G2 Meeting

76
G2 Meeting August 6, 2014

description

G2 Meeting. August 6, 2014. Agenda. Greetings from Director Bobby Cagle ETS ' IV-E Program:   Julie York Reporting Period 16 Results:   Karen and Jim Outcome Performance Grid:   Carol Hall Permanency Benchmarks:   Jim Outcomes 9 &10: C. Hall and Samantha Walker - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of G2 Meeting

Page 1: G2 Meeting

G2 Meeting

August 6, 2014

Page 2: G2 Meeting

Agenda Greetings from Director Bobby Cagle  ETS' IV-E Program:  Julie York Reporting Period 16 Results:  Karen and Jim Outcome Performance Grid:  Carol Hall Permanency Benchmarks:  Jim Outcomes 9 &10: C. Hall and Samantha Walker 8:8, Visitation, 8b and O.30:  County Staff Closing Remarks

Page 3: G2 Meeting

Greetings

Director Bobby Cagle

Page 4: G2 Meeting

ETS' IV-E Program

Julie York

Page 5: G2 Meeting

Period 16 Results

Jim and Karen

Page 6: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 5:Maltreatment in Care

Page 7: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 1:

Maltreatment-in-care Investigations Commenced Within 24 Hours of Receipt of Report

Page 8: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 2:

Maltreatment-in-care Investigations Completed Within 30 Days of Report Receipt

Page 9: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 3:

Maltreatment-in-care Investigations with Timely Face-to-Face Private Contact with All Alleged Victims

Page 10: G2 Meeting

Twelve Periods of State Performance on Outcome 6:Incidents of Corporal Punishment in Foster Homes

Page 11: G2 Meeting

Outcome 7 Diligent Searches Undertaken Within 60 Days

Page 12: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 19: Children are in Placements Close to their Homes

Page 13: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 21:

Children are Appropriately Visiting with their Parent(s) to Progress Toward Reunification

Page 14: G2 Meeting

Eleven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 16: Sibling Groups are Together in Placements

Page 15: G2 Meeting

Seven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 23:Sibling Visits

Page 16: G2 Meeting

Eleven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 8:Permanency for Children Entering Foster Care since

October 27, 2005

Page 17: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 11: Children are Adopted Within 12 Months of Parental Rights

Termination

Page 18: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods State Performance on Outcome 4: Foster Care Re-entry within 12 Months of Previous Exits

Page 19: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 15:

Children in Care 15 of the Previous 22 Months have Petitions for Terminating Parental Rights or a Compelling Reason Not to

Terminate Parental Rights

Page 20: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods State Performance on Outcome 27: Timely Semi-Annual Judicial/Citizen Panel Case Reviews

Page 21: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 28:

Timely Permanency Hearings 

Page 22: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 17:

Children with 2 or Fewer Placement Moves in Prior 12 Months

Page 23: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 18:

Children with 2 or Fewer Placement Case Managers in Prior 12 Months

Page 24: G2 Meeting

Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 20a:Required Twice Monthly Case Manager Visits with Children

Page 25: G2 Meeting

Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 20b: Required Private Monthly Case Manager Visits with Children

Page 26: G2 Meeting

Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 22: Required Case Manager Visits with Caregivers

Page 27: G2 Meeting

Eight Years of State Performance on Outcome Measure 24, Educational Achievement

Page 28: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 30:

Children with All Plan Identified Needs Met

Page 29: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 25: Children Placed in Settings that are in Full Approval and/or

Licensure Status

Page 30: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 31: Children are Not in Foster Homes Exceeding Specified Capacity Limits

Page 31: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 26:Court Orders Contain Required Language to Support IV-E

Funding Claims

Page 32: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 29:

Children in Care With Legal Custody Lapsesn=75

Page 33: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of CPS Investigation Caseloads Percent of Caseloads Meeting Standards

Page 34: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of Family Preservation Caseloads Percent of Caseloads Meeting Standards

These cases were formerly referred to as “on-going CPS”.

Page 35: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of Regular Permanency Caseloads Percent Meeting Standards

Page 36: G2 Meeting

Twelve Reporting Periods of Specialized Caseloads Percent Meeting Standard

Page 37: G2 Meeting

Outcome Performance Grid

Carol Hall

Page 38: G2 Meeting

Kenny A. Outcome Performance1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th

06) 90% (2nd), 98% (4th) of all foster homes will not have an incident of corporal punishment within the previous six (2nd), twelve (4th) months.

98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100%

07) At least 70% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all foster children entering care shall have had a diligent search for parents and relatives undertaken and documented within 90 (2nd), 60 (4th) days of entering foster care. (Separate Review Conducted)

95% 73% 93% 80% 94% 95% 96% 96% 97%

08a) Of all children entering custody following the entry of the Consent Decree, at least 40% shall have had one the following permanency outcomes within 12 months or less after entering custody: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption, or guardianship.

