Fusion 2012 LVPEI Lionel Kowal Melbourne. Number & complexity of proposed explanations for myopia...
-
Upload
beatrice-williamson -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Fusion 2012 LVPEI Lionel Kowal Melbourne. Number & complexity of proposed explanations for myopia...
Myopia progression:can we prevent it?
Fusion 2012 LVPEILionel Kowal
Melbourne
MECHANISM OF MYOPIA PROGRESSION
Number & complexity of proposed explanations for myopia genesis &
progression relates to the imagination of the investigators
Number of trials to try decrease the Rate Of Myopia Progression* has been
exceeded only by their ingenuity
* ROMP = Rate Of Myopia Progression
Why I have trouble assessing the literature 1: measuring myopiaWhen I refract a patient before or after
cyclopentolate I often have trouble determining the endpoint precisely either with retinoscope or subjectively
I think that ±0.25 DS is ambitious for some patients & Drs, & ± 0.5 DS is more realistic
This potential error rate not considered by most authors
I always do an autorefractor measurment – it is sometimes not reliable in my office yet is often relied on in published studies!
APPARENTLY EXCELLENT RESULT
MyopiaDS
AGE
CONTROL
TREATMENT
Why I have trouble assessing the literature 2: WHAT IS A GOOD RESULT?
EXCELLENT RESULT MUST HAVE FOLLOW UP
MyopiaDS
AGE
CONTROL
NEW RATE
TREATMENT STOPPED
AFTER STOPPING Rx, ROMP* @ ‘NEW’ [LOWER] RATE
* ROMP = Rate Of Myopia Progression
SIMULATED EXCELLENT RESULT-1MUST HAVE FOLLOW UP
MyopiaDS
AGE
CONTROL
CATCH UP ON STOPPING Rx
STOP TREATMENT
MyopiaDS
AGE
CONTROL
AFTER STOPPING Rx, ROMP @ ‘OLD’ [control] RATE
TREATMENT STOPPED
OLD RATE
SIMULATED EXCELLENT RESULT- 2MUST HAVE FOLLOW UP
SIMULATED EXCELLENT RESULT-3
MyopiaDS
AGE
CONTROL
CATCH UP
SLOWS MYOPIC PROGRESSION
Rx SLOWS ROMP. MYOPIA CATCHES UP DESPITE CONTINUING / AFTER STOPPING Rx
WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW IN A TRIAL TO REDUCE ROMP
1. CONTROL GROUP2. DURATION OF TREATMENT
3. DURATION OF FOLLOW UP
4. DATA AFTER TREATMENT STOPPED
What works to reduce the rate of myopia progressionAtropine 1%
~30 papers since 1973 show efficacy≥2 have long term follow up after cessation
of dropsCatch up is small, still < untreated group> 100 years of atropine use in ophthalmologyNO reported cases of UV toxicity etc
Atropine 1%In Singapore it's too hot to spend much time outdoors
in the sunshine. In Sydney I offer the drops to those Asian Aussies who
spend most of their time indoors studying. These kids tolerate it very well.
I've had only one kid out of hundreds who stopped the drops because of glare.
I don't offer it to the "bronze" Anglo-Aussies who spend a lot of time outdoors and don't overdo the close work.
Stephen Hing | Ophthalmologist Westmead Children’s hospital
What probably works to reduce ROMP
Atropine 0.01%In Press in ‘Ophthalmology’ from Singapore2y result ≈ 1% Atropine NO side
effectsIf long term follow up is +ve, this will
probably become routine treatment
0.01% Atropine ATOM2 study 1Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 1 (ATOM1): 1% effective in controlling ROMP but side effects
from cycloplegia & mydriasis. ATOM2 : compare efficacy / side effects of 0.5%,
0.1%, & 0.01%.400 children aged 6 –12, myopia ≥ -2.0D &
astigmatism ≤-1.5D ….randomly assigned to 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01%, once nightly R&L for 2y.
Cycloplegic refraction, axial length, accommodation amplitude, pupil diameter, and acuity at baseline, 2w, then every 4 mo for 2y.
0.01% Atropine ATOM2 study 2
Main Outcome: Myopia & axial length progression at 2y ROMP at 2y was -0.30±0.60, -
0.38±0.60, and -0.49±0.63 D in the 0.5%, 0.1%, & 0.01% groups, respectively
ROMP in ATOM1: placebo: -1.20±0.69 D; 1% : -
0.28±0.92 D.
0.01% Atropine ATOM2 study 3 Axial Length increase 0.27±0.25, 0.28±0.28,
and 0.41±0.32 mm in the 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% groups
..differences in myopia progression (0.19 D) and axial length change (0.14 mm) between groups were clinically insignificant
0.01% : negligible effect on accommodation, pupil size, and no effect on near visual acuity.
0.01% has minimal side effects c.f. 0.1% and 0.5%, and is nearly as effective in controlling myopia progression.
OLD OPTICAL TREATMENTS TO REDUCE ROMP
1.↓duration of spectacle wear2. planned under correction2. Bifocals / PALs3. contact lenses / orthoK
…NO repeatable positive clinically significant effect
NEW OPTICAL TREATMENTS TO REDUCE ROMP
NEW 1: Relatively hyperopic PERIPHERAL REFRACTION may stimulate myopia and myopic progressionPubMed: Myopia Peripheral Refraction 181 references
NEW 2: Bifocals with prisms
NEW 3: Spectacle Monovision
Eye Shape and Refraction Model
Myope.More Prolate shapeRelatively hyperopic peripherySimple minus lens correction can trigger further axial
elongation
Emmetrope.Oblate shapeRelatively myopic in the peripheryAppears to have a stable refraction
Wallman & Winawer 2004 Slide from Prof E Howell
Zeiss Myovision lenses
Myovision
‘ ....I assume you are referring to the published paper in September [2010] Optometry & Vision Science.
You are reading it correctly, in that the data does not support any significant effect in reducing myopia progression. ......’
Peripheral Correction HypothesisThe relatively hyperopic trend in
the periphery would require over-plus ‘correction’ to stabilise the refraction while a minus correction is required for the central myopia
Multi-focal glasses? Only plus in the lower field Leung & Brown 1999, Gwiazda et al 2005
Multi-focal contact lenses? Aller 2004, 2006
Australia: Cooper Proclear ‘D’ soft disposable daily wear contact lenses
Minus centre / Plus surround +1.50 D add
Slide from Prof E Howell
CLs & Peripheral refraction IOVSDec 2011Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results.
Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E 3rd, Naduvilath T, Chen X, de la Jara PL, Martinez A, Kwan J, Ho A, Frick K, Ge J.
Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
ROMP -0.57 D/y in treatment group = placebo group in ATOM1 .
NEW 2: bifocals with BO prismsArch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):12-9.
Randomized trial of effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopic progression: two-year results.
Cheng D, Schmid KL, Woo GC, Drobe B
Been and gonePirenzepine Novartis didn’t proceed
Ocular hypotensivesSome papers in 70’s-80’s
MYOPIA1. Major personal / societal problem
MYOPIA2. Convincing EARLY data on ↓ ROMP with Atropine 0.01% . I now offer it to all myopes who fit the ATOM2 criteria
MYOPIA3. ? Genetic segregation first & repeat optical and drug studies