Katrina kaif turquotte or katrina turcotte ajay mishra movie draft
G. Lambert R. Turcotte (SJ. · 2017. 1. 17. · G. Lambert R. Turcotte (SJ. RECEIVED SEP l 71992...
Transcript of G. Lambert R. Turcotte (SJ. · 2017. 1. 17. · G. Lambert R. Turcotte (SJ. RECEIVED SEP l 71992...
-
VAL DMGEOFHYSI" 4 1p Hsweese 2.14722 BURROWS""""""""" ^. 1 -
010
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYproperty of
COMINCO LIMITEDBURRO Project
Burrows TownshipProvince of Ontario
May 1991
G. Lambert R. Turcotte
(SJ.
RECEIVEDSEP l 71992
MINING LANDS BRANCH
SERVICES EN LEVES GEOPHYSIQUES - GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES50, hou). Lamaque. VAL D 'OB (Ou6bec) J9P 2H6 Til. : (819) 825-6529 Fax : (819) 825-1342
-
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Table of contents........,........,..,.....................iIntroduction............................,...,......,....,..lProperty, location and access..........................,...!Geophysical work.......,..........,..,.....................lSurvey specification..............................,........2Results and interpretation....,.......................,....3Conclusion and recommendations....,..................,..,,.4Certificates....,.........................,...,..........5-6
LIST OF FIGURES;
Figure #1: Index of claims, Figure 12: Area surveyed..,
.ii iii
LIST OF MAPS:
DRAWING NO. MAGNETIC SURVEY
1.1
1.2
Total field contours
Total field and gradient profiles
DRAWING NO. H.E.M. SURVEY
3.1
3.2
3.3
440 Hz
1760 Hz
3520 Hz
Q/0
-
-li-
COMINCO LIMITED BURRO Project
Figure #1: Index of claims
-
-iii-
COMINCO LIMITED BURRO Project
Figure #2: Area surveyed
-
-1-
INTRODUCTION
In April, 1991, a magnetic survey and electromagnetic H.E.M. survey were carried out on a property owned by COMINCO LIMITED, BURRO Project, in BurroJ5Township, province of Ontario.
These surveys were designed to locate structures favorable for base metal deposition.
PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is located approximately 80 km South of the town of Timmins, in Burrows Township, province of Ontario.
The property is accessible by secondary roads which can be taken from the highway 1560 or #144.
The property claims have been registered with the Ontario Department of Natural Resources and the numbers are presented on figure #1.
GEOPHYSICAL WORK
A total magnetic field survey and electromagnetic H.E.M. survey were carried out on part of the property between April 10th and 15th, 1991.
A total of 29.2 km was covered by the magnetic survey using the EDA OMNI-PLUS proton precession instuments. The H.E.M. survey was conducted over a total of 25.5 km using an APEX PARAMETRICS MAXMIN I instrument, operating at three frequencies.
-
-2-
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
The geophysical surveys were carried out along a network of North - South picket line cut at 100 metres intervals. The lines were chained and stations marked at 25 metres intervals.
The magnetic readings were taken with a proton precession magnetometer recording simultaneously the value of the total magnetic field and the measurement of the vertical gradient, with a precision of 0.1 gamma and 0.1 gamma/metre respectively. The separation between the sensors was 0.5 metre and the height of the upper sensor was 3.2 metres above the ground. The readings were taken systematically every 12.5 metres.
A base station magnetometer measuring the variation of the total magnetic field at 20 seconds intervals was used as a reference for correction of the diurnal variation.
The electromagnetic survey was carried out using a MAXMIN I, which was used in the horizontal loop mode with a 150 metres separations between the transmitting and receiving coils. Reading were taken at 25 metres intervals along the lines.
The instrument is capable of operating on nine different frequencies of which 440, 1760 and 3520 Hz were selected. In this type of survey, both in phase and out of phase components of the secondary field are measured and are recorded as percentages of the primary field.
O/D
-
-3-
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
The magnetic relief shows a predominance of NW-SE striking units among a background level of 58450 i 50 gammas. Probably originating from late, cross-cutting mafic dykes, these features define an important network of structural lineaments which cut and possibly displace the otherwise East- West to NE-SW stratigraphy.