40% 45% 45% 48% 49% 51% 50% 53% 55% 54% 54% 55% 55% 56% 57% 57%

14) No more than 5% of adoptions finalized during the reporting period shall disrupt within the 12 months subsequent to the reporting period. <5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%

15) At least 80% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all foster children who reached the point of being in state custody for 15 of the prior 22 months, shall have had either (1) a petition for the termination of parental rights filed as to both parents or legal caregivers as applicable OR 2) documented compelling reasons in the child's case record why termination of parental rights should not be filed.

95% 84% 86% 86% 92% 95% 95% 96% 100% 98% 100% 98% 96% 96% 98% 99%

19) At least 70% (2nd), 80% (3rd), 90% (4th) of all children in care shall be placed in their own county (the county from which they were removed) or within a 50 mile radius of the home from which they were removed, subject to the exceptions (CD Parag.5C4.b(ii) and (iii).

90% 88% 88% 97% 98% 97% 99% 98% 95% 99% 99% 98% 97% 95% 95% 95%

20a) At least 96.25% of the total minimum number of twice monthly face-to-face visits shall be conducted between case managers and all class member children.

96.25% 16% 15% 14% 36% 48% 51% 64% 64% 97.8% 97.8% 97.5% 99% 98.1% 98.3% 98.7%

20b) At least 96.25% of the total minimum number of twice monthly private, face-to-face visits shall be conducted between case managers and all class member children.

96.25% 98.3% 99.1% 98.1% 99.4% 99.1% 99.2% 99.5%

21) At least 85% of the children with a goal of reunification shall have had appropriate visitation with their parents to progress toward reunification.

85% 25% 47% 76% 81% 90% 90% 87% 88% 87% 86% 90% 95% 93% 92%

22) At least 90% (2nd) of all children in care at a point in time during the reporting period shall have had visits between their DFCS placement case manager and their foster parent, group care, institutional or other caretaker at least one time each month during the prior 12 months in custody.

90% 39% 45% 52% 60% 68% 75% 82% 80% 98% 98.0% 97% 99% 98% 97.7% 98.5%

23) At least 80% (2nd) of children in the Class at a point in time during the reporting period who have one or more siblings in custody with whom they are not placed shall have had visits with their siblings at least one time each month during the prior 12 months in custody, unless the visit is harmful to one or more of the siblings.

90% 19% 21% 24% 39% 34% 50% 56% 52% 92% 95% 94% 95% 95% 96% 94%

25) At least 85% (1st), 95% (2nd), 98% (4th) of all foster children in custody at a point in time during the first reporting period shall be in placements that are in full approval and/or licensure status.

98% 86% 86% 88% 96% 97% 99% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99% 99% 99% 98% 98%

29) No more than 5% (3rd) of all children in the physical custody of DHR/DFCS for 12 months or more shall have had a lapse in their legal custody within the prior 13 months.

<5% 30% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5% 1% 1% 0% 3% 4% 0% 1% 1%

31) No more than 10% (2nd) of all children in foster homes shall be placed in foster homes that exceed the capacity limits referenced in Section 5.C.4.e.

<10% 8% 8% 7% 6% 8% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3%

REPORTING PERIODS

Outcomes consistently achieved: 6, 7, 8a, 14, 15, 19, 20a, 20b, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29 & 31

OUTCOMES GOAL

Page 39: G2 Meeting

Kenny A. Outcome Performance

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th04) No more than 8.6% of all foster children entering custody shall have re-entered care within 12 months of the prior placement episode. 8.6% 9.3% 9.6% 9.2% 9.1% 6.5% 4.8% 9.7% 11.1% 9.6% 8.6% 8.7% 9.7% 9.4% 8.8% 9.4%

17) At least 86.7% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all children in care shall have had 2 or fewer moves during the prior 12 months in custody. 95% 90% 84% 91% 92% 91% 89% 87% 92% 94% 90% 93% 93% 93% 95% 90%

18) At least 90% (2nd) of all children in care at a point in time during the reporting period shall have had 2 or fewer DFCS placement case managers during the prior 12 months in custody. 90% 84% 91% 92% 90% 91% 91% 92% 85% 84% 88% 92% 89% 87% 92% 97%

26) At least 85% (2nd), 95% (4th) of foster children in custody at a point in time during the reporting period shall have all applicable language in court orders necessary to assess qualification for federal funding under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.

95% 55% 42% 69% 64% 65% 71% 69% 80% 85% 90% 91% 90% 90% 91% 91%

27) At least 80% (2nd), 85% (3rd), 95% (4th) of foster children in custody for six months or more shall have either had their six-month case plan review completed by the Juvenile Court within six months of their prior case plan review, or DFCS shall have submitted the child's six month case plan to the Juvenile Court and filed a motion requesting a six month case plan review within 45 days of the expiration of the six month period following the last review.

