADANG KONSERVASIBUAH BUAHAN TBNSAMAKLUMAT/INFO

PLOT PENYELIDIKANTUMBUHAN

MAKLUMAT/ INFO

MAKLUMAT/ INFO

JALAN TAAT

Page 67: Group b   site analysis

JAMBUPsidium guajava

DURIANDurian

BUAH NAGAHylocereus Spp.

BELIMBINGCarambola

PULUSANNephelium Mutabile

Page 68: Group b   site analysis

FENCING

Page 69: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHProvides perimeter safety

OPPORTUNITYFreedom to choose any site devoid of fences

WEAKNESSInferior fencing material

THREATInadequate site and personnel safety

Page 70: Group b   site analysis

LANDSCAPE

Page 71: Group b   site analysis

DENSITY OF

TREES

Page 72: Group b   site analysis

WATER FLOW

Page 73: Group b   site analysis

PLACEMENT OF

TREES

Page 74: Group b   site analysis

ZONING OF

TREES

LAKE ZONE

TROPICAL FRUIT ZONE

CACTUS ZONE

Page 75: Group b   site analysis

LAKE ZONE

Page 76: Group b   site analysis

Height: 6-8 mDiameter: 30-45 cmTrunk : SlenderLeaves : 2-6m longLeaflets : 0.6-1m longCoconuts are subject to numerous fungal diseases, bacterial infectionsThrives on sandy, saline soils

Height: 20-25 m Diameter: 5-10 cmTrunk: Clear trunk and often buttressed at the base with many spreading branchesLeaves: 15-60 cm or longer; almost entire deeply dissected with 1-6 pairs of lobes.

COCUS NUCIFERA

BREADFRUIT

LEMON TREE

Height: 3-6 mDiameter: 15-20 cmTrunk: Slender with thorny branches that form an open crownLeaves: Green, shiny, and elliptical-acuminate.

BANANA PLANTS

Height: 5 mDiameter: 50-60 cmTrunk: Normally tall and fairly sturdyLeaves: Spirally arranged and may grow 2.7 metres long and 60 centimetres wide

Page 77: Group b   site analysis

TROPICAL FRUIT ZONE

Page 78: Group b   site analysis

Height : 10-15 mDiameter : 15- 20 cmStraight trunkRelatively horizontal upper branchesRoots : anchoring system

Height: 3-5 mDiameter: 83 cmStraight trunk and the branched relatively open Diameter: 49 cm

OIL PALM TREE

DUKU/ DOOKOO TREES DURIAN TREES

PULASAN TREES

Height : 10-15 mDiameter: 20-25cmTrunk : short, 30-40 cm thickLeaves : 17-45cm long , oblong or elliptic-lanceolate shapeOrnamental tree

DURIAN TREE

Height: 15-20mDiameter: 50 cmTrunk: Single stemmed trunkLeaves: Pinnate and reach between 3-5 m long

Page 79: Group b   site analysis

Gazebo outside site perimeter, at the uphill end of the stairsCorinthian columns, 3 benches. Gazebo dimensions: 4.5m (L) x 4.5m (W) x 3.6m (H)Bench dimensions: 2.1m (L) x 0.5m (W) x 0.5m (H)Column diameter: 200mm

Page 80: Group b   site analysis

CACTUS ZONE

Page 81: Group b   site analysis

Most Agave sp. are monocarpicSome produce sweet odours to attract insectsMay attract pests such as rabbits and rodents

AGAVE SP

AGAVE NEGLECTA

Short - stemmedTrunks : 0.3-0.4m in diameterLeaves : Ascending to descending/reflexed

( 100x15cm to 150x25cm)

ZAMIA FURFARACEAHeight : 2-5 ft / Spread : 5-8 ftLeaf blade length : 4-8 inchesLight requirement : partial shade, partial sunRoots : not a problemOutstanding ornamental featuresNon-invasive, no serious pests

OPUNTIA SP

Height : 3-20 ft / Spread : 3-15 ftGrows upright, spreadingLeaf blade length : < 2 inchesThorns presentHigh drought toleranceRoots : usually not a problemPest resistant

Page 82: Group b   site analysis

OPUNTIA STRICTA

Height : 50-100cmStems : flattened, succulent segments (10-35 cm long, 7-20cm wide, 10-20mm thick)Segments : tiny bristles (2-4cm)Leaves : tiny cylindrical / cone-shaped (4.5-6mm long)Serious problem in arid landsPrevents access, causes injury

