frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

3
7/17/2019 frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/frsbogmimv210874pdf 1/3 st.  i  23G.  874 Summary  of  replies received  in  answer  to the  Board*s letter St.Ul67  of July 29, 1924,  subject Expense Budget, w GENERAL SUMMARY Sinc-e  Jan. 1, 1921 I  Banks having some form  of  Budget Control: In  effect 1. New  York 2.  Cleveland 3.  Chicago 4.  Kansas City(partial) Results During last  2  years I  Banks planning  to  install Budget System: January 1, 1925 As  soon  as  possible Big  factor  in  reducing expenses. Since July  1, 1924 Too  early  to  report. (Operating Depts.:Jan. 1,1924  Has  been  a  material (Agent*s Dept.: Foi .13  years, factor  in  reducing  ex- penses. Satisfactory  for  some departments. 1.  Richmond 2.  Minneapolis II  Banks  not  operating under  any  form  of  Budget Control  and  which have made  no  plans for  installing such  a  system; 1.  Boston 2.  Philadelphia 3,  Atlanta 4. St.  Louis DETAILED SUMMARY 5.  Dallas 6, San  Francisco BOSTON 1. Has  never undertaken  to  install  a  budget system. 2.  Budget might  be  established  and  lived  up to in a few  departments, 3.  Certain expenses cannot  be  anticipated: Example  -  Note issuance  and  Fiscal Agency. 4.  Operations  in  such departments  aa  Discounts, Transit  and  Currency  are  more ,  active  at  certain times  of the  month  and at  certain seasons  of the  year than  at  others  and  force must  be  maintained  to  handle peak loads. 5.  Trend  if'  expenses  haa  been downward during past  two  years: Expenses covering first half  of 1924 are  $80,000 less than  for  corresponding period  in 1923. NEW  YORK 1. Has  operated under ejgpense budget since January  1, 1921. 2. Has  been  one of the  biggest factors  in  reducing  the  operating expenses. 3.  Plan  is as  follows: a.  Detailed figures covering  the  principal items  of  expenditure during  the past  two  years  are  submitted  to  department heads  to  assist them  in  making estimates. Committee  of  three officers reviews these estimates  and  makes report  to  Officer 1 s Council and the  budget  is  then submitted  to  directors for  final approval.

Transcript of frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

Page 1: frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

7/17/2019 frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/frsbogmimv210874pdf 1/3

s t . i  23G.  8 7 4

Summary  of  replies received  i n  answer  to the  Board*s letter St.Ul67  of

July  29, 1924,  su bj ec t Expense Budget,

w

GENERAL SUMMARY

Sinc-e  Jan . 1 , 1921

I  Banks having some form  of  Budget Control:

In  e f fec t

1. New  York

2 .  Cleveland

3 .  Chicago

4 .  Kansas City(partial)

Results

During last  2  years

I

  Banks planning

  t o

  install Budget System:

January  1, 1925

As  soon  a s  possible

B ig  factor  i n  reducing

expenses.

Since July  1 , 1924 Too  ear ly  t o  report.

(Operating Depts .: Jan. 1,1924  Has  been  a  material

(Agent*s Dept.:

  Foi .13

 years, fac tor

  i n

  reducing

  ex-

penses.

Sat i s factory  f o r  some

departments.

1 .

  Richmond

2 .  Minneapolis

I I  Banks  n o t  operating under  any  form  of  Budget Control  and  which have made  no  plans

f o r  instal l ing such  a  system;

1 .  Boston

2 .

  Philadelphia

3,  Atlanta

4 . S t .

  Louis

DETAILED SUMMARY

5 .  Dallas

6, San  Francisco

BOSTON

1. Has

  never undertaken

  t o

  i n s t a l l

  a

  budget system.

2 .  Budget might  be  established  and  lived  up to in a few  departments,

3 .  Certain expenses cannot  b e  anticipated: Example  -  Note issuance  and  Fiscal

Agency.

