GCN Evaluation Guide

download GCN Evaluation Guide

of 50

Transcript of GCN Evaluation Guide

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    1/50

    Evaluating GovernmentCommunication ActivityStandards and Guidance

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    2/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    2

    Contents

    Introduction 3

    PROOF: ve guiding principles or evaluation 4

    The big IDIA: the our-stage evaluation process 5

    Stage 1: Identiy 6

    Stage 2: Develop 8

    Stage 3: Implement 17

    Stage 4: Analyse and report 23

    Conclusions 27

    Appendix: Recommended metrics 28

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    3/50

    3

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    IntroductionAs government communicators, were all aware o the need to make every piece o work

    that we produce as eective and ecient as possible. To do this, we need to understand

    whats already working well and where theres room or improvement. This in turn requires

    us to evaluate our work and apply the learning rom this evaluation to uture activity.

    Were also increasingly required to demonstrate how were applying evaluation in our

    day-to-day jobs, through the plans and reports that we submit to the Eciency and

    Reorm Group (ERG) or activities with a spend o 100,000 or more and the inormation

    that we supply to eed into the annual communication plan. The revised GovernmentCommunication Network (GCN) Core Skills or Government Communicators will set out

    clear evaluation standards that we should all ollow, based on our grade and the discipline

    that we work in.

    To help us evaluate our activity eectively, in line with expected standards, we need clarity

    on what good evaluation practice looks like. This guide sets out an approach to evaluation

    that should be ollowed as a minimum or all government communication activity,

    regardless o size, discipline or budget. This approach is pragmatic and ocuses on helping

    you to produce the best possible evaluation given the scope o your activity and the time,

    resource and budget that you have available or evaluation. By ollowing the guide, you

    can be condent that you will produce an evaluation that meets the required standards or

    your activity and or your role.

    I youre new to evaluation, use the guide to help you get started, recognising that it will

    take time to build up your approach and gather whats working. Remember, a partial

    evaluation is almost always better than no evaluation at all. I youre already evaluating

    your activity eectively, ensure that youre ollowing the standards required o you, making

    modications as necessary. Think about how you can share what youve learned with

    others to help them evaluate more eectively.

    By evaluating the activity that we carry out, we will be able to improve the eectiveness

    and eciency o our work over time in the uture. We will also be able to demonstrate the

    contribution that well-planned and executed communication activity makes to governmentoverall and hence justiy urther investment in our work.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/gcn-core-skills/https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/gcn-core-skills/
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    4/50

    4

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    P Pragmatic best availablewithin budget, not best ever

    A pre-planned, but partial, evaluation is better than no evaluation at all. Be transparent: acknowledge the gaps in your

    evaluation and the implications o these gaps. Even i you are not able to ully quantiy the eect o your communication

    activity, you will still be able to draw valuable learning rom the evidence that you have obtained.

    R Realistic prove what you can,acknowledge what you cant

    Dont worry i you can only collect a small amount o data in the short term. By establishing a robust evaluationramework that is linked to a clear set o communication objectives, you will be able to interpret and analyse whatever

    inormation you gather. Over time, you will be able to build on this knowledge, increasing the amount o data that you

    collect rom each subsequent activity.

    O

    Objective approach yourevaluation with an open mind

    Be honest and constructive about what was achieved, so that we can all learn or the uture. Learn rom your successes

    and rom things that didnt work as well as youd hoped. Use this to rene your uture strategy.

    O Open record and shareas much as possible

    Share your learning as widely as possible so that colleagues can also benet rom your experience. Work with GCN to

    develop a detailed case study.

    F Fully integrated integrate evaluationinto activity planning and delivery

    Plan ahead. Start thinking about how to evaluate your activity as soon as possible, ideally well beore it begins. This will

    help you to put the right mechanisms in place or subsequent measurement and data collection. Retrospective evaluation

    is oten less eective because the right data may not have been collected or objectives may not be measurable.

    PROOF: fve guidingprinciples or evaluation

    Whatever the size or scope o your communication activity,ollowing these guiding principles will help to ensure thatyour evaluation is as eective as possible.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    5/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    5

    You can evaluate all kinds o communication activity,including press and media management, marketing andinternal communication. Follow the our-stage process set out

    in Figure 1 below and you will carry out an eective evaluationin line with the ve guiding principles or evaluation.

    Figure 1: The our-stage evaluation process

    The big IDIA:the our-stage evaluation process

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Identiythe scope o your project

    Developyour evaluation plan

    Implement source data to measure perormance

    Analyse and reportperormance against the plan

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    6/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    6 Stage 1: Identiy

    Stage 1: Identify thescope o your project

    Checklist

    Task: to dene what you need to evaluate by asking:

    What activity am I evaluating?

    What do I already know?

    What is my evaluation expected to achieve?

    Output: summary o your proposed evaluation approach

    What activity are you evaluating?

    Begin by establishing exactly what you are going to evaluate. What activities do you need

    to include? Are these activities part o a wider communication strategy?

    Identiy the time period over which you will evaluate the activity. For a one-o piece

    o activity with clear start and end dates, this is generally straightorward. For ongoing

    activity, you need to identiy and agree appropriate time periods or evaluation, i.e. how

    oten you will assess perormance against objectives.

    Examples o types o activity

    Press For ongoing reputation management work, its oten most

    eective to track the eect o your work over time. Identiy the key

    messages that you want to track and monitor coverage on a regular

    basis, providing monthly or quarterly updates rather than reporting

    on individual activities.

    Marketing I the activity that you are evaluating runs across a range o

    channels (which might include, or example, paid-or activity,

    partnerships, leafets, a website or social media), check that youve

    included all o them in your plan.

    Internal

    communication

    I you are evaluating the eect o a change management

    programme, ensure that you include all the elements o the

    programme in your evaluation plan (e.g. briengs to senior sta,

    communication via email and the intranet, events, training etc).

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    7/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 1: Identiy 7

    What do you already know?

    Review similar previous activity that your team or others have run to see what you can

    learn. This will give you a benchmark to measure perormance against and may help to

    rene your objectives and your approach to the activity that you are about to run.

    $ Useful tip gathering evidence or ERG exemption requests

    I your activity is subject to ERG approval, use your previous evaluation results

    as evidence or why you believe it will meet its objectives in sections 3 and

    10 o the exemption request orm.

    What is your evaluation expected to achieve?

    Ask the ollowing questions to help identiy what is expected rom your evaluation:

    Whatarethekeyquestionsthatyourevaluationreportneedstoanswer?

    Whatlevelofdetailisexpectedfromyourreportandwhatformatdoesitneedtobein?

    Isanybudgetavailableforyourevaluation?

    Whowilldothework?Thismightincludeyouandothersonyourteam,research,

    analysis and evaluation specialists rom within your hub or the Shared Communications

    Service, an external agency or a combination o all o these.

    $ Useful tip ERG evaluation standards

    I your activity is subject to ERG approval, there is a standard ormat that you

    must use or your evaluation report. A report template can be ound here.

    Ensure that your evaluation plans are designed with this in mind

    Summarising your approach to evaluation

    Beore beginning work, set out your proposed approach to evaluation, basing this on the

    inormation that you have gathered so ar. Depending on the scope o the activity that

    youre evaluating and the person or whom you are carrying it out, this may be a detailed

    proposal to stakeholders in your department, an email to your manager or a note to

    yoursel. Whatever ormat you use, you can nd a useul template here that sets out the

    questions you should consider.

    $ Useful tip managing expectations

    Sometimes, there may be a gap between the time, resource and budget

    that you have available and others expectations o what your evaluation can

    achieve. Discuss whether its better to increase available resource, budget or

    time or to lower expectations. Decide this early in the process.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ERG-Evaluation-report-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-approach-template.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-approach-template.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ERG-Evaluation-report-template-.doc
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    8/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    8 Stage 2: Develop

    Stage 2: Develop yourevaluation plan

    Checklist

    Task: to dene how youll measure

    success by:

    Setting out activity objectives

    Dening target audiences

    Mapping out how your activitywill work

    Setting perormance metrics

    Agreeing metrics and targets

    Output: drat evaluation plan

    Setting out activity objectives

    Clear and measurable communication objectives are the cornerstone o any evaluation

    plan. They set out what your activity aims to achieve and the overall goals against which

    you should judge success.

