Gaia: an unprecedented observatory for Solar System objects · Gaia: an unprecedented observatory...
Transcript of Gaia: an unprecedented observatory for Solar System objects · Gaia: an unprecedented observatory...
Gaia: an unprecedented observatory for Solar System objects
Paolo TangaObservatoire de la Côte d’Azur (France)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
SummaryIntro: the Solar System
The general picture
Most relevant objects for Gaia
Asteroids properties, main facts and unknowns
Traditional observing techniques
Asteroids as seen by Gaia
Peculiar issues in SSO observations by Gaia
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007100000 AU
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Gaia will mainly observe…Asteroids
Remnants of Solar System formationAltered/shattered by mutual collisionsMain Belt: source of Earth Crossers
CometsPrimitive material from the outer Solar System
« Small » planetary satellites« regular »« irregular » (retrograde orbits)
Gaia will probably NOT collect observations of « large » bodies (~200 mas ?):
Main PlanetsA few largest asteroidsLarge satellites (Galilean, Titan..)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
How many asteroids will be seen by Gaia?
The large majority of asteroids observed by Gaia (~250.000) will be known
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroids are …small!Astrometry
Orbit determinationMass from mutual perturbations
PhotometryLightcurves shapes
Visible spectroscopyTaxonomy
Thermal IR…+ visiblesize & albedomodel-dependent (thermal conductivity of the surface)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Other techniquesPolarimetry
Albedo determination
Adaptive optics / HSTSatellite discovery ( mass)
Disk resolution of the largestasteroids
Radar ranging3D shape / size (NEOs mainly)
Occultations of starsShape/size (> 40 km)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Location, classification
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroid colours: taxonomyBased on:
UBVRI spectrophotometry
8 colors + albedo (Tholen 1984, ~500 objects)
Bus & Binzel (2002) CCD spectra, ~1500 objects
Problems:Poor statistics in some cases (S)Meteorite equivalents
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroid distributionColour gradient primitivecomposition gradient in the disk
Other effects:MixingSpace weathering
semi-major axis (AU)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroid sizeThe problem of size determination:
unresolved sources albedo
Debiased distributionRed: S typeBlue: C type
T. Quinn, Z. Isevic (SDSS)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Dynamics, collisions
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Collisional life: dynamical families
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Gravitational re-accumulationCumulative size distribution and dispersion in orbital elements: compatible with theobservations.
Binary systems are frequentlyformed in the process
Michel, Benz, Tanga, Richardson 2001Tanga, Delbò, Richardson 2007
a (AU)e
sin i
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Itokawa by the Hayabusa missionIs this a gravitational aggregate?
540 m
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
So, why are we interested in asteroids?
To understand their structure and evolution :
To improve Solar System ephemeris:Current accuracy : ~1 km/ 10 yr Earth, Mars (Standish, Fienga 2001)
~100 km / 10 yr for several NEOs
The great unknowns : density, porosity…Gravitational aggregates or solid bodies?The origin of shapesThe collisional historyImpact risks and mitigation strategy
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Gaia, 5 years of sky scans…
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
t1
t3
t4t5
t6 t7
t2
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Gaia and the Solar System - observablesAll objects observed, V<20, size <200 mas
~70 observations / object / 5 years
Astrometry and photometry for:3·105 Main Belt & Near Earth AsteroidsComets and TNOsasteroid / planet satellites
Spectroscopic properties (small dispersion)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
What Gaia can do for asteroids?Uncertainties from Earth from Gaia (each obs.)
