Game Understanding Stakeholders Involvement Jirina Bergatt Jackson, Zuzana Ladzianska „This...
-
Upload
gilbert-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of Game Understanding Stakeholders Involvement Jirina Bergatt Jackson, Zuzana Ladzianska „This...
GameUnderstanding Stakeholders
InvolvementJirina Bergatt Jackson, Zuzana Ladzianska
„This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the
information contained therein.“
Learning outcomes of this game
By the end of this section you will be aware of :
• Importance of attitudes and cooperation• Stakeholders roles • Stakeholders contributions to projects
How many can play?• This game is designed to be played by min. 8 people and
max. 15 people. • If there are more than 15 participants, we suggest, that
the game is played in 2 groups.
How long to play?• Minimum time to play this game is 45 minutes• At the beginning of the game each player has to read its
role and debriefing takes place – this takes another cca 15 minutes.
Game Task
A Participants devise themselves into groups. Minimal group size is 8 persons. Each group chooses from the Problem list 1-3, which type of project they would like to develop.
B Each group chooses from the Site description list 1-5 a suitable site for their project.
C Each participant shall choose a role from the role list, describing the type of a stakeholder that each participant would represent.
• Time allocated for task A+ B = 5 minutesD Participants of each group will take part in an initial stakeholders´ development
meeting behaving in line with their allocated role and attitude. • first the game is played with a non-cooperative attitude • then the game is repeated with a cooperative attitude
• Group facilitator shall be chairing the stakeholders ´meetings as a brownfields coordinator and also playing the „devils advocate role“, prompting the participants to develop their role.
• Total time to play both versions is cc. 40 minutes.
The Problem list
• In the town centre and an outer centre of a small town (with not much development potential) there are 5 brownfields. The following parties are potentially interested in a development project in this town:1. Small supermarket operator seeks premises for a shop2. An investor is considering building a small building
containing 4 classrooms, a gym and a sports bar3. Local NGO wanting to create a day centre for
handicapped residents
The Site description
SITE 1 – Abandoned cinema on the high street, structurally sound, valuable modernist facade, nearly no other land, but access to back, elderly private owner.
SITE 2 – Small metal paint workshop, back street to cinema, dilapidated, private speculative owner.
SITE 3 – Disused biology testing lab and an incinerator in a villa in a private garden, good access, outer centre owned by
the local authority.SITE 4 – Corner site ½ ha on one of main access roads outer
centre, ex builders yard, mainly temporary buildings, state institution owner + 2 private owners
SITE 5 – Ex petrol station site next to town square, restricted access (narrow streets), 2 willing to sell owners
Visualisation of the site (1)• For better visualisation it is recommended to
prepare illustrative Model of a site as well as a illustrative Land-use plan of the locality.
Illustrative Model of a site for brownfield development and regeneration.
Visualisation of the site (2)Illustrative Land-use plan of the locality
The Stakehoders´roles
1 – Local councilor or council development officer2 – Project promoter/developer3 – Member of local interest group4 – Real estate advisor5 – Environmental consultant6 – Next door owner, business man7 – Next door owner, informed pensioner8 – Radical NGO9 – Site owner10 – Civil engineer consultant11 – Lawyer 12 – Local architect13 – Member of a local club for historical heritage14 – Local public services representant15 – Local paper reporter16 – Brownfield coordinator
Example of role play cards (1)Role play card: Moderator Role play card: Opis hry
Example of role play cards (2)Role play card: Foreign developer
Example of role play cards (3)Role play card: Local councilor
Role cards rules
• When choosing your role, you must not chose to play your own profession.
• Individual stakeholder role parameters are described on their role cards.
• Individual role card parameters shall not be shown to other players.
• Role cards are part of the teachers notes. Only when participants select their roles, they will be given their role parameter card.
Playing Rules
1. The red marked roles are compulsory, other roles are optional. 2. If more than 15 participants take part, then the game is played in 2
separate groups, one with a negative and the other with a positive attitude, the group that is not playing at the time can watch as public.
3. All participants in each group have to speak but for a reporter, who does not speak but writes.
4. At the end of session each Reporter writes down the news release on what happened, max 300 words on each attitude version.
5. The negative attitude version is played until stakeholders response causes an impasse. (usually this takes place in a few minutes).
6. The positive attitude version is played until the time is out, or until the participants see a value in it).
7. Reporter's press release will be read at the of the teaching session.
Attitude
Play the game twice:
1. Negative attitude, no interest to compromise, seeing only ones own objectives.
2. Positive, open and cooperative attitude.
Conclusions
• Stakeholders are important to brownfields projects. • They bring in new and fresh point of view. • Fixed attitudes often „brake“ chances for brownfield
regeneration. • For brownfields redevelopment to succeed, a
capacity for pragmatism and ability to make certain compromises is needed.
• There is a large difference between observation and involved participation
Thank you for your attention
http://browntrans.vsb.cz
„This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the
information contained therein.“