    Your objectives should already be identied in the communication strategy or the

    activity you are evaluating. It may be useul to summarise them as shown in Figure 2,

    clearly demonstrating how each sub-objective links to the overall communication and

    departmental objective.

    Startbyidentifyingtheoveralldepartmental objective and the issue it is designed

    to address. Your activity will be part o a set o interventions which link back to this

    objective.

    Next,identifythecommunication objective. This is the overall role that

    communication is expected to play in achieving the policy objective.

    Differentchannelsoractivitiesmayhavedistinctrolestoplayinachievingtheoverall communication objective. Each o these should be set out as a separate

    communication sub-objective.

    You may only be evaluating the eectiveness o one communication sub-objective, but

    it is important to understand how this is expected to contribute towards the overall

    communication objective.

    Ensure that all communication objectives are clear and set out what each activity was put

    in place to achieve, together with a measure o success. Always consider whether or not

    you will be able to prove a communication objective has been met. I not, it will need to

    be revised.

    You may nd it useul to map out your objectives as shown in Figure 2.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    9/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 2: Develop 9

    Figure 2: Hierarchy o objectives

    Sample objectives might include:

    Press Departmental objective: To ensure that compliance with a new tax

    regulation is above 80%.

    Communication objective: To ensure that the majority o the general

    public understands the reasons why complying with the regulation

    benets the economy.

    Press-specic sub-objective: To ensure that the public is given a air

    and balanced view o the policy, via the media.

    Marketing Departmental objective: To get 10,000 more people working as

    community service volunteers in your area.

    Communication objective: To get 40,000 people in the area to

    register as potential volunteers on your community website.

    Sub-objective 1: To increase the proportion o the public who

    recognise the value o volunteering rom 20% to 40%.

    Sub-objective 2: To get 80,000 people to visit the website and nd

    out more about how to volunteer.

    Sub-objective 3: To secure 40,000 incremental registrations.

    Internal

    communication

    Departmental objective: To ensure that unauthorised sta absences

    all by 50%.

    Communication objective: To ensure that all sta are able to ollow

    the correct processes or reporting absences rom work.

    Sub-objective 1: To ensure that all sta recognise that there is a policyor reporting absences rom work and that they must ollow this.

    Sub-objective 2: To ensure that all sta understand how to access the

    guidance on how to report absences.

    Departmentalobjective

    Put in place to address

    a specic issue

    Includes: policy development,

    policy delivery, reputationmanagement

    Communicationobjective

    Role that communicationwill contribute to

    achieving departmental

    objective

    Communicationsub-objectives

    Role that individualactivities or channels

    will play in meeting the

    overall communicationobjective

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    10/50

    10 Stage 2: Develop

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Dening target audiences

    All communication activity has an end audience the people at whom it is ultimately

    targeted. But an activity may also have an intermediary audience a group o people

    targeted so that they will deliver the message to the end audience on your behal. Typical

    intermediaries include the media, stakeholders, such as non-governmental organisations

    and charities involved in delivering a policy objective, and commercial partners working

    with you to deliver a piece o marketing activity.

    I your activity includes an intermediary audience, you should evaluate:

    howeffectivelytheintermediarywasengagedbytheactivity

    howeffectivelytheintermediarycommunicatedthemessagetotheendaudience.

    Audiences might include:

    Press Where you are using a media engagement or PR campaign to try and

    raise volunteer levels among the public overall:

    Intermediary (the press): How did the media react to the activity

    targeted at them? Did they eature your messages, what volume

    and quality o coverage did you get or the story?

    End audience (the general public): How many people volunteered asa result?

    Marketing Where you are trying to engage a partner to run events promoting

    volunteering on your behal:

    Intermediary (partner): How eectively did you engage the partner

    and how many events did they run as a result?

    End audience (the general public): How many people volunteered as

    a result?

    Internal

    communication

    I you are training sta on how to communicate better with

    members o the public so that customer satisaction improves:

    Intermediary (sta): How eectively did you train them? Did they

    put their skills into practice in their interaction with the public?

    End audience (the general public): Did they notice that they received

    a better service rom trained sta? Were they more satised?

    $ Useful tip intermediary audiences

    I your activity includes an intermediary audience, make sure you include

    perormance metrics that enable you to: (1) evaluate the eect o youractivity on the intermediary; and (2) evaluate the eect o their activity on

    your end audience.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    11/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 2: Develop 11

    Mapping out how your activity will work

    Spend some time thinking about how your activity is expected to achieve its objectives. I

    it is successul, what messages will the target audience(s) see, what will they think or eel

    and what will they do? Mapping out the steps to success will help you identiy the right

    perormance metrics to evaluate your activity. Draw on any behavioural insight1 modelling

    or customer journey work that has already been done.

    Setting perormance metrics

    Having identied the objectives and target audiences or your activity and mapped out

    how you expect it to work, you need to build a set o performance metrics. These are

    the measures you will use to assess the activitys perormance against its objectives and to

    identiy which elements o the activity were most and least successul.

    Make sure that your evaluation plan includes a range o perormance metrics rom the

    ollowing ve categories:

    Figure 3: The ve types o perormance metrics or evaluation

    Using these ve categories as a guide will help you to pick the right perormance metrics

    or your activity. The categories can be applied equally to the ull range o press, marketing

    and internal communication activity.

    1 For more on behavioural insight, see MINDSPACE: Infuencing behaviour through public policy (Institute or Government/Cabinet Oce www.instituteorgovernment.org.uk/our-work/better-policy-making/mindspace-behavioural-economics)

    1. InputsThe activity carried out

    2. OutputsHow many people had the opportunity

    to see or hear your activity?

    3. Out-takesWhat was its immediate eect on them?

    4. Intermediate

    outcomesDid they do anything as a result o your activity?

    5. OutcomesDid you achieve your overall objective?

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    12/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    12 Stage 2: Develop

    Inputs

    Inputs include details o the actual activity that has been undertaken, including the

    channels that you used to communicate. The channels to include will have been identied

    at Stage 1.

    Examples o input metrics

    Press Number o press releases sent out or engagement work carried out

    Marketing Paid-or media plan

    Website or digital space created

    Number o partners contacted, types o message shared or requests

    made o partners (intermediary audience)

    Internal

    communication

    Number o sta events organised

    Number o briengs or training sessions organised

    Web content created and put on to the intranet

    Include the costs o carrying out the activity in your input metrics. Include all externaland internal costs and time spent (including sta time). When comparing results or

    more than one piece o activity, use a consistent methodology to record the costs and

    time spent against each one. This will be essential or calculating return on marketing

    investment.2

    $ Useful tip choosing the right perormance metrics

    At this stage, dont worry about whether you can get data or the

    perormance metrics you choose. Pick those that you would need or an

    eective evaluation. Stage 3 looks at how to secure data and deal with gaps.

    2 For more inormation reer to Evaluating the nancial impact o public sector marketing communication: An Introduction to Payback, Return onMarketing Investment (ROMI) and Cost per Result (https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/intro-to-payback-romi-and-cpr.pd)

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    13/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 2: Develop 13

    Outputs

    Output metrics measure the number o people who had the opportunity to see or hear

    your activity, regardless o whether they recall or recognise it. Try to include:

    Reach the total number o people or organisations in your target audience who were

    exposed to your activity.

    Frequency the number o times they saw or heard the activity.

    Examples o output metrics

    Press Number o pieces o coverage achieved

    Frequency o exposure to coverage by end audience

    Marketing Proportion o the target audience reached by media activity

    Number o impressions (one page-view) on the web page

    Number o stakeholders you contacted and number o contacts

    made

    Internal

    communication

    Number o sta attending events and training sessions

    Number o impressions on the intranet

    $ Useful tip activity mapping

    Use the activity map that you created earlier to help you identiy the right

    out-take, intermediate outcome and outcome perormance metrics or

    your activity.

