G2 Meeting
description
Transcript of G2 Meeting
G2 Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Greetings from Director Bobby Cagle ETS' IV-E Program: Julie York Reporting Period 16 Results: Karen and Jim Outcome Performance Grid: Carol Hall Permanency Benchmarks: Jim Outcomes 9 &10: C. Hall and Samantha Walker 8:8, Visitation, 8b and O.30: County Staff Closing Remarks
Greetings
Director Bobby Cagle
ETS' IV-E Program
Julie York
Period 16 Results
Jim and Karen
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 5:Maltreatment in Care
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 1:
Maltreatment-in-care Investigations Commenced Within 24 Hours of Receipt of Report
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 2:
Maltreatment-in-care Investigations Completed Within 30 Days of Report Receipt
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 3:
Maltreatment-in-care Investigations with Timely Face-to-Face Private Contact with All Alleged Victims
Twelve Periods of State Performance on Outcome 6:Incidents of Corporal Punishment in Foster Homes
Outcome 7 Diligent Searches Undertaken Within 60 Days
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 19: Children are in Placements Close to their Homes
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 21:
Children are Appropriately Visiting with their Parent(s) to Progress Toward Reunification
Eleven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 16: Sibling Groups are Together in Placements
Seven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 23:Sibling Visits
Eleven Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 8:Permanency for Children Entering Foster Care since
October 27, 2005
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 11: Children are Adopted Within 12 Months of Parental Rights
Termination
Twelve Reporting Periods State Performance on Outcome 4: Foster Care Re-entry within 12 Months of Previous Exits
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 15:
Children in Care 15 of the Previous 22 Months have Petitions for Terminating Parental Rights or a Compelling Reason Not to
Terminate Parental Rights
Twelve Reporting Periods State Performance on Outcome 27: Timely Semi-Annual Judicial/Citizen Panel Case Reviews
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 28:
Timely Permanency Hearings
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 17:
Children with 2 or Fewer Placement Moves in Prior 12 Months
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 18:
Children with 2 or Fewer Placement Case Managers in Prior 12 Months
Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 20a:Required Twice Monthly Case Manager Visits with Children
Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 20b: Required Private Monthly Case Manager Visits with Children
Six Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 22: Required Case Manager Visits with Caregivers
Eight Years of State Performance on Outcome Measure 24, Educational Achievement
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 30:
Children with All Plan Identified Needs Met
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 25: Children Placed in Settings that are in Full Approval and/or
Licensure Status
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 31: Children are Not in Foster Homes Exceeding Specified Capacity Limits
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 26:Court Orders Contain Required Language to Support IV-E
Funding Claims
Twelve Reporting Periods of State Performance on Outcome 29:
Children in Care With Legal Custody Lapsesn=75
Twelve Reporting Periods of CPS Investigation Caseloads Percent of Caseloads Meeting Standards
Twelve Reporting Periods of Family Preservation Caseloads Percent of Caseloads Meeting Standards
These cases were formerly referred to as “on-going CPS”.
Twelve Reporting Periods of Regular Permanency Caseloads Percent Meeting Standards
Twelve Reporting Periods of Specialized Caseloads Percent Meeting Standard
Outcome Performance Grid
Carol Hall
Kenny A. Outcome Performance1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th
06) 90% (2nd), 98% (4th) of all foster homes will not have an incident of corporal punishment within the previous six (2nd), twelve (4th) months.
98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100%
07) At least 70% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all foster children entering care shall have had a diligent search for parents and relatives undertaken and documented within 90 (2nd), 60 (4th) days of entering foster care. (Separate Review Conducted)
95% 73% 93% 80% 94% 95% 96% 96% 97%
08a) Of all children entering custody following the entry of the Consent Decree, at least 40% shall have had one the following permanency outcomes within 12 months or less after entering custody: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption, or guardianship.
40% 45% 45% 48% 49% 51% 50% 53% 55% 54% 54% 55% 55% 56% 57% 57%
14) No more than 5% of adoptions finalized during the reporting period shall disrupt within the 12 months subsequent to the reporting period. <5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
15) At least 80% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all foster children who reached the point of being in state custody for 15 of the prior 22 months, shall have had either (1) a petition for the termination of parental rights filed as to both parents or legal caregivers as applicable OR 2) documented compelling reasons in the child's case record why termination of parental rights should not be filed.
95% 84% 86% 86% 92% 95% 95% 96% 100% 98% 100% 98% 96% 96% 98% 99%
19) At least 70% (2nd), 80% (3rd), 90% (4th) of all children in care shall be placed in their own county (the county from which they were removed) or within a 50 mile radius of the home from which they were removed, subject to the exceptions (CD Parag.5C4.b(ii) and (iii).
