Gavel Issue - December 2013

download Gavel Issue - December 2013

of 20

description

Gavel Issue - December 2013

Transcript of Gavel Issue - December 2013

  • I N T H I S

    I S S U E :

    HWLS NEW

    WATER FEA-2

    HWLS gets

    Quite Award

    3

    ACLI 2013 4

    The im-

    portance of

    Trial by Jury

    5

    A Call of

    Firsts

    &

    My First Year

    of Practice in

    Chambers

    6

    Financial Intel-

    ligence Unit

    and the

    Attorney-at-

    Law

    7

    Graduation

    2013!

    8-9

    The DOs and

    DONTs of In-Service Train-

    ing

    10

    I MADE IT!

    NOW

    11

    DIVALI 2013

    AT HWLS

    12

    OECS NIGHT 13

    Nuttin

    Sweetuh Dan

    Dis'

    14

    Student in the

    Corridor

    15

    More Lawyers

    at the Legal

    16-

    17

    Interview with

    Rose-marie

    Belle Antoine

    19-

    20

    D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 3 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2

    THE GAVELTHE GAVEL A P U B L I C A T I O N O F

    T H E H U G H W O O D I N G L A W S C H O O L

    Mufti Waseem Khans view is further sup-ported by a Hadith (reports of the sayings of Prophet

    Muhammad) narrated by Abu Dawud, where the

    Prophet said: When a woman reaches puberty, it is not lawful that any part of her body be seen, except this and

    this, and then pointed to his face and the palms of his

    hands. Therefore, it is clear that the Khimar commonly referred to as the

    Hijab is compulsory for women to wear and not the

    niqaab.

    Debates on banning Niqaab

    Several countries in Europe have banned or are moving

    towards banning the wearing of the niqaab.

    Hijab: Khimar and Niqab BY SADDAM HOSEIN

    (Contd on page 3)

    HIJAB/PURDAH IS a sacred institution that embodies

    a wide range of measures that are all focused on the

    protection and preservation of the chastity, modesty and

    purity of women. These measures incorporate a wom-

    ans dress and clothing. Hijab is an Arabic word which linguistically means a cover, screen or partition. Howev-

    er, Hijab is commonly referred to the scarves used by

    Muslim women to cover their head. Khimar (derived

    from the word Khumur) which is commonly referred to

    as the Hijab is the term used in the Quran to describe the garment worn by women to cover their head, tem-

    ples and neck. Niqab refers to the garment worn by the

    women to cover their faces. (The Kuwaiti Encyclopedia

    of Jurisprudence, vol. 17, pp. 5-6). Therefore, the Hijab

    signifies the whole Muslim womans dress while the Khimar and Niqab commonly means the head covering

    and face-covering respectively.

    What does Islam say about the Khimar and Niqab?

    According to Quran Chapter 24 Verse 31 (Sura An

    Nur), Allah (God) says: And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty;

    that they should not display their beauty and ornaments

    except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they

    should draw their veils over their bosoms Mufti Waseem Khan of the Darul Uloom Trinidad in an article

    Consequences for not wearing hijab stated:

    While explaining the above verse, some scholars have stated that except what must ordinarily appear thereof refers to the face and hands up to the wrists. It means that a woman

    must cover her entire body, but an allowance is given to her

    to allow her face and hands up to the wrists to be exposed

    (as mentioned by these scholars). Many other scholars have

    stated that the face and hands must be covered.

    From the above verse, the law has been clearly established

    that Muslim women must cover themselves properly, which

    also includes the covering of the head (which is commonly

    referred to by Muslims as wearing the hijab).

    Above: Two traditional Muslim women wear-

    ing a niqab.

  • P A G E 2

    T H E G A V E L

    Credits THE GAVEL is the official

    newsletter of the Hugh

    Wooding Law School situated

    at Gordon Street, St. Augus-

    tine, Trinidad and Tobago. It is

    published three times a year

    by a joint committee of staff

    and students.

    Contributions and comments

    are welcomed from staff, students

    or any other interested parties.

    Send all e-mails to [email protected].

    Editorial Committee:

    Staff:

    Nisha Mathura-Allahar

    Barbara Lodge-Johnson

    Students:

    Eileen Benjamin-Ryan

    Karina Singh

    Khadija Mac Farlane

    Pravesh Ramlochan

    Sasha Mahadeo

    Siand Dhurjon

    Shazard Mohammed

    Editor:

    Eileen Benjamin-Ryan

    Design and Layout:

    Karina Singh

    Khadija Mac Farlane

    Festive Christmas Dcor at HWLS...

    Christmas Creche and Christmas tree placed in the lounge area.

    HWLS NEW WATER FEATURE!

    Our newly installed water feature crowned with water lilies serves as a spot for

    students to unwind from their hectic schedules.

    THANK YOU

    THE GAVEL NEWS Team

    would like to acknowledge

    our appreciation of those

    members of the administra-

    tive staff who help us to

    publish every issue.

    Specifically we wish to thank

    Michael Rampersad Singh,

    Shevkumar Singh, Marlene

    Herriera, James Allen, Diane

    Williams, and Roger A.

    Ramgoolam.

  • P A G E 3 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    (Contd from page 1)

    In 2011 both France and Belgium banned it imposing fines for per-

    son wearing the niqaab. Countries cite reasons such as oppression

    to women and security reasons for the ban.

    Oppression

    The proposition that the niqab is a form of oppression for Muslim

    women has been one of the most ironic justifications for the ban.

    It is direct contravention of international accepted rights of free-

    dom to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching (Article 18- The International Convention on Civil and Political Rights).

    The ban suppresses the rights of women of religious freedom,

    expression and undermines gender equality. While the ban rids

    itself of physical oppression it strangles those women socially who

    voluntarily choose to wear the niqaab.

    National Security

    It was argued above that the wearing of the niqaab is not compulsory. In

    Panday v Gordon (Trinidad and Tobago)(2005)UKPC 36 it was stated

    that guaranteed rights are not absolute. In performing the balancing ex-

    ercise, the scales may tip on the side of national security reasons for

    limiting the right of expression namely religious expression. This is so

    for the difficulty in the identification of persons.

    In conclusion, a ban on the basis for national security may be justified.

    Hijab: Khimar and Niqab

    HWLS CAPTURED FIRST place for Student Support Services in Tertiary Education in the recent Quality in Tertiary Education (QUITE)

    Awards 2013. The qualifying criteria for this category are: 1) Student support policy; 2) dedicated resources; 3) counseling and guidance; 4)

    health care and security. The annual awards are organised by the Accreditation Council of Trinidad and Tobago (ACTT) and was held at the

    Hyatt Hotel on October 31.

    HWLS GETS QUITE AWARD

    PATRICK FLOYD (Maintenance Manager and Supervisor), LYNDON ABDOOL (Quality Assurance Manager), PRINCIPAL

    MIRIAM SAMARU. DR. CHARMAINE BISSESSAR (Ag. Quality Assurance Research and Effectiveness) AND MEMBERS

    OF THE STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL(SRC).