The range of amplitudes of the anomalies extends from 100 gammas to 1000 gammas above backgound and the wavelengths are generally diagnostic of units lying at dephs of 25 to 80 meters.
Only in the Southwest are there magnetic units which strike along East-West directions and probably represent the signatures of mafic volcanic flows.
The MaxMin H.E.M. survey has mapped two types of conductors. First there are conductors of definitely massive metallic nature, in the areas of/450E/425N. These conductors are caused by either sulphidic or graphitic horizons in the bedrock. The interpreted depths of these conductors are in the range 30m - 35m. The conductor in the West strikes NE-SW where as the conductor in the East strikes East-West.
The second type of conductor is of electrolytic nature or poorly-connected metallic stringers or veins. They seem to occur in areas of intense bedrock relief and as such could well be related to tectonic phenomena such as faults and shear zones. Indeed, we have traced two possible faults in the area around 850E/550N.
Also evident in the MaxMin profiles are bedrock ridges which can be identified by positive quadrature peaks associated with the resulting higher apparent resistivities.
-
-4-
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The geophysical investigations which were carried out on the BURRO property have successfully mapped a dominant NW-SE tectonic fabric cross-cutting an East-West to NE-SW trending stratigraphy.
Two massive metallic conductors were delineated and a number of less conductive zones. If structure-hosted mineralisation is the target, there is an opportunity in the central sector of the property where disruptions and changes in direction are quite prominent.
If massive sulphides are to be explored, the two "good" conductors should be drill tested to see if they are due to sulphides or graphite.
Of course, the present results, examined in the light of additional geoscientific information should help in providing a better understanding of the lithological and stratigraphic complexities of this area.
Respectfully submitted, VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIQUE LTEE
By:rard Lambert. S ,i
Consulting Geophysic
And By:
QvO
-
GERARD LAMBERTGEOSCIENCES Sodttt de consultation tt de gfnie-conseil en gfophysique.
-5-
CERTIFICATE
undersigned, Gerard Lambert, P. Eng., certify that:
I reside at 679 Muroch ave, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, since 1983,
l am a graduate f o Universite Laval, Quebec where I have obtaned a B.Se.A. in Geological engineering in 1978,
I have been engaged in Exploration Geophysics since 1972 and have been practicing as a professional engineer since 1978.
l am a member of the Order des Ingenieur du Quebec since 1978.
I am a member of the Quebec Prospector Association, the Prospector t Developers Geophysicist, the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists and the Canadian Institute of Mining * Metallurgy.
This report is based on the information contained in the survey described. The interpretation of the data was made using methods known in the literature and based on my personnal experience.
I have not received, nor do I expect ot receive directly or indirectly any interest in the claims that belong to COMINCO LIMITED.
Rouyn-Noranda, this May 24, 1991
,Gerard Lambert, Consulting Geophysicist
679, avenue Murdoch, Rouvn-Noranda (Quthec) Canada J9XIH7 TtMphone: (819) 762-3182 Ttltcopieur: (819) 762-5364
-
-6-
CERTIFITCATE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:
I am a resident of Val d'Or, province of Quebec, since 1977t
I am a technologist graduated from "College du Nord-Ouest", Rouyn, Quebec in 1977.
I have been actively engaged in geophysical exploration since 1977 and have acquired a wode range of experience in geophysical methods and techniques.
I am a member of "Corporation professionnelle des Technogolues des Sciences Appliquees du Quebec" and also a member of the Quebed prospectors association and f the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
I do not hold nor do I expect to receive an interest of any kind in these claims help by COMINCO LIMITED.
Signed in Val d'Or, this May 24, 1991.
By:
QvO
-
Ontario4iPi4sweese a .14732 BURROWS
900
Ministry of Ministers duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines
Geoscience Approvals Section Mining Lands Branch Willet Green Miller Centre 933 Ramsey Lake Rd. , 6th Fir Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863
Our File: 2. 14722 Transaction ft: W9280. 00173
October 22, 1992
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Mr. Cuda:
RE: Approval of Assessment Work on mining claims LI167672 et al. in Burrows Township.
The assessment work credits listed on the above mentioned report of work have been approved as of October 20, 1992.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Dale Messenger at (705) 670-5858.
