Grand Rounds
description
Transcript of Grand Rounds
Grand Rounds
Carotid Body Tumours
Intro
Tumours
Derived from neural crest cells
Called nonchromaffin paragangliomas
Slow growing tumours
Historical Background
Swiss anatomist Von Haller in 1743
Alfred Kohn coined term paraganglion
Renamed vascular glomus in early 20th century
1941, Guild described “glomic tissue”
Glenner and Grimley distingushed adrenal and extra-adrenal paraganglionma
CURRENTLY, PARAGANGLIOMA BASED ON ANATOMICAL LOCATION IS PROPER TERMINOLOGY (e.g. carotid paraganglioma, jugulotympanic paraganglioma)
Site
90% pheochromocytoma10% extra-adrenal– 85% abdomen– 12% thorax– 3% head and neck
Carotid body most common– Jugulotympanic– Vagal– Other
Shamblin Classification
Shamblin 1971
Type I– Localized easily resected
Type II– Adherent partially
surrounding vessels
Type III– Completely encased
carotids
70% are type II or III
Imaging
MRI / MRA / AngioVascular insight
Occult tumors-0.8 cm
T1, T1 post gad, T2, axial FLAIR, FSE T2
Skull base to thoracic inlet
All well
Patient goes home
Is it cancer ?
Local recurrence
Metastases seen to lungs, lymph nodes, and bones
Malignant nature cannot be predicted by microscopic characteristics, such as nuclear atypia and mitotic rate.
Determined by the presence of local invasion or distant metastasis,
Mets can be late
Zellballen
We don’t know
How quickly will it grow ?
No solid data
Reality is imaging will tell us
Imaging ?
CT
MRI
MRI angiogram
Angiography
U/S
Functional scans
Paragangliomas have somatostatin receptors
Stage disease
Guide therapy
Monitor response
May provide long term palliation
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:358-62.
Bomanji JB et al. Middlesex
MIBI – I (123 / 131)MIBI similar to NA…..taken into chromaffrin cells….into
storage granulesBut PGL are non chromaffrin ?
They also express somatostatin receptorsThis can be confirmed histologically
Pentetreotide / octreotide – 111 and subsequent labeling with Y 90
How did I get it ?
GeneticsBad luckBad luckBad luck Vs
Hypoxia (10 times higher in high altitude African countries)
Sporadic vs Hereditary
Should we screen patients with sporadic head and neck paragangliomas for hereditary syndromes ?
M.D. Anderson
Jimenez C et al. 2006
The Journal Of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism Vol 91; (8) 2851 - 2858
7 genes known to cause hereditary paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas
NF I VHL
RET MEN II
SDHD SDHC
SDHB
Specific to head and neck paragangliomas – PGL genes
Germline mutations in SDHB, SDHC and SDHD cause hereditary paragangliomas
SDHD (PGL 1) - Chromosome 11q23
SDHB (PGL 4) - Chromosome 1p36
SDHC (PGL 3) - Chromosome 1q21 (single German family ?? )
PGL (PGL 2) locus mapped to 11q13 in an extended Dutch family
These encode 3 subunits of MC II
Succinate dehydrogenase
Some families have hereditary paragangliomas
Mitochondrion
Plasma membrane
Mitochondria complex dysfunction
Mimics chronic hypoxia at a microscopic level
Functional hyperplasia
?? Loss of oncosuppression
What does the carotid body do ?
What will happen when its gone ?
Unilateral – nothing
Bilateral – Something ?
Anecdotal reports
Timmers HJ
Rare but known to occur in neck after RT for NPC
Dutch womanBilateral carotid body tumour (at same time)Immediate onset of hypertension
Reported in Ned Tijdschr 2001
Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly decreased
3 had orthostatic hypotension
When valsalva done vagal tone was down
Normocapnic ventilatory response to hypoxia was absent in all
Conclusion
In bilateral tumour resection we should tell patients about the risks of labile blood pressure
Timmers
Do I need pre operative embolisation ?
Transfemoral under angiographic control
Embolisation
Complications are rare.
Cerebrovascular accident due to rupture of an atheroma with the catheter. The rate is approximately 1 % in most centres.
Prior to using platinum coils for embolisation, polyvinyl alcohol particles were used and this was associated with stroke due to reflux into the internal carotid system during introduction and removal of the catheter.
Facial pain, trisimus and tonsillar ulceration have all been reported.
Type 1 – NO
Types 2 and 3 - Yes
Bakoyiannis KC et al. Int Angiol. 2006 Mar; 25 (1) :40 - 5
AthensPre operative embolisation not necessary10 year retrospective study11 patients 12 tumoursNone embolisedPerioperative mortality zero. Out of 9 grade III tumour, 1 had ICA injured
and vein grafted per op
Radiotherapy
Valdagni et al. Am J Clin Oncol.1990 Feb; 13 (1) :45-8
(Italy)Questioned this theory
13 Carotid body tumours had Rt (mean 52 Gy)
10 - only
3 - In addition
Local control (Subjective and objective ) in all
3/13 complete response
7/13 Some response
3/13 No change
Mayer et al Strahlenther Onkol 2000 Aug; 176 (8): 356 -60
Good as post op in malignant cases – postpone spreading
Eradicating existing nodal diseaseProlong local control
Vascular surgery and complications ?
Smith JJ / Netterville JL et alAnn Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul; 20
(4) : 435 - 9
Retrospective analysis 1990 – 2005Compared all CBR and CBR – vasc.71 tumours 16 needed vasc. Recon. (23 %)Type I – usually CBRType II / III where vasc. Recon neededCranial nerve damage was higher in recon.(x 2)
Thank you