  • P A G E 4

    WHAT EXACTLY IS this CLC thing that youre work-ing on? Our colleagues asked us this question many times during the early days of November. We had the honour of being one of four

    teams chosen to represent the Hugh Wooding Law School at the

    Caribbean Law Clinic, an annual event organized by the American and

    Caribbean Law Initiative. The Clinic is an interactive system in which

    student teams tackle research questions based on issues of relevance

    to the host territory. The student teams worked with the guidance of

    coaches who were Faculty members of the respective participating

    Universities. This year the event was hosted by the Hugh Wooding

    Law School. Each team was assigned a question and asked to make

    written and oral submissions to our resident coaches. We then met

    with our counterparts from law schools in the Bahamas, Jamaica and

    the U.S. in order to decide how we would combine our research

    findings for presentation at the Attorney Generals office, Cabildo Chambers, in Port of Spain.

    We dealt with the fictional case of Mr. Bhola Singh, who

    had failed to be appointed to a senior public service post because the

    Prime Minister had exercised his constitutional power of veto over

    such appointments. In reality this meant lots of late night research sessions in which the intricacies of judicial review, in particular the

    application of the common law principles of fairness and natural jus-

    tice to the local context, were debated and explored in detail. Many

    cups of coffee were made and consumed. We were very grateful for

    the guidance provided by our coach, Mrs. Nisha Mathura-Allahar, in

    navigating this complex area.

    After having settled on a position that our entire team

    could live with, we then repeated the process with our colleagues

    from the visiting law schools. As law students, we can all imagine the

    challenges involved where nine persons have satisfied themselves that

    they have answered a question correctly, end up with somewhat

    different answers and then have to come together to agree on a uni-

    fied approach. The schedule allowed about two hours for this pro-

    cess. In reality, the discussion extended via email into the ungodly

    hours of the next morning.

    In the midst of our diverse views we managed to resolve

    the issues and arrive at a consensus on our approach. No doubt this

    was riddled with heated debates, but as lawyers-in-training disagree-

    ments and the expression of diametrically opposed views are staples

    of our daily diet. The presentations before the judging panel, were of

    a very high academic quality and, in the end, all of the teams were

    commended for a job well-done. The team which had dealt with the

    case of Johnny Velasquez was awarded the prize for the best presentation, a decision with which we are sure all participants heart-

    ily agreed.

    We were then ushered into the dining hall of the Office of

    the Attorney General and treated to a mouth-watering lunch with

    our counterparts from the other law schools. Later on that night, we

    explored the delights of Ariapita Avenue and became much better

    acquainted with our guests. Social cohesion makes for great bonding

    moments and allows true connections to be made. Those participants

    who went to bed at a decent hour visited Maracas Bay the next day,

    which was described by our Hugh Wooding counterparts as real good.

    You would expect us to say that the experience was re-

    warding and indeed it was. Group work is extremely challenging.

    Group work with persons you have just met is even more challeng-ing. We are immensely proud of Team Bhola Singh for pulling it all together. Congratulations to our colleagues on a perfect score on

    their ambassadorial duties. Moreover, we are extremely grateful to

    the Hugh Wooding Law School and the American and Caribbean Law

    Initiative for providing us with the opportunity to expand our legal

    networks. We are quite sure that if our colleagues were to utter

    sentiments to describe our experience they would say that it was

    intellectually enlightening. These are our humble parting words- Be encouraged colleagues, make your Hugh Wooding experience an edifying one and challenge yourselves!

    THE CARIBBEAN LAW CLINIC 2013

    BY ODWIN TRENTON, FAYOLA PHILLIP AND JOSIAH SOO-HON

    - Be encouraged colleagues, make your Hugh Wooding

    experience an edifying one and

    challenge yourselves!

    T H E G A V E L

  • P A G E 5 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    AT THE OPENING of the 2013-2014 Law Term in September,

    Chief Justice Ivor Archie proposed the abolition of the age old

    practice of trial by jury. He proposed that jury trial be absent from

    all criminal matters. His proposal and reasons in support of it have

    been endorsed by two notable former Chief Justices, Michael de la

    Bastide and Satnarine Sharma. Proposal for the abolition of trial by

    jury seems to be gaining currency in the region; Chief Justice

    Archies sentiments were also echoed by the former Speaker of Guyanas National Assembly, Ralph Ramkarran, SC who stated that the utility of jury trials have expired.

    It is against this background that the team of Criminal

    Defence Attorneys led by Christopher Leibig and Bradley Hay-

    wood from the United States of America addressed a large gather-

    ing of students at the Hugh Wooding Law School on October 10,

    2013. Leibigs team was uncompromising in their view that trial by jury is a foremost tenet of democracy and there is no justification

    for its abolition. They insisted that this practice should be retained

    in the Region, especially given the prominence on the Corruption

    Perception Index of several of the countries in the region. Criminal

    trials encapsulate the collective distaste the populace has for crimi-

    nal infractions; therefore the avenue through which this is ex-

    pressed should not be subtracted from the people. Also, the per-

    sons subject to the criminal justice system for commission of seri-

    ous offences have a fundamental right to due process of law to be

    judged by a jury of their peers and not by a judge who might be

    corruptible.

    The team also discussed to some length the international

    chaos created by the revelations made by Edward Snowden. As

    proponents of democracy, the team felt that the United States of

    America has immeasurably affronted the democratic freedoms of

    its people by tapping into their every means of communication

    under the guise of national security. They strongly supported the fearless and selfless stance taken by Snowden and Bradley Cooper;

    reminding the attentive and energized audience that democracy is

    but a misnomer in the face of the civil realities in the United States

    of America and several of the countries over which she exerts her

    influence.

    To loud applause from the students, the team insisted that as law-

    yers we are the vanguards of democracy and the onus is upon us

    to ensure its preservation.

    THE IMPORTANCE OF TRIAL BY JURY

    BY RONALD J. DANIELS

  • P A G E 6

    T H E G A V E L

    MANY FIRSTS MARKED the Octo-

    ber 18th Call to the Bar held in Court No.1 of the

    Supreme Court of Barbados. It was the first time a

    married couple, Mrs Nicole and Mr Khamaal Colly-

    more, was called to the Bar in the same sitting. It

    was also the first time that a father and daughter,

    Mr Glenroy Goddard and Miss Anne-Marie God-

    dard, were called together. Another first was that

    two individuals, President of the Bar Association Mr

    Barry Gale, QC and Mr Patterson Cheltenham, QC

    moved the applications. An arrangement indicative

    of the large numbers admitted to the Bar; 38 in all

    which in itself was also a first.

    Mr Gale remarked that the number of

    firsts associated with this year's Call was a foreshad-

    owing of things to come from the new crop of at-

    torneys. Expectations were further heightened by

    the varied backgrounds from which they emerged; accountants,

    debt collectors, insurance brokers, police officers, teachers and

    even directors of established agencies. This trend of firsts was continued in the remarks of

    the Chief Justice, the Honourable Sir Marston C.D. Gibson K.A.

    who warned the new attorneys that their first obligations were

    not to their clients but to the Court. As officers of the Court

    they must be willing to work and not cut corners and must

    come to Court prepared for whatever they are required to do.

