General Demo
Transcript of General Demo
Harnessing the Power of Feedback
Mike Phillips, AIAPresident(919) [email protected]
Collecting Feedback Creates Improvement
BEFORE
Initial Survey Results Subsequent Results
AFTER
24% below “Met Expectations”
3% below “Met Expectations”
83% of initial responsesbelow “Met Expectations” . . . improved on subsequent surveys.
Why Track Client Feedback?
ProfitabilityStaff
Retention
Staff Performance Liability
MarketingLeadership
Improve Awareness of Value to Clients
Improve Awareness and Response to Client Problems
Confirmation of Value to Clients
Improve Staff Assignments & Training
Improve Accountability & Reduction of Wasted Efforts
Improve Recognition of Staff Contributions
The Design Industry’s Only Customized Client Feedback Tool
Collect Feedback to:
• Measure firm’s value from
Client’s perspective
• ID issues to improve value
• Set fees more by valueScore Range: 1 – Unacceptable, 4 – Met Expectations, 7 - Exceptional
Client Name Avg. Score Ranking
Gene Laughlin 6.1 Excellent
EnergyFarms 5.8 Exceeded Expectations
Cinematica 5.4 Exceeded Expectations
Tri-City Jewelers 4.5 Met Expectations
Issue Avg. Score % Below Acceptable
Accuracy 3.2 21%
Budget 5.4 2%
Helpfulness 5.8 0%
Design Firm Challenges
Profitability
Identify Pattern of Problems:Improves firm’s
immediate and long-term response
Design Firm Challenges
Liability
Confirm Value to New Clients:
Independent confirmation of your firm’s value
to prospective Clients
Become Existing Clients’ Expert:
Promotes ‘expert’ statuswith your firm’s existing Clients
Project Name Avg. Score Top Category
ANC Institute 6.2 Budget
Wilson Building 6.0 Helpfulness
1110 Benson Dr. 5.1 Quality
Fitness Center 4.9 Responsiveness
Score Range: 1 – Unacceptable, 4 – Met Expectations, 7 - Exceptional
Category Avg. Score % Above Excellent
Budget 6.2 30%
Helpfulness 5.4 23%
Quality 5.2 17%
Responsiveness 5.1 6%
Design Firm Challenges
Marketing
Track Your Team’s Results:
Identify best assignmentsfor each team member
Improve Your Team’s Results:
Identify best trainingfor each team member
Client Name Designer Name Score
Gene Laughlin Michael Walker 6.0
EnergyFarms Amy Pace 5.6
Cinematica Joan Franklin 4.7
Tri-City Jewelers Michael Walker 4.2
Designer Avg. Score Category
Pam Day 2.4 Budget
Michael Walker 3.0 Budget
Joan Franklin 3.8 Quality
Pam Day 4.3 Responsiveness
Design Firm Challenges
Leadership
Use Feedback Data to:
Improve performanceand encourage growth
Use Feedback Process to:
Enhance accountability andimprove focus on clients
Designer 12 Month Average Score
CurrentAverage Score
Pam Day 3.4 4.8
Michael Walker 3.7 4.2
Joan Franklin 3.9 4.0
Otis Day 4.3 4.9
Designer Average Score Client
Nikki Young 5.8 AT&T
Nikki Young 5.5 Wells Fargo
Nikki Young 5.2 Silverton
Nikki Young 4.8 Spirit Group
Design Firm Challenges
Staff Performance
Profitability
Liability
MarketingLeadership
Annual Turnover:
12% of Staff
Cost of Each Departure:
>$100,000
Source: PSMJ Resources
StaffPerformance
Staff Retention
Design Firm Challenges
Staff Retention
Profitability
Liability
MarketingLeadership
Top 3 ReasonsWhy Good Staff Leave:
1. ‘Talents Not Seen’ 2. ‘Contributions Not Appreciated’
3. ‘Growth Not Supported’
Source: PSMJ Resources
Design Firm Challenges
Staff Retention
Staff Retention
StaffPerformance
Use Feedback To:
• Make talents visible
• Know instantly when applause is earned
• Know specifically where
support is helpful to staff member’s growth
Designer Avg. Score Category
Joan Franklin 2.7 Schedule
Michael Walker 2.8 Helpfulness
Joan Franklin 2.9 Responsiveness
Matthew Arnold 3.1 Accuracy
Design Firm Challenges
Staff Retention
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
“Oh no. We didn’t do it right.”
“Great Job. Do it again the same way.”
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
CLIENTFEEDBACK
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
A
B
C
D
E
Clients
LEGEND
ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
A
B
C
D
E
Clients
LEGEND
ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
A
B
C
D
E
Design Team
LEGEND
ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7
A
B
C
D
E
Project Type
LEGEND
ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
Tracking Project Results
High Profit
Loss Average Profit
BreakEven
Target Profit
Unacceptable - 1
Needed Improvement - 2
Acceptable - 3
Met Expectations- 4
Exceeded Expectations - 5
Excellent - 6
Exceptional - 7ExpertPotential
Poor Fit Burn Out
GOAL
Tracking Project Results
$ $ $Project Start Project Closeout
FB FBFBFB FBFBFBFBFBFB FB
MeetingKey Deliverable
Start Finish
MeetingEnd of Phase
End of Phase
FB = Send Survey & Collect Feedback
Designer’s Increased Value
Client’s Perception of Designer’s Value
Low
Hig
h
Collecting Feedback: WHEN
Firm Leaders
Team Leaders
Team Members
Accounting
Marketing
Collecting Feedback: WHO
Has Client
Contact
Can Send Survey
Collecting Feedback: HOW
• Automatic CenteringStarts at “Met
Expectations”
• Fast & EasyIntuitive to use,2 seconds to score
• Captures Detail 60 level answer scale
Measure by Client Expectations
Reviewing Feedback: FAST & SIMPLE
1 Answer
1 Survey
Trend Line
Viewing Collected Feedback
Sender: Billy BibbitRespondent: Nurse RatchedCategory: ResponsivenessProject: Activity Center
Create AutomaticEarly Warning System
Low Score Threshold
High Score Threshold
Chosen by Each User
Detailed Reporting
Advanced Reporting Capability
Data Filters for Drill Down
Variety of Data Views
Batching & Scheduling!
Fast & Simple Implementation
Set Up Firm
Train Surveyors
ScheduleReports
SendSurveys
1 Hour 1 Hour 15 Minutes 3 Minutes
Implementation can be accomplished via live webinar or on-site facilitation.
ProfitabilityStaff
Retention
Staff Performance Liability
MarketingLeadership
Improve Your Value& Billings to Clients
Improve Awareness and Response to Client Problems
Track Client Loyalty, Improve Referrals, Resolve Issues
Improve Leaders’ Awareness, Improve Staff
Assignments & Training
ImprovedAccountability &Reduction ofWasted Efforts
Improve Your Recognition ofStaff Contributions
Mike Phillips AIA [email protected] 866-433-7322
www.designfacilitator.com
Using Client Feedback to Improve Your Firm