    Out-takes

    Out-take metrics look at the impact that the activity had on your target audiences awareness,understanding and attitude. Think about what you wanted people to recall, think or eel about

    your activity and include perormance metrics that allow you to measure this.

    $ Useful tip other metrics

    Perormance metrics or out-takes, intermediate outcomes and nal

    outcomes cannot be standardised in the same way as those or inputs and

    outputs. They will need to be tailored to refect how you expect your activity

    to work and what it is trying to achieve.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    14/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    14 Stage 2: Develop

    Examples o out-take metrics

    Recall How many people are aware o your activity or the message(s) that

    it is promoting?

    Think How many people understand the key messages that your activity is

    trying to get across?

    Feel What eect has your activity had on peoples attitudes? Do they

    intend to behave dierently as a result o your communication?

    Intermediate outcomes

    Intermediate outcome metrics capture any action taken by the target audience as a result

    o your activity which may lead to the eventual end behaviour. Think about including

    perormance metrics that allow you to measure the ollowing:

    Examples o intermediate outcome metrics

    Talk How many people discussed the activity or its message with peers,

    riends and amilies? How many partners or stakeholders discussed

    it with their work colleagues?

    Direct response How many people responded to or otherwise interacted directlywith you as a result o the activity? This could include visiting a

    website, attending training, ringing a phone line or having a

    ace-to-ace discussion.

    Indirect response How many people responded to or otherwise interacted with third

    parties as a result o your activity? This could include people interacting

    with stakeholders or partners or other local and national services.

    Other actions How many people took (or claim to have taken) any other action as

    a result o your activity? For example, in a stop-smoking campaign

    this might include people buying books, patches or other similar

    products.

    Reer back to your activity map and make sure that you include measures to cover the ull

    range o actions that people could have taken.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    15/50

    Stage 2: Develop 15

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Outcomes

    Outcome metrics look at the eect that an activity has had on the overall communication

    and policy objectives that it was put in place to address. Include metrics that enable you

    to measure whether your communication objective was met and the eect your activity

    had on the wider policy objective. This could be related to changing behaviour, adopting

    a service, increasing positive reputation, increasing understanding and awareness or

    increasing participation.

    Y The appendix to this document provides a list o recommended metrics oreach component. You can use this to help identiy the appropriate metricsor your evaluation plan. This will enable you to compare your activity with

    other cross-hub work and will also ensure that your plan meets the standards

    required by ERG where applicable.

    Agreeing KPIs and targets

    You may decide to set a small number o key perormance indicators (KPIs) based on

    the perormance metrics that you have chosen or KPIs may already have been set by

    your team, department or hub. KPIs are measures o success that can help you track

    how well an activity is progressing towards its end objective or contributing to a broader

    communication strategy.

    KPIs are particularly useul where your activity wont achieve its end objective or some

    time. They will enable you to track how eectively the activity is progressing towards

    this end objective and may provide timely inormation to make changes to the existing

    communication plan, i necessary. KPIs are easier to set when the activity has run a

    number o times beore, as you will have a better eel or which metrics most accurately

    predict how it will ultimately perorm.

    KPIs may be single perormance metrics or combine several metrics.

    Youmaychoosetobringtogetherresponsesbyphone,weborface-to-facetogivea

    total number of responses.

    Wherepeoplesoverallsatisfactionisdrivenbyfourorvedifferentfactors,youcould

    bring these together in one composite satisfaction measure.

    How to set KPIs

    YoudontneedKPIstoevaluateeffectivelyonlysetthemiftheyareusefulin

    helping you understand whether an activity is progressing as expected or contributing

    eectively to overall goals.

    EnsurethatyourKPIsaremeasurable.

    SelectnomorethanveKPIsforyourendaudience(andthesameforanyintermediary

    audiences). SettargetsforeachKPIandspecifythetime-frameinwhichyouexpecttoachieve

    them.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    16/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    16 Stage 2: Develop

    Maketargetsasmeaningfulandasrealisticaspossible,drawingonpreviousresults

    where applicable. The less historical data you have available, the broader your targets

    should be.

    Asfaraspossible,benchmarktargetsagainstotheractivitycarriedoutbyyouand

    others within your team, department or hub. This will give you a broader context or

    what success looks like.

    Creating the evaluation plan

    Your evaluation plan should bring together:

    theobjectivesandtargetaudiencesthatyouwillevaluateperformanceagainst

    theperformancemetrics(andKPIsandtargetsifyoureusingthem)thatyouwillusein

    your evaluation.

    Your team or department may already have a standard template or evaluation plans.

    I not, you may nd these templates or activities with and without an intermediary

    audience useul.

    $ Useful tip multi-channel activity

    For more complex activities, include a separate set o perormance metrics

    or each activity/channel and audience.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Evaluation-plan-template-2.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Evaluation-plan-template-2.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.doc
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    17/50

    Stage 3: Implement source datato measure perormance

    Checklist

    Task: to identiy and gather evaluation

    data by:

    Identiying available data andevidence

    Creating proxies and assumptions

    Using monitoring, market researchand eedback

    Reviewing any remaining gaps

    Agreeing who will collect data

    Completing the evaluation planOutput: completed evaluation plan

    At this stage, you need to source data and evidence or the perormance metrics you

    identied in Stage 2. Budget, time and resource may restrict the amount o data you are

    able to gather but this should not stop you evaluating your activity. Its better to produce

    an evaluation report with gaps in it than to produce nothing at all, provided that you are

    clear about what is missing.

    Identiying available data and evidence

    Begin by identiying the perormance metrics or which data is immediately available. This

    will come rom three main sources:

    datagatheredfromyouractivity

    datagatheredbystakeholdersandpartners

    existingdatasources(e.g.governmentdataandwidermediaandlifestyledata).

    Data gathered rom your activityGather as much data as possible directly while your communication activity is running.

    Identiy all the ways in which people can respond to it and ensure that data is being

    gathered or each one. Data might include web visits, telephone calls or ace-to-ace

    interaction. Also, look or ways to gather additional data rom these responses or

    example, asking or peoples personal details (while remaining mindul o the requirements

    o the Data Protection Act 1998) or asking or permission to contact them again or

    ollow-up research.

    $ Useful tip plan ahead

    Always try to identiy the data sources that you plan to use in your evaluation

    beore the activity actually runs. This will give you time to ensure that theright data is being gathered in the right ormat while the activity is live.

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 3: Implement 17

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    18/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    18 Stage 3: Implement

    Data gathered by stakeholders and partners

    Look at what data or evidence could be collected by an agency, stakeholder, partner

    or colleague working with you to deliver the activity. This might include the number o

    responses to an event or helpline run by a partner; any eedback received by stakeholders;

    data rom surveys; competitions or promotions; and website statistics.

    $ Useful tip getting data rom agencies

    When youre procuring an agency to work on planning, running or

    evaluating an activity or you, always ask what data they can provide to eed

    into the evaluation at the procurement stage. This can then be built into their

    contract. Ask or data well in advance and, where appropriate, agree to sharethe results o your evaluation.

    Existing data sources

    As well as resh data gathered rom current activity, you may nd it useul to look at data

    sources that already exist to help you put your results in context and back them up with

    supporting evidence.

    For example:

    Media consumption surveys such as NRS (newspapers), BARB (TV) or comScore (digital

    media) provide inormation on the number o people reached by dierent media channels.

    These are particularly useul or input and output measures.

    Syndicated consumer lifestyle and media surveys such as TGI, TouchPoints or ACORN

    can be used to build up liestyle and behavioural proles or a range o audiences. These

    are particularly useul or tracking longer-term outcome measures and optimising uture

    campaign planning.

    Existing government demographic and research data gathered centrally or by

    individual departments can be used or measuring longer-term outcomes. The Oce or

    National Statistics publishes a number o surveys across all sectors o public interest.