Height : up to 6.1mSingle trunkedLeaves : bladed, 2-4.5ft in length

CACTUS ZONE

YUCCA FAXONIACEREUS PERUVIANUS

Height : up to 9m tallSculptural, columnar shapeRequires well drained soil that retains moisture

EUPHORBIA LACTEA

FURCRAEA SELLOA VAR. MARGINATA

Height : up to 3-6mStems : erect, approx. 5-8cm in diameterRibs : 3 strongly-winged, thinLeaves : tiny leaves at the tipsStipular spines : tiny but sharp, paired, 2-6mm long

Leaves : can grow up to 3ftHooked spines at the tipsPanicles : can grow up to 20ft highFaintly scented, greenish-white flowers

Page 83: Group b   site analysis

HEIGHT OF GREENERIES

Page 84: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 1-1”

SECTION 2-2”

SECTION 3-3”

SECTION 4-4”

SECTION 5-5” SECTION 7-7”

SECTION 6-6”

ROAD

ROAD

ROADROAD

Page 85: Group b   site analysis

SECTION 10-10”

SECTION 9-9”

SECTION 8-8”

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

Page 86: Group b   site analysis

HEIGHT OF GREENERIES

SECTION 14-14”

SECTION 13-13”

SECTION 12-12”

SECTION 11-11”

LEGEND

SHORTEST

SHORTER

SHORT

HIGH

HIGHER

HIGHEST

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

ROAD

Page 87: Group b   site analysis

SOIL CONDITION

SECTION 1-1”

SECTION 2-2”

SECTION 3-3”

SECTION 4-4”

SECTION 5-5” SECTION 7-7”

SECTION 6-6”

Page 88: Group b   site analysis

SOIL CONDITION

SECTION 10-10”

SECTION 9-9”

SECTION 8-8”

Page 89: Group b   site analysis

SOIL CONDITION

LEGEND

SAND

PEAT

SOIL

SURFACE SOIL

MUD

MOIST MUD

SECTION 14-14”

SECTION 13-13”

SECTION 12-12”

SECTION 11-11”

Page 90: Group b   site analysis

CLIMATIC STUDIES

Page 91: Group b   site analysis

SUN PATH

Page 92: Group b   site analysis

SUN PATH

Taman Botani Negara Shah Alam is located in Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

As Malaysia is located near the equator, it allows for the location to receive more sunshine.

Being close to the equator, the sun path or position does not shift much throughout the year.

On the average, Malaysia receives about 10 hours of sunshine per day. However, seasonal variations may influence the amount of sunshine received.

Page 93: Group b   site analysis

SUN ORIENTATION

Knowing the sun path and orientation of the site is vital to the design of the pavilion in order to control the direction and amount of sunlight entering the space.

The site receives sunlight at around 7.13 a.m. (annual average).

Page 94: Group b   site analysis

During the early months of the year, the sun rises above the equator nearer to the southern hemisphere.

Page 95: Group b   site analysis

During the mid months of the year, the sun rises above the equator nearer to the northern hemisphere.

Page 96: Group b   site analysis

During the mid months of the year, the sun rises above the equator nearer to the northern hemisphere.

Page 97: Group b   site analysis

TEMPERATURE

Page 98: Group b   site analysis

The chart above shows the annual average temperature recorded for Shah Alam, Selangor.

Page 99: Group b   site analysis

During the site visit, the temperature recorded was around 34°C.

The entire trail is directly exposed to sunlight as the trees are too short and sparse to provide shade.

Some areas which are sheltered from direct sunlight.

Page 100: Group b   site analysis

SHADOW CASTING

Page 101: Group b   site analysis

ShadedRelatively high tree density allowing for efficient shading from direct sunlight.

Semi-ShadedRelatively low tree density giving less shade to the highlighted areas.

ExposedFew to no trees leaving the areas extremely vulnerable to direct sunlight and heat

Page 102: Group b   site analysis

WIND

Page 103: Group b   site analysis

DIRECTION: Southwest WIND SPEED (APRIL-SEPT): 1-12 km/h

Strong wind can be felt throughout the entire trail as a result of the clear path the trail provides.

SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM

Page 104: Group b   site analysis

DIRECTION: North-East WIND SPEED (OCT-MAR): 1-12 km/h

The site is not affected by this wind as it is surrounded with trees. Hence, most of the breeze comes from the south-west direction.SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM

SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM SELANGOR, SHAH ALAM

Page 105: Group b   site analysis

RAIN

Page 106: Group b   site analysis

The chart above shows the annual average precipitation and rainfall days recorded for Shah Alam, Selangor.