90% 88% 88% 97% 98% 97% 99% 98% 95% 99% 99% 98% 97% 95% 95% 95%
20a) At least 96.25% of the total minimum number of twice monthly face-to-face visits shall be conducted between case managers and all class member children.
96.25% 16% 15% 14% 36% 48% 51% 64% 64% 97.8% 97.8% 97.5% 99% 98.1% 98.3% 98.7%
20b) At least 96.25% of the total minimum number of twice monthly private, face-to-face visits shall be conducted between case managers and all class member children.
96.25% 98.3% 99.1% 98.1% 99.4% 99.1% 99.2% 99.5%
21) At least 85% of the children with a goal of reunification shall have had appropriate visitation with their parents to progress toward reunification.
85% 25% 47% 76% 81% 90% 90% 87% 88% 87% 86% 90% 95% 93% 92%
22) At least 90% (2nd) of all children in care at a point in time during the reporting period shall have had visits between their DFCS placement case manager and their foster parent, group care, institutional or other caretaker at least one time each month during the prior 12 months in custody.
90% 39% 45% 52% 60% 68% 75% 82% 80% 98% 98.0% 97% 99% 98% 97.7% 98.5%
23) At least 80% (2nd) of children in the Class at a point in time during the reporting period who have one or more siblings in custody with whom they are not placed shall have had visits with their siblings at least one time each month during the prior 12 months in custody, unless the visit is harmful to one or more of the siblings.
90% 19% 21% 24% 39% 34% 50% 56% 52% 92% 95% 94% 95% 95% 96% 94%
25) At least 85% (1st), 95% (2nd), 98% (4th) of all foster children in custody at a point in time during the first reporting period shall be in placements that are in full approval and/or licensure status.
98% 86% 86% 88% 96% 97% 99% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99% 99% 99% 98% 98%
29) No more than 5% (3rd) of all children in the physical custody of DHR/DFCS for 12 months or more shall have had a lapse in their legal custody within the prior 13 months.
<5% 30% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5% 1% 1% 0% 3% 4% 0% 1% 1%
31) No more than 10% (2nd) of all children in foster homes shall be placed in foster homes that exceed the capacity limits referenced in Section 5.C.4.e.
<10% 8% 8% 7% 6% 8% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3%
REPORTING PERIODS
Outcomes consistently achieved: 6, 7, 8a, 14, 15, 19, 20a, 20b, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29 & 31
OUTCOMES GOAL
Kenny A. Outcome Performance
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th04) No more than 8.6% of all foster children entering custody shall have re-entered care within 12 months of the prior placement episode. 8.6% 9.3% 9.6% 9.2% 9.1% 6.5% 4.8% 9.7% 11.1% 9.6% 8.6% 8.7% 9.7% 9.4% 8.8% 9.4%
17) At least 86.7% (2nd), 95% (4th) of all children in care shall have had 2 or fewer moves during the prior 12 months in custody. 95% 90% 84% 91% 92% 91% 89% 87% 92% 94% 90% 93% 93% 93% 95% 90%
18) At least 90% (2nd) of all children in care at a point in time during the reporting period shall have had 2 or fewer DFCS placement case managers during the prior 12 months in custody. 90% 84% 91% 92% 90% 91% 91% 92% 85% 84% 88% 92% 89% 87% 92% 97%
26) At least 85% (2nd), 95% (4th) of foster children in custody at a point in time during the reporting period shall have all applicable language in court orders necessary to assess qualification for federal funding under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
95% 55% 42% 69% 64% 65% 71% 69% 80% 85% 90% 91% 90% 90% 91% 91%
27) At least 80% (2nd), 85% (3rd), 95% (4th) of foster children in custody for six months or more shall have either had their six-month case plan review completed by the Juvenile Court within six months of their prior case plan review, or DFCS shall have submitted the child's six month case plan to the Juvenile Court and filed a motion requesting a six month case plan review within 45 days of the expiration of the six month period following the last review.
95% 70% 33% 46% 63% 81% 80% 77% 71% 92% 87% 88% 87% 95% 96% 94%
28) At least 95% (2nd) of foster children in custody for twelve or more months shall have either had a permanency hearing held by the Juvenile Court within 12 months of the time the child entered foster care or had his/her last permanency hearing, or DFCS shall have submitted the documents required by the Juvenile Court for and requested a permanency hearing within 45 days of the expiration of the 12 month period following the time the child entered the foster care or had his/her last permanency hearing.