    For more inormation on how you might be able to use and access these and other

    surveys, talk to colleagues in your departments or hubs research and analytics teams, the

    Shared Communications Service or external media and research agencies.

    Creating proxies and assumptions

    I you cant get the exact data that you need or a perormance metric, look at whether

    you can source a similar piece o evidence as an alternative. This is known as a proxy

    measure. For example:

    ifanactivityisaskingpeopletochecktheirsmokealarmsmoreregularly,agood

    proxy would be the number o nine-volt batteries being sold (a type o battery almostexclusively used in smoke alarms).

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    19/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 3: Implement 19

    Is your activity similar to other activity run in the past or which youve got accurate

    results? I so, you might create an assumption that this activity will perorm in the same

    way. For example:

    ifyouractivityencouragespeopletosignupforastop-smokingservice,youmaynot

    have the budget to carry out research to see how many people have given up smoking

    as a result o using the service. However, all things being equal, you could assume that

    cessation rates were the same as in previous research studies.

    Using monitoring, market research and eedback

    I gaps still remain in your evaluation plan once you have exhausted all the available data

    sources, consider lling them using bespoke monitoring, market research and eedback.

    Monitoring

    You can use monitoring to track how many people your communication is reaching. The

    main monitoring techniques and tools include:

    PR and media monitoring: I your activity is designed to generate media coverage,

    you could use an agency to track how many people it reached, how many times the

    key messages were mentioned and how avourable the coverage was. I you dont have

    the budget or this, consider whether you could monitor coverage yoursel, either by

    subscribing to a PR-monitoring service such as Gorkana or by looking at whats being saidacross a representative selection o media channels.

    Web monitoring: The Government Digital Service (GDS) measures a range o standard

    digital metrics or gov.uk and other government and partner sites. Topline data is available

    in the regular reports provided by GDS and more detailed analysis will be available on

    request. I you are responsible or monitoring perormance o a stand-alone website, there

    is a range o ree and paid-or tools that you can use to monitor perormance, including

    Google Analytics.

    Social media monitoring: GDS will also provide guidance on social media monitoring.

    There are various tools that you can use to monitor perormance yoursel:

    WhereyouractivityishostedonasocialmediasitesuchasFacebook,LinkedInor

    YouTube, you can set up standard user reports to monitor interactions with your

    content. Look both at how many people interact with you and at the quality o these

    interactions.

    IfyoushareinformationviaTwitter,monitorhowmanypeoplefollowyouandhowmany

    retweet your messages. Tweetdeck enables you to analyse interactions more eectively.

    Buzz-monitoringtoolsenableyoutoseewhetherpeoplearecommentingonlineabout

    your message, and whether the comments are positive and rom credible sources.

    Eective buzz-monitoring relies on you dening the terms that you want to monitor in

    advance; the more specic you can be, the more accurate the results. There is a wide

    range o ree and paid-or buzz-monitoring tools. Google Alerts is one example o aree tool.

    Thereisarangeoffreeandpaid-fortoolsthatcanbeusedtomonitorwhatterms

    people are searching or online. Google Trends provides a useul ree snapshot.

    http://www.tweetdeck.com/http://www.tweetdeck.com/
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    20/50

    20 Stage 3: Implement

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Market research

    I you have gaps in the data or out-take, intermediate outcome and outcome metrics,

    then paid-or market research is generally the most eective way o lling them, provided

    that budget is available. Market research or evaluation doesnt necessarily have to involve

    large-scale ace-to-ace quantitative surveys. Lower-cost research methodologies can be

    a useul source o insight. These include:

    Omnibus studies: An omnibus study is a quantitative survey o a representative sample

    o an audience (usually, the general public). The questionnaire is made up o groups o

    questions placed by dierent clients, which means the overall costs are shared, making

    it a relatively cheap option. Omnibus surveys may not be appropriate i your activity is

    localised, your audience is niche, or i you want to ask many and/or in-depth questions

    about a particular topic.

    Commissioned online surveys: Standard online surveys recruit respondents rom large

    panels o people who have agreed to take part in research. They can be very cost-eective

    i your target audience is digitally engaged. However, check the quality o the panel and

    how it is managed in advance. Online panels are not always suitable or tracking long-term

    activities, as you may not wish to survey the same panel members repeatedly.

    Qualitative research: Qualitative research, including discussion groups or interviews,

    can be a useul alternative to quantitative research in some circumstances. It may be

    appropriate or small-scale activities; when audiences are hard to reach; or when activity isonly running or a short period with no requirement to track its impact over time.

    When commissioning paid-or research, you may be able to lower your costs by reducing

    the size or specication o your sample, shortening the length o your questionnaire

    or simpliying your reporting requirements. Research and evaluation specialists in your

    marketing hub or the Shared Communications Service (SCS) can provide advice and help

    with commissioning paid-or research or conducting your own online research.

    Feedback

    Feedback is inormal comment and opinion that you gather yoursel. It can be a valuable

    alternative to robust research when there are limitations in time, resource and budget. This

    may take the orm o a ew inormal telephone or ace-to-ace interviews with the primary

    target audience, those involved in delivering the activity or direct engagement with the

    audience; alternatively, eedback can be obtained through an online survey that you run

    yoursel, or via a blog, email or text.

    I possible, seek input rom colleagues in research or insight roles within your department

    or SCS beore gathering eedback yoursel. They will be able to give you advice on

    questionnaire design, data protection and propriety issues. They will also be able to advise

    you on how to use online survey tools such as SurveyMonkey when seeking eedback.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    21/50

    Stage 3: Implement 21

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Examples o eedback include:

    Press Speaking to a ew journalists

    Monitoring the type o enquiries that you get when you run a story

    Marketing Counting the number o people attending an event

    Inormally asking stakeholders or partners or their observations on

    how an activity went

    Running a survey on your website or social media space

    Adding a question about your service to a call-centre script

    Internal

    communication

    Inormal interviews with rontline sta

    Feedback rom training sessions

    Feedback is not scientic. It will give you anecdotal evidence, rather than statistically

    robust measures. Use as many dierent sources as possible and ensure that your analysis

    refects the limitations o using such inormal methods (see Stage 4 or more detail).

    $ Useful tip data protection

    I youre asking members o the public to provide you with personal

    inormation, this will need to be gathered and stored in line with government

    and industry standards. Check your departments inormation risk policy and

    talk to market research specialists in your marketing hub i you need more

    advice.

    Reviewing any remaining gaps

    Ater gathering the data, review your evaluation plan to identiy any perormance metricsthat have no data source. I gaps still exist, consider how important it is to measure that

    particular perormance metric or KPI. I it is not central to the evaluation, you may choose

    not to measure it at all but point out this limitation in the nal report. I a perormance

    metric or KPI is crucial to your evaluation, consider asking or additional resource or budget

    to measure it, and make clear the implications o not obtaining it.

    Agreeing who will collect data

    Beore the activity runs, agree who will gather the data or each source that you have

    identied, when and in what ormat. Collecting each piece o data in the same ormat

    using consistent time periods and target audiences will help with the analysis later on.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    22/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    22 Stage 3: Implement

    Completing the evaluation plan

    You should now complete your evaluation plan by setting out the data sources that you

    will use or each o your perormance metrics and by noting any gaps that still exist. Your

    completed plan will now include:

    objectivesandtargetaudiences

    performancemetricsandKPIs,andthedatasourcesthatyouwillusetomeasureeachone

    anylimitationsinyourevaluation

    agreedbudgetandresourceneededtogatherthedata(signedoffbythebudget-

    holder i needed).

    The three Cs principles or good data collection

    Whatever youre measuring, make the data that you collect as continuous, consistent

    and comparable as possible.

    Continuous Most communication activity aims to get people to start, stop or

    continue a particular attitude or behaviour. To quantiy its eect,

    try to measure peoples attitudes or behaviour beore, during and

    ater the activity runs. Benchmarking beore it runs is particularly

    important to demonstrate the eect o your activity. For ongoingactivity, measure perormance regularly enough to show the eect

    it is having on attitudes or behaviour. The more data points you can

    capture, the more obvious the trends will be.