    Aside from the publicly acknowledged firsts that

    marked the occasion, there were also some more sentimental firsts shared amongst the new attorneys and their respective

    families. For this author, like a few of her colleagues, it was the

    first time that anyone in her close family was called to the Bar.

    A CALL OF FIRSTS

    At centre is the Honourable Sir Marston C.D. Gibson K.A, Chief

    Justice of Barbados surrounded by Attorneys-at-Law called to the

    Bar in Barbados this year.

    BY TAMAR GRANT

    WHEN ASKED TO consider the first year in practice it im-

    mediately became clear to me that I could only speak from my

    personal experience. That, experience as it turns out, is largely one of being situated in a chambers environment as opposed to

    any of the other plethora of alternatives which a newly minted

    Attorney-at-Law may find himself/herself after being called to the

    Bar. Even now, as I reflect, I am constantly resisting the urge to

    perform one of the preocupations of my particular practice, that

    is, starting the clock which records my time spent dealing with a

    matter; it seems a year is all it takes for that to become second

    nature.

    Perhaps the most impinging reality of practising as an

    Attorney-at-Law of less than a years experience in chambers (for convenience, a Baby Lawyer) is that you are junior to every other practitioner, which usually means that you are the one

    most mystified by what is sometimes the run of the mill practice

    of the law. Surprisingly this includes the fact of having to coax,

    persuade, cajole and almost threaten the client for your instruc-

    tions; something which was not conceivable to me when I hung

    up my shingle. After all, it is their matter, surely they stand to gain the most from the practitioner being facilitated with what is

    necessary for a happy ending. That logic is often lost on some

    clients and so I have developed a heaping respect for any compe-

    tent instructing attorney.

    A Baby Lawyer will also find that he/she must contend

    with having to set themselves the task of mastering two disci-

    plines rather than one, namely, the practice of law and managing

    a successful business. As good and as helpful as your law office

    management class is/ will be, I can assure you, you will have to

    get deeper into the thing. Deeper understandings of the tax

    regime of your jurisdiction, of accounting for your time and your

    profits and losses, and, of marketing and advertising your business within the confines of the Legal Profession Act or your

    jurisdictions equivalent. What has probably been my greatest asset in this wil-

    derness is my ability to call on past colleagues, tutors and profes-

    sors for assistance. It was not long ago that I had to make an

    application under the Real Property Act on behalf of a client and

    needed urgent guidance on the kind of evidence that would be

    expected by the Registrar. Mrs Allahar was happy to help.

    If I had to say what I have most appreciated in my

    practice perhaps it would be that, within the year, I have gained

    experience in completely disparate corners of the law. Most

    times I am a litigator addressing the Court, drafting claims and

    advising, hopefully, cogently. Other times I am administering

    estates, conveying land or incorporating companies. While litiga-tion has been my main interest, practising as a solicitor has also

    been rewarding once the threat of exploring the new and as yet

    unexplored is confronted. And so if I were to close with some

    advice I would ask that when you begin your practice you make

    the absolute best of your experiences.

    BY YURI SAUNDERS

    MY FIRST YEAR OF PRACTICE IN CHAMBERS

  • P A G E 7 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    REPRESENTATIVES OF THE Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)

    recently held a panel discussion at HWLS, where they explained

    the role, responsibilities and obligations of attorneys vis-a-vis the

    FIU and money laundering.

    The FIU was established under the Financial Intelligence Unit Act

    2009 and is a department of the Ministry of Finance. Its purpose is

    to implement the anti-money laundering policies of the Financial

    Action Task Force (FATF). More importantly, the role of the

    FIU is to substantiate suspicious activities and report these matters

    to the authorities in charge of conducting criminal investigations so

    they could pursue prosecution proceedings.

    Our role as Professionals:

    Reporting institutions and professionals must absorb their own

    costs in implementing the anti- money laundering obligations, which

    involve setting up systems for detecting and reporting suspicious

    transactions/activities along with identifying their greatest money

    laundering risks.

    Attorneys are required by the FIU Regulations to register

    with the FIU for the purpose of identifying themselves as entities

    under the supervision of the FIU for AML/CFT (Anti-Money

    Laundering/ Combating the Financing of Terrorism) com-

    pliance. This mandates the adoption of the provisions of the com-

    pliance programme, designed to ensure proper record keeping and

    reporting of transactions and to prevent attorneys from being used

    to launder money or to finance terrorism.

    Money laundering must be recognised for its overall

    negative impact and repercussions on the economy and wider

    society. More importantly, banks are the main institutions with the

    volumes of transactions daily which identify them as prime targets

    for financial misuse.

    However, it has been noted that in our professional ca-reers we will inevitably be approached at least once for the pur-

    pose of evading the regulated system. Those with such intentions

    view lawyers as the gatekeepers whom they seek to abuse along with the financial institutions and other businesses in order to

    achieve their ulterior illegal motive.

    Therefore, criminals may seek the services of legal pro-

    fessionals for the sole purpose of disguising illegal transactions,

    making it more difficult to detect or even perhaps to use the cli-

    ents account as a means of introducing illegal funds into the bank-ing system.

    Financial Intelligence Unit and the Attorney-at-Law

    BY KARINA SINGH

    Three stages of money laundering:

    1) Placement where the money is deposited into a financial institu-tion; 2) Layering where the funds are moved around and 3) Integration where it is converted to personal assets such as invest-ing the funds into real estate, luxury assets, or business ventures.

    Another method of money laundering is smurfing where funds are broken up into smaller amounts and deposited in different banks

    which makes it difficult to trace its origin.

    Indicators of suspicious transactions:

    Frequent change of ownership of property;

    Property sale shortly after purchase which does not corre-spond with its value;

    Repetitive changing of attorneys without a reasonable expla-nation;

    The purchasing of property in names of other persons;

    Depositing large amounts of money on a clients behalf.

    However, we must recognise that our requirement to

    disclose is subject to boundaries such as the rules of confidentiality,

    as provided in our Code of Ethics under the Legal Profession

    Act (1986).

    In transactions involving buying and selling of real estate,

    lawyers, notaries and other independent professionals are required

    to report suspicious activities.

    Under the FIU Act, we must report any suspicious activity

    by filing a suspicious transaction report. It is understood that the

    FIU requires a degree of protection and confidentiality of infor-

    mation. This obligation is immune from liability for the legal conse-

    quences of having made the disclosure as it states that the facts or contents of reports to the FIU will not be disclosed to anyone

    other than the FIU. We must also be cognisant of the offences in omitting or

    failing to report such transactions. These offences are laid out in

    sections 43 to 46, 51 and 52 of Proceeds of Crime Act chap

    11:27. They include suspicious dealing with property, concealing or

    disguising ones own or anothers proceeds of crime, receiving an-others proceeds of crime, tipping-off and failure to disclose knowledge or suspicion of money laundering. Offences are also

    covered under Part 111a, section 22a of the Anti-Terrorism-Act

    Chap 12:07.

