Fulton City School District 2015-2018 CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education...
-
Upload
willis-pitts -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Fulton City School District 2015-2018 CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education...
Fulton City School District 2015-2018 CDEP Plan Implementation Update
Fulton Board of Education
October 27, 2015
3 Areas of CDEP Goals and Objectives
BehaviorCommunity Involvement
Academics
2
5% annual increases in rates of college and career readiness (9-12) and proficiency (3-8).
Engagement of all familiesin the educations of their Students in the Fulton City School District.
80% of students consistently meeting behavior expectations.
2
3
As we implement the 2015-2018 CDEP…the Achievement Gap Persists
• Achievement gaps across racial/ethnic groups
remains relatively stable.
• Our gaps are widest for our Economically
Disadvantaged students and our Students With
Disabilities.
• Reading-level gaps for students in these
subgroups widen as they advance in grades.
4
Fulton City School District Cohort Information
5
Graduation Rate Information
CDEP Goals
Increase the college readiness rate (ELA 75, Math 80) by 5% annually.
80% of students district-wide will consistently meet behavior expectations.
Increased participation of economically disadvantaged students and families in community engagement offerings and opportunities.
Goal 1: AcademicIncrease College and Career readiness rates by 5% annually.
7
• Interim Objective 1.1: Fully implement a viable and guaranteed curriculum that is vertically-aligned from grades in English Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies.
Determine timelines by department for development and implementation of balanced common assessment systems.
Monitor implementation and pacing through systematic reviews of common assessment data.
FCSD Curriculum
• http://www.fultoncsd.org/districtpage.cfm?pageid=164
8
Goal 1: AcademicIncrease College and Career readiness rates by 5% annually.
9
• Interim Objective 1.2: Continuously monitor disaggregated progress of all students and accountability subgroups towards District goals.
Determine timelines for development and implementation of a District Data Cycle that articulates timelines, processes, roles, and responsibilities for data gathering, analysis, and reporting.
Data Cycle
• Updated 5-week data will appear on these dates:
• Friday, October 16, 2015• Friday, November 20, 2015• Wednesday, December 23, 2015• Wednesday, February 03, 2016• Friday, March 11, 2016• Friday, April 15, 2016• Friday, May 27, 2016
10
Five Week RtI Data Cycle
Week 7: Principal and team review RtI Toolbox noting
building trendsWeek 6: By end of week, RtI Toolbox is uploaded in
SharePoint 5 week mid point
of quarterTier 2 teams analyze and
review student response to intervention.
Intervention teams select Tier 3 students who are not responding to and develop individual
plans using RTI-M Direct.
Week 8: Principal meets with Directors to review RtI status to identify areas in need of
additional support
Goal 1: AcademicIncrease College and Career readiness rates by 5% annually.
12
• Interim Objective 1.3: Fully implement the District’s “Pyramid of Interventions” with regard to academics; and monitor progress towards interim goals based on the following indicators: Proportions of students in Tiers I/ II/ III based on STAR Reading/ Math/ Early Literacy
percentile rankings
Rates of students meeting STAR’s “Moderate” and “Ambitious” individual growth targets.
Application of responses and procedures for students in Tier II, Tier III, or who are failing to meet “Moderate” growth targets, as prescribed by “Pyramid of Interventions”
RtI Framework in Action: RtI Summary Data
If……..
Then…….Intervention Alignment
Goal 2: Behavior80% of students district-wide will consistently meet behavior expectations.
16
• Interim Objective 2.1: Fully implement the District’s “Pyramid of Interventions” with regard to behavior; and monitor progress towards interim goals based on the following indicators: Proportions of students in Tiers I/ II/ III based on SWIS reporting of “Major” and “Minor”
referrals
Rates of students advancing from higher to lower Tiers (i.e. III to II, II to I)
Application of responses and procedures for students in Tier II, Tier III, as prescribed by “Pyramid of Interventions”
If……..
Then…….Intervention Alignment
Goal 3: Community Engagement Increased participation of economically disadvantaged students and families in
community engagement offerings and opportunities.
19
• Interim Objective 3.1: Develop a system for documenting, measuring, and monitoring the district’s engagement opportunities and offerings, and participation therein. Utilize new system to establish baseline levels of participation from which
measurable goals can be set for increasing participation in the future
20
What’s changed in the 2015-2018 CDEP?
• A focus on utilizing data:– Embedding measurability and observability
throughout plan
• A focus on monitoring our processes:– Determining protocols and timelines for reporting
progress towards goals that also serve to monitor
consistency of implementation and compliance.
• A focus on closing gaps:– Developing a data cycle for reporting progress
towards goals that is disaggregated by building and
subgroup.