Astrometry ~0.2-1 asPhotometry ~0.05 magV lim ~23
~0.2-1 mas~ 0.005 ~ 20
Gaia data can be used for:Orbit accuracy improvementDynamical familiesMass determination for largest asteroidsShapes and sizesSatellites of planets and asteroidsRelativity testsDetection of cometary activity…
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Orbit improvement
Accuracy from a pure Gaia data set:102-103 better than current
M. Granvik
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroid massesPerturbed motion of a minor planet
m
22VGm
m D VMsol km ua km/s mas
10-10 ~500 0.1 3 400.05 3 80
10-11 ~200 0.1 3 40.05 3 8
V
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Asteroid masses: today
Asteroid Mass (M ) Reference
10 Hygiea (4.7 ± 2.3) × 10-11 Scholl et al. 1987(5.6 ± 0.7) × 10-11 Michalak 2001
11 Parthenope (2.6 ± 0.10) × 10-12 Viateau Rapaport 199715 Eunomia (4.2 ± 1.1) × 10-12 Hilton 1997
(1.2 ± 0.4) × 10-11 Michalak 2001
limited astrometric precision, long periods of observation perturbations by other unknown masses
Uncertainty > 10-11 M (10-30% Ceres, Pallas, Vesta)~40 asteroids at better than 60% (Mouret et al. 2007)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Masses as computed with Gaia data:N-body system of « unknown » masses
The global solution (orbits + masses) must take into account the complete system.
Results on simulations of 20.000 asteroids (5 years):
(S. Mouret, 2007)
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Final statistics for mass determinationNumber of masses(over 20.000 simulated!)
But in reality we will observe ~10 times more objects with Gaia.(Mouret et al. 2007)
Supplementary Earth-based observations will help…!
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
From photometry to shapes…
Courtesy of Marco D
elbò
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
p = 30
p = 60
b/a = 0.7
c/a = 0.5
P = 7h.527
0 = 0.4
Simulated Gaia photometry
(mag) wrt first observation
Orbit of 39 Laetitia
A. Cellino, P. Tanga, M. Delbo
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Ellipsoidal model inversion:
when the problem has a solution?
Inversion limits
A. Cellino, P. Tanga
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Spin properties: important constraint to modern models of the collisional evolution of Main Belt asteroids.
Tests of preferential alignments of family members, or the effectiveness of the Yarkovsky-YORP effects.
Implications
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Rotation periods
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Putting all the results together…Gaia can offer a new, complete overview of asteroid properties:
Dynamical propertiesNew spectral taxonomyShapes (sizes)
Complete picture of family member properties.For a subset: masses & densities
New definition of families« Minor » families discovery
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Problems… (each result has its price)Solar System objects are moving
They are not always point-like sourcesSome of them (>10 mas) are marginally resolved
(>10-25 km in the Main Belt)
Sparse observations of a new object must be linked together (threading)
Photocentre discrepancy: see exercise presentation….
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
= 1.7 au = 3.7 au
Dkm
Hmag
N ( < H)mag mas
Vmag mas
Vmag
250 6.1 5 200 9.4 90 11.1100 8.1 200 80 11.4 40 13.050 9.5 2000 40 12.9 20 14.525 11.3 10 000 20 14.4 10 16.110 13.0 5 x 104 8 16.4 4 18.25 14.5 2 x 105 4 17.9 2 19.52 16.5 10 6 1.6 19.8 0.8 21.51 18.0 5 x 106 0.8 21.4 0.4 23.0
5
D : diameter - H : abs. mag. - : angular diameter - V : apparent mag.
Albedo = 0.15
Apparent sizes: some useful numbers
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Focal Plane – TDI modeSM1-2 AF1 - 9 BP
420 mm0.69°
RP
RVS
BAM
BAM
WFS
WFS
0s 10.6 15.5 49.5 56.3 64.130.1
0s 5.8 10.7 44.7 51.5 59.325.3
sec
secFOV1
FOV2
106 CCDs (4.5 x 2 kpix), 1 pixel 60 x 180 mas
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
MB
MB NEOs
NEOs
Along and across scan proper speeds
P. Tanga – ELSA school 2007
Windows on moving sourcesWindows are allocated from ASM centroiding
centroiding errors lead to offset in the window
transit velocity errors lead to a drift in the window
A moving object will also drift relative to the windowthe total effect depends on the window size and Val
SM
Signal recorded
AF1 AF2