95% 70% 33% 46% 63% 81% 80% 77% 71% 92% 87% 88% 87% 95% 96% 94%

28) At least 95% (2nd) of foster children in custody for twelve or more months shall have either had a permanency hearing held by the Juvenile Court within 12 months of the time the child entered foster care or had his/her last permanency hearing, or DFCS shall have submitted the documents required by the Juvenile Court for and requested a permanency hearing within 45 days of the expiration of the 12 month period following the time the child entered the foster care or had his/her last permanency hearing.

95% 80% 70% 82% 83% 81% 95% 87% 89% 99% 92% 95% 94% 94% 92% 98%

12) For children with TPR and child has an identified adoptive or legal guardian resource at entry of the CD, 90% shall have had their adoptions/legal guardianships finalized within six months.

90% 94%

13) For children with TPR at entry of the CD, and the child does not have an identified adoptive resource, 95% shall have registered on national, regional, and local adoption exchanges, and have an individualized adoption recruitment plan or plan for legal guardianship within 60 days.

95% 30%

Outcomes approaching complinance for 18 months: 4, 17, 18, 26, 27 & 28

OUTCOMES GOALREPORTING PERIODS

ONE TIME MEASURES

LEGEND

Green = Achieved

Yellow = Approaching Goal

Red = Not Achieved

Page 40: G2 Meeting

Kenny A. Outcome Performance

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th01) At least 95% of all investigations of reports of abuse or neglect of foster children shall be commenced, in accordance with Section 2106 of the Social Services Manual, within 24 hours of receipt of the report.

95% 91% 87% 85% 86% 90% 97% 97% 97% 99% 100% 93% 94% 93% 91% 90% 84%

02) At least 95% of all investigations of reported abuse or neglect of foster children shall be completed, in accordance with Section 2106 of the Social Services Manual, within 30 days of receipt of the report.

95% 83% 78% 72% 72% 76% 84% 90% 66% 55% 77% 82% 81% 75% 73% 85% 93%

03) At least 99% of all investigations of reported abuse or neglect of foster children during the reported period shall include timely face-to-face, private contact with the alleged victim, including face-to-face, private contact with a child who is non-verbal due to age or for any other reason.

99% 85% 87% 83% 83% 88% 97% 97% 97% 99% 99% 93% 93% 91% 88% 88% 84%

05) No more than .57% of all children in foster care shall be the victim of substantiated maltreatment while in foster care. <0.57% 0.54% 0.81% 0.92% 1.01% 0.90% 0.55% 1.06% 1.17% 0.63% 0.42% 0.41% 0.58% 0.58% 0.74% 0.68% 0.48%

08b) Of all children entering custody following the entry of the Consent Decree, at least 74% (1) shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes within 12 months or less after entering custody: reunification or permanent placement with relatives; or (2) shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes within 24 months or less after entering custody: adoption, permanent legal custody or guardianship.

74% 50% 53% 56% 56% 59% 62% 62% 61% 62% 62% 63% 64% 65%

09) For all children in the "up to 24 month backlog pool," by the end of the fourth reporting period at least 40% shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption, or guardianship.

40% 49% 20% 20% 19% 21% 19% 19% 24% 24% 27% 9% 17% 32% 8% 9%

10) For all children in the "over 24 month backlog pool," by the end of the second reporting period at least 35% shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption,

35% 36% 9% 9% 14% 15% 10% 16% 18% 23% 9% 6% 11% 17% 8% 18%

11) By the end of the second reporting period, for all children whose parental rights have been terminated or released during the reporting period, 80% will have their adoptions finalized within 12 months of final termination or release of parental rights.

80% 74% 70% 69% 70% 69% 68% 50% 54% 59% 67% 84% 84% 55% 60% 66%

16) At least 70% (2nd), 80% (4th) of all foster children who entered foster care during the reporting period along with one or more siblings shall be placed with all of their siblings. 80% 73% 72% 84% 69% 79% 81% 79% 81% 94% 74% 74% 81% 66% 76% 71%

24) By the end of the second reporting period, the baseline of children discharged from foster care at age 18 or older during the 12 months prior to the entry of the Consent Decree who have graduated from high school or earned a GED shall increase by 10 percentage points. By 4th, the NEW base shall increase by 10 percentage points. (Revised Baseline = 36%)[P14]

56% 34% N/A 25% N/A 47% N/A 50% N/A 58% N/A 49.1% N/A 40% N/A 47%

30) At least 80% (2nd), 85% (4th) of children in care at a point in time at the end of the reporting period shall not have any unmet medical, dental, mental health, education, or other service needs, according to the service needs documented in the child's most recent case plan.