Page 107: Group b   site analysis

ANALYSIS

The average annual amount of precipitation has been recorded at around 8.3 inches. The most amount of precipitation occur during the last quarter of the year, with the highest amount of precipitation, 11 inches, in both October and

November respectively. The least amount of precipitation is observed during the middle of the year, with the amount of 5 inches of precipitation in the month of June.

Throughout the year, rain or drizzle falling is expected on average of about 18 days of the month. The most days of rainfall occur during the last quarter of the year, with 25 days of rainfall in the month of November. The least days of

rainfall is recorded in the month of February, with only 14 days.

Page 108: Group b   site analysis

HUMIDITY

Page 109: Group b   site analysis

The chart above shows the average Humidity in Shah Alam in the year 2015 and 2016

Page 110: Group b   site analysis

ANALYSIS

Malaysia has high humidity.The mean monthly relative humidity falls within 70 to 90%, varying from place to place and from month to month. For any specific area, the range of the mean monthly relative humidity varies from a minimum of

3% to a maximum of about 15%.

In Shah Alam, the minimum range of mean relative humidity varies from a low 77% in February to a high of only 87% in November. It is observed that in Shah Alam, the minimum relative humidity is normally found in the months of January

and February.The maximum is however generally found in the month of November.

Page 111: Group b   site analysis

MICROCLIMATE

Page 112: Group b   site analysis

12 3

3. Lake Zone

The bodies of water cool the local atmosphere during April-Sept as the wind blows from the direction of South-West

During hot times of still air,the bodies of water add to the humidity and heat in the atmosphere

2. Tropical Fruit Zone

Area is slopedDirection of the slope faces the west -More exposure to the evening sun which is relatively cooler than the morning sun

1. Cactus Zone

The lower density of trees and grassprovide relatively less shade and moistureto the surroundings - hotter atmosphere

Zones 1 & 2

The retaining wall of zone 1, concrete stairs of zone 2, along with the brick pavement and asphalt road found in both - absorb the sun’s heat and reradiate it to the ambient air causing the zones to be relatively hotter compared to zone 3

Page 113: Group b   site analysis

STRENGTHS:

Natural lighting is abundant as the sun path does not shift position throughout the year.

Some areas are sheltered with small trees to provide shade in the heat of the weather.

Strong wind can be felt throughout the site (from South-West region) as it is naturally ventilated.

Rain showers and drizzle occurs often hence the humidity level maintains above 80%. Water vapour traps heat, the earth’s surface is cooled during evaporation.

Page 114: Group b   site analysis

WEAKNESSES:

The temperature of the site for most part of the day is high due to the low density of trees

The site experiences high humidity as it is located near water bound and near the equator, therefore the site is warm throughout the day.

Home to countless insects (namely mosquitoes) which causes discomfort.

Page 115: Group b   site analysis

OPPORTUNITIES:Opportunity-Strengths (OS)

1. Some areas within site boundary are sheltered from the sun by smaller trees - natural shelter as an advantage - allow for nature-integrated pavilion design 2. Area within site boundary receives great amount of wind flow

- gives an opportunity for well ventilated design

Opportunity-Weaknesses (OW) 1. Most area within site boundary are exposed to direct sunlight, thus making the site receive maximum amount of sun

- creates opportunity to provide much needed shelter for users/visitors allow for interesting pavilion design that plays with natural lighting

Page 116: Group b   site analysis

THREATS:

1. Most of the area receives natural and direct sunlight during the daywithout a great amount of shade provided by the surrounding trees:

- May cause discomfort to the eyes and skin- Pavilion would require appropriate roofing (options in design become more restricted)

2. Mosquitoes are not uncommon in the area:

- Pavilion would require to be sealed off with walls/doors- Pavilion cannot be stayed in for too long if pavilion is open-aired (options in design become more restricted)

Page 117: Group b   site analysis

VIEWS AND VISTAS

Page 118: Group b   site analysis
Page 119: Group b   site analysis

SITE NO. 1

LAKE 3

1

Page 120: Group b   site analysis

ON YOUR LEFT

FROM THE JUNCTION(ON YOUR RIGHT)

Page 121: Group b   site analysis

SStrengths

● Great view towards lake● Shady from the sun because of big

trees OOpportunities

● Suitable place for leisure time● High ground thus give a sense of

privacy.