95% 80% 70% 82% 83% 81% 95% 87% 89% 99% 92% 95% 94% 94% 92% 98%
12) For children with TPR and child has an identified adoptive or legal guardian resource at entry of the CD, 90% shall have had their adoptions/legal guardianships finalized within six months.
90% 94%
13) For children with TPR at entry of the CD, and the child does not have an identified adoptive resource, 95% shall have registered on national, regional, and local adoption exchanges, and have an individualized adoption recruitment plan or plan for legal guardianship within 60 days.
95% 30%
Outcomes approaching complinance for 18 months: 4, 17, 18, 26, 27 & 28
OUTCOMES GOALREPORTING PERIODS
ONE TIME MEASURES
LEGEND
Green = Achieved
Yellow = Approaching Goal
Red = Not Achieved
Kenny A. Outcome Performance
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th01) At least 95% of all investigations of reports of abuse or neglect of foster children shall be commenced, in accordance with Section 2106 of the Social Services Manual, within 24 hours of receipt of the report.
95% 91% 87% 85% 86% 90% 97% 97% 97% 99% 100% 93% 94% 93% 91% 90% 84%
02) At least 95% of all investigations of reported abuse or neglect of foster children shall be completed, in accordance with Section 2106 of the Social Services Manual, within 30 days of receipt of the report.
95% 83% 78% 72% 72% 76% 84% 90% 66% 55% 77% 82% 81% 75% 73% 85% 93%
03) At least 99% of all investigations of reported abuse or neglect of foster children during the reported period shall include timely face-to-face, private contact with the alleged victim, including face-to-face, private contact with a child who is non-verbal due to age or for any other reason.
99% 85% 87% 83% 83% 88% 97% 97% 97% 99% 99% 93% 93% 91% 88% 88% 84%
05) No more than .57% of all children in foster care shall be the victim of substantiated maltreatment while in foster care. <0.57% 0.54% 0.81% 0.92% 1.01% 0.90% 0.55% 1.06% 1.17% 0.63% 0.42% 0.41% 0.58% 0.58% 0.74% 0.68% 0.48%
08b) Of all children entering custody following the entry of the Consent Decree, at least 74% (1) shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes within 12 months or less after entering custody: reunification or permanent placement with relatives; or (2) shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes within 24 months or less after entering custody: adoption, permanent legal custody or guardianship.
74% 50% 53% 56% 56% 59% 62% 62% 61% 62% 62% 63% 64% 65%
09) For all children in the "up to 24 month backlog pool," by the end of the fourth reporting period at least 40% shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption, or guardianship.
40% 49% 20% 20% 19% 21% 19% 19% 24% 24% 27% 9% 17% 32% 8% 9%
10) For all children in the "over 24 month backlog pool," by the end of the second reporting period at least 35% shall have had one of the following permanency outcomes: reunification, permanent placement with relatives, permanent legal custody, adoption,
35% 36% 9% 9% 14% 15% 10% 16% 18% 23% 9% 6% 11% 17% 8% 18%
11) By the end of the second reporting period, for all children whose parental rights have been terminated or released during the reporting period, 80% will have their adoptions finalized within 12 months of final termination or release of parental rights.
80% 74% 70% 69% 70% 69% 68% 50% 54% 59% 67% 84% 84% 55% 60% 66%
16) At least 70% (2nd), 80% (4th) of all foster children who entered foster care during the reporting period along with one or more siblings shall be placed with all of their siblings. 80% 73% 72% 84% 69% 79% 81% 79% 81% 94% 74% 74% 81% 66% 76% 71%
24) By the end of the second reporting period, the baseline of children discharged from foster care at age 18 or older during the 12 months prior to the entry of the Consent Decree who have graduated from high school or earned a GED shall increase by 10 percentage points. By 4th, the NEW base shall increase by 10 percentage points. (Revised Baseline = 36%)[P14]
56% 34% N/A 25% N/A 47% N/A 50% N/A 58% N/A 49.1% N/A 40% N/A 47%
30) At least 80% (2nd), 85% (4th) of children in care at a point in time at the end of the reporting period shall not have any unmet medical, dental, mental health, education, or other service needs, according to the service needs documented in the child's most recent case plan.
