Glycerine loading of liquid-storage-tank photoelastic models

2
Glycerine Loading of Liquid-storage-tank Photoelastic models Technical note describes the planning of a tank-model experiment and the stress-freezing procedure adopted for a model loaded by glycerine by Robert Mark ABSTRACT---The advantages of small-scale photoelastic- model analysis of welded-steel pressure vessels are well known. The object of a current investigation is to show that similar advantages accrue in the analysis of com- plex reinforced-concrete liquid-storage tanks. This technical note describes the planning of a tank-model experiment and the stress-freezing procedure adopted for a modeI loaded by glycerine. Introduction Concrete structural design is usually based on force distributions which are predicted by linear elastic analysis of assumed homogeneous (and monolithic) mathematicalmodels. The use of small-scale physi- cal models formed of plastic to obtain these distribu- tions was established by Beggs 1 and others almost a half century ago. In stress-frozen thin plate and shell models, force distributions may be readily de- termined from photoelastic observations of sur- face stresses. Robert Mark is Research Engineer and Lecturer, Department of Civil and Geological Engineering, Princetgn Univers:ty, Princeton, N. J. Fig. 1--Tank model with Teflon cover Experimental Design The loading to be applied to a photoelastic model can be estimated by considering the maximum fiber strains that will be present in both prototype and model. For a well proportioned concrete structure, this strain will be about 500 #in./in., while the maximum strain in a stress-frozen epoxy model is of the order of 10 ~ #in./in. The relationship between prototype and model loading densities for tank systems having complete similitude* is derived from dimensional analysis: (1) ~p (Ee), \X,,,/ where o = density of fluid loading E = Young's modulus 9 = strain ), = characteristic length and the subscripts m andp refer to model and proto- type. For the one forty-eighth scale model illustrated in Fig. 1, with Em = 3500 psi, and with E~ = 3.5 (10) 6 psi, eq (1) indicates a fluid-density ratio of p,,~/ pp ' ~ 1.0. Glycerine having a specific gravity of 1.26, has become ubiquitous in our laboratory. U.S.P. grade glycerine (stored at room temperature in closed containers) is inert with respect to epoxy dur- ing the stress-freezing cycle. As its density is only about 1 percent greater than epoxy's, glycerine flo- tation is frequently employed for the elimination of body-force effects onflexible epoxy model components and assemblies. 2 It is also used in combination with water and gelatin in varying proportions to form an extremely sensitive model material for the analysis of body-force stress distribution. 3 The application of glycerine as a loading fluid for tank * The effect of any differences in Poisson's ratio is not cortsidered. Experimental iV[echanics I 47

Transcript of Glycerine loading of liquid-storage-tank photoelastic models

Page 1: Glycerine loading of liquid-storage-tank photoelastic models

Glycerine Loading of Liquid-storage-tank Photoelastic models

Technical note describes the planning of a tank-model experiment and the stress-freezing procedure adopted for a model loaded by glycerine

by Robert Mark

ABSTRACT---The advantages of small-scale photoelastic- model analysis of welded-steel pressure vessels are well known. The object of a current investigation is to show tha t similar advantages accrue in the analysis of com- plex reinforced-concrete liquid-storage tanks. This technical note describes the planning of a tank-model experiment and the stress-freezing procedure adopted for a modeI loaded by glycerine.

Introduction C o n c r e t e s t r u c t u r a l des ign is u s u a l l y b a s e d on force d i s t r i b u t i o n s wh ich a re p r e d i c t e d b y l inea r e l a s t i c ana lys i s of a s s u m e d h o m o g e n e o u s (and m o n o l i t h i c ) m a t h e m a t i c a l m o d e l s . T h e use of smal l - sca le p h y s i - ca l mode l s f o r m e d of p l a s t i c to o b t a i n t hese d i s t r i b u - t i ons was e s t a b l i s h e d b y Beggs 1 a n d o t h e r s a l m o s t a h a l f c e n t u r y ago. I n s t r ess - f rozen t h i n p l a t e a n d shel l models , force d i s t r i b u t i o n s m a y be r e a d i l y de- t e r m i n e d f rom p h o t o e l a s t i c o b s e r v a t i o n s o f sur- face s t resses .

Robert Mark is Research Engineer and Lecturer, Department of Civil and Geological Engineering, Princetgn Univers:ty, Princeton, N . J .

Fig. 1--Tank model with Teflon cover

Experimental Design T h e l o a d i n g to be a p p l i e d to a p h o t o e l a s t i c m o d e l

c a n be e s t i m a t e d b y cons ide r ing t h e m a x i m u m f iber s t r a i n s t h a t wil l be p r e s e n t in b o t h p r o t o t y p e a n d mode l . F o r a wel l p r o p o r t i o n e d conc re t e s t r u c t u r e , t h i s s t r a i n will be a b o u t 500 # in . / i n . , whi le t h e m a x i m u m s t r a i n in a s t r e s s - f rozen e p o x y m o d e l is of t h e o r d e r o f 10 ~ # i n . / i n . T h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n p r o t o t y p e a n d m o d e l l o a d i n g dens i t i e s for t a n k s y s t e m s h a v i n g c o m p l e t e s i m i l i t u d e * is d e r i v e d f rom d i m e n s i o n a l ana lys i s :

(1) ~p (Ee ) , \X,,,/

where

o = d e n s i t y o f f lu id l o a d i n g

E = Y o u n g ' s m o d u l u s

�9 = s t r a i n

), = c h a r a c t e r i s t i c l e n g t h

a n d t h e s u b s c r i p t s m a n d p refer to m o d e l a n d p r o t o - t y p e .