WWeaknesses

TThreats

● Danger because of durian tree● Sloopy area● Lack of physical access to the

slope

● High risk of tree falling● Less activities can be carry out

LAKE 3

Page 122: Group b   site analysis

VIEW INWARDS

Page 123: Group b   site analysis

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

VIEW FROM SITE

Page 124: Group b   site analysis

SITE NO. 2

LAKE 2AND HILL

2

Page 125: Group b   site analysis

ON YOUR RIGHT

ON YOUR LEFT

Page 126: Group b   site analysis

SStrength

● Scenic views of lake● Symmetrical trees● Near to the main road O

Opportunities

● Having trees provide natural shades (during afternoon)

WWeakness

TThreats

● Uneven land● No view for sunset

● Circuit box may cause accident

HILL

Page 127: Group b   site analysis

VIEW INWARDS

Page 128: Group b   site analysis

VIEW FROM SITE

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

Page 129: Group b   site analysis

LAKE 3

SStrength

● Calming● Fishing access● Wetland O

Opportunities

● Trees as natural shading (during morning)

WWeakness

TThreats

● Lack of physical access to water

● Uneven land

● Heat radiated from the lake (afternoon onwards)

● Need to choose the materials for structure wisely

LAKE 2

Page 130: Group b   site analysis

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

VIEW INWARD

VIEW FROM SITE

Page 131: Group b   site analysis

ON YOUR RIGHT

ON YOUR LEFT

Page 132: Group b   site analysis

SITE NO.3

3

Page 133: Group b   site analysis

SStrengths

● View towards orchard ● Fruit trees neatly arranged● Easy to access ● Shady from the sunrise sun O

Opportunities

● Eye catching because of the unique arrangement of tree.

● Suitable for structure which requires a nature pathway.

WWeakness

TThreat

● Number of fruit trees ● Sweet scent of fruit will attract animals and insects.

LAKE 3SITE NO.3

Page 134: Group b   site analysis

VIEW INWARD

Page 135: Group b   site analysis

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

Page 136: Group b   site analysis

VIEW FROM SITE

Page 137: Group b   site analysis

SITE NO.4

4

Page 138: Group b   site analysis

ON YOUR RIGHT

ON YOUR LEFT

Page 139: Group b   site analysis

VIEW INWARDS

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

Page 140: Group b   site analysis

VIEW FROM SITE

Page 141: Group b   site analysis

SStrength

● Large space between trees.● Less steep ground.● Visual connection toward North-

East which is a good view. OOpportunities

● Open area so allow sunlight penetration especially

● Suitable for exercises and activities.

WWeakness

TThreats

● Trees blocked vision from main road.

● Visitors might not be able to notice any structures on the slope.

HILL BESIDE CACTUS GARDEN

Page 142: Group b   site analysis

SITE NO.5

CACTUS GARDEN

5

Page 143: Group b   site analysis

ON YOUR LEFT ON YOUR LEFT

VIEW FROM TOP

Page 144: Group b   site analysis

SSTRENGTHS

● Great panoramic view (from top)● Good light penetration● Windy at the top of the garden

WWEAKNESSES

● Narrow and rocky area● Step will be slippery after rain● Long distance from the main road to

the top

OOPPORTUNITIES

● Observation purpose● Tourists attraction

TTHREATS

● Less activities could be done● Lack of adequate access to water

CACTUS GARDEN

Page 145: Group b   site analysis

VIEW INWARDS

Page 146: Group b   site analysis

View Approaching

VIEW APPROACHING SITE

Page 147: Group b   site analysis

VIEW FROM SITE

Page 148: Group b   site analysis

ACTIVITIES

Page 149: Group b   site analysis

ZONING

QUIET NOISY

QUIET INTERMEDIATE

QUIET

NOISY

NOISY

Boundary

Road/ Trails

Page 150: Group b   site analysis

Boundary

Road/ Trails

CACTUS

DURIAN

COCONUT TREE

DRAGON FRUIT

STAR FRUIT

Page 151: Group b   site analysis

Boundary

Road/ Trails

SIGHTSEEING & STAR GAZING

CAMPING

HIKING

PICNIC

FRUIT PLUCKING

FISHING

Page 152: Group b   site analysis

WHAT’S THERE TO DO?WALKING,CYCLING,NORMAL TRANSPORT (LORRY/CAR)

QUIET ZONE - CONTEMPLATING/REST AREA

- PICNIC/ FISHING (BY THE LAKE)

- CAMPING/STARGAZING/SIGHTSEEING

Page 153: Group b   site analysis

● INTERMEDIATE - FRUIT PLUCKING

(by workers during evening)

● NOISY - HIKING

Page 154: Group b   site analysis

S - provide functions to the pavilions accordingly 0 - more interesting activites for attraction