85% 74% 77% 57% 54% 75% 72% 68% 69% 77% 78% 75% 78% 74% 73% 81%
OUTCOMES GOALREPORTING PERIODS
Outcomes consistently not met: 1, 2, 3, *5, *8b, *9, *10, 11, *16, *24 & 30
LEGEND
Green = Achieved
Yellow = Approaching Goal
Red = Not Achieved
Permanency Benchmarks
Jim
What is “Stock and Flow?"
6-12 month “Tub”
13+ month “Tub”
Exits from Care
13+ month “Faucet Kids”
Exits from Care
Win Fabulous Prizes!!!
Children in Care 6-12 Months Oct 2013
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Jan 2014
Feb 2014
Mar 2014
Apr 2014
May 2014
Jun 2014
Jul 2014
10 Mo. Total
ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 532 549 546 551 571 589 591 614 619 616 578
10 Month Average
Number of Children Removed 55 31 49 48 52 53 60 50 55 24 4810 Month Average
DNumber of Children reaching 6 months total 16 22 18 23 8 19 36 14 28 32 216
10 Month Total
HNumber of Children reaching 13 months during the month 16 17 12 7 16 12 16 5 17 14 132
10 Month Total
INumber of Children in care 6-12 Months exiting 6 2 12 3 6 8 8 10 4 10 69
10 Month Total
JNumber of Children in Care 6-12 Months on the last day of the month 124 125 119 132 118 116 128 132 138 148 128
10 Month Average
Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 2 1 5 2 5 4 8 6 4 9b Live with other relative 2 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0c Adoption finalized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0d Guardianship 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 0 1
Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 5 2 12 3 6 7 8 10 4 10 6710 Month Total
e Emancipation 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 2 12 3 6 8 8 10 4 10
Positive Permanency Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/(D) 31% 9% 67% 13% 75% 37% 22% 71% 14% 31% 31%10 Month Average
Matriculation Ratio: (H)/(H+I) 73% 89% 50% 70% 73% 60% 67% 33% 81% 58% 66%10 Month Average
DeKalb
All Children in Care 13+ MonthsOct 2013
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Jan 2014
Feb 2014
Mar 2014
Apr 2014
May 2014
Jun 2014
Jul 2014
10 Mo. Total
ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 532 549 546 551 571 589 591 614 619 616 578
10 Month Average
Number of Children Removed 55 31 49 48 52 53 60 50 55 24 4810 Month Average
DNumber of Children reaching 13 months total 16 17 12 7 16 12 16 5 17 14 132
10 Month Total
Number of Children reaching 25 months total 9 7 2 5 8 9 7 6 11 6 70
10 Month Total
HNumber of Children in care 13+ months exiting during the month 6 6 14 6 7 12 7 8 21 5 92
10 Month Total
INumber of Children in Care 13+ Months on the last day of the month 269 272 262 264 275 277 286 280 281 290 276
10 Month Average
Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 0 1 4 3 2 4 3 2 9 3b Live with other relative 4 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0c Adoption finalized 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 0d Guardianship 0 3 0 2 0 7 0 0 5 2
Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 4 5 10 5 6 12 5 3 16 5 7110 Month Total
e Emancipation 2 1 4 1 1 0 2 5 5 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 6 14 6 7 12 7 8 21 5
Positive Permancy Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/D 25% 29% 83% 71% 38% 100% 31% 60% 94% 36% 54%10 Month Average
DeKalb
DeKalb Permanency Benchmarks
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13
% of Children Still in Care
% of Children Exited within 24 mos.
% of Children Exited within 12 mos.
% of Children Exited within 6 mos.