F o r t he one f o r t y - e i g h t h scale m o d e l i l l u s t r a t e d in F ig . 1, w i t h Em = 3500 psi , a n d w i t h E~ = 3.5 (10) 6 psi , eq (1) i n d i c a t e s a f l u i d - d e n s i t y r a t i o o f p,,~/ pp ' ~ 1.0.

G l y c e r i n e h a v i n g a specif ic g r a v i t y of 1.26, h a s b e c o m e u b i q u i t o u s in our l a b o r a t o r y . U . S . P . g rade g lyce r ine ( s to red a t r o o m t e m p e r a t u r e in c losed con t a ine r s ) is i n e r t w i t h r e s p e c t to e p o x y dur - ing t h e s t r e s s - f r eez ing cycle. A s i t s d e n s i t y is o n l y a b o u t 1 p e r c e n t g rea t e r t h a n e p o x y ' s , g lyce r ine flo- t a t i o n is f r e q u e n t l y e m p l o y e d for t h e e l i m i n a t i o n o f body - fo r ce effects onf lex ib le e p o x y m o d e l c o m p o n e n t s a n d assembl ies . 2 I t is also u sed in c o m b i n a t i o n w i t h w a t e r a n d ge l a t i n in v a r y i n g p r o p o r t i o n s to fo rm a n e x t r e m e l y sens i t i ve m o d e l m a t e r i a l for t h e a n a l y s i s o f b o d y - f o r c e s t r ess d i s t r i b u t i o n . 3 T h e a p p l i c a t i o n of g lyce r ine as a l o a d i n g f luid for t a n k

* The effect of any differences in Poisson's ratio is not cortsidered.

Experimental iV[echanics I 47

Page 2: Glycerine loading of liquid-storage-tank photoelastic models

Fig, 2--Model moment along vertical sec- tion at midspan

hi (3

O~ -r I-- Z 0 )-- 0

0 3 0 J

l BASE

5.0 TEST LIQUID - - 4 . 8 2

LEVEL

/ /

/

-o.50 -o.3o -o.lo o o.lo MOMENT (IN-LBS)

~ \ THEORETICAL LIQUID LEVEL

4.0-

I ~ ~PREDICTED 3.0 . l I i ~ (PINNED ~ OBSERvEDBASE}

2.0 ~ PREDICTED

I (FIXED BASE

I 0.30

testing, therefore, seemed most appropriate. An open-top square- tank model was selected for

the first experiment. Model dimensions: 91/2 in. on a side • 5-in. high (internal measurements) • 0.250-in.-thick walls, were scaled from a prototype design based on a publication of the Port land Cement Association. 4 A base having 0.65-in. thickness was chosen to act as a fixed boundary. The model was fabricated from machine-finished Photolastic PL-4 cast plates joined by Photolastic PC-1C cement. The stress-fringe constant for the model material was found from diametral loading of a disk to be 2.19 lb/fringe-in. (normal stress).

Model Testing The model was supported on a flat, rigid alum-

inum plate in the stress-freezing oven. /,~ was filled to within 0.1 in. from the upper edge and the fluid level was carefully measured. A 1/32-in.-thick Tef- lon plate covered the tank during the test to reduce fluid loss.

To eliminate any problems arising from the rela- t ively large thermal inertia of the model and the glycerine, the rather fast rise time of the s tandard stress-freezing cycle (room temperature to 290 ~ F in 3/4 hr) was abandoned. A revised cycle called for a 4-hr rise t ime followed by a 2-hr "soak" at 290 ~ F, and cooling at 5 ~ F /hr .

The fluid level was measured following stress freezing and a loss of 0.05 in. noted. Plate de- formations were measured and a number of slices were taken from the model to indicate the force distributions throughout the tank. A typical slice is the vertical section showing integer order fringes in Fig. 2. Bending moments corresponding to portions of the slice indicating linear stress distribu- tions have been plotted according to

h 2

M = (~v - ~t) 12 (2)

where

M = bending momen t /un i t width

~0 and ~t = stresses on the outer and inner sur- faces of the slice (determined from light- and dark-field fringe photo- graphs)

h = plate thickness

Moment at the lower boundary has been extrap- olated as shown.

Predicted moment values for fixed- and pinned- base tanks as given in Ref. 4 are also plotted on Fig. 2. Considering the differences between the mathe- matical and the physical models (i.e., fluid level not exactly equal to wall height and different Poisson's ratios) the test results are reasonable and sub- stantiate the approach for application to complex tank configurations.

Acknowledgments

The reported work is supported by a grant from the Reinforced Concrete Research Council. The author wishes to express appreciation to the Coun- cil, and to A. Lazaro, graduate student in the De- par tment of Civil and Geological Engineering, and L. Barth, model maker, School of Architecture, for their valuable assistance.

References 1. Beggs, G., "Design of a Multiple-arch System," Trans. A S C E

88, 1208-1230 (1925). 2. Mark, R. , "Eliminating the Body-force Effect in Stress-frozen

Models," EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 5, 7, 239--240 (1965). 3. Richards, R. , and Mark, R. , "Gelatin Models for Photoelastic

Analysis of Gravity Structures," Proc. 2nd. S E S A Int. Cong. on Exp. Mech., 112-122 (1966).

4. "'Rectangular Concrete Tanks," Portland Cement Assoc. Info. Bull. S T 63 (1951).

48 I January 1968