    Consistent Use consistent measures and methodology to assess activity that you

    repeat or run continuously over time. Using the same wording or

    questions, tracking against the same audience and collecting data

    in the same way every time will enable you to measure longer-term

    trends accurately.

    Comparable As ar as you can, try to use the same measures or every piece

    o activity that you run. Try to make your measures as similar aspossible to the ones used by other communicators in your team

    and across government. This will make it easier to compare results

    in the uture. The appendix gives you guidance on the types o

    measures that you might want to use or your activity to help with

    standardisation.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    23/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 4: Analyse and report 23

    Stage 4: Analyse and reportperormance against the plan

    Checklist

    Task: to assess the success o your activity by:

    Analysing eectiveness

    Demonstrating eciency and value or money

    Output: nal evaluation report

    Analysing eectiveness

    Once your activity has run, you will need to measure how eectively it met its objectives.

    Begin by gathering data and evidence rom all your sources and bringing it together in a

    centralised database or older. Check to see whether it looks correct beore beginning the

    analysis. Also, check that the activity ran as planned and whether anything unexpected is

    likely to have aected its perormance.

    $Useful tip activity diaryYou will nd it useul to keep a diary while your activity is running, noting

    down any external or operational actors that might aect perormance as

    they happen (e.g. bad weather aecting event attendance; negative news

    stories aecting public perceptions; or downtime on a website aecting

    visitor numbers). This will make subsequent analysis easier.

    How to approach analysis

    Did your activity work as you expected?

    At Stage 2, you mapped out how you expected your activity to work. Use this as the basis

    or your analysis. Create some key hypotheses results or outcomes that you might expect

    to see based on your objectives, activity map and past perormance.

    Check perormance against your KPIs and targets

    Have these been met? I so, what is driving success? I not, consider whether your targets

    were realistic and whether your KPIs are accurate measures o success. For example, i you

    have set KPIs or a new activity, you may need to consider revising these in the uture.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    24/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    24 Stage 4: Analyse and report

    Be objective

    Analyse the ull range o potential outcomes and results or your activity. Do not ignore

    results or trends that dont t with your hypotheses or with the general patterns in the

    data. Instead, look or the reasons behind these. I something didnt work in the way that

    you expected or ailed to meet its objectives, look at the reasons why. This will help you to

    amend uture activity and so improve uture perormance.

    Try to isolate any operational or external issues

    Did any unoreseen operational issues aect your activitys perormance? For example:

    Werethereenoughcontactcentrestafftorespondtothecallswhichyouractivitygenerated?

    Didthewebsitetowhichyouweredirectingpeoplestopworking?

    Didexternalfactors(e.g.negativePR,badweather,theeconomicsituation)havean

    impact on your activitys success?

    An activity diary can be very useul in helping you to identiy these actors.

    Analyse data on a bottom-up basis

    I you are analysing the eect o more than one activity or channel, analyse data on a

    bottom-up basis against your evaluation plan. First, analyse the eectiveness o each

    individual activity against its sub-objective. Then, look at the eect that each activity hadon the wider communication objective, considering which one had the greatest eect.

    Assess the eect o communication on the policy objective

    Consider the eect that communication as a whole has had on the wider policy objective,

    bearing in mind the eect o other interventions designed to meet that objective. You

    may not have sucient data to ully isolate the eect o communication on the policy

    objective, but try to draw conclusions based on the available evidence.

    Review progress

    When evaluating activity that will not achieve its communication objectives or some time,

    look or evidence o progress towards these based on the KPIs and perormance metrics

    that you have identied.

    Cross-check your conclusions

    Where you have data rom a range o dierent sources, check to see i the results rom

    each one are pointing towards the same conclusions. This is particularly important where

    you are relying on less robust data sources such as inormal eedback. One set o results

    may not always give a conclusive answer, but several pieces o evidence all pointing in the

    same direction may allow you to be more condent in your conclusions.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    25/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Stage 4: Analyse and report 25

    Signpost gaps and limitations

    Your evaluation plan will identiy the gaps in available data and the implications o those

    gaps. Be aware o the limitations that this puts on the evaluation. Where possible, try to

    draw assumptions about missing results rom the available data. For example, i you dont

    know how many people have stopped smoking as a result o your stop-smoking event,

    can you make an assumption about possible cessation rates based on the number o

    people who tell you that theyre going to quit at the end o the event? I you cant make

    such assumptions, signpost missing data within the evaluation report.

    Get specialist support where necessary

    Some evaluation will require more sophisticated analysis, or example econometricmodelling techniques to predict uture perormance or isolate the eect o dierent

    actors on perormance. This type o analysis will generally be carried out by specialists,

    either within your department or externally. Only seek external support where you are

    unable to carry out the analysis within your marketing hub.

    Demonstrating eciency and value or money

    When you evaluate perormance, always ask yoursel whether the results that you

    achieved justiy the time, resource and money that you spent. As part o your evaluation,

    also consider whether the results that the activity achieved justiy the time and money

    that were spent on it. Where you are able to quantiy the actual eect that the activity

    had on the overall policy objective and put a nancial value on this, you should be able

    to calculate the overall return on marketing investment. Otherwise, calculate the cost per

    result the amount o time or money that was invested or each person who carried out

    a specied action. Compare your results with other activities that you or others have run

    to see which ones are most cost-eective and time-ecient and use your learning to

    optimise uture activity.

    Examples o return on marketing investment and valid cost per result gures include:

    Return on marketing investment: Where you are able to demonstrate how many lives

    have been saved as a result o a campaign to reduce speeding on residential streets and

    calculate the nancial value o each lie saved, the return on marketing investment is thetotal number o lives saved multiplied by the nancial value o each lie saved minus the

    cost o running the campaign.

    Cost per result: Where you are not able to demonstrate how many lives have been saved

    as a result o the campaign, you may instead choose to calculate the cost per result, basing

    this on any action that people took ater seeing the activity. This might include the cost

    per web visit (total web visits divided by total campaign cost) i the activity sends people

    to a website or more inormation, or the cost per event attendee (total event attendees

    divided by total campaign cost) i the activity involves running events on road saety.

    Further guidance on demonstrating nancial return is available in a separate GCN

    publication.3

    3 Evaluating the nancial impact o public sector marketing communication: An Introduction to Payback, Return on Marketing Investment (ROMI)and Cost Per Result (https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/intro-to-payback-romi-and-cpr.pd)

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    26/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    26 Stage 4: Analyse and report

    The evaluation report

    You will have agreed the ormat or your report at Stage 1. Check that this is still correct.

    Whatever ormat your report is in, always try to ollow these principles:

    beobjectiveandincludeallresults,positiveandnegative

    alwaysprovideclearconclusionsandrecommendationswhatshouldbedoneasa

    result o this report and by whom?

    separatefactfromopinionandrecommendationssothatotherscanreviewthe

    evidence on which you have based your conclusions

    acknowledgegapsinthedataandtheirimplications

    stateanyassumptionsthatyouhavemadeandwhatyoubasedtheseon

    includereferencesforalldatasourcesusedinyourreport

    includeappropriategraphsandimagestoaidinterpretation.

    A template or your evaluation report is included here. I you are submitting an evaluation

    report to ERG, you must use the ollowing template.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GCN-Evaluation-report-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ERG-Evaluation-report-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ERG-Evaluation-report-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GCN-Evaluation-report-template-.doc
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    27/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Conclusions 27

    ConclusionsAdopting the principles, processes and practical examples set out in this guide will

    enable you to design and implement evaluation plans or the ull range o government

    communication activity to the standards required by ERG and the Communication Delivery

    Board. By ollowing the recommended approach, you can also be condent that your

    work will meet the revised GCN competencies or government communicators.