85% 74% 77% 57% 54% 75% 72% 68% 69% 77% 78% 75% 78% 74% 73% 81%

OUTCOMES GOALREPORTING PERIODS

Outcomes consistently not met: 1, 2, 3, *5, *8b, *9, *10, 11, *16, *24 & 30

LEGEND

Green = Achieved

Yellow = Approaching Goal

Red = Not Achieved

Page 41: G2 Meeting

Permanency Benchmarks

Jim

Page 42: G2 Meeting

What is “Stock and Flow?"

6-12 month “Tub”

13+ month “Tub”

Exits from Care

13+ month “Faucet Kids”

Exits from Care

Page 43: G2 Meeting

Win Fabulous Prizes!!!

Page 44: G2 Meeting

Children in Care 6-12 Months Oct 2013

Nov 2013

Dec 2013

Jan 2014

Feb 2014

Mar 2014

Apr 2014

May 2014

Jun 2014

Jul 2014

10 Mo. Total

ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 532 549 546 551 571 589 591 614 619 616 578

10 Month Average

Number of Children Removed 55 31 49 48 52 53 60 50 55 24 4810 Month Average

DNumber of Children reaching 6 months total 16 22 18 23 8 19 36 14 28 32 216

10 Month Total

HNumber of Children reaching 13 months during the month 16 17 12 7 16 12 16 5 17 14 132

10 Month Total

INumber of Children in care 6-12 Months exiting 6 2 12 3 6 8 8 10 4 10 69

10 Month Total

JNumber of Children in Care 6-12 Months on the last day of the month 124 125 119 132 118 116 128 132 138 148 128

10 Month Average

Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 2 1 5 2 5 4 8 6 4 9b Live with other relative 2 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0c Adoption finalized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0d Guardianship 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 0 1

Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 5 2 12 3 6 7 8 10 4 10 6710 Month Total

e Emancipation 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 2 12 3 6 8 8 10 4 10

Positive Permanency Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/(D) 31% 9% 67% 13% 75% 37% 22% 71% 14% 31% 31%10 Month Average

Matriculation Ratio: (H)/(H+I) 73% 89% 50% 70% 73% 60% 67% 33% 81% 58% 66%10 Month Average

DeKalb

Page 45: G2 Meeting

All Children in Care 13+ MonthsOct 2013

Nov 2013

Dec 2013

Jan 2014

Feb 2014

Mar 2014

Apr 2014

May 2014

Jun 2014

Jul 2014

10 Mo. Total

ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 532 549 546 551 571 589 591 614 619 616 578

10 Month Average

Number of Children Removed 55 31 49 48 52 53 60 50 55 24 4810 Month Average

DNumber of Children reaching 13 months total 16 17 12 7 16 12 16 5 17 14 132

10 Month Total

Number of Children reaching 25 months total 9 7 2 5 8 9 7 6 11 6 70

10 Month Total

HNumber of Children in care 13+ months exiting during the month 6 6 14 6 7 12 7 8 21 5 92

10 Month Total

INumber of Children in Care 13+ Months on the last day of the month 269 272 262 264 275 277 286 280 281 290 276

10 Month Average

Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 0 1 4 3 2 4 3 2 9 3b Live with other relative 4 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0c Adoption finalized 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 0d Guardianship 0 3 0 2 0 7 0 0 5 2

Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 4 5 10 5 6 12 5 3 16 5 7110 Month Total

e Emancipation 2 1 4 1 1 0 2 5 5 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 6 14 6 7 12 7 8 21 5

Positive Permancy Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/D 25% 29% 83% 71% 38% 100% 31% 60% 94% 36% 54%10 Month Average

DeKalb

Page 46: G2 Meeting

DeKalb Permanency Benchmarks

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13

% of Children Still in Care

% of Children Exited within 24 mos.

% of Children Exited within 12 mos.

% of Children Exited within 6 mos.

# of Children Still in Care

# of Children Exited within 24 mos.

# of Children Exited within 12 mos.

# of Children Exited within 6 mos.

Outcome 8a

Outcome 8b

Page 47: G2 Meeting

Children in Care 6-12 Months Oct 2013

Nov 2013

Dec 2013

Jan 2014

Feb 2014

Mar 2014

Apr 2014

May 2014

Jun 2014

Jul 2014

10 Mo. Total

Number of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 590 610 594 578 594 585 610 623 625 609 602

10 Month Average

Number of Children Removed 62 39 49 65 49 108 78 85 59 45 6410 Month Average

Number of Children reaching 6 months total 16 15 19 24 13 13 25 8 19 18 170

10 Month Total

Number of Children reaching 13 months during the month 16 15 13 9 5 20 8 9 9 11 115