  • P A G E 8

    T H E G A V E L

    The DOs and DONTs of In-Service Training BY JASON NATHU

    IN-SERVICE TRAINING is a critical component of the pro-

    gramme at the Hugh Wooding Law School (HWLS). Regulations stip-

    ulate that each student will be required to serve a period of attach-

    ment for the purpose of practical training, during the vacation be-

    tween the first and second year.

    For many students, this period of In-Service Training is their first

    contact with the actual practice of law. At HWLS, In-Service Training

    precedes the Legal Aid Clinic (mandatory for all second year stu-

    dents), which is designed to provide students with practical training in

    client communication, critical analysis, case preparation and trial ad-

    vocacy.

    Some law firms or public offices offer a structured pro-

    gramme for In-Service Trainees, but many students find themselves

    going with the flow, with no advance warning of what to do or what to expect. Here are a few points to remember when you start

    your In-Service Training:

    Attire: As a student attorney, your professionalism is central to your

    success. Putting thought into your attire is an easy way to project

    professionalism. If your law office observes a business casual dress code, consider that the emphasis is on the word business. If you are invited to observe or participate in a court attendance or client meet-

    ing, always wear a suit.

    Take notes: Always bring a pen and paper to every meeting. It is

    shocking how many people fail to do this, and it never leaves a good

    impression.

    Interact: As an In-Service Trainee, you will be evaluated (among

    other things) on your ability to act sociably with the attorneys and

    staff in your office. You will make a much stronger impression if you

    are not only diligent in your work but also personable and easy to get

    along with. You can demonstrate that you are a sociable person by

    making an effort on a daily basis to engage in friendly, comfortable

    dialogue with the attorneys and staff in your office.

    Manage your workload: Be open and receptive to all types of mat-

    ters. No job is beneath you, so no matter what the assignment, ex-

    press enthusiasm at the prospect of working on it. Let each attorney

    know what other matters you may be working on for other attor-

    neys in the office. You are always better served by communicating

    with the attorneys rather than to keep accepting assignments and

    producing substandard work, or not finishing it at all. The attorneys

    you are working with will greatly appreciate if you regularly update

    them with status of the assignments that they have given to you. Do

    not let them think that the work they have given you has fallen into

    an abyss.

    Social events: Make an effort to participate in the social events at

    your firm or office. That having been said, NEVER get drunk at social

    events. This may sound obvious, but there is always a story about the

    intern who had a few too many, embarrassing himself/herself in front

    of the entire office.

    Punctuality: Always observe the office hours of the firm or office to

    which you are assigned. If you are going to be late, or have to leave

    the office for any reason, always let someone know where you are.

    There is nothing worse than people having to look for you, and no

    one can tell a Partner or senior attorney where you are. Never be

    late for court matters.

    Be open to learning: Even if you are an A student, do not expect

    that you know all the answers. If you are given an assignment and you have absolutely no idea what to do, conduct some preliminary re-

    search and make a list of questions before discussing with the attor-

    ney. The staff at law firms and law offices is an invaluable resource,

    and paralegals, secretaries and clerks may be able to assist you if you

    encounter difficulty with any task. When you attend court, take notes

    and make it a point to discuss the matter with the attorney. Remem-

    ber you are there to learn, not just to observe.

    Confidentiality: You will be working on real-life matters. It is not

    appropriate to discuss the files with your friends, family or colleagues.

    Never post on social networks about the files that you are working

    on, or the matters that you observe in court.

    In-Service Training can be both an enjoyable and rewarding experi-

    ence. Be yourself, but above all, always remember to conduct your-

    self in a manner that is befitting of the Law School and the Council

    of Legal Education.

    A is for arson, the firing of houses

    B is for bigamy, too many spouses.

    C is for caveat. Emptor beware!

    Ds for defense which counsel prepare.

    Es for extradition of chaps from abroad,

    F is for felony, forgery, fraud.

    G is for all the goodwill you will need,

    H is for heir, who will try to succeed,

    Is for identity, plus the parade,

    Js for the juries who never get paid.

    K is for kin who are sought from afar,

    L is for lawyers, all sides of the bar.

    Ms the mandamus, for which we

    have waited,

    N is the nuisance as yet unabated.

    O is for oath on the old or the new,

    P is for paperwork, long overdue.

    Q is for questions which counsel will ask,

    Rs the refresher he needs for his task.

    S is for sacrilege, stealing from churches,

    T is for title - a good one on purchase.

    U is for usage, the custom of trade,

    V is for view, which his Lordship has

    made.

    Ws for wife and for woolsack and wills,

    X is the sum of solicitors bills.

    Y is the number of years you will get.

    And Z is a crime that we do not know of

    yet.

    SUBMITTED BY JENNY ROGERS

  • P A G E 9 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    THIS ARTICLE ORIGINATED from discussions with students

    about the issues they were facing or had faced while studying at

    HWLS. Following the discussion and considering the lasting effect

    that failure here could have on self-esteem, the following advice to

    you, while not exhaustive, has been compiled based on my observa-

    tions and feedback from past students and Tutors.

    As new students, you sometimes lack an appreciation for

    the amount of work that is required of you. Time management will

    be the key to your success. You must choose how to use your

    time, for instance, whether or not you attend social activities or

    classes. Whatever decision you make, you must always remember

    there are consequences.

    During your tenure at HWLS, you will establish emotional

    independence from your parents, experience increased freedom,

    determine a personal value system, work out your career goals and

    establish relationships with your peers. While these experiences are

    normally age-related, they may sometimes become overwhelming

    and seriously interfere with academic performance. Do not hesitate

    to seek counseling where necessary.

    At HWLS you must be able to read, write, speak, and listen effectively. Ineffectiveness in even one of these language skills

    I MADE IT! NOW WHAT?

    will lead to academic difficulty. You may find that your educational

    background or previous lack of effort has not prepared you for

    these academic demands. You may need remedial work to address

    these deficiencies. Do not hesitate to avail yourself of the resources

    at the HWLS that may assist you in this regard.

    At earlier levels of your education, evaluation of your

    work was largely the responsibility of your teacher and so you may

    not have learnt how to do so yourself. Overestimation of your un-

    derstanding of course material and the quality of your work could

    lead to an inability to handle criticism as well as placing blame on

    and claiming personality conflict with tutors. Seeking feedback from

    your tutors and peers will serve you in good stead.

    You may be concerned about employment after HWLS

    based on current graduate employment levels, workplace competi-

    tion and student loan repayment schedules. You should not overly

    concern yourself with these issues at this stage as your performance

    would most certainly be affected. Rather, use this time to focus on

    your training with a view to becoming the best attorney that you

    can be, thereby enhancing your chances for success in this your

    chosen career.

    Good luck on your journey!

    BY PETRONILLA SYLVESTER

    INVICTUS (by English poet William Ernest Hen-

    ley)

    Out of the night that covers me,

    Black as the pit from pole to pole,

    I thank whatever gods may be

    For my unconquerable soul.

    In the fell clutch of circumstance

    I have not winced nor cried aloud.

    Under the bludgeonings of chance

    My head is bloody, but unbowed.