    Adopting good evaluation standards will also enable you both to demonstrate the

    contribution that your communication activity makes towards achieving overall policy

    objectives and to make a well-inormed business case to invest urther resource andbudget in your work. Sharing your learning with other government communicators in your

    team, department or arms-length body and hub, and across GCN more widely, will enable

    others to benet rom your knowledge and insight as well.

    Finally, remember that it can take time to ully implement the approach set out in this

    guide and to gather the data needed to understand what is driving success. Begin

    gradually, recognising that it is always better to produce a partial evaluation than nothing

    at all, provided that you are clear on the limitations o your end report.

    This guide and the examples that it contains refect knowledge and experience drawn

    rom a wide range o colleagues rom across the government communication network.

    Further comment, eedback and examples are always welcome. Please contact

    [email protected].

    Helpul contacts and resources

    I you want more help or support in applying the content in this guide, talk to your hub

    lead or to the evaluation specialists within your hub. The GCN website includes their

    contact details.

    There are also a number o teams within the Government Communication Centre who

    may be able to help:

    The Campaigns and Strategy Team works with the communication hubs to dene

    good practice evaluation standards across government and to ensure that these are

    refected in all annual communication plans and ERG submissions.

    TheEvaluation Team in the Shared Communications Service can provide urther

    advice on how to apply these evaluation standards to specic projects; they can

    oer practical support in planning and conducting your evaluation and advice on the

    procurement o external agencies and should be your rst point o contact or general

    evaluation queries.

    TheGovernment Procurement Service will provide access to specialist external

    agencies, i required.

    TheGovernment Communication Network runs training courses on evaluation and

    the GCN website contains a wealth o inormation and access to groups and individuals

    to help you with your evaluation. Go to https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/ or more

    inormation.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    28/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    28 Appendix

    Appendix

    Recommended metrics

    Introduction

    This appendix gives examples o the types o perormance metric that you should

    consider including in your evaluation plan. They are split by discipline:

    1. Press

    2. Marketing

    3. Internal communication

    Within each discipline, perormance metrics are urther split by channel and

    objective type. Choose the set that is most relevant to your activity, adapt it as

    appropriate and include it in your evaluation plan. I you are using more than one

    channel, you will need to pick separate sets or each channel that your activity uses.

    I your activity reaches the end audience via an intermediary (e.g. the media or

    a partner), use separate sets o metrics to measure:

    how eectively your activity engaged the intermediary;

    how eectively your intermediary engaged the end audience on your behal.

    Templates or activities with and without an intermediary audience are available on

    the GCN website.

    $

    Useful tip adapting perormance metrics to your activity

    Ensure that you are clear on your activitys objectives, the channelsthat you are using and the key messages that you are promoting.

    This will enable you to adapt the example perormance metrics to

    t your activity.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Evaluation-plan-template-2.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Evaluation-plan-template-2.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.doc
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    29/50

    Appendix 29

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    1. Press activity

    Press activity includes proactive publicity (activity which proactively promotes

    a policy or your organisation), reactive media handling (activity put in place to

    respond to a specic issue or event or to rebut inaccurate coverage o this issueor event) and media briefng and handling sessions that you organise to support

    ministers and senior policy ocials in their work. All types o press activity have

    an intermediary audience (e.g. the media or other spokesperson (a minister or

    senior ocial)) and an end audience (generally members o the public).

    Choose the perormance metrics that are most relevant or your activity rom the

    list below.

    $

    Useful tip evaluating intermediary and end audiences

    The nal outcome or your intermediary audience should always orm

    the input or your end audience use this evaluation plantemplate to

    help you.

    Inputs or intermediary audience

    The number and nature o press or media activities that you carry out. This

    might include:

    Proactivepublicity the number o PR activities, media briengs and packagesissued to the media

    Reactivemediahandling the number o corrections, reactive statements andrebuttals issued, the number o interviews arranged

    Mediabriefngandhandling the number o media briengs and mediahandling sessions that you organise or ministers and ocials

    Any costs incurred in running the activity, time and internal resources used.

    Outputs or intermediary audience

    Proactivepublicity the number o media contacts that you reach with youractivity, the number o times that you contact them, the messages that you

    pass onReactivemediahandling the number o media contacts that you reach with

    your corrections, reactive statements and rebuttals, the number o interviews

    that take place

    Mediabriefngandhandling the number o briengs and training sessionsthat you organise, the inormation and skills that you pass on.

    https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.dochttps://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Evaluation-plan-template-.doc
  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    30/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    30 Appendix

    Out-takes or intermediary audience

    Proactivepublicity the attitude o the media overall (and key media contacts

    where applicable) towards the message that you are promoting or towardsyour organisation more generally

    Reactivemediahandling the attitude o the media towards the issue that youare working on and your handling o it. Have you changed their knowledge

    or attitude?

    Mediabriefngandhandling what do ministers and senior ocials thinkabout the brieng and training that you provide? Do they nd it useul?

    Do they intend to put it into practice?

    Intermediate outcomes or intermediary audience

    Proactivepublicity the number o media contacts that you reach with youractivity, the number o times that you contact them, the messages that you

    pass on

    Reactivemediahandling the number o media contacts that you reach withyour corrections, reactive statements and rebuttals, the number o interviews

    that take place

    Mediabriefngandhandling knowledge and skills that ministers and ocialsgain as a result o your brieng or training sessions.

    Final outcomes or intermediary audience/Inputs or end audience (these

    perormance metrics are the same)

    The volume and quality o media coverage achieved by your activity. This might

    include:

    Proactivepublicity number o pieces o coverage achieved, accuracy ocoverage, avourability o coverage, key message penetration, quotes and

    interviews used

    Reactivemediahandling number o pieces o coverage or interviewscontaining your responses, amendments or corrections, overall accuracy o

    coverage, avourability o coverage, the amount o negative coverage that has

    been prevented as a result o your work

    $Useful tip measuring a reduction in negative coverage

    It is oten ar harder to measure the negative coverage that has

    been avoided as a result o the corrections and rebuttals that

    you issue. By keeping a record o the contacts that you have with

    the media or each issue that you work on, over time it becomes

    easier to demonstrate how your interventions are aecting

    coverage in the longer term.

    Mediabriefngandhandling the number o times that your contacts use theknowledge and skills that you have passed on in their contact with the media,

    the volume o coverage achieved as a result o these contacts, accuracy and

    avourability o coverage, key message penetration.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    31/50

    Appendix 31

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Outputs or end audience

    The number or percentage o your end audience reached by the media activity

    and how oten they saw it.

    Out-takes or end audience

    Use the perormance metrics included in section 2.1 (purchased marketing

    activity) to measure what your end audience recall, think or eel about the

    media activity.

    Intermediate outcomes or end audience

    Depending on the nature o the messages that you promote, you may expect

    your end audience to take some orm o action as a result o seeing the media

    coverage. This might include:

    Seeking inormation rom you

    Seeking inormation rom other sources

    Registering or a service, product or inormation

    Starting, stopping or continuing a particular behaviour.

    Use the perormance metrics included in section 2.1 (purchased marketing

    activity) to measure each o these actions where relevant.

    Final outcomes or end audience

    Final outcome measures should assess whether your activity met its overall

    communication objective, and its eect on the overall policy or reputation

    objective that you are working to and the eect that this has had. Choose

    perormance metrics that enable you to measure this.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    32/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    32 Appendix

    2. Marketing activity

    Choose the perormance metrics that are most relevant rom the ollowing list,

    based on the type o activity that you are evaluating:

    2.1 Purchased media

    2.2 Websites, social media and other digital spaces

    2.3 Public and stakeholder engagement

    2.4 Partnership activity(including public advocacy).

    2.1 Purchased media (TV, radio, press, outdoor, digital advertising, paid-or

    search, direct marketing)

    $Useful tip evaluating multi-channel activityI your activity includes more than one paid-or channel, remember to

    include perormance metrics to measure the eectiveness o each one.

