Gateway course success

33
GATEWAY COURSE SUCCESS Scaling Corequisite

description

Gateway course success. Scaling Corequisite. Too many students start college in remediation. Too many entering freshmen need remediation. 51.7%. of those entering a 2-year college enrolled in remediation . 19.9%. of those entering a 4-year college enrolled in remediation . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Gateway course success

Page 1: Gateway course success

GATEWAY COURSE SUCCESSScaling Corequisite

Page 2: Gateway course success

2

Too many students start college in remediation.

Page 3: Gateway course success

3

Too many entering freshmen need remediation.

51.7%of those entering a 2-year college enrolled in remediation

19.9%of those entering a 4-year college enrolled in remediation

Source: Fall 2006 cohorts

Page 4: Gateway course success

4

Too few remedial students ever graduate.

Page 5: Gateway course success

5

Most remedial students never graduate.

Source: Completion data: fall 2006 cohorts; graduation data: 2-year, fall 2004 cohorts; 4-year, fall 2002 cohorts

Page 6: Gateway course success

6

Student attrition is at the heart of the matter.

Page 7: Gateway course success
Page 8: Gateway course success
Page 9: Gateway course success
Page 10: Gateway course success
Page 11: Gateway course success

11

Few Ever Get to Gateway

70% of students placed into remediation fail to enroll in

a gateway course in two academic years

Page 12: Gateway course success

12

Policy Objectives for Gateway Course Success1. Design STEM and non-STEM math options.2. The default placement for most students

will be gateway courses.3. Provide additional academic support as

corequisite, not prerequisite.4. Establish a placement range instead of a

single cut score.

Page 13: Gateway course success

13

What is Statewide Scale?A state system where . . .

• the vast majority of students . . .

• at the vast majority of institutions . . .

• receive academic support as a corequisite . . .

. . . resulting in dramatic increases in the number of students completing gateway math and English courses in one academic year.

Page 14: Gateway course success

14

Guiding Objective

Students complete gateway courses and enter programs

of study in one academic year

Page 15: Gateway course success

15

Mathematics must be aligned

with programs of study.

Page 16: Gateway course success

“College Algebra was designed explicitly to meet the needs of students who are preparing to take Precalculus and Calculus.”

University System of GeorgiaMathematics Task Force:

Page 17: Gateway course success

17

College Algebra’s Only Purpose :Preparation for Calculus

College Algebra Calculus

STEM

Page 18: Gateway course success

STEM

Page 19: Gateway course success

19

Providing Academic Support as a Corequisite

Page 20: Gateway course success

20

One Semester Redesigned Gateway

Extra Ti

me

• 45 minutes after class

• Additional class periods

Mandatory Tutorin

g

• Paired proctored labs

Sequenced

• 5 weeks prep plus 10 weeks gateway content

Gateway

Page 21: Gateway course success

21

One Semester Corequisite Results

Institution Subject Traditional Model

Corequisite Model

CC of Baltimore County Accelerated Learning Model English 33% 74%

Austin Peay State University Structured Assistance

English 49% 70%

Quantitative Reasoning 11% 78%

Statistics 8% 65%

Page 22: Gateway course success

22

One Year Corequisite

Gateway

Semester 1 Semester 2

Gateway ContentAcademic Support

College Success Skills

STEM

Quantitative Reasoning

Statistics

Page 23: Gateway course success

23

One Year Corequisite Results Carnegie Statway

Success in gateway math within one academic year

Traditional Model Statway

5.9%

51.0%

Page 24: Gateway course success

24

Aligned and Parallel Support in Technical Certificate Programs

Technical Program Math and Language Skills

Tennessee Colleges of Applied Technology• Work Keys/Keytrain• Required, Proctored Lab• Competency-based, Self-paced

Page 25: Gateway course success

25

TCAT Results

79% Graduation RateAll Complete Academic Support

Page 26: Gateway course success

26

Placement into gateway courses and programs

of study

Page 27: Gateway course success

27

Plotting a Path to Programs of Study• High school Performance

(GPA/Senior Year Courses)• High School Transcripts• Placement/Entrance Exams• “Grit”

Page 28: Gateway course success

28

Plotting a Path to Programs of Study• Grit, like cognitive ability, falls within a

normal distribution.• Our current higher education system was

built for students with high grit and high academic ability.

• We don’t know if we can teach grit – but we can remove the unnecessary barriers that prevent student success.

Page 29: Gateway course success

29

Current Model Enrolls Most Students into Remediation

Perc

ent

of S

tude

nts

Student Placement Data

30%70%

GatewayRemediation

Page 30: Gateway course success

30

New Model Enrolls Most in CollegePe

rcen

t of

Stu

dent

s

Student Placement Data30%10% 60%

GatewayTest Prep or

Technical Certificate

Gateway Course with Corequisite

Support

Page 31: Gateway course success

31

A Broad Placement RangePe

rcen

t of

Stu

dent

s

Student Placement Data30%10% 60%

Less than 2.0 HS GPA or

ACT Below 14 or

Equivalent

2.0 – 2.5 High School GPA or ACT 14-18 or

Equivalent

2.5 High School GPA or ACT 19 or

Equivalent

Page 32: Gateway course success

32

Goal of Assessment Reform : More Students in Gateway CoursesDON’T:• Try to build the perfect test• Create a new rigid system for sorting studentsDO:• Dismantle unnecessary barriers by placing the

vast majority in gateway courses• Accept that the majority of students need

some support – cognitive and non-cognitive• Provide that support in the college-level

gateway course – as a co-requisite

Page 33: Gateway course success

33

Policy Objectives for Gateway Course Success1. Design STEM and non-STEM math options.2. The default placement for most students

will be gateway courses.3. Provide additional academic support as

corequisite, not prerequisite.4. Establish a placement range instead of a

single cut score.