    Beyond this place of wrath and tears

    Looms but the horror of the shade,

    And yet the menace of the years

    Finds and shall find me unafraid.

    It matters not how strait the gate,

    How charged with punishments the

    scroll,

    I am the master of my fate,

    I am the captain of my soul.

    The Gavel takes a moment to pay tribute to South African hero, Nelson Mandela The late Nelson Mandela used this

    poem to sustain himself while in

    prison.

    Caricom leaders: Prime Minister Kam-la Persad-Bissessar, right, sits next to

    President of Guyana Donald Ramotar

    and Jamaica's Prime Minister Portia

    Simpson-Miller in Johannesburg for the

    Nelson Mandela memorial.

    QUICK FACTS

    FULL NAME: Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela

    OCCUPATION: Civil Rights Activist, World Leader, Writer

    BIRTH DATE: July 18, 1918

    DEATH DATE: December 05, 2013

    Nelson Mandela became the first black president of South Africa in 1994, serving until 1999.

    A symbol of global peacemaking, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993.

  • P A G E 1 0

    T H E G A V E L

    HWLS Presentation of Graduates 2013

    The top performe

    rs receive their aw

    ards.

    Senior Tutor, Mrs. Cheryl Ann Jerome-Alexander

    poses with a few of the graduates.

    Jacqueline Samuels Brown QC, Chairman of the Council of

    Legal Education presents graduates with their LEC.

  • P A G E 1 1 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    HWLS Presentation of Graduates 2013 PHOTOS COURTESY PIERRES PHOTOGRAPHY

    Graduates collec

    t their Legal Educ

    ation Certificate

    at

    the Graduation C

    eremony at UWI

    SPEC

    Special awards were awarded to the graduates

  • P A G E 1 2

    T H E G A V E L

    DIVALI HAS COME and gone yet

    again and as is customary, we marked

    the occasion with our annual Divali

    programme. It was a night of cultural

    performances showcasing our diaspo-

    ra. A night where our very own peers displayed their various talents

    and boy was there talent! A night of tassa and dance. A night of delica-

    cies and curry which could be smelt throughout the entire dining hall. A

    night of fashion and modelling. A night where knowledge about the

    festival of lights in Trinidad and Tobago was shared and where we learnt

    that ironing over paper gets wax out of carpet.

    The lead up to the programme included a very successful 'Pholourie

    sale' which has us, up to today, being flagged down in the hallways by

    Legal Aid tutors to make more pholourie. Students were able to sam-

    ple our local East Indian cuisine and treat their taste buds to these fried savouries.

    The festivities culminated in the lighting of deyas. Each person was given a deya which was lit from another deya which, in turn, was lit from another deya. This showed the unity of us all and the sharing of light with each other, the true message of Divali.

    At this point, the Hindu Students' Council would like to express sincerest gratitude to all those who contributed in making this celebration the

    grand success it has been.

    Divali 2013 at HWLS

    Our lovely models in their Indian attire. Our Principal Miriam Samaru takes

    part in the lighting of deyas.

    BY KARUNA BISRAMSINGH

    Students take part in the lighting of deyas the festival of

    lights!

    Tassa in the Lecture Hall

  • P A G E 1 3 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    LET THE ISLAND NIGHTS BEGIN! OECS NIGHT

    BY SIAND DHURJON

    THE FIRST ISLAND Night of the academic year kicked off with students of

    the various OECS countries treating everyone in the jam-packed Aubrey Fraser

    Lecture Theatre to a series of performances. Their island-hopping skit was most

    captivating; it took on a humorous twist that incorporated most of the islands of

    the OECS.

    Song and dance were also incorporated into the presentation. The

    entire theatre jolted into animation when soca musician Sekon Sta specially per-

    formed his new song Wine on de Truck. Ending with their riveting rendition of

    four songs about various OECS islands, the students of the OECS certainly did

    their home proud.

    Next, the attendees were regaled with scrumptious dishes from the

    OECS countries. The food included oil down, Grenadas national dish, which is a meltdown of coconut milk, dasheen bush, salted meat, dumplings and breadfruit.

    Also, the take on salt-fish and stewed chicken was particularly delicious.

    As for the fete- let us simply say that the students thoroughly enjoyed

    themselves in the nights final festivity. Transformed into a dance floor, the Din-ing Hall thumped and thudded with bass from the rhythms. Perhaps, it was something in that Vincentian Sunset Rum

  • P A G E 1 4

    Nutting Sweetuh Dan Dis'

    ON THE 30TH November 2013, the place to be was the Aubrey

    Fraser Lecture Theatre for one of the most highly anticipated

    nights on the Hugh Wooding Law School's Calendar, Bajan Night.

    Despite being only 166 square miles and one smile wide, Barbados

    truly boasts larger than life talent.

    The night, aptly entitled 'Nuttin Sweetuh Dan Dis' did not fail to

    deliver. Patrons and specially invited guests were immediately met

    with the infectious and pulsating sounds of tuk band rhythms upon

    entering whilst being seated by two Barbadian cultural characters;

    Mother Sallies. These characters, played by Casey Boyce and

    Aesha Nassar, who are known for their over exaggerated dimen-

    sions added a certain je ne sais quoi which made you feel you as

    though you were in the epicentre of Barbadian culture during Crop

    Over and not in Trinidad and Tobago . The Law School was transformed into a sea of blue

    Despite a late start, the production was worth the wait. Enti-

    tled "Hotel Bimshire: Coz when yuh get dere ya aint gine want

    tuh Lef dey", was a melting pot of tributes, drama, dance, song

    and music accentuated by pieces of information about the

    island's culture. Emceed by Kim Ramsay-Moore and Lorimer

    Denny, they kept the production moving and entertaining.

    Even inviting persons to come and limbo on the stage.

    The play, penned and directed by Second Year Kimberley Al-

    leyne, treated the large crowd to the musings of Elroy the

    doorman, Pretty Boy Floyd the Bell Boy, Chef, Katrina, the

    Minister, Clotelle the maid and even the Condense Babies who

    left everyone in stitches.

    BY KIMBERLY ALLEYNE

    Food Coordinator Michelle Shepherd created history serving

    flying fish strips for the first time in years at Bajan Night. The

    servers who were well attired, could be seen with trays of hors

    d'oeuvres serving the long line before they reached the well pre-

    pared main course of traditional Bajan foods and dessert. She

    must be commended for her efforts.

    Fete Coordinator Janelle Skeete, who brought the ultimate cli-

    max to this night was not to be outdone as her shot girls en-

    sured everyone was ready to finish the night off with a good ol'

    Bajan 'bruggadung'.

    All in all Bajan Night did not fail to deliver. For two years in a

    row it has set the bar high for the other nights. This year how-

    ever will truly be a hard act to follow.

    Hugh Wooding is oozing with talent galore and it is good when

    there is an avenue for students to show off their various talents.

    Bajans....wunna outdid wunna selves!!

    KUDOS!!!

    Glamour Girl Sue Kimber-

    ley Griffith and Production

    Coordinator Ann Marie

    Hinds treated us for anoth-

    er year with an entertaining

    duet, "Malicious Crew".