10 Month Total

Number of Children in care 6-12 Months exiting 1 4 2 2 10 5 9 5 15 0 53

10 Month Total

Number of Children in Care 6-12 Months on the last day of the month 102 96 99 114 112 98 107 101 95 102 103

10 Month Average

Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits ExitsReunification 1 3 2 1 2 4 5 3 13 0Live with other relative 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0Adoption finalized 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Guardianship 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 0

Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 1 4 2 1 9 5 8 4 15 0 4910 Month Total

Emancipation 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 1 4 2 2 10 5 9 5 15 0

Positive Permanency Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/(D) 6% 27% 11% 4% 69% 38% 32% 50% 79% 0% 29%10 Month Average

Matriculation Ratio: (H)/(H+I) 94% 79% 87% 82% 33% 80% 47% 64% 38% 100% 68%10 Month Average

Fulton

Page 48: G2 Meeting

All Children in Care 13+ MonthsOct 2013

Nov 2013

Dec 2013

Jan 2014

Feb 2014

Mar 2014

Apr 2014

May 2014

Jun 2014

Jul 2014

10 Mo. Total

ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 590 610 594 578 594 585 610 623 625 609 602

10 Month Average

Number of Children Removed 62 39 49 65 49 108 78 85 59 45 6410 Month Average

DNumber of Children reaching 13 months total 16 15 13 9 5 20 8 9 9 11 115

10 Month Total

Number of Children reaching 25 months total 8 7 3 10 5 5 6 9 7 14 74

10 Month Total

HNumber of Children in care 13+ months exiting during the month 6 22 19 13 18 7 16 20 22 15 158

10 Month Total

INumber of Children in Care 13+ Months on the last day of the month 375 367 352 349 336 349 342 330 315 316 343

10 Month Average

Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 3 3 5 5 3 1 3 4 13 1b Live with other relative 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 5c Adoption finalized 0 16 11 0 2 3 6 4 8 4d Guardianship 1 2 1 0 6 0 1 3 0 3

Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 5 21 17 7 13 5 10 13 21 13 12510 Month Total

e Emancipation 1 1 2 6 5 2 6 7 1 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 22 19 13 18 7 16 20 22 15

Positive Permancy Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/D 31% 140% 131% 78% 260% 25% 125% 144% 233% 118% 109%10 Month Average

Fulton

Page 49: G2 Meeting

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13

% of Children Still in Care

% of Children Exited within 24 mos.

% of Children Exited within 12 mos.

% of Children Exited within 6 mos.

# of Children Still in Care

# of Children Exited within 24 mos.

# of Children Exited within 12 mos.

# of Children Exited within 6 mos.

Fulton Permanency Benchmarks

Page 50: G2 Meeting

Outcomes 9 & 10

Carol Hall and Samantha Walker

Page 51: G2 Meeting

Outcome 9 and 10 Kids

Case ID Name DOB AGERemoval

DatePrimary Perm Plan

Legal Status

Child Characteristics Updates as of 08/05/14

10401687Avery, Qwondari

2/15/98 16 6/12/04 Adoption (03)Permanent Court

Depression, Eating Disorder

Stepped down to a foster home on 6/2/2014. Child does not wish to be adopted. Guardianship options will be explored further once child has been in the home longer.

10402856Holloway, Regginal B

11/17/98 15 4/12/05 Adoption (03)Permanent Court

ADD/ADHD, Depression, Conduct Disorder

Currently pursuing a possible adoptive resource. Home study is underway.

10402983 Smith, Chasity 9/1/99 14 10/26/05 Adoption (03)Permanent Court

ADD/ADHD,Trouble Sleeping,Steals, Aggressive, Anxiety Disorder,Attachment Disorder

Stepped down to a foster home on 6/3/2014. Adoption possible 6 - 10 months.

10403872Pinkney, Lakeidrea

2/2/97 17 10/27/05

Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Emancipation

Temporary Court

Adjustment Disorder, Sibling Group

APPLA. Child doesn't wish to be adopted. Child was arrested on 6/21/2014 and was released 6/30/2014. Is currently on runaway status.

10403872Pinkney, Lakeithea

2/2/97 17 10/27/05

Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Emancipation

Temporary Court

Adjustment Disorder, Wets Bed

APPLA. Child doesn't wish to be adopted. No discharge date from PRTF as she is not stabilized. Her levels keep changing though she is improving overall. Ruling out medical basis for enuresis.

Page 52: G2 Meeting

Outcome 9 and 10 KidsCase ID Name DOB AGE

Removal Date

Primary Perm PlanLegal Status

Child Characteristics Updates as of 08/05/14

10403872McCrary, Charles

2/10/03 11 10/27/05 Adoption (No TPR Compelling Reasons)

Temporary Court

Aggressive, Sibling Group, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Learning Disability, Anxiety Disorder, Allergies

Stepped down to a therapeutic foster home 5/23/2014. Doing well in this placement, improving aggressiveness and hygiene issues. Walker and hall to visit placement.