4 .  Operations  i n  such departments  a a  Discounts, Transit  and  Currency  a r e  more

,  act ive  a t  certain t imes  of the  month  and at  certain seasons  of the  year

than  a t  others  and  force must  be  maintained  t o  handle peak loads.

5.  Trend  i f '  expenses  h a a  been downward during past  two  ye ar s: Expenses covering

f i r s t ha l f  of 1924 ar e  $80,000 less than  f o r  corresponding period  in 1923.

NEW

 YORK

1. Has  operated under ejgpense budget since January  1, 1921.

2. Has

  been

  one of the

  biggest factors

  i n

  reducing

  t h e

  operating expenses.

3.  Plan  i s a s  follows:

a .

  Detailed fi gu re s covering

  t h e

  principal i tems

  of

  expenditure during

  the

past

  two

  years

  a r e

  submitted

  to

  department heads

  t o

  assist them

  i n

  making

estimates. Committee  of  three officers reviews these estimates  and  makes

report

  to

  Of f i ce r

1

s Council

  and the

  budget

  i s

  then submitted

  to

  directors

f o r

  final approval.

Page 2: frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

7/17/2019 frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/frsbogmimv210874pdf 2/3

- 2 - S t .

 4636 ^375

b . A

 monthly, dep art men tal expense r ep or t w it h c-croparative f ig u re s shows

whether expenses

  a r e

  run nin g wi th in budget

  and

  also whether they have

increased

  o r

  decreased over

  t h e

  same period

  of the

  year before.

4 .  Supplementing  t h e  budget  i s t h e  following system  of  making purchases:

a .  Every requisition must  be  signed  b y  o f f i c e r s  i n  charge  of  department

and i f in  excess  of 100  must  b e  approved  by  sen ior o f f i ce r  a s  well,

b .  Requisition then goes  to  Planning Division, which passes  on i t s  necess i ty

and  whether  or not the  a r t i c l e  i s  standard both  f o r  manufacturer  and for

bank.

c .  Deputy Governor then vises  a l l  purchase requisitions after which they  a r e

made upon  a  str ict ly competi t ive basis ,

1 . Has no t pu t any  departments  on a  budget*

2. In a few

  in sta nc es r es tr ic te d appropriati ons have been made.

3 .

  Cost

  of

  food

  i n

  c a f e t e r i a

  i s

  limited

  t o

  approximate receipts.

ELAND

1. Has  jus t es tabl i shed  a  budget  f o r t h e  l as t  s i x  months  of 1924,

2 .  Budgeted  t h e  expense units  a s now  reported  i n t h e  Functional Expense Reports.

• 3* Too  ea r ly  to  repor t r e su l t s .

Plan  i s a s  fol lows:

a .  Furnished each o f f i c e r wit h  a  form showing cost  f o r t h e  f i r s t h a l f  of

192k of the  expense utoits under  h i s  supervision  and  requested  a  report  on

t h e

  probable expenses

  f o r t h e

  las t ha l f

  of

  year. Budget Commit

 t e e r e -

viewed estimates

  and

  approved figures were reported back

  to

  off icers wi th

statement that

  th e

  amounts approved were

  th e

  maximum amounts that could

  b e

expended

  an d

  even these should

  be

  further reduced

  i f

  poss ible ,

BI OSMOND

1. Has n ot y et i n  operat ion  a  budget control  b u t  expects  t o  i n s t a l l  one by

January  1, 1925.

2 ,  Present system  of  expense control  i s a t a l l  times under  the  careful super-

v i s i o n  of t he  execut ive of f icers  and i s  designed  t o  maintain  a  rigid super-

vision over salaries  of  employees, promotions  and  t ransfers , te rminat ions  and

replacements,

  a s

  well

  a s a l l

  purchases

  of

  supplies

  and

  equipment

  a nd t h e d i s -

t r i b u t i o n  of  sup pli es from sto ck.

m a m

1, Has

  never established

  a

  budget system.

2 ;  Purchases  a r e  made  on a  competitive  b id  b a s i s  and  approved  by  Managing

Committee.