    Mention must be made of

    the high quality of the danc-

    ers, the world renowned

    choir, actors, stage crew

    and lighting. It was truly a

    memorable night full of

    laughs and moments to last

    a lifetime.

    Dining Hall converted into a blue and yellow

    candle light setting.

    The food service added a touch of class to

    T H E G A V E L

  • P A G E 1 5 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    STUDENT IN THE CORRIDOR...WHAT DO YOU WISH FOR CHRISTMAS?

    Aleema Ameerali

    (Yr.2) :

    I wish to see my two brothers this Christ-

    mas.

    Miguel Rawlins

    (Yr.2):

    Some cufflinks, nice cologne, a watch...GQ

    stuff!

    Tsean Vasquez

    (Yr.2):

    I wish to graduate.

    Janet Taylor

    (Yr.2) :

    Happiness, health, peace

    and love ..and

    lots of Christmas cheer.

    Johanna

    Daniel

    (Yr 2):

    A sure job after Gradua-

    tion.

    Shivana

    Sharma

    (Yr.2):

    I wish for people

    to be more selfless.

    Rae Thomas

    (Yr.2) :

    I wish more people would focus on the

    Christ in Christmas.

    He is the reason for

    the season and

    throughout.

    Philip C.

    Gaskin (Yr.2):

    I wish that I might spend time

    with my two love-

    ly children and my

    granddaughter in

    Barbados.

    Alaina Ram-

    roop (Yr.1): A 2013 wrx sti

    with Hawk

    eyes (a rally

    car) and maybe

    some dia-

    monds( lol).

    Michael Mat-

    thews (Yr.2):

    My wish is to survive Final

    year of HWLS

    and get my

    LEC.

    Kavita Sirjusingh

    (Yr.2): I wish for lots of stationary, I love Lisa

    Frank stationery!

    Andell Ar-

    nold (Yr.1):

    For Christ-mas, Id like this gor-geous emerald and

    white gold ring!

    Roger Carter

    (Yr.1):

    I wish for stronger closeness and to-

    getherness among

    the Law Schools students from dif-

    ferent countries.

    Anastacia San-

    ford (Yr.1):

    I just wish to be with my children

    in the comfort of

    my own home in

    Guyana.

    Chanelle

    Aching

    (Yr.1):

    I wish that every-

    ones personal jour-ney in life is success-

    ful in all aspects and

    that my grandfather is

    healed.

    Javed

    Mohammed

    (Yr.1)

    Thats easy! The new Bat-

    man Arkham

    Origins for Playstation 3.

    Tiffany

    Hohenkirk

    (Yr.1)

    I have mostly everything I need,

    so for Christmas I

    just want a Kindle

    Fire HDX.

    Nawana Shillingford

    (Yr.1): How about all As in my assignments? Or is that

    too much to ask?

    Grace Bhagwan-

    deen (Yr.1):

    More than anything, what I want for

    Christmas is for the

    world to remember

    that Jesus Christ is

    the reason for the

    season.

  • P A G E 1 6

    T H E G A V E L

    BY EILEEN BENJAMIN-RYAN

    THE LEGAL AID Clinic has increased its capacity to provide valuable service to student attorneys and clients with the addition

    of four tutors this term . Jason Nathu, Kerry Ann Harrison, Annika Fritz and Liselle Guerin agreed to share their new experience

    with the Gavel.

    More Lawyers at Legal Aid Clinic

    Jason Nathu

    Attorney-at-Law

    Annika Fritz

    Attorney-at-Law

    Follow Your Passion

    For Jason Nathu, it is a transition from the

    firm environment where he was accus-tomed to corporate clients to Legal Aid Clin-

    ic where its a different kettle of fish. However it is a worthwhile experi-

    ence since he was always interested in aca-

    demia. The Clinic therefore gives him the

    opportunity to give back and contribute to

    the development of young attorneys.

    He enjoys this new experience

    especially since he is also co-ordinator of the

    Human Rights Clinic, where students have

    done fantastic work on projects that impact on society. He also has a passion for intel-lectual property which he practised for a few

    years.

    His biggest challenge is practising

    family law for the first time and the emotion-al challenge of such cases as domestic vio-

    lence and abuse of children where it is diffi-cult to detach yourself from clients personal problems . Mr Nathu admits that his first love

    was media and broadcasting but his passion is

    intellectual property which he practised for a

    few years . His advice to new lawyers is to

    figure out their passion so they can enjoy and like what they do.

    Its not all about remuneration but ful-fillment of a passion.

    Be Smart

    Kerry Ann Harrison describes her new

    experience at the Legal Aid Clinic as ful-

    filling. She has been in private practice for

    seven years mainly in the areas of family,

    corporate and industrial relations. Her love

    of teaching however, has brought her here

    for a different hybrid experience. She is accustomed to dealing with students since

    she taught at UWI before; but she enjoys

    the fast paced environment of students, classes, clients, court. Her greatest challenge is getting

    students to do their work and inspiring

    them to do better. Its peoples livesthey sacrifice and they come here. Le-gal aid experience at an early age helps stu-

    dents to develop a social conscience. It prepares them for the real world and peo-ple with real problems. Her advice is to be smart and use

    your intelligence; fashion yourselves after

    very good role models and do not blindly

    follow the crowd ; always maintain profes-

    sionalism and uphold the Code of Ethics.

    She also advises students to follow Justice

    Holdips caution about social media very seriously and to be aware that postings on

    these media could turn out to be embar-

    rassing and negatively affect their career.

    Kerry Ann Harrison

    Attorney-at-Law

    No Price for Experience

    Annika Fritz describes her experience

    at the Legal Aid Clinic as very pleasant

    and appreciates the dynamism of it all. She brings with her 10 years legal expe-

    rience in different capacities, including

    Parliament and a Government Ministry.

    She also taught at UWI; she really really enjoys teaching and loves the blend of teaching and going to court.

    Her advice to new lawyers is

    appreciate creeping before you walk and walking before you run, because there is no price for experience. She

    stressed the importance of research

    and an understanding of the law to ef-

    fectively advise clients.

    Dont rush into advising before understanding the facts and

    their relation to the law.

  • P A G E 1 7 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 T H E G A V E L

    Lyndon Abdool Quality Assurance Manager

    Do not underestimate hard work

    For Liselle Guerin, it is enlightening to see how much has changed in the five years

    since she graduated from HWLS and the expectations of student-attorneys at the Legal

    Aid Clinic.

    She believes that it is only through practice that you get to understand the

    dynamics of the profession. However, she always wanted to teach, so she has learnt to

    appreciate law in a new way at the Legal Aid Clinic, with the combination of teaching

    and practiceperfect match. She stressed the importance of treating with legal aid as if you are in a firm --

    efficient and not just producing and the need to understand what youre doing. Her greatest challenge is the increased number of students but is confident

    the Clinic will continue to produce quality. She advises students to be willing to seek

    guidance because at the end of the day we do not know it all; know what you want and

    do not underestimate hard work; do not bottle-neck yourself and be confident in your

    ability.