10402351 Jones, Rhonda 7/8/96 17 5/19/99

Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Long Term Foster Care

Temporary Court

Adjustment Disorder,Emotionally Disturbed, Sibling Group, Asthma

Child emancipated J uly 8, 2014.

10400738 Young, Stephani 10/2/96 17 10/31/00 AdoptionPermanent Court

Aggressive, Intellectual Disability, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder , Conduct Disorder

Will emancipate 10/02/2014.

10403862Parrott, Chevanne

11/6/00 13 2/9/01 AdoptionPermanent Court

Downs Syndrome, Self Abuse, Visually Impaired, Hearing Impaired, Mental Retardation

Child has severe special needs. Removed from 7-year placement 2 years ago. Currently in pacement for 1 year. Has round the clock nursing care. Walker and Hall to visit placement soon.

10400775 Blair, Linval 11/8/96 17 5/2/03 AdoptionPermanent Court

ADD/ADHD, Anxiety DisorderAPPLA. Child doesn't want to be adopted.

10400775 Blair,Joseph 7/27/98 15 5/2/03 AdoptionPermanent Court

ADD/ADHD, Violent, Aggressive, Steals, Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Adoption within 6 - 10 months.

Page 53: G2 Meeting

8b and 8 in 8

(Counties)

Page 54: G2 Meeting

DeKalb P14 8B Cohort Children Who Entered Care During Period 14 and Who

Will Reach 24 Months in Care Between7/1/14 and 12/31/14

8/1/14Unofficial Results: DeKalb needs 0 additional 8B exits by 12/31/14(As of 8/1/14 206 positive permanencies)

Newly Discharged 3 +(3*)Children Remaining Eligible 44•No/Unlikely 36•Yes 0•Possible 8*= not a positive permanency

Page 55: G2 Meeting

Fulton P14 8B Cohort Children Who Entered Care During Period 14 and Who Will

Reach 24 Months in Care Between

7/1/14 to 12/31/14

Fulton needs

11additional 8b exits

By 12/31/14

8/7

Newly Discharged

2

Children Remaining

50

•No/Unlikely 25•Yes 13•Possible 12

Page 56: G2 Meeting

8 in 8 Data

Counties

Page 57: G2 Meeting

QA Review of 8 in 8 : FultonResults for May 2014

  Total Number Percent Initial Planned Disruptions

Number of children 20 8 7 5

Number of visits due 146 63 43 40

Number of visits made 119 45 35 39

 Percent of visits made 82% 71% 81% 98%

All 8 in 8 requirements met 8 40% 1 3 4

All visits made butmissed time or location requirement

NA NA NA NA NA

At least one in-placement visit in the 1st wk 18 90% 7 6 5

At least one visit any location in the 1st wk 20 100% 8 7 5

Page 58: G2 Meeting

QA Review of 8 in 8 : DeKalb Results for May 2014

  Total Number Percent Initial Planned Disruptions

Number of children 20 5 10 5

Number of visits due 125 25 65 35

Number of visits made 112 25 60 27

 Percent of visits made 90% 100% 92% 77%

All 8 in 8 requirements met 13 65% 4 7 2

All visits made butmissed time or location requirement

2 10% 1 1 NA

At least one in-placement visit in the 1st wk 17 85% 4 9 4

At least one visit any location in the 1st wk 18 90% 4 10 4

Page 59: G2 Meeting

Region XIV 8x8 Results by Reporting Period

  P14 P15 P16 P 17 P17Month Placement Started       Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Total

Month Presented at G2       Apr May Jun July Aug Sept  

# Region XIV Children Reviewed 205 206 192 40 40 40 40  40   200

# all 8x8 requirements met 55 56 55 16 18 17 20 21    92

Percent of children with all 8x8 requirements met

27% 27% 29% 40% 45% 43% 50%  53%   46%

# Visits Due 1387 1431 1329 257 261 288 278 271    1355

# Visits Made 1008 1059 965 209 208 235 224 231   1107

Percent of required visits made 73% 74% 73% 81% 80% 82% 80%  85%   82%

Page 60: G2 Meeting

• Yolanda Loving Aberdeen

• Leah Montgomery

• Latosha Sullivan

• Rhodesha Middlebrook

• Tamara Comer

• Shakerria Walker

• Desarae Benton

• Vera Fieullete-Williams

• Lorenzo Jackson

• Jasmine McCully• Taralynn Burns• Jennifer Duvivier

• Alonze Oliver• Vonda Dubose• Rodderick Nelson• A’Leah Williams• Tranteegus Austin

Workers who finished their 8th visit during the month of June and July on time and all

documented!