# of Children Still in Care
# of Children Exited within 24 mos.
# of Children Exited within 12 mos.
# of Children Exited within 6 mos.
Outcome 8a
Outcome 8b
Children in Care 6-12 Months Oct 2013
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Jan 2014
Feb 2014
Mar 2014
Apr 2014
May 2014
Jun 2014
Jul 2014
10 Mo. Total
Number of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 590 610 594 578 594 585 610 623 625 609 602
10 Month Average
Number of Children Removed 62 39 49 65 49 108 78 85 59 45 6410 Month Average
Number of Children reaching 6 months total 16 15 19 24 13 13 25 8 19 18 170
10 Month Total
Number of Children reaching 13 months during the month 16 15 13 9 5 20 8 9 9 11 115
10 Month Total
Number of Children in care 6-12 Months exiting 1 4 2 2 10 5 9 5 15 0 53
10 Month Total
Number of Children in Care 6-12 Months on the last day of the month 102 96 99 114 112 98 107 101 95 102 103
10 Month Average
Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits ExitsReunification 1 3 2 1 2 4 5 3 13 0Live with other relative 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0Adoption finalized 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Guardianship 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 0
Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 1 4 2 1 9 5 8 4 15 0 4910 Month Total
Emancipation 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 1 4 2 2 10 5 9 5 15 0
Positive Permanency Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/(D) 6% 27% 11% 4% 69% 38% 32% 50% 79% 0% 29%10 Month Average
Matriculation Ratio: (H)/(H+I) 94% 79% 87% 82% 33% 80% 47% 64% 38% 100% 68%10 Month Average
Fulton
All Children in Care 13+ MonthsOct 2013
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Jan 2014
Feb 2014
Mar 2014
Apr 2014
May 2014
Jun 2014
Jul 2014
10 Mo. Total
ANumber of Foster Care Cases open on the first day of the month 590 610 594 578 594 585 610 623 625 609 602
10 Month Average
Number of Children Removed 62 39 49 65 49 108 78 85 59 45 6410 Month Average
DNumber of Children reaching 13 months total 16 15 13 9 5 20 8 9 9 11 115
10 Month Total
Number of Children reaching 25 months total 8 7 3 10 5 5 6 9 7 14 74
10 Month Total
HNumber of Children in care 13+ months exiting during the month 6 22 19 13 18 7 16 20 22 15 158
10 Month Total
INumber of Children in Care 13+ Months on the last day of the month 375 367 352 349 336 349 342 330 315 316 343
10 Month Average
Discharge Reason Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exits Exitsa Reunification 3 3 5 5 3 1 3 4 13 1b Live with other relative 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 5c Adoption finalized 0 16 11 0 2 3 6 4 8 4d Guardianship 1 2 1 0 6 0 1 3 0 3
Positive Permanency Subtotal (a+b+c+d) 5 21 17 7 13 5 10 13 21 13 12510 Month Total
e Emancipation 1 1 2 6 5 2 6 7 1 0f Transfer to another agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1g Runaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h Death of Child (May 2009 forward) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i Legal Status not mapped to AFCARS (May 2009 forward)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i) 6 22 19 13 18 7 16 20 22 15
Positive Permancy Ratio:(a+b+c+d)/D 31% 140% 131% 78% 260% 25% 125% 144% 233% 118% 109%10 Month Average
Fulton
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13
% of Children Still in Care
% of Children Exited within 24 mos.
% of Children Exited within 12 mos.
% of Children Exited within 6 mos.
# of Children Still in Care
# of Children Exited within 24 mos.
# of Children Exited within 12 mos.
# of Children Exited within 6 mos.
Fulton Permanency Benchmarks
Outcomes 9 & 10
Carol Hall and Samantha Walker
Outcome 9 and 10 Kids
Case ID Name DOB AGERemoval
DatePrimary Perm Plan
Legal Status
Child Characteristics Updates as of 08/05/14
10401687Avery, Qwondari
2/15/98 16 6/12/04 Adoption (03)Permanent Court
Depression, Eating Disorder
Stepped down to a foster home on 6/2/2014. Child does not wish to be adopted. Guardianship options will be explored further once child has been in the home longer.
10402856Holloway, Regginal B
11/17/98 15 4/12/05 Adoption (03)Permanent Court
ADD/ADHD, Depression, Conduct Disorder
Currently pursuing a possible adoptive resource. Home study is underway.
10402983 Smith, Chasity 9/1/99 14 10/26/05 Adoption (03)Permanent Court
ADD/ADHD,Trouble Sleeping,Steals, Aggressive, Anxiety Disorder,Attachment Disorder
Stepped down to a foster home on 6/3/2014. Adoption possible 6 - 10 months.
10403872Pinkney, Lakeidrea
2/2/97 17 10/27/05
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Emancipation
Temporary Court
Adjustment Disorder, Sibling Group
APPLA. Child doesn't wish to be adopted. Child was arrested on 6/21/2014 and was released 6/30/2014. Is currently on runaway status.
10403872Pinkney, Lakeithea
2/2/97 17 10/27/05
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Emancipation
Temporary Court
Adjustment Disorder, Wets Bed
APPLA. Child doesn't wish to be adopted. No discharge date from PRTF as she is not stabilized. Her levels keep changing though she is improving overall. Ruling out medical basis for enuresis.
Outcome 9 and 10 KidsCase ID Name DOB AGE
Removal Date
Primary Perm PlanLegal Status
Child Characteristics Updates as of 08/05/14
10403872McCrary, Charles
2/10/03 11 10/27/05 Adoption (No TPR Compelling Reasons)
Temporary Court
Aggressive, Sibling Group, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Learning Disability, Anxiety Disorder, Allergies
Stepped down to a therapeutic foster home 5/23/2014. Doing well in this placement, improving aggressiveness and hygiene issues. Walker and hall to visit placement.