    Fostering Quality culture at HWLS

    Mr Lyndon Abdool has been recruited as Quality Assurance Manager

    to improve stakeholders satisfaction of HWLS. The department provides insti-tutional data to other departments, monitors and measures processes and pro-

    cedures to ensure they are effective in achieving programme objectives.

    His greatest challenge is establishing systems which foster quality in the

    organisation. He believes there are already good plans but implementation is

    the problem. Surveys/research agenda include: student assessment, peer as-

    sessment (pilot project with Senior Tutor), supervisory assessment, assessment

    of exam results to determine trends.

    Before joining HWLS, Mr Abdool worked in a similar capacity at

    Cipriani Labour College. However, he recognises the difference here with stu-

    dents who are post-graduate, with higher expectations and a different niche. He also praises HWLS for its stability of leadership, autonomy and independence

    from Government.

    He believes that the school is student-centred and that administration

    listens to students and gives them a voice. His advice to students is to take an active role in the way they want HWLS to be run. At every opportunity be actively involved and give recommendations so that students remain the centre

    of all operations.

    Liselle Guerin

    Attorney-at-Law

    Jiselle Alexander Counsellor

    Balance! Balance! Balance!

    Staff and students of HWLS now have access to a counseling service as a means of helping

    them cope with the stresses of life and the demands of work/school. The programme

    only started this term under the management of Counsellor Jiselle Alexander, but stu-

    dents are already utilising the service and as people become aware, numbers will improve.

    Ms Alexander is optimistic about the new service. She admits that when students do not

    know about the service they may be cautious, but once the information is out there, eve-

    ryone can reap the benefits. Results of a recent on-line survey will guide in prioritising

    the range of services that will be available, such as workshops on time management, emo-

    tional health and well being and facing loss.

    Counselling is confidential and no counselling history will go into the students academic file. Students make their own appointments for counseling and sessions are

    held off campus.

    Nobody wants to seek help or to admit that they need help. They push hard and do not

    think about emotions and feelings, but self-imposed pressure to perform takes a toll even-

    tually.

    She advises students that we should pay attention to all sectors of our life and ensure

    there is balance. This is only for a time and there is more to life. No one wants be-come emotionally unbalanced, alienate their loved ones and lose the respect of their chil-dren because they neglected to take care of other things that matter. Make a conscious

    effort to spend quality time with family and practice healthy lifestyles.

  • P A G E 1 8

    SOME YEARS AGO, Maximus Dan had a major hit entitled

    Have some order, do not cross the border! and the shouts of Order in the Court is an all-too-familiar phrase within the pre-cincts of the courtroom so in this article we focus on order both in apparel and behaviour. As we welcome new and continu-

    ing students to our hallowed halls of the Hugh Wooding Law

    School, and as a reinforcement of our presentation at the Orien-

    tation Exercise we feel it necessary to treat with what we term

    sense of appropriateness. The Registrar spent an inordinate amount of time

    speaking to the mode of dress, decorum and general behaviour

    and interestingly enough on Friday, November 15, 2013 when

    addressing the new attorneys at the call to the bar, the Learned

    Judge dedicated a section of his presentation to Civility of Law-yers which he deemed to be one of his pet peeves from his standpoint both as arbiter and as associate tutor. This contribu-

    tor feels it absolutely necessary to reinforce these issues which

    form the base of the legal pyramid.

    In some instances, we behave the way we dress; there

    is a distinct correlation between our dress and our behaviour.

    Over the centuries, there have been drastic and incremental

    changes in the legal profession in keeping with societal changes.

    Wigs are no longer worn (although The Bahamas still does),

    females wear trousers, dreadlocks hairstyles are permissible and

    more recently Israel Khan SC challenged and won the right to

    wear Nehru-collared suits to court and this list is by no means

    exhaustive. However, there are certain norms which still remain

    intact and are truly representative of this conservative profes-

    sion to which we ought to adhere, bearing in mind that the pro-

    fession did not choose you but you chose the profession. Your

    two years at the law school is a transition towards your profes-

    sional destination of attorney and accordingly we prepare you in

    dress, word and thought for this eventuality. This explains our

    expansive though expensive involvement in local, regional and

    international moots as far afield as The Hague. Given the fore-

    going, we expect you to honour your part of this arrangement

    with appropriate dress and conduct.

    The wearing of adornments, ill-fitting and tight clothing

    which at times render you unable to move with comfort and

    ease are inappropriate for the courtroom and ought not to be

    worn during your tenure at the Law School. We ask that you

    accord us the same courtesy. We are all guided by standards

    and foundational blocks from which we build and nurture a soci-

    ety. An engineer must wear a hard hat on a site so designated

    regardless of his hairstyle or traditions and we must therefore

    be careful not to allow modernity to wreak havoc with the tradi-

    tions of this noble profession. Your conduct and decorum must

    remain intact. We are defined by our qualities and not by our qualifications. We are a transitioning body and therefore re-

    sponsible in part for what you become. We cannot speak of

    legal reinforcement at a societal level if we renege at the institu-

    tional or personal levels. The micro informs the macro.

    While we have employees to maintain the cleanliness

    and aesthetic appearance of our premises, you do need to coop-

    erate and ensure that you do what is required of you. In the

    words of George Bernard Shaw -

    better keep yourself clean and bright; you are the window through which you must see the world.

    REGISTRARS WRITE!!Order!! Order!!

    BY THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR

    T H E G A V E L

  • P A G E 1 9 V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2

    very basic, Im so poor, I cant get a job.

    Q: What are your thoughts on de-criminalization of marijuana

    in Trinidad and Tobago? Are the laws on possession still neces-

    sary or outdated?

    What I dislike about it most is that simply because the US did

    it they want to do it. Because for many years, the Rastafarian community

    has been lobbying to do exactly that and we never took any notice.

    Theyve presented studies, weve had academics who were Rastafarian and so on and tried to present their evidence. We laughed at them, we

    vilified them, we said all kinds of things. Now today a few months after a

    couple states in the US did it we now want to jump on the bandwagon

    so you know what I refuse to answer that question because of that. Ask

    the Rastas thats my answer. You know what I mean? Why cant we think for ourselves? What gives it more validity today? The only reason

    theyre willing to talk about it now is because of that. It really annoys me. Its part of the problem of us being re-colonized peoples. We still havent gotten there, we still dont think for ourselves. Everything some-body else does we do. It really irritates me. Mimic men is what Nai-paul called us.

    Q: Do you see the illegality of abortion as an infringement on a

    womans right to make decisions affecting her body? Should it be legalised and regulated?