Yours sincerely,
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands BranchMines and Minerals Division
'TJEM/jl Enclosures:
cc: ^ssessment Files Office Toronto, Ontario
ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GIS-ASSESSMENT FILES
NOV O 3 1992
RECEIVED
Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario
-
Ministry ofNorthern Development
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act
Transaction Number
Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury. Ontario, P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7284. '.o
*V *Instruction*: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.
Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group
j, ''Geotechnical Survey
Physical Work, Including Drilling
Rehabilitation
Other Authorized Work
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Type
/XteGA//^'/*? * /S^jr^? &SPJ&V&s
RECEIVEDSEP 1 7 1992
MINING LANUb BRANCH
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs
Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address
/ ? //s? i-
(attach a tchedule H necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side
1 certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered In this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.
Certification of Work Report1 certify that 1 have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth In this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after Ha completion and annexed report Is true.
Name and Address of Pereon Certifying
For Office Use OnlyTotal Value Cr. Recorded ate Recorded
Deemed Approval Date
zDate Notice for Amendments Sent
Date Approved
Received StarljJEGEIVED LARDER UKE
MlNINrt
AUG
TOf?
-
it 4
fc XI
s1 iss
M
x
r irN
s
\
^vV
X
vvx ^V
\ N
Valueof
l
^
Vi"o
0)
RE
CE
1VH
)E
P1
7 19
'12
MIN
ING
LAND
S BR
ANCl
*
al
Cre
dits
you
are
cla
imin
g in
this
rep
ort m
ay b
e cu
t bac
k. In
ord
er to
min
imiz
e th
e ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of
suc
h de
letio
ns, p
leas
e In
dica
te fr
om
whi
ch c
laim
s yo
u w
ish
to p
riorlz
e th
e de
letio
n of
cre
dits
. Pl
ease
mar
k (s
) on
e of
the
follo
win
g:
1.
D C
redi
ts a
re t
o be
cut
bac
k st
artin
g w
ith t
he c
laim
list
ed la
st,
wor
king
bac
kwar
ds.
2.
Bcr
ed
its a
re t
o be
cut
bac
k eq
ually
ove
r al
l cla
ims
cont
aine
d in
this
rep
ort
of w
ork.
3.
D C
redi
ts a
re to
be
cut
back
as
prio
rized
on
the
atta
ched
app
endi
x.
In t
he e
vent
that
you
hav
e no
t spe
cifie
d yo
ur c
hoic
e of
prio
rity,
opt
ion
one
will
be im
plem
ente
d.
Not
* 1:
Exam
ple*
of b
enef
icia
l Int
eres
t are
unr
ecor
ded
tran
sfer
*, op
tion
agre
emen
ts, m
emor
andu
m o
f agr
eem
ents
, etc
., w
ith re
spec
t to
the
min
ing
clai
m*.
Not
* 2:
If
wor
k ha
* be
en p
erfo
rmed
on
pate
nted
or
leas
ed la
nd, p
leas
* co
mpl
ete
the
follo
win
g:
1 1 c
ertif
y th
at t
he r
ecor
ded
hold
er h
ad a
ben
efic
ial i
nter
est
In th
e pa
tent
ed
or le
ased
land
at t
he ti
me
the
wor
k w
as p
erfo
rmed
.
Sign
atur
eD
ate
-
Ontario
Ministry OlNorthern Developmentt
ere du Ddveloppement du Nord t des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
fetat des coQts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Lol sur lee mines
Transaction No./N' de transaction
Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining clalm(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renselgnements personnels contenus dans la present* formule sent recuelllls en vertu de la Lol sur Its mines et serviront a tenlr a Jour un reglstre des concessions mlnleres. Adresser toute question sur la collece de ces renselgnements au chef provincial des terrains mlnlere, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159, rue Cedar, 4* etage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoQts directs
Type
Wages Salalres
Contractor's and Consultant's Fees Drolts d* ('entrepreneur t de I'expert- consell
Supplies Used Fournltures utilities
Equipment Rental Location de materiel
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Typ*
xC^t^7 's/TT/^fr
tft/Kte ys&ePc&r-ft'iC-ir/'Sf,
/s*rcxpx'e7XrMsJTyp*
Type
Amount Montan!
# A.67b.
S
7./3-S.
6 tt),
Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs
Totals Total global
fax??