10402351 Jones, Rhonda 7/8/96 17 5/19/99
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Through Long Term Foster Care
Temporary Court
Adjustment Disorder,Emotionally Disturbed, Sibling Group, Asthma
Child emancipated J uly 8, 2014.
10400738 Young, Stephani 10/2/96 17 10/31/00 AdoptionPermanent Court
Aggressive, Intellectual Disability, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder , Conduct Disorder
Will emancipate 10/02/2014.
10403862Parrott, Chevanne
11/6/00 13 2/9/01 AdoptionPermanent Court
Downs Syndrome, Self Abuse, Visually Impaired, Hearing Impaired, Mental Retardation
Child has severe special needs. Removed from 7-year placement 2 years ago. Currently in pacement for 1 year. Has round the clock nursing care. Walker and Hall to visit placement soon.
10400775 Blair, Linval 11/8/96 17 5/2/03 AdoptionPermanent Court
ADD/ADHD, Anxiety DisorderAPPLA. Child doesn't want to be adopted.
10400775 Blair,Joseph 7/27/98 15 5/2/03 AdoptionPermanent Court
ADD/ADHD, Violent, Aggressive, Steals, Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Adoption within 6 - 10 months.
8b and 8 in 8
(Counties)
DeKalb P14 8B Cohort Children Who Entered Care During Period 14 and Who
Will Reach 24 Months in Care Between7/1/14 and 12/31/14
8/1/14Unofficial Results: DeKalb needs 0 additional 8B exits by 12/31/14(As of 8/1/14 206 positive permanencies)
Newly Discharged 3 +(3*)Children Remaining Eligible 44•No/Unlikely 36•Yes 0•Possible 8*= not a positive permanency
Fulton P14 8B Cohort Children Who Entered Care During Period 14 and Who Will
Reach 24 Months in Care Between
7/1/14 to 12/31/14
Fulton needs
11additional 8b exits
By 12/31/14
8/7
Newly Discharged
2
Children Remaining
50
•No/Unlikely 25•Yes 13•Possible 12
8 in 8 Data
Counties
QA Review of 8 in 8 : FultonResults for May 2014
Total Number Percent Initial Planned Disruptions
Number of children 20 8 7 5
Number of visits due 146 63 43 40
Number of visits made 119 45 35 39
Percent of visits made 82% 71% 81% 98%
All 8 in 8 requirements met 8 40% 1 3 4
All visits made butmissed time or location requirement
NA NA NA NA NA
At least one in-placement visit in the 1st wk 18 90% 7 6 5
At least one visit any location in the 1st wk 20 100% 8 7 5
QA Review of 8 in 8 : DeKalb Results for May 2014
Total Number Percent Initial Planned Disruptions
Number of children 20 5 10 5
Number of visits due 125 25 65 35
Number of visits made 112 25 60 27
Percent of visits made 90% 100% 92% 77%
All 8 in 8 requirements met 13 65% 4 7 2
All visits made butmissed time or location requirement
2 10% 1 1 NA
At least one in-placement visit in the 1st wk 17 85% 4 9 4
At least one visit any location in the 1st wk 18 90% 4 10 4
Region XIV 8x8 Results by Reporting Period
P14 P15 P16 P 17 P17Month Placement Started Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Total
Month Presented at G2 Apr May Jun July Aug Sept
# Region XIV Children Reviewed 205 206 192 40 40 40 40 40 200
# all 8x8 requirements met 55 56 55 16 18 17 20 21 92
Percent of children with all 8x8 requirements met
27% 27% 29% 40% 45% 43% 50% 53% 46%
# Visits Due 1387 1431 1329 257 261 288 278 271 1355
# Visits Made 1008 1059 965 209 208 235 224 231 1107
Percent of required visits made 73% 74% 73% 81% 80% 82% 80% 85% 82%
• Yolanda Loving Aberdeen
• Leah Montgomery
• Latosha Sullivan
• Rhodesha Middlebrook
• Tamara Comer
• Shakerria Walker
• Desarae Benton
• Vera Fieullete-Williams
• Lorenzo Jackson
• Jasmine McCully• Taralynn Burns• Jennifer Duvivier
• Alonze Oliver• Vonda Dubose• Rodderick Nelson• A’Leah Williams• Tranteegus Austin
Workers who finished their 8th visit during the month of June and July on time and all
documented!