    Well I believe every woman should have the right to make her

    own decision. I suspect its a decision that would cause them a lot of anguish but I do accept it. On the other hand I do no want to see a

    world where people would abort a child very willy nilly. But I do believe

    there are situations where a woman is faced with very dire circumstanc-

    es. In St. Lucia the laws changed where if you were raped you could have

    an abortion and some of the churches opposed it. But if I am raped I

    believe I should have the choice to abort the child. I could never do it

    but intellectually I accept it. These issues are often so complicated be-

    cause the majority of times that women chose to have abortions are

    because of economic circumstances. Its usually poor people and you wonder why didnt they use contraception, which is another complicat-ed question. What do you mean by regulated? Lets only have one child? Medically its risky to have an abortion after a certain time but of course the question is also when is a person a person? I dont know the answer to that. Nobody knows the answer to that. It seems for us a society to

    be able to see a heartbeat etc it seems callous but perhaps as medical

    science advances we may be able to view a fetus at earlier stages maybe

    within the first week you could probably hear a heartbeat you know

    what I mean? (laughs)

    Q: You recently published a collection of articles on the Legal

    and Policy Perspectives on HIV and Human Rights in the Carib-

    bean. What else could be done to promote awareness of HIV

    and other STDs?

    So much is being done. I think were moving in the right direction and there is a lot of awareness and civil society work so I think were doing what is necessary.

    Q: If you could eliminate one of the ills in society what would it

    be?

    Well we were talking about poverty a while ago so I think it would be poverty.

    Having just come from places like Haiti I suppose its been on my mind.

    Q: What do you think can be learnt from fellow human

    rights activist, Nelson Mandela?

    Well I actually met Nelson Mandela he said I remind him of his

    niece and I gave him a David Rudder CD. I always wondered if he

    listened to it. Im sure he did. Im a very cynical person in the sense that I have an enquiring mind. For many years as a young child I

    followed the anti-apartheid movement, so I didnt just know about Nelson Mandela, I knew about Steve Biko and other freedom fight-

    ers. So before I met Nelson Mandela and I read his books I said to

    myself its not really about Nelson Mandela because there are so many people who did exactly what he did, who were in the strug-

    gle, some lost their lives or were imprisoned. Nelson Mandela was

    just a symbol. He was in the right place at the right time. People

    may say it became a personal thing about Nelson Mandela as against

    the struggle the ANC had. So yes, I admired him but he wasnt the only one. That was my thought of Nelson Mandela.

    But having met him I did feel, and I am not at all a gullible per-

    son, I did feel a sense of his presence. That man had something

    special honestly. I felt his vibes I felt his karma and its only then I thought yes Nelson Mandela is a great man, seriously. And its not that he said anything so earth shattering to me, we had a social

    conversation and we were chatting and laughing, but it was the

    sense of his being and something about that made me understand

    he wasnt an ordinary person. Im not religious but I think some-times God sends special people to us at points in our lives, I do

    believe Bob Marley was one of those, to sort of jolt us and guide us.

    I do think Nelson Mandela was one of those. He had a destiny he

    was chosen to do what he did. It wasnt just that he was a symbol but he himself had that quality in him. Actually, Nelson Mandela

    himself wasnt only this peacemaker, he was a rebel and a fighter but he was able to contain it and use it to channel his energy. He

    definitely had that special presence. I met him and I felt it.

    Q:What is one thing that is on your bucket list and why?

    Ive seen that movie recently (laughs). Ive always wanted to go to Egypt to see the mummies and the kings and so on because I feel

    very strongly that they have tried to disorient them. When Ive gone to the Louvre in France, their noses are always missing and I

    have this theory that its deliberate distortion of history. They dont wanna admit their African heritage as they want us to believe the

    people who form these things and built these pyramids were not

    black and so I always wanted to see their nose for myself.

    INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR ANTOINE (Continued from page 20)

    T H E G A V E L

  • THE GAVELTHE GAVEL A P U B L I C A T I O N O F

    T H E H U G H W O O D I N G L A W S C H O O L

    V O L U M E 6 , I S S U E 2 D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 3

    (Continued on page19)

    BY RONALD J. DANIELS

    Q: What triggered your interest in protecting human

    rights?

    I had a social conscience ever since I was young. I come from

    a large family that was community oriented. We would have dis-

    cussions about apartheid and stuff. I had this impression in my

    mind that law was for people who just wanted to make a lot of

    money. One day we had a Career seminar at school and my for-

    mer Headgirl, Jo-Anne Julien, an Attorney-at-Law, came to speak

    to us. While we were chatting she said, Why dont you do law? So I said, Everybody said I should do law but Im interested in changing the world, social reform and making a difference. And she said but law is a platform in which you could do that. You can

    do so much with a law degree.

    I had a social conscience and people wanted me to do law

    but nobody ever put the two together. So when I went to the Law

    faculty, I already had a clear vision of the subjects I wanted to do.

    At that time, I was the exception, because most of my colleagues

    were interested in doing more commercial law to make money.

    The Human Rights class had about 6 people. I even had art exhibitions where I displayed things like gen-

    der, apartheid etc. People were oblivious. Its hard for you to understand because the faculty has changed so much.

    Q: Do you agree with Nelson Mandela that overcoming pov-

    erty is the protection of a fundamental human right?

    Of course. A lot of my human rights work is done through

    economic, social and cultural rights which for many years we thought

    were non justiciable or non enforceable: right to work, right to health,

    right to education. We did so much to expand our Constitution to

    protect a persons right to life for criminals but we did very little to protect right to humanity through these economic rights. What good is

    it to me if I have the right to go and call the talk show and say whatev-

    er I want- freedom of expression- but I dont even have a loaf of bread to feed my children because Im so poor or I cant get a job? Im always saying that we have neglected these and now, Im also at the Commis-sion the head of a new unit which we created last year, Economic,

    Social and Cultural Rights Unit, because were now recognising that we have to embrace economic, social and cultural rights in a more tangible

    way. I was the rapporteur for African Descendants first so that is race

    and discrimination but I see the important synergies. So when I talk to

    about race discrimination you think Im only interested in saying, Okay non-discrimination, dont call me the n word? We want more than that. We want to find ways to ensure persons are given genuine oppor-

    tunities to advance themselves. The most important thing when I look

    at issues such as race or gender discrimination is to look at it through

    the lens of economic, social and cultural rights. Thats why I support

    reparations. Its about, Give us some genuinely equal opportunities in economic and social rights, give us quality education, make sure we

    have the funds for it. So clearly what Mandela says about poverty is true and the human

    rights agenda is beginning to move in that direction. A lot of it is about

    structural and institutional discrimination. For instance you may say

    health is free but in a rural area or particular areas where persons of

    African descent live, it will be the poorest type of health facility or you

    may have to go long ways to get it and these things perpetuate them-

    selves. It takes one accepting these truths. What Ive found is that race is invisible people dont like to talk about it. People have this very nar-row view of racism, yes I have a friend who is black so Im not racist. It includes stereotyping that we may not even be aware of.

    Im not interested in narrow, insular human rights. Im interested in economic, social and cultural rights in tandem with those other rights

    because for me the right to equality, right to non-discrimination, right

    to dignity and personhood can only generally exist if a person also has

    those rights. You cant have one without the other. You cant tell me that Im equal or that I have dignity and personhood if Im denied the

    INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR ANTOINE BY KHADIJA MAC FARLANE

    Professor Rose-Marie Belle Antoine DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF LAW, UWI, ST.AGUSUTINE CAMPUS;

    COMMISSIONER ON THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN

    RIGHTS