/tfJr^T
2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coOls Indlrects ne sont pas admlsslbles en tant que travaux d'evaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
F
Food and Lodging NourrHur* *t h*b*rg*m*nt M|Mobllliatlon and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation
Description
Typ*
^ECElVEnSEP 1 7 199?
JING LANDS BrVv^^/ffe/rTT/^e^ v'^p/yyr/ff-
(2x31*^*0^;-
Amount Montant
:CH
x:*2aaSub Total of Indirect Costs
Total partial des coOts IndlrectsAmount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des eoOts directs)Total Value of A*s***m*nt Credit V*l*ur total* du credit (Total of Direct *nd Allowable devaluation Indirect eoitt) (ToUI dM eotti dlraeb '
Totals Total global
.^rf^,
S~fte
M.&s'r
tf.r7S(t Indlrtctt (dmlMlblM
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed In this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le titulaire enreglstrt sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present etat des coOts dans les 30 Jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectute, le mlnlstre pout rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation preserves.
Filing Discounts
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at lOO'/b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion Is claimed at 50"M) of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
x 0.50 -
Remises pour depdt
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sont rembourses a 100 "ft de la valeur totale susmenttonnee du credit d'evaluation.
2. Les travaux deposes trols, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 60 "to de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentlonne. Volr les calculs cl-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit d evaluation Evaluation totale demand**
x 0,50 -
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
that as
to make this certification
ded Holder, Agent. Position In Company) ,
Attestatlon de I'etat des coQts
J'atteste par la prdsente :que les montants Indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces dlpenses ont ete* engagers pot/r effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains Indiquds dans la formule de rapport de travail cl-jolnt.
Etqu'atitrede. . le suls autorlse(litulalr* enreglstnt, reprisenlant, post* oocupi dans la compagnl*)
a falre cette attestation.
yjp^hul*. lorsqu'll design* des personnes, le masculln est utilise" au sens neulr*.
-
?-' z
*-i~
O C
3 S
Z X
^ Z
-4
m c
™l-H
O^S
'-S
^X
Z^^;o,r
-xT
^z-^
^**
5 :n
*~ o
N!
I&
OS
3D
2
^0
s: ^
*^
-" j,
Q
rr
m
m 2nO
CO
CI
H -,
!Z
P"
GJ z
-H -l
o m m
CO D
S? e C cn0
co o
O I
O li-H
—
l ~
'
^
Ci
i o
> o
o z
om
Z9^0?
^ C
O r-
m15
T!
-l
MA
TT
AG
AM
I T
WP
ra s 0
o
> CD O H -l 3 "D
w 3
)
J]
^*"
0(*
l ff)
!tio
——^—
———
-4-r
—^
—
.— -I
----
ir H
~^ .a
II l_
__(L
-^--
t-Y
^
C/) rn H .̂"D
to o o 9 O
KE
MP
TW
P.
- -*,
,
z
o 5
o
m
•o i*
o
z
z
m CO
Z o CD cb CJl
t*D
ci
CO 0
CO (V o
o -
o o
0
3-
0
o
*1 ?
W
OD *
(T*
e-
**OD
^
™
OD
^
O
O 3 d.
00
o A
- Ot/
)
n-*
Q
O
3
rn ?
"D
**
n
o c 3 d
o
i-
^
—
ix
xST
O
-c
t/-
o o
cr,
mn*
x I o
cZ
-D *-
o
o
n
o
o
O O X
^ CO
CO
o s^ c5 50 ^ -nO
O
-n
^ C/
) x
-
1200 N^
1100 N-
000 N-
900 N
800 N^
700 N^
500 N —
500 ^
400 N
300 N.
200 N.
TOO ^
200 E 400 E 6DO E 800 E 000 E 200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 2000 E
200 M
00 N
000 N
.900 N
-800 N
-700 N
-600 N
-500 N
400 N
.300 N
-200 N
-100 N
BASELINE
200 E 400 E 600 E BOG E 000 E 200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 2000 E
TOO
Scale
D 100 :oo 300 400
41P145H8858 2.14722 BURROWS 210
\N
e
LEGENDCONTOUR INTERVAL (gamma)
500
EDA OW1 IV
oJ?