STARS!!
• Shalonda Armstead*
• Kristi Martin
• Brandy Willis*
• Tammy Arnold
• Dotse Oyarebu
• Patricia Mitchell
• Yolunda Brown
• Betty Brathwaite*
• Courtney Buggs*
• DeJerecka Ferrell
• Cherish Williams
• Jodi Kentish
• Jessica Johnson
• Tanisha Sheeler*
• Josephine Broderick*
• Beverly Mackey
• Brittany Farmer• Ashley Chisholm**/*• Demond Gordon• Jennifer Baker• Amne Simons• Rodniqua Armstrong*
• Jamisha Turner** • Brittany Burden• Marjorie Pryce*• Ashley Goodine• Molly Williamson*• Ronda Brown• Moise Nash* = more than one **= way out of town!
Workers who finished their 8th visit during the month of June and July on time and all
documented!
STARS!!
County Visitation Data
June 2013
Fulton County
PlacementVisitation Data
FINAL
June 2014
Fulton County
June2014
OM 20A
Child Visits
Admin
Supervisor Required Made %
Russell97.05%
509/494
Beasley 142 127 89.44%
Greene 141 141 100%
Hudson 103 103 100%
Rudd 123 123 100%
Walker98.86%
176/174
Haynes 60 60 100%
Searcy 49 49 100%
Trim 67 65 97.01%
Williams99.07
428/424
Booker 129 129 100%
Bradley 69 67 97.10%
Fulton 125 123 98.40%
Scott-Morrow 105 105 100%
Summary 1113 109298.11
%
Excellent 96.25% or greater
Good 92% - 96.24%
Needs Improvement <92%
Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%
Fulton County
June2014
OM 20B
Child PrivateVisits
Admin% Required Made %
Russell97.291%
258/251
Beasley 73 66 90.41%
Greene 71 71 100%
Hudson 52 52 100%
Rudd 62 62 100%
Walker100%
92/92
Haynes 30 30 100%
Searcy 25 25 100%
Trim 37 37 100%
Williams96.98%
232/225
Booker 68 68 100%
Bradley 39 38 97.44%
Fulton 64 63 98.44%
Scott-Morrow 58 58 100%
Summary 579 57098.45
%
Excellent 96.25% or greater
Good 92% - 96.24%
Needs Improvement <92%
Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%
Fulton County
June2014
OM 21
Reunification
Visits
Excellent 85% or greater
Good 75% - 84.9%
Needs Improvement <75%
Kenny A. Mandate 85%
Admin
Supervisor Required Made %
Russell100%
127/127
Beasley 36 36 100%
Greene 37 37 100%
Hudson 21 21 100%
Rudd 33 33 100%
Walker100%
5/5
Haynes 4 4 100%
Searcy 1 1 100%
Trim 0 0 100%
Williams97.4%
115/112
Booker 42 42 100%
Bradley 17 17 100%
Fulton 36 33 91.7%
Scott-Morrow 20 20 100%
Summary 247 244 98.8%
Fulton County
June 2014
OM 22
Caretaker
Visits
Excellent 95% or greater
Good 87.5% - 94.9%
Needs Improvement <87.5
Kenny A. Mandate 95%
Admin Required Made %
Russell96.5%
254/245
Beasley 70 63 90.0%
Greene 70 70 100%
Hudson 52 50 96.2%
Rudd 62 62 100%
Walker98.9%
90/89
Haynes 30 30 100%
Searcy 25 25 100%
Trim 35 34 97.1%
Williams100%
212/212
Booker 63 63 100%
Bradley 33 33 100%
Fulton 62 62 100%
Scott-Morrow 54 54 100%
Summary 578 562 97.2%
Fulton County
June 2014
OM 23
Sibling Visits
Excellent 90% or greater
Good 80% - 89.9%
Needs Improvement <80%
Kenny A. Mandate 90%
Admin
Supervisor Required Made %
Russell100%
39/39
Beasley 7 7 100%
Greene 13 13 100%
Hudson 4 4 100%
Rudd 15 15 100%
Walker100%
12/12
Haynes 5 5 100%
Searcy 5 5 100%
Trim 2 2 100%
Williams100%
37/37
Booker 13 13 100%
Bradley 3 3 100%
Fulton 11 11 100%
Scott-Morrow 10 10 100%
Summary 88 88 100%