STARS!!

Page 61: G2 Meeting

• Shalonda Armstead*

• Kristi Martin

• Brandy Willis*

• Tammy Arnold

• Dotse Oyarebu

• Patricia Mitchell

• Yolunda Brown

• Betty Brathwaite*

• Courtney Buggs*

• DeJerecka Ferrell

• Cherish Williams

• Jodi Kentish

• Jessica Johnson

• Tanisha Sheeler*

• Josephine Broderick*

• Beverly Mackey

• Brittany Farmer• Ashley Chisholm**/*• Demond Gordon• Jennifer Baker• Amne Simons• Rodniqua Armstrong*

• Jamisha Turner** • Brittany Burden• Marjorie Pryce*• Ashley Goodine• Molly Williamson*• Ronda Brown• Moise Nash* = more than one **= way out of town!

Workers who finished their 8th visit during the month of June and July on time and all

documented!

STARS!!

Page 62: G2 Meeting

County Visitation Data

June 2013

Page 63: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

PlacementVisitation Data

FINAL

June 2014

Page 64: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

June2014

OM 20A

Child Visits

Admin 

Supervisor Required Made %

Russell97.05%

509/494

Beasley 142 127 89.44%

Greene 141 141 100%

Hudson 103 103 100%

Rudd 123 123 100%

Walker98.86%

176/174

Haynes 60 60 100%

Searcy 49 49 100%

Trim 67 65 97.01%

Williams99.07

428/424

Booker 129 129 100%

Bradley 69 67 97.10%

Fulton 125 123 98.40%

Scott-Morrow 105 105 100%

Summary 1113 109298.11

%

Excellent 96.25% or greater

Good 92% - 96.24%

Needs Improvement <92%

Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%

Page 65: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

June2014

OM 20B

Child PrivateVisits

Admin% Required Made %

Russell97.291%

258/251

Beasley 73 66 90.41%

Greene 71 71 100%

Hudson 52 52 100%

Rudd 62 62 100%

Walker100%

92/92

Haynes 30 30 100%

Searcy 25 25 100%

Trim 37 37 100%

Williams96.98%

232/225

Booker 68 68 100%

Bradley 39 38 97.44%

Fulton 64 63 98.44%

Scott-Morrow 58 58 100%

Summary 579 57098.45

%

Excellent 96.25% or greater

Good 92% - 96.24%

Needs Improvement <92%

Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%

Page 66: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

June2014

OM 21

Reunification

Visits

Excellent 85% or greater

Good 75% - 84.9%

Needs Improvement <75%

Kenny A. Mandate 85%

Admin

 

Supervisor  Required Made %

Russell100%

127/127

Beasley 36 36 100%

Greene 37 37 100%

Hudson 21 21 100%

Rudd 33 33 100%

Walker100%

5/5

Haynes 4 4 100%

Searcy 1 1 100%

Trim 0 0 100%

Williams97.4%

115/112

Booker 42 42 100%

Bradley 17 17 100%

Fulton 36 33 91.7%

Scott-Morrow 20 20 100%

Summary 247 244 98.8%

Page 67: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

June 2014

OM 22

Caretaker

Visits

Excellent 95% or greater

Good 87.5% - 94.9%

Needs Improvement <87.5

Kenny A. Mandate 95%

Admin Required Made %

Russell96.5%

254/245

Beasley 70 63 90.0%

Greene 70 70 100%

Hudson 52 50 96.2%

Rudd 62 62 100%

Walker98.9%

90/89

Haynes 30 30 100%

Searcy 25 25 100%

Trim 35 34 97.1%

Williams100%

212/212

Booker 63 63 100%

Bradley 33 33 100%

Fulton 62 62 100%

Scott-Morrow 54 54 100%

Summary 578 562 97.2%

Page 68: G2 Meeting

Fulton County

June 2014

OM 23

Sibling Visits

Excellent 90% or greater

Good 80% - 89.9%

Needs Improvement <80%

Kenny A. Mandate 90%

Admin 

Supervisor  Required Made %

Russell100%

39/39

Beasley 7 7 100%

Greene 13 13 100%

Hudson 4 4 100%

Rudd 15 15 100%

Walker100%

12/12

Haynes 5 5 100%

Searcy 5 5 100%

Trim 2 2 100%

Williams100%

37/37

Booker 13 13 100%

Bradley 3 3 100%

Fulton 11 11 100%

Scott-Morrow 10 10 100%

Summary 88 88 100%

Page 69: G2 Meeting

OM Goal Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Child Visits 20 A96.25