-- —-*-""
CABOT
2. 14722 1km 2 ka
COMINCO LTDBURRO PROPERTY
MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTAL FIELD CONTOURS
VAL D 9 OR GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE
nterpreted by' G. Lambert, P.Eng. Date 0 4/199
Scale : 5000 Drawing no. 9 1-699-1.l
-
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 1000 E 1200 E 1400 E 1600 E 800 E 2000 E
1200 N-
1100 N-
000 N
900 N-
800 N
700 N
600 N-
500 N-
400 N-
300 N-
200 N-
00 N
TL 1200-N
— BASELINE
/a f e
fl)Olfi(fi -*Q-^^'V ^ (fe^V fOV tfi — SD ^ P^ fi B-iMWuiVr-tttfia *J*CTjryjjrql DC N**fcig ~. j*——-————P^"——~
TL 1200 N
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 1000 E i1200 E 1400 E 600 E 100800 E 2000 E
IDD
Scale
B 100
'5000200______300 400
.1200 N
-1100 N
-l DOON
-900 N
-BOO N
-700 N
-600 N
.500 N
.400 N
.300 N
-200 N
-100 N
.0
41P14S*8858 2.14722 BURROWS 220
i
N
LEGENDINTERPRETATION.Uthological jjnit of .increased megiettc susceptibility.teflc to ul traffic plutonic rocks, ironnafic
Lithological unit hawing a negative wyiitic r&llef (macpatic lau). Possibly associated with a n^-othermal ly altered zcne pp a *ejor frecttre ztine. felsic uni't,
Depth and dip estimates for ragnetic units.
Interpreted shear zone interpreted fault.
MAGNETIC PROFILES.———— Total Field
Vertical Gradient
Relative zero for Total Field
Readings:
SQOgoem.100 ganwe/netre.
5B330gaMm.
cm on
Total Field - 58200 Cgamnes) 165- IS
Gradient (game/metre)
IretrunenV M^netemeter EDA 0*1 IV
O O^rf
^ *^ J/
^* l A"^i /*j*
VI J^1 *^f i .* ! **u^•-^i-~2 * i 'i t,*f i * i
s* lv* l vrf J*•*- - '*— —-f "" ""Z1^"" "V" V"~ "*"F
j*" f j ^* i*" V*^ ^ *^ i us A -10
BURROWS TWPCABOT TWP
2
COMINCO LTDBURRO PROPERTY
MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTAL FIELD AND GRADIENT PROFILES
VAL'D'OR GEQPHYSIQUE LTEE
ntarpreted by ! 6. lalibert. P. Eng Data 04/1991
Scale 1 .1 5000
-
1200 N_
1100 N —
1000 N -
900 N
800 N_
700 N
600 N-
500 N
400 N-
300 N.
200 ^
100 ^i_
B^SELINt
200 E 400 E 6DO E 800 E 000 E 200 E 4DO E 600 E 800 E
——r — ' — ' — ' ——— - — - - — - i
i it
it
; Tif i J-
TLU
g sCD
S S(.O
SCD
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 1000 E 200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E
00
Scale
100
:5000
200 300 400
C •*t'-*s J
2000 E
BASEUNE
OJ
en
2000 E
1200 M —1200 N
-1100 N
-1000 N
-900 N
-.800 N
..700 N
-600 N
.500 N
-400 N
-300 N
-200 N
-100 N
41PMSWW56 2.M722 BURROWS S30
N
C L
——GO——GO——
LEGENDINTERPRETATION.Relatively Ion resistivity unit uith respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.
Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, ?nore resist i ye Hthoiogical unit..
Well-defined Maxnin H. L E. M, bedrock conductor. Conductance higher than 40 mnos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to seni-massive nineralisation.
Low conductivity Maxmin H.L.E.M. conductor, lower than 20 nhos. Causes possibly metallicDiscontinuous, stringer or disseninated nineralisation. Gr electrolytic 1 conductive tectonic structure.
Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors
Interpreted shear zone.
Interpreted fault.
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES.____. In-phase l cai. ~ 1 0 'l-
__ __ Out-of-phftse l en. - 10 l
Readings 1IrrPhase
X
Instruct APEX MAXNIN
24-2 Out-of-phase l
CABOT
14722
COMINCO LTDBURRO PROPERTY
ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 44Q Hz CABLE - 150 m .