OM Goal Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Child Visits 20 A96.25
% 96.8% 99.5% 98.87%99.19
%97.45
%98.11
%
Child Private 20 B96.25
% 98.2% 100% 97.67%96.97
%98.46
%98.45
%
Reunification 21 85% 94.7% 98.6% 97.4% 97.4% 90.6% 98.8%
Caretaker 22 95% 98.2% 99.0% 99.0% 99.1% 97.2% 98.2%
Sibling 23 90% 96.8% 100% 97.4% 95.1% 90.9% 100%
Fulton CountyVisitation Summary
December 2013 to June 2014
DeKalb County
PlacementVisitation Data
June 2014
DeKalb County
June2014
OM 20A
Child Visits
AdministratorSuperviso
r Require
dMade %
Lyles401/40998.04%
Cox 106 106 100%
Hill 110 105 95.45%
Njenga 110 107 97.27%
Jack 83 83 100%
Johnson376/38797.16%
Scott 119 119 100%
Hall 98 96 97.96%
Jacob 101 100 99.01%
Pertiller 69 61 88.41
Rayne305/32294.72%
Macon 116 130 89.23%
Garrett 95 94 98.95%
Smith 97 95 97.94%
Summary 1080 1120 96.78%
Excellent 96.25% or greater
Good 92% - 96.24%
Needs Improvement <92%
Kenny A. Mandate 96.25%
DeKalb County
June2014
OM 20B
ChildPrivateVisits
Kenny A. Mandate96.25%
Excellent 96.25% or greater
Good 92% - 96.24%
Needs Improvement <92%
Administrator Supervis
orRequire
dMade %
Lyles209/21099.52%
Cox 55 55 100%
Hill 55 54 98.18%
Njenga 57 57 100%
Jack 43 43 100%
Johnson203/20499.51%
Hall 51 51 100%
Jacob 52 52 100%
Pertiller 35 34 97.14%
Scott 66 66 100%
Rayne159/16397.55%
Macon 66 62 93.94%
Garrett 48 48 100%
Smith 46 46 100%
Summary 571 577 98.96%
DeKalbCounty
June2014
OM 21
Reunification
Visits
Excellent 85% or greater
Good 75% - 84.9%
Needs Improvement <75%
Kenny A. Mandate 85%
Administrator
Supervisor
Required
Made %
Lyles62/6693.9%
Cox 1 1 100%
Hill 26 23 88.5%
Njenga 35 34 97.1%
Jack 4 4 100%
Johnson107/11196.4%
Hall 24 23 95.8%
Jacob 33 33 100%
Pertiller 29 26 89.7%
Scott 25 25 100%
Rayne71/8880.7%
Macon 38 30 78.9%
Garrett 25 19 76%
Smith 25 22 88%
Summary 265 240 90.6%
DeKalb County
June2014
OM 22
CaretakerVisits
Kenny A. Mandate 95%
Excellent 95% or greater
Good 87.5% - 94.9%
Needs Improvement <87.5
Administrator Supervis
orRequire
dMade %
Lyles204/20997.6%
Cox 55 55 100%
Hill 55 51 92.7%
Njenga 56 55 98.2%
Jack 43 43 100%
Johnson193/19897.5%
Hall 51 49 96.1%
Jacob 51 51 100%
Pertiller 34 32 94.1%
Scott 62 61 98.4%
Rayne140/15888.6%
Macon 64 51 79.7%
Garrett 46 46 100%
Smith 48 43 89.6%
Summary 565 537 95%
DeKalbCounty
June2014
OM 23
Sibling Visits
Excellent 90% or greater
Good 80% - 89.9%
Needs Improvement <80%
Kenny A. Mandate 90%
Administrator
Supervisor
Required
Made %
Lyles26/26100%
Cox 8 8 100%
Hill 4 4 100%
Njenga 6 6 100%
Jack 8 8 100%
Johnson15/15100%
Hall 3 3 100%
Jacob 2 2 100%
Pertiller 4 4 100%
Scott 6 6 100%
Rayne7/17
41.2%
Macon 10 4 40%
Garrett 3 0 0%
Smith 4 3 75%
Summary 58 48 82.8%
OM Goal Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Child Visits 20 A 96.25%
98.4% 98.47% 98.81% 98.9% 99% 96.6%
Child Private 20 B 96.25%
99.6% 100% 100% 99.5% 99.8% 98.8%
Reunification 21 85%
91.8% 88.9% 95.3% 95.2% 92.7% 90.6%
Care taker 22 95%
97.7% 96.6% 98.7% 96.6% 98.1% 95%
Sibling 23 90%84.2% 91.1% 95.5% 100% 91.8% 82.8%
DeKalb CountyVisitation Summary
January 2013 to June 2014