    Inputs

    The number o people you plan to reach with your activity and requency o

    exposure. This might include:

    Estimated reach, coverage and requency (TV, press, radio, outdoor)

    The number o impressions served (digital advertising)

    The number o planned clicks (paid-or search)

    The number o inserts produced, the number o leaets planned to be

    distributed (direct marketing)

    The costs (media and production) incurred (by channel).

    Outputs

    The number o people actually reached by your activity and the number o

    times they were exposed to your message.

    $Useful tip sourcing data

    I an agency is booking media or organising distribution o direct

    marketing materials, it will be able to provide input and output data

    or you.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    33/50

    Appendix 33

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Out-takes

    Think about the key messages that you want your activity to get across to your

    end audience what will they be thinking or eeling i its been successul? Adaptthe ollowing perormance metrics to enable you to measure their reaction,

    choosing those which are most relevant or your activity.

    $Useful tip identiying key messages

    Use your activity map to help you to identiy what your key

    messages are and how you expect your target audience(s) to

    react to them.

    Have they seen it (RECALL)?

    Are the end audience aware o the key/supporting message that you are

    promoting?

    Have they seen any advertising, communication or publicity about the key/

    supporting message?

    Can they describe this advertising, communication or publicity? Where have

    they seen the advertising, communication or publicity?

    Do they recognise your activity when its shown to them (this might include

    advertising, leaets, letters, event invitations etc produced by you or press

    coverage and partnership activity delivered via an intermediary)?

    Do they understand the activitys key messages (THINK)?

    Did the end audience like the activity?

    Did they think it was relevant to them?

    Was it clear and engaging?

    Did it capture their attention?

    Did they understand the key/supporting message that the activity was

    promoting?

    Has it impacted on their views? Do they intend to do anything as a result (FEEL)?What would you want the end audience to eel or think i the activity was

    successul? On this basis, what eect did the activity have on your end/

    intermediary audiences attitudes?

    Do the end/intermediary audience eel more positive about your department

    and its work as a result o the activity? Are they willing to support you in your

    work or to advocate your department more widely?

    Do the end/intermediary audience intend to take the action specied in the

    key/supporting message in the coming weeks or months (depending on the

    time-rame or your activity)?

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    34/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    34 Appendix

    Intermediate outcomes

    Intermediate outcome metrics measure the actions that people have taken

    as a result o your activity. These will vary depending on your communicationactivity, but might include:

    a) Seeking inormation rom you

    b) Seeking inormation rom other sources

    c) Registering or a service, product or inormation

    d) Starting, stopping or continuing a particular behaviour

    e) Interacting with you or with others online or ofine.

    Suggested perormance metrics or each o these intermediate outcomes aregiven below choose the one(s) that is/are most appropriate or your activity

    and adapt as appropriate.

    a) Seeking inormation rom you

    Sometimes, you will ask people to contact you directly or more inormation.

    Always try to include a range o metrics that cover who contacted you, how

    they contacted you and the depth o contact. Even i you dont directly ask

    people to contact you, its always worth checking to see whether youve had

    uplit in contact as a result o your activity. Suggested perormance metrics or

    the dierent contact channels include:

    Call centre:

    The number o people calling

    What drove them to call (your activity, activity carried out by

    intermediaries, e.g. media, stakeholders, other actors)

    The reason or their call

    How many callers you passed relevant inormation on to

    Digital activity (advertising):

    The number o people clicking on digital advertising or text links

    (split by creative, site)

    The number visiting your website or social media space as a result o

    advertising

    Website or social media space (NB: data or these metrics will be

    available rom the Government Digital Service (GDS)):

    Source o visits (how people came to the site)

    Average length o time spent on the site (and number spending more

    than 30 seconds on the site)

    The number o pages visited

    The number watching any videos or embedded content on your site

    (starting to watch and watching whole clip)

    The number seeking relevant inormation

    Bounce rate (percentage only visiting one page)

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    35/50

    Appendix 35

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Intermediate outcomes (continued)

    a) Seeking inormation rom you (continued)

    Events/ace-to-ace The number attending events as a result o activity you ran to promote them

    The number visiting you or your sta in person at other times

    What drove them to visit (your activity, other actors)

    How many you passed relevant inormation on to

    Correspondence

    Number o emails received (positive/negative)

    Number o letters received (positive/negative).

    b) Seeking inormation rom other sources

    I your activity is being delivered by stakeholders or partners, ask them whether

    they can gather data on how people seek inormation using the perormance

    metrics listed under section (a) above.

    Other sources that you might want to include are:

    People searching or inormation on your activity online

    People who claim to have asked riends, amilies or other organisations or

    inormation or advice ollowing your activity.

    c) Registering or a service, product or inormation

    Your activity might ask people to register or a service, more inormation or a

    product, or to attend an appointment with you or a stakeholder. I so, you might

    want to include measures that look at:

    The number o people seeking inormation on the service, product or

    inormation eatured in your activity (see previous section)

    The number o people requesting a product eatured in your activity (and

    where they heard about this product)

    The number who actually receive this product

    The number who go on to use this product

    The number o people signing up to receive inormation in the uture

    The number o people starting the registration process or a service or

    product (and where they heard about it)

    The number o people completing the registration process

    The people using the service that they have registered or and how they use it

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    36/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    36 Appendix

    Intermediate outcomes (continued)

    c) Registering or a service, product or inormation (continued)

    $Useful tip choosing the right perormance metrics oryour activity

    The perormance metrics that you choose here will vary

    depending on the nature o your activity. For example, i youre

    running an ongoing programme to support people as they give

    up smoking, you might record how many people attend an initial

    meeting or read the inormation that you have sent to them

    and then record how many attend subsequent meetings,

    request urther inormation etc. Creating an activity map can

    be a helpul way o identiying how you would expect people

    to use the service, and can help you to choose the rightperormance metrics.

    The number o people making an appointment with you or a stakeholder

    The number o people attending this appointment.

    d) Starting, stopping or continuing a particular behaviour

    Your activity may ask people to start, stop or continue a particular behaviour.

    I so, you might want to include perormance metrics that look at:

    The number o people undertaking that behaviour beore the activity ran

    The number o people who take the relevant steps to change their behaviouras a result o your activity

    The number o people who continue with the changed behaviour over time.

    e) Interacting with you or with others online or ofine

    You may want people to pass your message on or to discuss it with others.

    I youre using social media, you may want them to join an online community

    or contribute to content on your website.

    You may nd the ollowing metrics useul, depending on what media youre using:

    The number o people who pass your message on or discuss your activity orthe message that it is promoting with others

    The number o people who claim to have discussed your message with

    others (online and ofine)

    The number passing on or sharing your content digitally (e.g. tweets,

    retweets, sharing link on Facebook, via Digg, Delicious, StumbleUpon,

    Reddit etc)

    Amount o talk on digital orums, blogs, websites etc (tracked via buzz

    monitoring)

    Amount o this talk that is positive (and accurate)

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    37/50

    Appendix 37

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Intermediate outcomes (continued)

    e) Interacting with you or with others online or ofine (continued)

    The number o people who interact with you online depending on thedigital space that you use, this might include:

    The number o Facebook ans or riends, the number liking your content

    The number o Facebook ans or riends who are active (i.e. return to the

    site regularly)

    The number o people posting content on your site

    The number o people commenting on your content (e.g. on your own

    site, Facebook, YouTube).

    $

    Useful tip passing the message on

    I your activity asks someone to pass a message on on yourbehal, also include metrics that enable you to measure the eect

    o this message on those to whom they speak.

    Final outcomes

    Final outcome measures should assess whether your activity met its overall

    communication objective, and its eect on the overall policy objective that

    you are working to and the eect that this has had. Choose perormance

    metrics that enable you to measure the activitys impact on both.

    2.2 Websites, social media and other digital spacesGDS will produce standard reporting dashboards or gov.uk. These include

    standard perormance metrics that measure outputs, out-takes and intermediate

    outcomes. Bespoke reports or gov.uk and other government websites and social

    media spaces will also be available. Further inormation on how to get this data will

    be available soon via the GCN website. Always ensure that you integrate these

    perormance metrics with wider measures that look at the eect o your website

    or social media activity. These might include:

    Inputs

    The website, social media or other digital space and related content created

    to meet communication objectives

    The cost and resource used to create this website, social media space or

    content.