VAL D 'OR GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE
interpreted by G. Lambert, P.Eng.
Scale : 5000 Drawing no. 91-699-3.t
-
200 N-
00 N
1000 N -
900 N
800 N
700 N-
600 N
500 N
400 N-
300 N-
200 N-
00 N-
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 1000 E 1200 E 1400 E 1600 E 1800 E 2000 E
8 o oU-J LU
Lu- f^~.
J \1
j i1rt' i r /*"
U 3 f 6
- 3
- ^ l ^11 b J
i ' - *. j 1t s r*"Jvr ' \t- 3 iV
\ 1
TJ
\ l\
1 *M 'i!
i r
r- 3 (6-1-3
-3 b -j- 3
1
f tf
( f
^ BASE'i NE BASELINE
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 000 E 200 E 400 E 1600 E 800 E 2000 E
100
Scale
D '00 200 300 400
B*tr as
-1200 N
-1100 N
1000 N
-900 N
.800 N
-700 N
.600 N
.500 N
-400 N
-300 N
-200 N
-100 N
-O
41PMSWM58 2.14723 BURROWS a-40
lN
LEGENDINTERPRETATION.
f t
—GO——OO——
tiu iouTresistivity ,jnit jiith aspect to invnediate surround i r.gs. BedrocK valley, thicker overburden, siith or without an associated tectonic structure.
Relatively high resistivity unit iiith respect to immediate surroundirgs. Bedrod: riCge, thinner overburden, more resistive 3ithological unit..
is 31-Refined Maxmir H.l.E.M. bedrock conductor. Conductance higher than 40 mhos. Dafiniteiy metallic causes, continuous, massive lo seni-sidssive mineralisation.
Lou.1 conductivity Waxnin H.L.E.M. conductor, Iou*er thari 20 nhcs. Causes possibly metallic 1 Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated nineralisation. Or ai-ectroLuUc : conoxictive tectonic structure.
Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors
Interpretea shear zone.
Interpreted fault.
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES._____ In-phase I cm. s 30 'i-
_____ Out-of-phase i cm. - ID t
Readings : .l rrPhase - i-p Out-of-phase
'i
instrument APEX MAXMIN i
otf
CABOT
2.14722 1km 2 km
COMINCO LTDBURRO PROPERTY
ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY 1760 Hz CABLE - 150 n.
VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIOUE LTEE
interpreted by : 6. Lambert* P .Eng. Date 04/1991
Scale : 5000 Drawing n o, 91-699-3.2
-
200 N-
00 N -
000 N
900 N-
800 N-
700 N-
600 N
500 N
400 N-
300 N
200 N-
00 N
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 000 E 200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 2000 E
1167212 l--6
;; 115.^68 rii l iii '
200 E 400 E 600 E 800 E 1000 E 1200 E 400 E BOO E 800 E 2000 E
100
Scale
D too
:5000200 ____ 300 400
-1200 N
-1100 N
-1000 N
.900 N
-600 N
-700 N
-600 N
-500 N
-400 N
-300 N
.200 N
.100 N
-O
41PMS**858 S. 14782 BURROWS sso
N
l
LEGEND
INTERPRETATION.. -.--. .. a Ion resistivity unit uiith respect to immediate
^ ^ surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, jjith or without an associated tectonic structure.
"^ Relatively high resistivity unit aith respect to immediate .x" surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more
resistive lithological unit...
We!!-de?ined Haxmin H.L.E.M. bedrock conductor. Conductance higher than 40 mhos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to sefti-massive mineralisation.
CO OO LOLU conductivity Maxmin H. L.E.M. conductor, lower than 20 ahos. Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated nineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.
Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors
Interpreted shear zone.
Interpreted fault,
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES,
Readings^
In-phase
Out-of-phase
ln-Phase l
Instruwnt APEX MAXNJN
2—2
l en. ' 20 Z
l cm. - 20 t
Out-of-phase
o
CABOT
2.COMINCO LTDBURRO PROPERTY
ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 3520 Hz CABLE - 150 m.
VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIQUE LTEE
interpreted by: G. Lanbert, P.Eng. Date 04/1991
Scale ' 5 000 Drawing no. 91-699-3.3