3 .  Board  of  Directors reviews salaries  of  employees every  30  days.

4, .

CHICAGO

1 .  Operating departments  now  working under budget plan  f o r  first year , al though

Agent's department  h a s  used budget  f o r  three years.

2 .  Substant ial reduction  h a s  been effected  i n  operat ing force  an d  general  ex-, 4*>

penses  of  bank  and the  establ ishment  of the  budget  i s  considered  a  material

fac tor ,

3 Plan  is as  fol lows:

Page 3: frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

7/17/2019 frsbog_mim_v21_0874.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/frsbogmimv210874pdf 3/3

° 7 6

, 3

  -

  St.4236.

a .

  Officers were furnished with forms showing detailed expenses

  f o r

' 1922 and 1923 and  asked  f o r  estimates  f o r  1924-. Procedure Comnittee

reviewed estimates  an d  made necessary re vis io ns . Relation ship  b e -

tween actual expense

  and

  budget

  i s

  shown

  i n

  monthly expense reports.

ST.

  LOCJIS

1, Ho

 budget system

  i n

  e f f e c t

  a s

  local procedure camiittee

  h a s

  been unable

  t o

r see

  wherein

  a

  benefit would

  be

  derived from

  i t s

  adoption.

2, I f

  budget system

  i s

  establ ished,

  i t

  should

  in no way

  int erf ere wi th

  t he

present policy  of the  bank regarding economy  and  efficiency, which  has

been very succ.es sful*

MINNEAPOLIS

1. Has  never established  a  budget system  f o r t h e  control  of  expenses,

2 .

  Suggestion, however, appeals

  t o

  Governor

  an d

  such

  a

  system will

  be put

i n

  operation

  a s

  soon

  a s

  possible .

3 .

  Points

  o u t

  that there

  a r e

  some departments,

  f o r

  example, Failed Banks

where

  th e

  budget system would

  not be

  applicable,

KANSAS CITY

1. Ho

  regular budget system although such

  a

  system pa rt ia l l y

  i n

  operation

  d u r -

i n g

  l a s t

  two

  years,

2 .

  Estimates

  of

  expenses made

  a t

  various periods

  and if

  actual expenses

  ex -

ceed estimates,

  a n

  invest igat ion

  i s

  made.

3 .

  At

  present operating costs

  a r e

  being compared with expenses

  f o r

  correspond-

i n g  period  of 1923  said  any  increase will  be  immediately investigated.

b .

  Believe

  i n

  budget system

  as a

  Whole

  b u t

  could

  n o t

  toaintain efficient

service

  i f

  kept within

  a

  cost

  of

  operation that

  was

  estimated during

  a

previous period when conditions

  may

  have been quite d if f er e nt .

m m

1.

  Budget

  ha s no t

  been established because

  i t was

  thought that

  on

  account

  of the

size

  of t he

  organization

  end the

  character

  of

  work perfo rmed,

  th e

  expenses

could

  b e

  controlled

  i n

  other ways.

2. I f the

  Board concludes, after

  a

  further study, that

  th e

  plan would work

  t o

t h e

  advantage

  of a

  bank

  of

 th is size

  and

 perf orming

  the

  character

  of

  operations

performed

  by us we

  would

  be

  glad

  to

  give further consideration

  to the

  matter.

SAN

 FRANCISCO

  '

1. Has no t  adopted  a  budget system  a s a means  of  controlling expenditures.

2 .

  Functional expense reports have been

  an

  admirable means

  of

  detecting

  any

material variat ion

  i n t he

  cost

  of

  conducting

  t h e

  different operating functions

of the  bank. These re po rt s  do n o t ,  however, provide  th e  essent ia l fac t s  f o r

a n • i n t

 srj9

 i s t r i c t

-

 x oqiaris

 en .

 t>fex penses.

3 .

  Greatest help

  we

  could receive would

  be a

  visi t from

  an

  operating represent-

a t i v e ;

  of

  Board's Committee

  to

  determine whether

  or not the

  bank

  i s

economically  and  efficiently conducting  i t s  various operations.