STRENGTH - plantation (isolated areas) OPPORTUNITIES - provide good areas for pavilion/retreat

W - isolated,restricted activities T -animal threats

WEAKNESSES - pollution THREATS

Page 155: Group b   site analysis

CASE STUDY

Page 156: Group b   site analysis

SERPENTINE GALLERY

KENSINGTON GARDENS, LONDON, UK

SUMMER, WARM AND HUMID

3m/s FROM ALL DIRECTION

RELAXATION, GATHERING, CYCLING, PICNIC, MEDITATION, SKETCHING, PLAYING ETC

12.3°C - 18.6°C

Page 157: Group b   site analysis

CHARACTERISTICSTEMPORARY PAVILIONNO DOORS AND NO WINDOWSUNUSUAL FORMS“KEYLESS” STRUCTUREEXPERIMENT WITH SPACEINTERWEAVED WORKS OF ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS

Page 158: Group b   site analysis

SITE CIRCULATION

BICYCLE CIRCULATION

SITEHUMAN CIRCULATION

Page 159: Group b   site analysis

2001DANIEL LIBESKIND WIT ARUPDANIEL LIBESKIND WITH ARUP

Page 160: Group b   site analysis

2001DANIEL LIBESKIND WITH ARUP

ORIGAMI FIGURE

FLEXIBLE AND DYNAMIC FORM

ANGULAR PANEL STRUCTURE (FOLDING EFFECT)

REFLECTIVE STRUCTURE REVEALED A NEW PERSPECTIVE OF THE GREENERY OF PARK

Page 161: Group b   site analysis

APPROXIMATELY340M²

PLAN

ELEVATIONS & SECTION

Page 162: Group b   site analysis

M A T E R I A L S

SHEER METALLIC PLANES

1MM CLAD IN REFLECTIVE ALUMINIUM PANELS

TIMBER FLOORING

Page 163: Group b   site analysis

EVENING - POETRY READING, DEBATES, BBC PROMS

MORNING

MORNING - CAFE, LECTURE THEATRE

SUN PATH

Page 164: Group b   site analysis

2005DANIEL LIBESKIND WIT ARUPALVARO SIZA & EDUARDO SOUTO DE MOURA WITH CECIL BALMOND - ARUP

Page 165: Group b   site analysis

2005ALVARO SIZA AND EDUARDO SOUTO DE MOURA

WITH CECIL BALMOND - ARUP

ANIMAL SKELETON IN WOOD

CONTEMPORARY DESIGN WITH TRADITIONAL STRUCTURE

“DIALOGUE” WITH THE SERPENTINE GALLERY AND THE SURROUNDING

DISTORTED RECTANGULAR FORM

Page 166: Group b   site analysis

APPROXIMATELY374M²

PLANS ELEVATIONS

Page 167: Group b   site analysis

EVENING - PARK NIGHTS (PERFORMANCES, TALKS AND EVENTS)

MORNING - CAFE, PLACE TO RELAX

SUN PATH

Page 168: Group b   site analysis

STEEL LINTELS

TIMBER BEAM (ORGANIC)

TRANSPARENT POLYCARBONATE PANEL WITH AUTONOMOUS SOLAR-POWERED

LIGHT

MATERIALS

CONSTRUCTION METHOD

MORTISE AND TENON JOINTS“LAMELLA” SYSTEM

Page 169: Group b   site analysis

2007DANIEL LIBESKIND WIT ARUPOLAFUR ELIASSON

AND KJETIL THORSON

Page 170: Group b   site analysis

2007OLAFUR ELIASSON AND KJETIL THORSEN

THREE STOREYS-HIGH ILLUSION THROUGH SPIRALING MOVEMENT

STEEL STRUCTURE, FILL WITH PLYWOOD PANELS

INTERIOR WITH GEOMETRIC PATTERNS

EXPERIMENT AMPHITHEATRE

Page 171: Group b   site analysis

PLAN ELEVATIONS

APPROXIMATELY450M²

Page 172: Group b   site analysis

MATERIALS

WELDED STEEL STRUCTURE WITH CONCRETE + BOLT

PRECISELY-CUT DARK-STAINED GEOMETRIC PLYWOOD PANELS

TIMBER (INTERIOR)

PERMANENCE +TEMPORALITY

AXONOMETRIC

Page 173: Group b   site analysis

MORNING - AMPHITHEATRE, PLACE TO RELAX

EVENING - SERPENTINE GALLERY EXPERIMENT MARATHON (IN EVERY FRIDAY)

SUN PATH