Global Energy Perspectives180.235.241.158/news/events/pdf/Nakicenovic_ALPS_2012.pdf · WBGU...
Transcript of Global Energy Perspectives180.235.241.158/news/events/pdf/Nakicenovic_ALPS_2012.pdf · WBGU...
Nebojša Nakićenović International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis xx
Technische Universität Wien xx
ALPS International Symposium on:
"Addressing Climate Change Harmonized with Sustainable Development"
RITE, Tokyo, Japan – 7 February, 2012
Global Energy Perspectives Efficiency and Decarbonization Revolution
Nebojša Nakićenović International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis xx
Technische Universität Wien xx
ALPS International Symposium on:
"Addressing Climate Change Harmonized with Sustainable Development"
RITE, Tokyo, Japan – 7 February, 2012
Global Energy Transformation Efficiency and Decarbonization Revolution
#3
Energy Transformation
● The world is still on a carbon-intensive growth path with ever increasing GHG emissions
● 2°C stabilization requires a trend reversal of global emissions before 2020
● Global energy is based predominantly on fossil sources (more than 80%)
● 3 billion people lack access to modern forms of energy
#4
Decarbonization Pathways Framework conditions
Challenges:
● Achieving universal energy access in the world
● Decarbonization of energy systems until 2050
Preconditions:
● The global primary energy demand should not increase significantly beyond the current levels
● Drastic improvements in energy efficiency (halving the global of CO2 intensity of energy)
● Behavioral and lifestyles changes necessary
#5
Mapping Energy Access Final energy access (non-commercial share) in relation to population density
Source: Pachauri et al, 2011
#7
Global Carbon Pools
14
Gas Hydrates
~6,600 – 57,000
GtCO2
Gas Hydrates
~100,000
GtCO2
Coal
~ 29,000 – 43,000 GtCO2
Unconv. Oil
~1,100–1,500
GtCO2
N. Gas
~340–500
GtCO2
Oil
~660–1,000
GtCO2
Soils
~10,000 GtCO2
Atmosphere
~3100
GtCO2
Unconventional
Natural Gas
~2,450 – 4,550
GtCO2
Biomass ~1,600–
1,650
GtCO2
#9
Europe Population vs. Energy Demand Density
9
WEU: 21% of demand below
renewable density threshold
EEU: 34% of demand below
renewable density threshold
Potential Synergies between New Energy and
Transport Infrastructures: Asian “Supergrid”
Super Cables Super Cables
Power linesPower lines
Electric Power Research institute ©
Source:
Y. Yamagata, NIES. 2010
MAGLEV
#17 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Other renewables
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass Microchip
Commercial
aviation
Television
Vacuum
tube Gasoline
engine Electric
motor Steam
engine
Nuclear
energy
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary Energy
#18 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Other renewables
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass Microchip
Commercial
aviation
Television
Vacuum
tube Gasoline
engine Electric
motor Steam
engine
Nuclear
energy
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary Energy Efficiency – Counterfactual
#19 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Savings
Other renewables
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass Microchip
Commercial
aviation
Television
Vacuum
tube Gasoline
engine Electric
motor Steam
engine
Nuclear
energy
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary Energy no CCS, no Nuclear
Source: Riahi et al, 2011
#20 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Savings
Other renewables
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary Energy no CCS, no Nuclear
Energy savings (efficiency, conservation,
and behavior)
~40% improvement by 2030
~30% renewables by 2030
Oil phase-out (necessary)
Nuclear phase-out (choice)
Source: Riahi et al, 2011
#21 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Savings
Other renewables
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary Energy lim. Bioenergy, lim. Intermittent REN
Energy savings (efficiency, conservation,
and behavior)
~40% improvement by 2030
~30% renewables by 2030
Oil phase-out (necessary)
Limited Intermittent REN
Limited Bioenergy
Bio-CCS – “negative CO2”
Nat-gas-CCS
Coal-CCS
Source: Riahi et al, 2011
#22
1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Savings
Geothermal
Solar
Wind
Hydro
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Biomass
Biomass
Coal
Renewables
Nuclear
Oil
Global Primary Energy WBGU Exemplary Pathway
Gas
#23
GEA-Efficiency
Industry:
1. Retrofit of existing plants
2. Best available technology for
new investments
3. Optimization of energy &
material flows
4. Lifecycle product design &
enhanced recycling
5. Electrification incl. switch to
renewable energy
Global Final Energy Demand
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
EJ
/ y
r
Residential:
1. Rapid introduction of
strict building codes
2. Accelerate retrofit rate
to 3% of stock per
year (x 4 improvement
by 2050)
3. Improved electrical
appliances
Transport:
1. Technology
efficiency (50%)
2. Reduced private
mobility (eg urban
planning)
3. Infrastructure for
public transport +
railway freight
Source: Riahi et al, 2011
#24
Global Energy Investments
Annual Energy
Investments
Innovation
RD&D [billion US$2005]
Markets Formation
[billion US$2005]
Present Investments [billion US$2005]
Future Investments [billion US$2005]
2010 2010 2010 2010 - 2030
Efficiency >> 8 ~ 5 300 ~400
Renewables > 12 ~ 20 200 ~400
Access < 1 < 1 ~ 9 ~40
Total > 50 < 150 1250 ~1750
Source: Grubler et al, & Riahi et al, 2011
UN General Assembly resolution 65/151
2030 Energy Goals
● Universal Access to Modern Energy
● Double Energy Efficiency Improvement
● Double Renewable Share in Final Energy
Aspirational & Ambitious but Achievable
#27
Drivers of Transformations
learning from the past
Vision – better future, normative perspectives
Abolition of slavery, Democracy, European Union
Crisis – “Gales of Creative Destruction”
The Great Depression, Structural adjustment programmers,
financial market reforms after 2008
Technology – Rapid innovation diffusion
Substitution of carriages by cars, IT-revolution
Knowledge – research-driven, precautionary
principle
Protection of the ozone layers, climate change mitigation
#28
I. Legitimacy
of BAU
eroding
II. Vision:
low carbon
narrative → Growing number of
actors of change: • green businesses
• cities
• civil society
• science
• IGOs (UNIDO etc.)
Drivers of Transformations
”Decarbonization Revolution”
#29
I. Legitimacy
of BAU
eroding
II. Vision:
low carbon
narrative
Growing number
of actors of change
Green
innovation
Policy regime
Problem perception
increasing in many sectors
Shifting norms
values / heuristics
legitimacy
concepts
power
“it can be“
(finance,
technologies)
International
context
Drivers of Transformations
Multiple Drivers of Change
#30 0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
Only Energy Security Only Air Pollution and Health Only Climate Change All Three Objectives
Tota
l Glo
bal
Po
licy
Co
sts
(20
10
-20
30)
CC PH
ES
CC PH
ES
CC PH
ES
CC PH
ES
All objectives
fulfilled at
Stringent level
At least one
objective
fulfilled at
Intermediate
level
At least one
objective
fulfilled at
Weak level
Added costs of ES and
PH are comparatively
low when CC is taken as
an entry point
Policy Prioritization Framework
Energy Policy Costs (% GDP) CC – Climate Change
PH – Pollution & Health
ES – Energy Security
McC
ollu
m e
t al