% 96.8% 99.5% 98.87%99.19

%97.45

%98.11

%

Child Private 20 B96.25

% 98.2% 100% 97.67%96.97

%98.46

%98.45

%

Reunification 21 85% 94.7% 98.6% 97.4% 97.4% 90.6% 98.8%

Caretaker 22 95% 98.2% 99.0% 99.0% 99.1% 97.2% 98.2%

Sibling 23 90% 96.8% 100% 97.4% 95.1% 90.9% 100%

Fulton CountyVisitation Summary

December 2013 to June 2014

Page 70: G2 Meeting

DeKalb County

PlacementVisitation Data

June 2014

Page 71: G2 Meeting

DeKalb County

June2014

OM 20A

Child Visits

AdministratorSuperviso

r Require

dMade %

Lyles401/40998.04%

Cox 106 106 100%

Hill 110 105 95.45%

Njenga 110 107 97.27%

Jack 83 83 100%

Johnson376/38797.16%

Scott 119 119 100%

Hall 98 96 97.96%

Jacob 101 100 99.01%

Pertiller 69 61 88.41

Rayne305/32294.72%

Macon 116 130 89.23%

Garrett 95 94 98.95%

Smith 97 95 97.94%

Summary 1080 1120 96.78%

Excellent 96.25% or greater

Good 92% - 96.24%

Needs Improvement <92%

Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%

Page 72: G2 Meeting

DeKalb County

June2014

OM 20B

ChildPrivateVisits

Kenny A. Mandate96.25%

Excellent 96.25% or greater

Good 92% - 96.24%

Needs Improvement <92%

Administrator Supervis

orRequire

dMade %

Lyles209/21099.52%

Cox 55 55 100%

Hill 55 54 98.18%

Njenga 57 57 100%

Jack 43 43 100%

Johnson203/20499.51%

Hall 51 51 100%

Jacob 52 52 100%

Pertiller 35 34 97.14%

Scott 66 66 100%

Rayne159/16397.55%

Macon 66 62 93.94%

Garrett 48 48 100%

Smith 46 46 100%

Summary 571 577 98.96%

Page 73: G2 Meeting

DeKalbCounty

June2014

OM 21

Reunification

Visits

Excellent 85% or greater

Good 75% - 84.9%

Needs Improvement <75%

Kenny A. Mandate 85%

Administrator

Supervisor 

Required

Made %

Lyles62/6693.9%

Cox 1 1 100%

Hill 26 23 88.5%

Njenga 35 34 97.1%

Jack 4 4 100%

Johnson107/11196.4%

Hall 24 23 95.8%

Jacob 33 33 100%

Pertiller 29 26 89.7%

Scott 25 25 100%

Rayne71/8880.7%

Macon 38 30 78.9%

Garrett 25 19 76%

Smith 25 22 88%

Summary 265 240 90.6%

Page 74: G2 Meeting

DeKalb County

June2014

OM 22

CaretakerVisits

Kenny A. Mandate 95%

Excellent 95% or greater

Good 87.5% - 94.9%

Needs Improvement <87.5

Administrator Supervis

orRequire

dMade %

Lyles204/20997.6%

Cox 55 55 100%

Hill 55 51 92.7%

Njenga 56 55 98.2%

Jack 43 43 100%

Johnson193/19897.5%

Hall 51 49 96.1%

Jacob 51 51 100%

Pertiller 34 32 94.1%

Scott 62 61 98.4%

Rayne140/15888.6%

Macon 64 51 79.7%

Garrett 46 46 100%

Smith 48 43 89.6%

Summary 565 537 95%

Page 75: G2 Meeting

DeKalbCounty

June2014

OM 23

Sibling Visits

Excellent 90% or greater

Good 80% - 89.9%

Needs Improvement <80%

Kenny A. Mandate 90%

Administrator

Supervisor

 

Required

Made %

Lyles26/26100%

Cox 8 8 100%

Hill 4 4 100%

Njenga 6 6 100%

Jack 8 8 100%

Johnson15/15100%

Hall 3 3 100%

Jacob 2 2 100%

Pertiller 4 4 100%

Scott 6 6 100%

Rayne7/17

41.2%

Macon 10 4 40%

Garrett 3 0 0%

Smith 4 3 75%

Summary 58 48 82.8%

Page 76: G2 Meeting

OM Goal Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Child Visits 20 A 96.25%

98.4% 98.47% 98.81% 98.9% 99% 96.6%

Child Private 20 B 96.25%

99.6% 100% 100% 99.5% 99.8% 98.8%

Reunification 21 85%

91.8% 88.9% 95.3% 95.2% 92.7% 90.6%

Care taker 22 95%

97.7% 96.6% 98.7% 96.6% 98.1% 95%

Sibling 23 90%84.2% 91.1% 95.5% 100% 91.8% 82.8%

DeKalb CountyVisitation Summary

January 2013 to June 2014