    Outputs (available via GDS reports)

    GDS can provide perormance metrics that you can use to look at how many

    people were exposed to your digital content. These will include:

    The number o the end audience visiting the site or digital space at least once

    during the evaluation period (unique users)

    The source o visitor reerrals.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    38/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    38 Appendix

    Out-takes (available via GDS reports)

    What people think, eel or recall about the webspace. Section 2.1 gives more

    detail on the types o perormance metric that you might want to include.You may also be able to iner attitudes and understanding rom comments

    that people leave on your website or social media space.

    Intermediate outcomes (available via GDS reports)

    GDS can provide a number o standard metrics that measure how people

    interact with your site or digital space. These will include:

    Average length o time spent on site

    Bounce rate

    The number watching any videos or embedded content on your site (starting

    to watch and watching whole clip)

    The number o pages visited.

    Also consider including metrics that look at actions carried out on social media

    websites, such as:

    Number o likes on Facebook

    Number o retweets on Twitter.

    Always ensure that you tie these standard metrics back to your website or

    digital spaces objectives and consider what you are trying to get people to

    do (register, read a particular piece o content, retweet content etc). This will

    enable you to interpret the data appropriately.

    Final outcomes

    Final outcome measures should assess whether your website or digital space

    met its overall communication objective, and its eect on the overall policy

    objective that you are working to and the eect that this has had. Choose

    perormance metrics that enable you to measure the activitys impact on both.

    2.3 Public and stakeholder engagement

    Public or stakeholder engagement activity is put in place to secure eedback on orsupport or a specic policy area. Depending on the activity that you are running,

    you may use a range o channels including events, digital and purchased channels.

    Inputs

    The activity that you carry out to promote your initiative. Depending on the

    nature o your engagement activity, this might include:

    The number o invitations to events that you send out

    The number o requests to provide eedback that you issue

    Activity that you carry out to publicise your engagement activity

    The website that you create to gather eedback

    The number and nature o contacts that you make with specic

    stakeholders.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    39/50

    Appendix 39

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    Outputs

    Depending on the nature o your engagement activity, these might include:

    The number o people that you reach via your publicity, invitations andrequests

    The number o people attending the event that you organised

    The number o people who visit your website or digital space (see

    section 2.2 or more detail on digital metrics)

    The number o conversations that you have with a specic stakeholder as

    a result o the contacts that you make.

    Out-takes

    Think about what you want the audience that you are engaging to recall, think

    or eel as a result o your engagement activity. Oten there will be a specicpolicy that you want them to advocate or support. Include relevant out-take

    measures to assess levels o support or your message and your department.

    Use the perormance metrics included in section 2.1 (purchased marketing

    activity) to help to measure the depth o engagement and attitudes towards

    your policy area.

    Intermediate outcomes

    Intermediate outcome metrics measure the actions people have taken as

    a result o your activity. These will vary depending on your communication

    activity, but typical intermediate outcomes or stakeholder and public

    engagement include:

    a) Providing usable eedback

    b) Attending an event

    c) Passing your message on to others.

    Suggested perormance metrics or each o these intermediate outcomes are

    given below choose the one(s) that is/are most appropriate or your activity

    and adapt as appropriate.

    a) Providing usable eedback

    You may be running activity to increase engagement among specic audiences

    possibly to seek help in developing policy or to ask or eedback or consult on a

    particular policy area. I so, you might include measures that look at:

    The number o people who respond to your engagement activity in any way.

    This might include:

    Comments or eedback received on your website, in writing, by phone,

    ace-to-ace

    The quality o eedback and comments received

    The number o people attending public meetings or hearings

    The number o people agreeing to help to develop a specic policy area

    (generally in relation to stakeholder engagement)

    The amount o usable eedback incorporated into uture policy development

    or engagement activity.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    40/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    40 Appendix

    Intermediate outcomes (continued)

    b) Attending an event

    You may invite stakeholders or members o the public to attend events so thatyou can share inormation or increase engagement. Depending on what your

    event is designed to do, you might want to think about including perormance

    metrics that look at:

    The number o event attendees who interact with you or your sta during

    the event

    The number o event attendees who undertake specic actions or

    behaviours in line with messages promoted at the event

    The number who thought the event was good and useul

    The number who understand the messages that you were promoting.

    c) Passing your message on to others

    You may want people to pass on specic messages rom your engagement

    activity. You may nd the ollowing metrics useul, depending on what media

    youre using:

    The number o stakeholders or members o the public who pass your message

    on and discuss your activity or the message that it is promoting with others

    The number o stakeholders or members o the public who claim to have

    discussed your message with others (online and ofine):

    The number passing on or sharing your content digitally (e.g. tweets,

    retweets, sharing link on Facebook, via Digg, Delicious, StumbleUpon,

    Reddit etc)

    Amount o digital talk on orums, blogs, websites etc (tracked via buzz

    monitoring)

    Amount o positive (and accurate) digital talk.

    $Useful tip passing the message on

    I your activity asks someone to pass a message on on your

    behal, also include metrics that enable you to measure the eect

    o this message on those to whom they speak.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    41/50

    Appendix 41

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    2.4 Partnership activity (including public advocacy)

    In partnership activity a partner is used as an intermediary to advocate your

    work, pass on a message or deliver a service to an end audience on your behal

    typically in the areas o policy delivery and reputation management. Partnersmay include commercial, not-or-prot and government bodies as well as

    individual stakeholders.

    $Useful tip evaluating partnership activity

    All partnership activity will have an intermediary audience the partner

    that you are engaging. Always think about who your end audience is and

    what you are asking the partner to do to reach them on your behal.

    Inputs or intermediary audience

    Details o your overall partnership engagement strategy and the supportingactivity that you carry out to engage stakeholders or partners so that they will

    pass on your message on your behal. This might include:

    The number o partners that you contact by phone, email or ace-to-ace

    The number o partners that you invite to events, training etc and the

    number o events and training sessions that are held

    The number o times that you contact each partner (particularly when

    building relationships and hence advocacy over time)

    The number and nature o key messages that you pass on to each partner(particularly when building relationships/advocacy)

    Any costs incurred in contacting partners, time and internal resources used.

    Outputs or intermediary audience

    The number o partners who are exposed to the activities that you run and the

    messages that you promote. This might include:

    The number o partners successully reached by your activity (the number

    with whom you are able to share your messages)

    The number o partners attending events or training that you have organised

    The quality and range o messages shared with each partner over time

    (particularly when building advocacy).

    Out-takes or intermediary audiences

    Think about what you want partners to think or eel as a result o the contact

    that you make. This might include:

    The number o partners who support your activity

    The number o partners who are interested in nding out more about your

    initiative or in working with you.

  • 7/30/2019 GCN Evaluation Guide

    42/50

    Evaluating Government Communication Activity

    42 Appendix

    Intermediate outcomes or intermediary audiences

    Intermediate outcomes will depend on the nature o contact that you make with

    partners and the response that you are seeking rom them. They might include:

    The number o partners contacting you or more inormation

    The number o partners discussing the activity with you

    The number o partners expressing an interest in working with you

    The number o partners agreeing to undertake a specic activity or pass on a

    specic message or you.

    Final outcomes or intermediary/Inputs or end audience

    The number and/or nature o messages passed on or activities carried out to

    promote messages on your behal by partners. This might include:

    The number o partners advocating the work o your department or team:

    The number o partners passing on specic messages about your

    department and its work (through conversations with others, interviews,

    media coverage, digital interaction etc)

    The number o partners oering more general support or your department

    The number o messages passed on by each individual partner, content o

    each message, avourability o each message

    The number passing on or sharing your content digitally (e.g. tweets, retweets,

    sharing link on Facebook, via Digg, Delicious, StumbleUpon, Reddit etc)

    The number o partners carrying out activities to prom